Are you a good judge of character? Can you make an accurate judgment of people’s personalities based only on your first impression of them? Ironically, the answer lies as much in them as it does in you.
US psychologist Henry Adams tried to identify good judges of character in 1927.His research led him to conclude that people fell into two groups—good judges of themselves and good judges of others. Adams’s research has been widely criticized since then, but he wasn’t entirely wrong about there being two clearly different types.
We need to define what a good judge of character is. Is it someone who can read personality or someone who can read emotion? Those are two different skills. Emotions such as anger or joy or sadness can generate easily identifiable physical signs. Most of us would probably be able to accurately identify these signs, even in a stranger. As such, most of us are probably good judges of emotion.
In order to be a good judge of personality, however, there needs to be an interaction with the other person, and that person needs to be a “good target”. “Good targets” are people who show related and useful clues to their personality. So this means “the good judge” will only appear when reading “good targets”. This is according to Rogers and Biesanz in their 2019 journal entitled “Reassessing the Good Judge of Personality”. “We found clear and strong evidence that the good judge does exist”, Rogers and Biesanz concluded. But their key finding is that the good judge does not have magical gifts of observation — they are simply able to “detect and use information provided by the good target”.
So, are first impressions really accurate? Well, if you’re a good judge talking to a “good target”, then it seems the answer is “yes”. And now we know that good judges probably do exist, more researches can be done into how they read personality, what kind of people they are — and whether their skills can be taught.
1. What is the conclusion of Adams’s research?A.Fewer people can read physical signs. |
B.Most people are good judges of themselves. |
C.First impressions have a huge effect on people. |
D.There are two obviously different types of people. |
A.There is no need to interact with the other person. |
B.Good judges are related to good targets. |
C.Good judges have magical talents for emotion. |
D.Good targets are persons who hide important information. |
A.Disapproving. | B.Indifferent. | C.Objective. | D.Pessimistic. |
A.To inform readers of a good judge of character. |
B.To highlight the importance of good character. |
C.To introduce some ways of define good characters. |
D.To explain what first impressions are. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】In the simplest of terms, white noise is sound that can be used to cover up background sounds.
● White Noise for Studying
Since most people who are distracted find it hard to focus, teachers urge students to study in quiet rooms.
Research conducted in 2014 at the University of Hamburg-Eppendorf Medical Center found a positive link between white noise and people learning mathematics.
In other words, the effectiveness of white noise or other background sounds as a study aid remains a case of personal experience rather than well-established scientific research.
● White Noise for Sleep
In what has become the “sleep industry,” the term “white noise” is used as a generic description for any background noise that is constant and unchanging.
A.It can drown out potentially distracting sounds. |
B.However, another research indicates it all depends. |
C.But they find studying boring in that atmosphere. |
D.Some babies do fall asleep faster with white noise in the background. |
E.Years of researches have shown that serious sleeplessness can cause brain damage. |
F.Though illogical, the idea that white noise can help people fall asleep is well established. |
G.White noise blocks sudden changes, helping people fall asleep and light sleeper remain asleep. |
【推荐2】A strong hit to the head will normally give you a concussion(脑震荡). Woodpeckers(啄木鸟), however, strike their beaks(喙) into trees thousands of times a day and are perfectly fine.
We used to think that a woodpecker’s skull(头骨) worked as a kind of safety helmet which absorbed the shocks. A new study by Sam Van Wassenbergh, a researcher at the University of Antwerp in Belgium, proved that this “common sense” was in fact false.
Van Wassenbergh and his colleagues argued that, if a woodpecker’s head absorbed the force, it would not be able to strike the tree with enough force.
“If the beak absorbed much of its own impact, the unlucky bird would have to pound even harder,” they said in their paper. In other words, if the theory were true, the woodpecker would have to peck even harder to compensate for both the shock-absorbing qualities of the sponge-like bone inside its skull as well as the density(密度) of the wood.
The scientists recorded four different kinds of woodpeckers in zoos as they were pecking. The team used data from their high-speed recordings to build digital models of the woodpeckers. Van Wassenbergh described the woodpeckers motion as “a hammer(锤子) hitting wood” since their movement appeared rigid and focused.
