Blue whales eat up to 10 million pieces of microplastic every day, research estimated Tuesday, suggesting that the pollution causes a bigger danger to the world’s largest animal than previously thought.
A US-led research team put tags on 191 blue whales that live off the coast of California to observe their movements. “It’s basically like an Apple Watch, just on the back of a whale,” said Shirel Kahane-Rapport, a researcher at California State University, Fullerton, and the study’s first author.
The whales mostly fed at depths of between 50 to 250 meters, which is home to the “greatest concentration of microplastics in the sea,” Kahane-Rapport said. The researchers then estimated the size and number of mouthfuls the whales had daily, modeling three different situations. Under the most likely situation, the blue whales ate up to 10 million microplastic pieces a day. Over the 90 to 120 days’ annual feeding season, which represents more than a billion pieces a year.
The largest animal ever to live on Earth is also likely the biggest microplastic consumer, eating up to 43.6 kilograms a day, the study said. While it is easy to imagine whales sucking (吞没) in vast amounts of microplastics as they ate, the researchers found that was not the case.
Instead, 99 percent of the microplastics entered the whales because they were already inside their prey (猎物). “That’s concerning for us,” Kahane-Rapport said, because humans eat that prey. “We also eat sardines,” she said, adding that “krill (磷虾) is the basis of the food web.” “Previous research has shown that if krill is in a tank with microplastic, they will eat it,” Kahane-Rapport said.
Now that the researchers know how much microplastic is being consumed by whales, next they aim to determine how much harm it could be doing. “The quantity defines the poison,” Kahane-Rapport said.
1. Why is a tag placed on the back of the whales?A.It can treat the illness of whales. | B.It can track the living of whales. |
C.It can ensure the safety of whales. | D.It can record the danger of whales. |
A.By providing data. | B.By giving examples. | C.By explaining the reason. | D.By expressing their guess. |
A.The research process was very complicated. | B.The whales live in the area free from pollution. |
C.Most microplastics entered the whales directly. | D.Humans may eat microplastics through their diet. |
A.It will be highly profitable. | B.It will be further conducted. |
C.It will involve food poison. | D.It will help whales avoid risk. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Mapping Antarctica
Antarctica was on the map long before anyone ever laid eyes on it. Nearly 2,400 years ago, ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle believed that a great continent must exist at the bottom of the world. They though it was needed to balance out the continents at the top of the world. In the 1500s, mapmakers often included a fanciful continent they referred to as Terra Incognita(Latin for “unknown land”) at the bottom of their maps. But it was not until the 1800s -----after explorers had sighted and set foot on Antarctica----- that mapmakers got down to the business of really mapping the continent, which is one—and—a –half times rhe size of the U.S..
While the coastline could be mapped by ships sailing around the continent, it took airplanes—and later, satellites---to chart Antarctica’s vast interior(内陆). That job continues today. And it is a job that still require a mapmaker, or cartographer, to put on boots and head out into the wild.
Cole Kelleher is familiar with that. He is a cartographer with the Polar Geospatial Center(PGC), which is based at the University of Minnesota and has a staff at McMurdo Station. PGC teamed up with Google to use the company’s Trekker technology to capture images of Antarctica for the Internet giant’s popular feature, Street View. A Trekker camera, which is the size of a basketball, is set about two feet above a backpack. The camera records image in all directions. “It weighs about 50 pounds. I was out for two and a half days, hiking 10 to 12 hours each day,” says Kelleher. It was hard work, but really an incredible experience.” According to Kelleher there are plans to use the technology to create educational apps for museums.
The PGC staff at McMurdo Station provides highly specialized mapmaking services for the U.S. Antarctic Program. For one project, Kelleher used satellite images to map huge cracks in the ice. That helped a team of researchers know whether they could safely approach their field camp on snowmobiles. Another recent project was to help recover a giant, high—tech helium(氦气) balloon used to carry scientific instruments high into the atmosphere. These balloons are launched in Antarctica because there is no danger that they will hurt anyone when they fall back down to Earth. Using satellite images, Kelleher and colleagues created maps of where the balloon could be found.
Antarctica may no longer be Terra Incognita, but it still holds countless mysteries. Cartographers and the maps they make will continue to be essential in helping scientists unlock those secrets.
