Smartphones have changed lives in so many ways. They help people communicate, navigate, remember to pick up the laundry, and more. Now, smartphones may also help keep people safe while they travel.
A recent study, published in the journal Nature Communications Engineering, led by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Senseable City Laboratory, has shown that smartphone sensors are nearly as good at collecting information about bridge safety as sensors. The researchers conducted the study on the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California and a smaller bridge in Ciampino, Italy.
The researchers drove over the Golden Gate Bridge, their sensor apps running, one hundred and two times. They also gave the app to seventy-two drivers who regularly cross the bridge over the course of their days. Once they had the data from the phones, they compared that data to the information from two hundred and forty sensors that had been placed on the bridge. Surprisingly, they found that the data from their phones pretty much matched the data from the sensors.
In Italy, the researchers collected the data from two hundred and eighty trips across the bridge, and compared it to the data from six sensors that had been placed on the bridge. Though the results differed a bit, the results were still quite similar.
“We still have work to do, but we believe that our approach could be scaled up easily—all the way to the level of an entire country,” told a researcher. “It might not reach the accuracy that one can get using fixed sensors installed on a bridge, but it could become a very interesting early-warning system. Small differences could then suggest when to carry out further analyses.”
Millions of smartphone-carrying people drive over bridges every day. If the new method is put into use, it will go a long way towards making bridges much safer.
1. What is the recent study about?A.Smartphones can change people’s everyday life. |
B.Smartphones can entertain people in many ways. |
C.Smartphones may keep people comfortable on the road. |
D.Smartphones can detect the condition of bridges. |
A.To present the locations of the study. | B.To tell how the study was carried out. |
C.To stress the accuracy of the data. | D.To make a comparison. |
A.By fixing sensor apps on certain bridges. |
B.By comparing data from two different sources. |
C.By collecting information about bridge safety. |
D.By referring to different drivers’ comments. |
A.It’s time-consuming. | B.It’s challenging. |
C.It’s promising. | D.It is far from satisfactory. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】What is cloning?
The term cloning describes a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity (存在体). The copied material is referred to as a clone.
How are genes cloned?
Researchers routinely use cloning techniques to make copies of genes that they wish to study. The procedure consists of inserting a gene from one organism, often referred to as “foreign DNA,” into the genetic material of a carrier called a vector (带菌者). Examples of vectors include bacteria, yeast cells or viruses. After the gene is inserted, the vector is placed in laboratory conditions that prompt it to multiply, resulting in the gene being copied many times over.
What animals have been cloned?
Over the last 50 years, scientists have conducted cloning experiments in a wide range of animals using a variety of techniques. In 1979, researchers produced the first genetically identical mice by splitting mouse embryos in the test tube and then implanting the resulting embryos into the wombs of adult female mice. It was not until 1996, however, that researchers succeeded in cloning the first mammal from a mature cell taken from an adult animal. After 276 attempts, Scottish researchers finally produced Dolly, the lamb from the udder cell of a 6-year-old sheep. Besides, other mammals that have been cloned include: cat, deer, dog, horse, mule, ox, rabbit and rat.
Have humans been cloned?
Despite several highly publicized claims, human cloning still appears to be fiction. There currently is no solid scientific evidence that anyone has cloned human embryos.
In 1998, scientists in South Korea claimed to have successfully cloned a human embryo, but said the experiment was interrupted very early when the clone was just a group of four cells.
In 2004, a group led by Woo-Suk Hwang of Seoul National University in South Korea published a paper in the journal Science in which it claimed to have created a cloned human embryo in a test tube. However, an independent scientific committee later found no proof to support the claim and, in January 2006, Science announced that Hwang’s paper had been retracted (撤销).
Why is human cloning difficult?
From a technical perspective, cloning humans and other primates (灵长类动物)is more difficult than in other mammals. One reason is that two proteins essential to cell division are located very close to the chromosomes(染色体)in primate eggs. Consequently, removal of the egg’s nucleus to make room for the donor nucleus also removes the proteins, interfering with cell division. In other mammals, such as cats, rabbits and mice, the two proteins are spread throughout the egg. So, removal of the egg’s nucleus does not result in loss of proteins. In addition, some dyes and the ultraviolet light used to remove the egg’s nucleus can damage the primate cell and prevent it from growing.