The research suggested that woodpeckers don’t have any shock-absorbing device or the ability to reduce the amount of force. Although they are without “helmets”, the team claimed that the woodpeckers’ tiny size and weight protect them.
A woodpecker’s brain is about 700 times smaller than that of a human. “Smaller animals can withstand higher deceleration(减速). Think about a fly that hits a window and then just flies back again,” Van Wassenbergh said. “So that is why even the hardest hits we observed are not expected to cause any concussion.
1. What did people use to believe about woodpeckers when they peck trees?A.Their beaks could spread the shocks they produce. |
B.They could stand slight concussions. |
C.Their bodies were soft enough to absorb the force. |
D.Their heads were able to reduce the shocks. |
A.Influence. | B.Shock. | C.Limit. | D.Benefit. |
A.Woodpeckers do not have special safety devices. |
B.How woodpeckers peck depends on their type. |
C.Density of the wood affects a woodpeckers pecking force. |
D.The shock absorber theory is mostly correct. |
A.A guidebook. | B.A medical report. | C.A science magazine. | D.An advertisement. |
【推荐3】People have been making and flying kites for about 2000 years.
Kites are made in many different sizes, colors and shapes. Simple kites are made by crossing two sticks and covering them with paper or cloth.
Kite flying is great fun and it is easy if you know some secrets.
Kites were used to develop airplanes. The Wright Brothers experimented with kites before they flew the first airplane. In the past, kites were sometimes used to take pictures in wars. In World War I, the Germans developed a large kite that could transport people to a submarine.
Today most people fly kites as a hobby. Kite festivals are organized in many cities in all parts of the world.
A.Then you attach a string at the end. |
B.Kites have also been used in experiments. |
C.No one knows for sure who invented the kite. |
D.A flat kite is the oldest and simplest type of kite. |
E.In Japan, families fly fish kites on Children’s Day. |
F.Kites were also used to carry radio signals over long distances. |
G.Stories of kites were brought to Europe till the end of the 13th century. |
【推荐1】A small robot may help children who are recovering (康复) from a long-term illness in the hospital or at home. Anyone who has had a long-term illness knows that recovering at home can be lonely, which is especially true of children. These children may feel isolated from their friends and classmates. The robot takes their place at school. Through the robot, the children can hear their teachers and friends. They also can take part in class activities from wherever they are recovering.
Norwegian researchers have developed a clever robot called AV1 to keep children recovering from long-term illness connected to their friends and their education. AV1 is large and looks like a human because it is supposed to be a friend to the children. It was designed to be hard. It is water-resistant (防水) and can take a fall from a desk without break. AVI goes to school for a child who is at home while recovering from a long-term illness. And the child’s school friends must help. They carry the robot to school and between classes place the robot on the child’s desk.
At home, the child uses a tablet (手写板) or phone to start the robot. Then they use the same device (装置) to control the robot’s movements. At school, the robot becomes the eyes, ears and voice of the child. The student can take part in classroom activities from wherever they are recovering — whether at home or from a hospital bed. The robot is equipped (装备,配备) with speakers, microphones and cameras that make communicating easy.
Robots are, quite simply, cool. The robot just became available (可得到的) to the public. Hopefully AVI will help some children feel less lonely while they are absent from class.
1. The robot can help children ________.A.who study at home on their own |
B.who are absent from school for illness |
C.who show no interest in school studying |
D.who feel alone at home without parents |
A.separated | B.different | C.connected | D.communicated |
A.Because it can help children better. |
B.Because children like it very much. |
C.Because children can treat it as a friend. |
D.Because it can do the homework like a human. |
A.Robots help sick children a lot. |
B.Robots aim to help children with study. |
C.Robots are to be friends to the children. |
D.Robots can take part in classroom activities. |
【推荐2】We know animals have emotions. They can feel fear. We also think they feel love, since they have strong relationships with each other. So are animal emotions similar to our own? And do animals have a sense of humor? Do animals feel empathy? Does an elephant have consciousness? Can a dog plan ahead? These are some of the questions that deserve our full attention.