1. From the passage, we can infer that Antarctica was on the map in the 1500s when________.A.mapmakers knew it was much larger than the U.S. |
B.Aristotle named the continent Terra Incognita |
C.no one had ever seen or been to the continent |
D.it was such an interesting continent as was often referred to |
A.It needs much work for the mapmakers to head out into the wild. |
B.The interior can only be mapped by planes and satellites. |
C.It is relatively easy to map Antarctica’s coastline by ship. |
D.Antarctic is a vast but still mysterious continent. |
A.to capture images of Antarctica for Street View |
B.to test the company’s Trekker technology |
C.to create educational apps for museums |
D.to hike for an incredible experience |
A.satellite images which are used to map huge cracks in the ice |
B.a high-tech helium balloon for carrying scientific instruments |
C.how to safely approach the researcher’s field camp and the balloon |
D.the specialized mapmaking services provided by the PGC staff |
【推荐2】Organic produce has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, "organic" does not mean "pesticide-free"(无农药的)or "chemical-free". In fact, organic farmers are allowed to use a wide variety of chemical sprays and powders on their crops.
Many people believe organic produce is healthier and safer. Nobody bothered to look at whether natural chemicals are harmful.
A.And the land being planted cannot have been-treated with synthetic materials for that period either. |
B.Thus, we should be more cautious in our acceptance of "natural" as being harmless. |
C.There are many choices and decisions that we, as consumers, are asked to make. |
D.It should be noted that we don't know which system is more harmful. |
E.This is a case where everyone made the same dangerous mistake. |
F.That was because it was assumed that they posed little risk. |
G.So what does organic mean? |
【推荐3】Living downstream from a waste-treatment plant can leave fish tired, a new study finds, led by Graham Scott, a biologist in Canada. “Wastewater treatment plants are pretty good at taking out the waste and treating it before it gets into our waterways,” he said. “But not everything can be taken out,” he added.
For example, some plants beside the stream were not designed to remove remains of drugs. So when some medicines are left over after people use them, they can be released into the environment. These include the drugs used to treat depression and high blood pressure.
Life-sustaining chemical reactions in an animal’s body (including ours) allow it to grow, move and reproduce. These reactions, taken together, are known as the creature’s metabolism (新陈代谢). Some studies have shown that even just one drug can change the metabolism of fish, making their metabolism slow down. Then that will impair their bodies.
That creates a problem for the animals — using the extra energy to rid their bodies of the pollutants which can damage their cells and tissues. “That’s energy they burn just to stay alive,” explained Scott. That is also the energy no longer available to avoid predators (天敌), to find food and to mate.
And they report that fish exposed to a mix of chemicals can use up some of their energy just to deal with those pollutants. Therefore, they will have less energy to eat and avoid being eaten, says Paul Craig, a biologist in Ontario.
“It is up to us to help reduce the types of pollutants in. wastewater,” Craig says. “That includes not throwing leftover medicines down the toilet.” he recommends.
1. What do Scott’s words mean in paragraph 1?A.There are still some pollutants in the treated water. |
B.Wastewater treatment plants don’t work well. |
C.Things in waterways are difficult to deal with. |
D.Canadians tend to throw waste down the toilet. |
A.Form. | B.Harm. | C.Benefit. | D.Examine. |
A.They will stop growing. |
B.They will avoid their mates. |
C.They will have to rid their bodies of the polluted cells. |
D.They will consume extra energy to survive. |
A.To explain how pollutants affect animals. |
B.To show ways of fighting against pollution. |
C.To advise people to stop buying polluted fish. |
D.To urge people to reduce pollutants in wastewater. |
【推荐1】Turtles have a habit of eating plastic objects floating in the sea, which may kill them. Many believe that it is because floating plastic bags look similar to jellyfish, which many types of turtles love to eat. However, lots of plastic objects that turtles eat do not look like jellyfish at all. Joseph Pfaller of the University of Florida doubts that the smell of sea micro-organisms(微生物) which live on floating plastic objects attract turtles to eat.