What are some of the ethical issues related to cloning?
Cloning would present the potential of creating a human that is genetically identical to another person who has previously existed or who still exists. This may conflict with long-standing religious and societal values about human dignity, possibly violating principles of individual freedom, identity and autonomy (自主权).
1. Which of the following animals hasn’t been cloned?A.Cat. | B.Donkey. | C.Sheep. | D.Ox. |
A.Hwang copied others’ finds in his paper. |
B.There was no proof to support Hwang’s claim. |
C.Science found out mistakes in the paper. |
D.Hwang wanted to update the paper by adding new things. |
A.The cloning procedure consists of inserting a vector into the genetic material. |
B.Dolly was successfully cloned after a few attempts. |
C.Removal of the egg’s nucleus can lead to the failure of human cloning. |
D.As a biotechnology, cloning is widely accepted in modern society. |
【推荐2】Amazon recently announced its latest launch, a robot called Astro. Small in size, but with impressive technology, Astro is seemingly similar to Amazon’s popular virtual assistant. With all the same capabilities as Alexa, many critics are asking why there’s a need for Astro.
Answering this question, Amazon’s Vice-President of Products, Charlie Tritschler, highlights some unique features of Astro that make it a different kind of robot. Astro can move on its own and follow people, offering consumers a far broader range of options. Besides, it can monitor home security. Astro uses Artificial Intelligence to learn more about household members by interacting with users. Users can also register themselves and others into its recognition system. When they leave home, they can make an away mode, which means “Sentry (哨兵) Mode”, or “Patrol Mode” start working. If someone who is not recognized enters the house, Astro will follow and record them. Astro’s mobility seems to be the key feature in its technological enhancement, but what appeals to people most is its “unique persona”. Its big, circular, blinking “eyes” displayed on its screen-like head making it look rather cute are a big reason for this.
Years of research show that humans often experience positive emotional connections with robots. According to MIT’s technology review of Astro, it may not fall far from this observation. People have come to love robotic pets, though they are fully aware that the pets are lifeless. Robots at home can play a useful role in helping elderly patients fight loneliness or young children face social anxiety.
Amazon is offering people interested in Astro the chance to sign up for Day 1 Editions, a program giving invitations to Astro as soon as it goes on the market later this year. Tritschler is encouraging people to personalize the robot when it becomes available, and he is confident that users will come up with more ideas and features they will want to see in the robot in the near future to make it even better.
1. What is paragraph 2 mainly about?A.The convenient operation of Astro. | B.The essential functions of Astro. |
C.The increasing popularity of Astro. | D.The distinctive capabilities of Astro. |
A.Its recognition system. | B.Its ability to move on its own. |
C.Its adorable appearance. | D.Its ability to monitor home security. |
A.Critical. | B.Positive. | C.Uncertain. | D.Doubtful. |
A.Astro: A Robot Assistant | B.The New Revolution of AI |
C.Astro: An Emotional Relief | D.The Great Potential of Robots |
【推荐3】Everyone looks forward to progress, whether in one’s personal life or in the general society. Progress indicates a person’s ability to change the way he is living at the moment. Progress must lead to a better life and a better way of doing things. All these, however, remain true only in so far as people want to accept technology and move forward by finding new and more efficient ways of doing things.
However, at the back of the minds of many people, especially those who miss the “good old days”, efficiency comes with a price. When communication becomes more efficient, people are able to contact one another no matter where they are and at whatever time they wish to. The click of a button allows people miles apart to talk or see each other without even leaving their homes. With the communication gadgets, such as mobile phones and iPads, people often do not take the effort to visit one another personally. A personal visit carries with it the additional feature of having to be in the person’s presence for as long as the visit last. We cannot unnecessarily excuse ourselves or turn the other person off.
