组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:44 题号:19020866

Many of the psychological benefits of outdoor play are already well established. Our brains evolved in natural landscapes, and our perceptual(感知的)systems are particularly well suited to wild outdoor spaces.

This means that natural scenes provide the perfect level of stimulation, which is thought to help recharge the brain when it is tired and easily distractible. Supporting this theory, one study found that children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were better able to concentrate following a 20-minute walk in the park, compared to a 20-minute walk on the streets of a well-kept urban area. Being exposed to grass and trees seemed to have had a beneficial effect on their minds. The authors recommended using such “doses(剂量)of nature” as a safe and accessible way of supporting children with ADHD, alongside other tools.

Besides these restorative effects, outdoor play can offer valuable learning experiences. For example, playing with mud or sand can help children develop the way their senses and movement interact, which allows the child to gradually understand his or her body signals.

Such activities — away from the house or classroom — may also help children to find ways to cope with emotions that maybe hard to explore in other environments. So-called “sand tray therapy”, which involves using sand and clay to express one’s thoughts and feelings, is an accepted form of counselling for children who are struggling to verbalise their emotional state.

When it comes to the child’s physical health, the most obvious advantage of outdoor play maybe the exercise A child may find it easier to buildup strength and endurance in a large open space resulting in a reduced risk of overweight, according to one study led by Elizabeth Gershoff, professor of human development and family sciences at the University of Texas at Austin, US.

The latest findings, however, suggest there could be a host of other advantages to playing in natural environments — and the secret maybe alive in the mud itself.

1. What’s the function of the first paragraph?
A.To present the topic.B.To display brain landscapes.
C.To prove the well-established benefits.D.To introduce the perceptual systems.
2. How does the study show that natural scenes provide the perfect level of stimulation?
A.By recording learning experiences.B.By comparing walking in different settings.
C.By observing different activities.D.By exposing children to grass and trees.
3. What’s the advantage of sand tray therapy?
A.Children can speak out their inner thoughts.
B.Children can develop their senses and movements.
C.Children can express their thoughts by applying sand.
D.Children can cope with their emotions in the classroom.
4. What does the author mean by saying “the secret maybe alive in the mud itself’?
A.Playing outdoors brings unexpected benefits.
B.Playing in the mud is the best outdoor exercise.
C.Playing outdoors can cure children with ADHD.
D.Playing in the mud can reduce the risk of overweight.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了伦敦公共汽车上的工人曾经改变了人们如今的生活方式,曾经人们认为锻炼有害身体,结果对工人的研究发现锻炼使人保持活力。

【推荐1】A new study has found that smiling at London bus drivers increases happiness. However, on the Number 24 bus to Hampstead Heath, Londoners are sceptical. “Bus drivers,” says Liz Hands, a passenger, “are generally annoying.”

It might seem improbable that a report on London’s buses could change behaviour. But it has happened before. London’s buses have an underappreciated role in the history of medical science. In the 1940s, a single study of London’s transport workers transformed epidemiology (流行病学), medicine and the way we live now. Every time you go on a run, check your step-count, or take the stairs instead of the lift, you are following a path pioneered by the feet of the workers on London’s buses.

In the late 1940s, doctors were worried. Britain, like many rich countries, was suffering from an “epidemic” of heart disease and no one knew why. Various hypotheses, such as stress, were suggested; but one thing that was not exercising researchers was exercise. The idea that health and exercise were linked “wasn’t the accepted fact that we know today”, says Nick Wareham, a professor of epidemiology at Cambridge University. Some even felt that “too much physical activity was a bad thing for your health”. Miners and farmers who did physical exercise also suffered from various diseases and died young.

At this time a young doctor called Jerry Morris started to suspect that the increasing deaths from heart disease might be linked to occupation. He began studying the medical records of 31,000 London transport workers. His findings were breathtaking: conductors, who spent their time running up and down stairs, had an approximately 30% lower possibility of disease than drivers, who sat down all day. Exercise was keeping people alive.

Morris’s research was eventually published in 1953, just three years after a study by Richard Doll proving the link between smoking and lung cancer. Morris’s work had consequences both big and small. Morris now also took up exercise, handing his jacket to his daughter and just running. “People thought I was bananas.” Slowly, the rest of the world took off its jacket and followed.