The kind of idea first appeared in 2016. Researchers at the University of California, Davis, noticed that certain chemicals, especially dimethyl sulphide(二甲基硫), which can be found on plastics where micro-organisms live, are those which many seabirds sniff(嗅)to find food. These birds are more likely to eat plastics.
Since turtles usually appear above the sea surface and sniff the air when going to their feeding areas, Dr. Pfaller believed that they are following these same chemicals like those seabirds and mistakenly think that floating plastic objects are edible.
To test that idea, he and his team did an experiment using loggerhead turtles. They exposed 15 turtles to four smells: the smell of clean water; the smell of turtle-feeding food; the smell of a clean plastic bottle; and the smell of a bottle that had been kept in the ocean for five weeks to allow micro-organisms to grow on it. When sniffing both the smell of turtle-feeding food and that of five-week-old bottles, turtles kept their noses out of the water more than three times as long, and took twice as many breaths as they did when sniffing the smell of fresh bottle-plastic or clean water.
Though they have not yet tested whether dimethyl sulphide on the five-week-old bottles cause turtles to eat plastic objects, Dr. Pfaller and his team think it is highly possible.
1. Which of the following is closest in meaning to the underlined word "edible"?A.pleasing the eyes | B.suitable for use as food |
C.holding the attention | D.concerned with actual use |
A.Seabirds prefer the smell of the plastic bottles. |
B.Seabirds feed on the food similar to the turtles'. |
C.Seabirds produce a certain micro-organism. |
D.Seabirds break up the plastics without difficulty. |
A.To suggest a new way to study turtles. |
B.To stress the importance of sea protection. |
C.To introduce the findings on the cause of turtles' death. |
D.To discuss the overusę of the plastic bottles. |
A.Education. | B.Entertainment. |
C.Science. | D.Health. |
【推荐2】Nowadays, the most effective way to get power comes from burning fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas. They are less costly than other forms of energy. But burning fuels releases carbon dioxide, known as CO2 gas. Scientists agree that increasing amount of CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere is partly to blame for the rising temperature. It's clear the change in the atmosphere can have a big effect on the weather condition around the world.
However, keeping extra CO2 from entering the atmosphere is a difficult process. It’s not enough to advise people to burn the fuels in a clean way. As a result, scientists are looking for the best method for capturing the gas and storing it away from the atmosphere. Some of this research is taking place in Norway. The Technology Center in Mongstad (TCM) is the largest facility in the world for major testing of the CO2-capturing technology.
Tore Amundsen is its chairman. He says TCM has produced important information since it opened. The center is connected to a nearby electric power plant. It treats the waste gas from the plant using the chemical solvent (溶剂) which attracts the CO2 molecules. Then researchers take the solvent with the CO2 molecules and boil it. In this way, they can separate CO2 from the solvent and use the solvent again to capture more CO2. TCM can help capture 90 percent of the CO2 from the waste gas. With the current state of technology, it will increase the cost of electricity between perhaps 30% to 40% when the technology is applied to a power plant.
Experts say the best way to store the captured CO2 gas is to place it below the surface of the ground. Scientists can use the pumping technology to put it into areas left empty after the removal of oil or natural gas. But TCM does not pump the CO2 it captures. Instead, it releases the gas into the atmosphere. Tore Amundsen says only highly developed industrial nations can afford the pumping technology. So far, only Canada has a power plant that pumps CO2 gas. In total, there are just a few similar power plants in the world.
1. What can we learn about the CO2 gas?A.It is usually found in coal. |
B.It leads to world climate change. |
C.It is a new kind of energy. |
D.It does good to the atmosphere. |
A.sending it into the atmosphere |
B.finding clean fuels to use |
C.collecting it with technology |
D.stopping people from burning fuels |
A.It works well in treating the waste gas. |
B.It’s the only center to study the CO2 gas. |
C.It was set up by Tore Amundsen. |
D.It helps the power plant save a lot of money. |
A.can be used with oil or natural gas |
B.should be put underground |
C.must be allowed to go into the air |
D.should stay in the chemical solvent |
【推荐3】You’ve heard that plastic is polluting the oceans — between 4.8 and 12.7 million tonnes enter ocean ecosystems every year. But does one plastic straw or cup really make a difference? Artist Benjamin Von Wong wants you to know that it does. He builds massive sculptures out of plastic garbage, forcing viewers to re-examine their relationship to single-use plastic products.