With efficiency also comes mass production. Such is the nature of factories and the success of industrialization today. Factories have improved efficiency. Unskillful tasks are left to machines and products are better made and produced with greater accuracy than any human hand could ever have done. However, with the improvements in efficiency also comes the loss of the personal touch when making these products. For example, many handicrafts(手工艺品) are now produced in a factory. Although this means that supply is better able to increase demand, now that the supply is quick and efficient, the demand might fall because mass production lowers the quality of the handicraft and it is difficult to find unique designs on each item.
Nevertheless, we must not commit the mistake of analyzing progress only from one point of view. In fact, progress has allowed tradition to keep up. It is only with progress and the invention of new technology that many old products can be brought back to their old state. New technology is required for old products to stay old.
It is people’s attitude towards progress that causes the type of influence that technology has on society. Technology is flexible. There is no fixed way of making use of it. Everything depends on people’s attitude. The worst effects of progress will fall on those who are unable to rethink their attitudes and views of society. When we accept progress and adapt it to suit our needs, a new “past” is created.
1. The underlined word “gadgets” s closet in meaning to ______.A.tools | B.messages | C.barriers | D.skills |
A.describing a process | B.using examples |
C.following time order | D.making classification |
A.It can destroy old traditions. |
B.It can lead to social progress. |
C.It can be used to correct mistakes. |
D.It can be used to preserve old products. |
A.Progress can suit the needs of daily life. |
B.People review the past with great regret. |
C.People’s attitude decides the use of technology. |
D.Technology should be introduced in a fixed way. |
【推荐1】A 70-year-old grandfather has successfully rowed a boat unassisted across the entire Atlantic Ocean-and he didn't do it for himself. Frank Rothwell took the challenge in memory of his brother-in-law Roger, who died of Alzheimer's disease (阿尔茨海默病) during Frank's crossing.
Requiring 18 months of hard training, the entire trip took eight challenging weeks for Rothwell to travel from La Gomera in the Canary Islands on December 12 to the finish line 3000 miles away in Antigua on February 6. “I like a challenge!” explains Frank on his fundraising site. “In 2017, I spent five weeks on a deserted island for the Channel 4 program, The Island with Bear Grylls. Before that, I was only the 10th person ever to circumnavigate North and South America.”
In a statement, Hilary Evans, chief executive of Alzheimer's Research UK, said, “We're honored to have such amazing support from Frank. His courage and determination helped him to complete his epic challenge and raise £1 million for dementia(痴呆)research.”
“This incredible amount will be a huge benefit to the groundbreaking research we carry out here at Alzheimer's Research UK, as we continue our mission to bring about life-changing treatments for people affected by dementia,”added Evans.
Crossing the finish line was an emotional moment for Rothwell. He said, “I am on cloud nine! I set out in December wishing to raise £1 million for Alzheimer's Research UK but I never thought I'd actually achieve it. At times, the challenge was incredibly tough, with rough seas, huge waves, and missing my wife, Judith. But as exhausting as it was, it was all totally worth it.”
He also said, “Having received hundreds of messages from people who, like me, have witnessed the heartbreak of dementia, I am proud to have raised such an incredible amount in honor of Roger and everyone else who has experienced the destruction it causes.”
1. Why did Rothwell sail across the Atlantic Ocean?A.To raise money for Roger to receive treatment. |
B.To call on people to challenge themselves. |
C.To collect money for Alzheimer's research. |
D.To photograph the rare view of seas and waves. |
A.At a loss | B.In surprise |
C.In great shape | D.In wild excitement |
A.Courageous and helpful. | B.Humorous and patient. |
C.Optimistic and cautious. | D.Generous and wise. |
A.Sports | B.Society | C.Education | D.Health |
【推荐2】On December 26, 2004, hundreds of tourists relaxed on Sri Lanka’s Yala National Park’s beaches. But at mid-morning the park’s elephants began crying wildly and running away from the ocean and up a nearby hill. The puzzled keepers could tell the animals were worried about something but what?