1. Why does the author mention the new study in the first paragraph?
A.To clarify a concept.B.To introduce the topic.
C.To present the argument.D.To provide an example.
2. What does the underlined part “exercising researchers” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Encouraging researchers to work out.B.Helping with researchers’ inquiry.
C.Hold back researchers’ progress.D.Drawing researchers’ attention.
3. How did Morris conduct his study on the transport employees?
A.By carrying out survey.B.By observing their routines.
C.By doing medical examinations.D.By analyzing the medical data.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Smiling and Its Effects on London Bus Drivers.
B.The Evolution of London’s Transportation System.
C.How London Bus Drivers Led the world to exercise.
D.What Londoners Think about Studies on Bus Drivers.
2024-01-15更新 | 151次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章讲述了情绪在决策过程中的积极作用。

【推荐2】Paul Dirac was one of the greatest physicists of the 20th century. He was a pioneer in quantum(量子) theory, which shaped our modern world. Dirac was also a genius when it came to analytical thinking. But when his colleagues asked him for advice, his secret to success had nothing to do with the traditional scientific method. “Be guided,” Dirac told them, “by your emotions.”

Dirac’s advice, like his physics, ran against the common assumption of psychology in his day: that logical thought primarily drives our behaviors, and that when emotions play a role, they are likely to keep us off our best judgment.

Today, researchers have gained a deeper understanding of emotions and how they can positively influence logical choices. In a study led by Professor Mark Fenton, his team conducted interviews with 118 professional traders at four investment banks. They found that even among the most experienced traders, the lower-performing ones seemed less likely to effectively engage with the emotions guiding their choices—whether to buy or sell a set of securities, for example, with millions of dollars at risk. The most successful traders, however, were particularly likely to acknowledge their emotions and followed their direct feelings about stock options(股票期权) when they had limited information to draw on. They also understood that when emotions become too intense, toning them down can be necessary. The issue for the successful traders was not how to avoid emotions but how to control them.

Welcoming emotions into the decision-making process can help us be more clear-eyed about where our choices come from. Dirac knew that emotions helped him look beyond the beliefs of his contemporaries. Again and again, his controversial ideas proved correct. Dirac passed away in 1984, a couple of decades before the revolution in emotion theory began, but he’d been happy to see that he’d been right again.

1. Why does the author mention Paul Dirac in paragraph 1?
A.To offer a suggestion.B.To introduce the topic.
C.To describe the scientist.D.To present a phenomenon.
2. What did people think of emotions’ effect on behaviors in Dirac’s days?
A.It was permanent.B.It was unfavorable.
C.It was meaningful.D.It was unavoidable.
3. How did some traders perform better at work according to paragraph 3?
A.By working more intensely.B.By experiencing more widely.
C.By making decisions more directly.D.By controlling emotions more efficiently.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.A study on professional traders.
B.A development in emotion theory.
C.The role of emotions in decision-making.
D.The achievements of Paul Dirac as a physicist.
2024-01-07更新 | 33次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,实验研究表明外语对于人们思维方式有影响。

【推荐3】In a 2012 study, Boaz Keysar, a professor at the University of Chicago in the US, led an experiment on the relationship between foreign languages and people’s way of thinking.

In the experiment, people were asked to make a choice: Just take one pound or take a 50percent chance of winning 2.50 pounds. When given this choice in their native language, most people took the safe option of only getting one pound. But they were more willing to make the riskier choice when asked in a foreign language, leading to more profits overall, according to The Guardian. As Keysar put it, “People just hate the chance of losing, but they hate it less in a foreign language.”

In another study published this year, Keysar and his team did an experiment in which participants were given a series of related words like “dream”, “snooze”, “bed” and “rest”. Later, when asked which words they remembered hearing, people were more likely to mistakenly remember “sleep”, which was not on the list, in their native language. But it was much less likely to happen if they did the test in a foreign language. As Keysar explained, people have more careful thinking when using a foreign language, leading to more accurate memories.

The foreign language effect may even influence our personality. Silvia Purpuri at the University of Trento, Italy, looked at people’s willingness to face uncertainty and enter unfamiliar situations. Being tolerant (宽容的) of uncertainty allows people to have more creative ideas and be more open to new things. It turns out that people naturally score more highly on this trait (特点) when they can speak or use a foreign language because speaking a foreign language requires taking risks.

The evidence is clear: By learning a foreign language, you’re not just learning a language—you’re gaining a new state of mind.

1. What does the first experiment suggest?
A.People like expressing in a foreign language.
B.People are afraid of losing in face of money.
C.People make quick choices in their native language.
D.People prefer riskier decisions in a foreign language.
2. Which of the following best explains “accurate” underlined in paragraph 3?
A.Colorful.B.Simple.C.Usual.D.Exact.
3. Willingness to face uncertainty makes people          .
A.Cool-headed.B.Open-minded.C.Light-hearted.D.Easy-going.
4. What is the main idea of this text?
A.Learning foreign languages helps a lot.
B.People should learn to face uncertainty.
C.Foreign languages influence how people think.
D.Personality has an effect on language learning.
2023-12-10更新 | 130次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般