At the beginning of the year, the artist built a piece called “Strawpocalypse,” a pair of 10-foot-tall plastic waves, frozen mid-crash. Made of 168,000 plastic straws collected from several volunteer beach cleanups, the sculpture made its first appearance at the Estella Place shopping center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Just 9% of global plastic waste is recycled. Plastic straws are by no means the biggest source (来源) of plastic pollution, but they’ve recently come under fire because most people don’t need them to drink with and, because of their small size and weight, they cannot be recycled. Every straw that’s part of Von Wong’s artwork likely came from a drink that someone used for only a few minutes. Once the drink is gone, the straw will take centuries to disappear.
In a piece from 2018, Von Wong wanted to illustrate (说明) a specific statistic: Every 60 seconds, a truckload’s worth of plastic enters the ocean. For this work, titled “Truckload of Plastic,” Von Wong and a group of volunteers collected more than 10,000 pieces of plastic, which were then tied together to look like they’d been dumped (倾倒) from a truck all at once.
Von Wong hopes that his work will also help pressure big companies to reduce their plastic footprint.
1. What are Von Wong’s artworks intended for?A.Beautifying the city he lives in. | B.Introducing eco-friendly products. |
C.Drawing public attention to plastic waste. | D.Reducing garbage on the beach. |
A.To show the difficulty of their recycling. |
B.To explain why they are useful. |
C.To voice his views on modern art. |
D.To find a substitute for them. |
A.Calming. | B.Disturbing. |
C.Refreshing. | D.Challenging. |
A.Artists’ Opinions on Plastic Safety |
B.Media Interest in Contemporary Art |
C.Responsibility Demanded of Big Companies |
D.Ocean Plastics Transformed into Sculptures |
【推荐1】Extracting (提取)CO2 from the air is one of the best ways to address climate change without preventing billions of people from getting the energy they need. But the trick is what to do with it afterwards.
Common approaches include injecting (注射)it deep underground to get rid of it. But if you could use it to make useful stuff, then it would do double duty and make the products zero-carbon since they wouldn't put extra carbon into the atmosphere. For years, focus has been on making zero-carbon petrol or jet fuel from the extracted carbon using non-fossil fuels to generate the energy needed.
Today, XPRIZE revealed the two winners in this year's 20-million-dollar prize for a competition developed to create breakthrough carbon technologies that turn emissions (排放物;排放)into products with a high net value. The winners were CarbonCure of Canada and CarbonBuilt of California. Interestingly, they both demonstrated technologies focused on decarbonizing (脱碳)the concrete industry.
CarbonBuilt developed a technology that reduces the carbon footprint of concrete by more than 50% while reducing raw material costs. During the curing process, CO2 is directly injected into the concrete mixture where it is chemically transformed and permanently stored.
CarbonCure's technology enables the production of concrete with a reduced water and carbon footprint while increasing the material's reliability. The CO2 is transformed into a permanently embedded mineral which can then be combined with new concrete mixes. The technology is able to reduce the material costs and increase profitability for producers.
Concrete is a major contributor to global warming as producing it releases a huge amount of carbon dioxide. Yet it's the most widely used artificial material, second only to water. Renewable energy sources use much concrete per unit energy produced. If they are to increase enough to make a difference in time to help the planet, getting control of the CO2 in concrete production is essential.
1. What does the underlined part “double duty” in Paragraph 2 refer to?A.Extracting CO2 and making useful products. |
B.Cutting CO2 emission and saving energy. |
C.Removing CO2 and creating value. |
D.Storing carbon and reducing waste. |
A.They permanently store the CO2. |
B.They make concrete more reliable. |
C.They reduce the carbon footprint of concrete. |
D.They lower the cost of concrete. |
A.To manage concrete emissions. |
B.To invest in clean energy sources. |
C.To cut the use of concrete. |
D.To find an alternative to concrete. |
A.A competition on global crisis. |
B.Innovative ways of decarbonization. |
C.A revolution in the concrete industry. |
D.The possibility of turning CO2 into treasure. |
【推荐2】Many people will be familiar with automated writing through Gmail. Smart Reply provides brief answers to routine emails. If someone asks “Do you want to meet at 3 pm?”, Gmail offers one-click responses such as “Sure!”