What the keepers did not know was that a 30-foot wall of water was headed straight toward them. This tsunami(海啸) had been caused by an earthquake more than 1, 000 miles away in the Indian Ocean. When the huge wave hit the coast, it caused severe damage. Many people died. The elephants, however, were not swept away by the water. They stood safely on the hill.
Scientists have long suspected that animals sense natural disasters before humans do. People have told stories of dogs refusing to go outside and sharks swimming to deeper waters before a hurricane. After the 2004 tsunami, people said they saw tigers, monkeys, and water buffalo escaping to higher ground before the waters rushed in. Even in the hardest-hit areas of southern Asia, there were few animal deaths.
It's unlikely that an animal’s so-called sixth sense comes from some magical power to see into the future. Experts believe that animals may be more sensitive than humans to changes in temperature and other environmental conditions that take place before a natural disaster. The elephants in Sri Lanka, for example, may have picked up vibrations from within the Earth, a sign that earthquake was coming. Because vibrations in the ground travel much faster than an ocean wave, the elephants may have felt the earthquake that caused the tsunami well before the tsunami itself came to the coast.
A few scientists are calling for a system to track reports of strange behavior in people’s pets, hoping that these reports can serve as a warning system that a natural disaster is about to happen. But Marina Haynes, an animal behavior scientist at the Philadelphia Zoo, says, “It would be an unreliable way to predict disasters. It can be difficult to know what an animal is doing. Is the animal nervous because an earthquake is about to happen or is it frightened because there is an enemy nearby?”
1. What happened to the elephants in Yala National Park on December 26, 2004?A.They died in the natural disaster. |
B.They were disturbed by the tourists. |
C.They moved from the hill to the seaside. |
D.They behaved strangely before the tsunami. |
A.giving examples |
B.making comparisons |
C.telling interesting stories |
D.showing research findings |
A.changes in temperature | B.a kind of chemical power |
C.continuous shaking movement | D.serious environmental pollution |
A.Positive. | B.Doubtful. |
C.Hopeful. | D.Supportive. |
【推荐3】The past few months have brought electrifying news that, for the first time, a gene treatment has provided some hearing to children born with deafness.
Eli Lilly announced this week, for example, that a profoundly deaf boy from Morocco given its treatment as part of a clinical trial in Philadelphia can now hear. And five children in China treated similarly at younger ages gained hearing with some able to verbally communicate without their cochlear implants (人工耳蜗). Their hearing recovery, first covered by the press in October 2023, is described in detail this week in The Lancet.
“It’s an enormous achievement,” says geneticist Karen Avraham of Tel Aviv University. Otolaryngologist (耳鼻喉科专家) and gene therapist Lawrence Lustig of Columbia University, whose lab was among the first to test the same approach in mice, agrees. “Other than cochlear implants, we haven’t really had any successful treatments to treat deafness,” he notes.
The various efforts from companies and academic centers each use a virus to insert the same gene, OTOF, into the children’s inner ear so the so-called hair cells there can sense sound and transmit it to the brain.
The new deafness treatments add to a string of recent successes for the gene treatment field, but also raise questions. The ear’s hair cells don’t divide, so the new copies of OTOF they contain should persist and continue to instruct the cells to make OTOF. Gene expression could drop off over time or the ear could mount an immune response that shuts it off.
But Lustig is optimistic that the various challenges will be overcome. “Now that we’ve got one success story, there’s going to be more money coming in to fund some of these other projects,” he says.
1. What do we know about the new treatment?A.It is a totally mature practice. | B.It’s a China-only clinical trial. |
C.It uses a virus to sense sound. | D.It aims to treat the deafness. |
A.Breakthrough. | B.Regret. | C.Disappointment. | D.Adventure. |
A.The brain refuses to receive it. |
B.Gene stops to produce hair cells. |
C.Gene expression might be weakened. |
D.Companies really profit a lot from it. |
A.Electrifying News Based on Some Clinical Trials |
B.Gene Treatment That Brings Deaf Children Hope |
C.Ways How Scientists Develop Cochlear Implants |
D.Challenges About the New Deafness Treatment |