A parrot’s joke
Sally Blanchard’s parrot Bongo Marie didn’t get along with her other parrot, Paco. In fact, Bongo Marie clearly didn’t like Paco at all! One day, Blanchard cooked a chicken for dinner. She started to cut the chicken with a knife. “Oh, no! Paco!” Bongo Marie said loudly and laughed. Blanchard laughed, too, and said, “That’s not Paco.” “Oh.. no,” said Bongo Marie. This time, she sounded disappointed. Then the parrot laughed at her own joke.
Yoga dog
Jean Donaldson enjoys yoga, and so does her dog Buffy. While Donaldson does yoga, Buffy carefully places her toys on Donaldson’s body. If a toy falls, Buffy runs to put it back. Does this behavior have any real purpose? “She thinks it’s funny!” says Donaldson.
Animal laughter
Can dogs laugh? Recent research shows that dogs can tell each other when they want to play. They make a special sound — a kind of laugh. Psychologist Patricia Simonet recorded the sound. Then she played it back to dogs and studied their behavior. “All the dogs seemed to like the laugh,” says Simonet. So do animals have a sense of humor? If laughter is a clue, then perhaps the answer is “Yes”.
Life is very vivid to animals. In many cases they know who they are. They know who their friends are and who their rivals are. It is incredible that there is still a debate over whether animals are conscious and even a debate over whether human beings can know animals are conscious.
1. How does the author introduce the topic?A.By raising some questions |
B.By describing a scene |
C.By making a comparison |
D.By analyzing a phenomenon |
A.To explain how parrots can talk. |
B.To show how parrots can feel love. |
C.To tell an interesting experience. |
D.To suggest that parrots can make jokes. |
A.She tries to jump over Donaldson. |
B.She copies Donaldson’s movements. |
C.She puts her toys on Donaldson’s body. |
D.She makes fun of Donaldson. |
A.Dogs can make a sound like a laugh and may have a sense of humor. |
B.Dogs talk to each other and seem to be funnier than most animals. |
C.Dogs know how to please their masters with their laughter. |
D.Dogs cannot communicate as well as other animals. |
【推荐3】About 40% of all food grown in the world goes uneaten each year, according to a World Wildlife Fund report from last year. And when food ends up in landfills, it produces huge amounts of greenhouse gases. So it’s no surprise that the app Too Good to Go designed to be opposed to this problem—by giving consumers the opportunity to purchase leftover, out-of-date or ugly food at discount prices—has become increasingly popular in recent years.
Users of the Too Good to Go app can search for local restaurants, bakeries and grocery stores—and purchase surprise bags filled with whatever food is left over at the end of the day. The bags range in price from about $3 to $5, but they’re stocked with food about three times that value. So customers are also getting a steep discount.
Too Good to Go first launched in Europe in 2015 and opened in the US in October 2020.Today it’s available in cities including Austin, Chicago, Los Angeles, Seattle and Philadelphia. And the app saves 300,000 meals a day from ending up in landfills around the world.
Besides saving meals from ending up in the trash, Too Good to Go’s primary aim is to increase awareness of food waste, eventually encouraging consumers to effect policy change in their local communities.
“The whole food chain is wasting food. So we need to help,” said Lucie Basch, co-founder of the app Too Good to Go.” But for us, starting with the consumers and raising awareness with a super simple app that anyone can download and start using today was really the opportunity to make a difference for us.”
1. What is the purpose of designing the app Too Good to Go?A.To fight against food waste. | B.To recycle the leftover food. |
C.To reduce air pollution. | D.To deal with world hunger. |
A.enveloped | B.housed | C.filled | D.coated |
A.It still has a long way to go |
B.It can change the existing food chain. |
C.It should work together with more grocery stores. |
D.It can help improve related policies of communities. |
A.The Main Cause of Food Waste | B.The Solution for Greenhouse Gases |
C.A New App Helps People Reduce Waste | D.A Consumption Concept Becomes Popular |