The New Yorker’s John Seabrook recently described a more powerful version of this technology, called GPT-2, which can ably mimic (模拟) his magazine’s style. Such systems use a digital network of billions of artificial “neurons” (神经元) with virtual “synapses” — the connections between neurons — that strengthen as the network “learns”, in this case from 40 gigabytes(千兆字节)— worth of online writing. The version Mr. Seabrook tested was polished with back-issues of the New Yorker.
The metaphor of the brain is attractive, but “neurons” and “synapses” deserve those scare-quotes ( 双引号). The system is merely making some—admittedly very complex—statistical guesses about which words follow which in a New Yorker-style sentence.
What escapes computers is creativity. They cannot create a topic or goal on their own, much less plan how to get there with logic and style. At various points in the online version of his article, readers can see how GPT-2 would have carried on writing Mr. Seabrook’s piece for him. The writing gives the impression of being human. But on closer inspection it is empty, even incoherent.
Meaningless writing is the preserve of artificial intelligence. But to truly write, you must first have something to say. Computers do not. They await instructions. To compose meaningful essays, the likes of GPT-2 will first have to be integrated with databases of real-world knowledge.
1. Why does the author mention Gmail in the first paragraph?A.To prepare for the introduction of the topic. | B.To advertise the powerful Gmail. |
C.To describe the feature of Gmail. | D.To prove the strength of the Gmail. |
A.It is creative. | B.It has neurons with synapses. |
C.It can offer quick answers. | D.It can follow a certain writing style. |
A.GPT-2 is powerful because it is integrated to real-world knowledge. |
B.GPT-2 has already been able to write meaningful essays. |
C.GPT-2 still has a long way to write like humans. |
D.GPT-2 can help Mr. Seabrook with writing very well. |
A.A brochure. | B.An advertisement. |
C.A magazine. | D.An essay. |
【推荐3】The United Nations predicts worldwide temperatures over the next five years may at times rise to more than 1.5 degrees Centigrade above pre-industrial levels. The U.N.’s World Meteorological(气象的) Organization, WMO, said the prediction suggests continued warming could present a challenge to climate change goals set in the 2015 Paris Agreement,which seeks to limit world temperature rises through major cuts in human-caused greenhouse gases.
The WMO said there was a 20 percent chance that the yearly average temperature will rise above 1.5 Celsius higher than the pre-industrial average levels in at least one year.The report identifies 1850-1900 as the pre-industrial period.That does not mean that the average would be crossing the long-term target of 1.S Celsius that scientists have set as the limit for avoiding catastrophic(灾难性的) climate change.
Temperatures over the last five years have been the warmest on record, the WMO reported. Temperatures over the next five years are very likely to be within the range of 0.91 to 1.59Celsius above pre-industrial levels, it predicted. Southern Africa and Australia, where fires last year destroyed millions of hectares(公顷),will probably be drier than usual through 2024, the report said. Africa’s Sahel region is likely be wetter, while Europe should see more storms.
Maxx Dilley, the WMO’s director of climate services, told the Associated Press the predictions are worrisome. “It shows how close we’re getting to what the Paris Agreement is trying to prevent,” he said.Still,Dilley added that it would not be impossible for countries to reach the target set in Paris,of keeping global warming well below 2 degrees Celsius,by the end of the century. Petteri Taalas, the WMO Secretary-General, added, “While COVID-19 has caused a severe international health and economic crisis, failure to cope with climate change may threaten human well-being, ecosystems and economies for centuries.”
1. According to WMO,the continued warming isA.in an alarming trend. | B.Out of control. |
C.Naturally developing. | D.Far from worry. |
A.Temperatures will have a sudden rise. |
B.People in Africa should get more help. |
C.Fires in Australia will last over 5 years. |
D.Our living environment is getting worse. |
A.Carefree. | B.Objective. | C.Indifferent. | D.Scared. |
A.Global impact of Climate change. |
B.The most serious challenge we face. |
C.UN predicts more rising temperatures. |
D.How do we cope with continued warming. |