Want great success in your career and your love life, as well as a healthy brain long into old age? The answer could be to learn another language. That’s the case according to a majority of Americans and Britons polled in a survey by language app Babbel.
71% of Americans and 61% of Britons believe speaking more than one language makes a person seem more attractive. Of 3000 English speakers polled in the US and the UK, nine out of ten admitted they’d learnt a new language in pursuit of romance. Besides, about one in four Americans and Britons think that being monolingual (单语的) has held them back professionally.
“Languages not only enable you to expand yourself in terms of perspective and skill set, but they also open doors and help you better understand other cultures and peoples,” Miriam Plieninger, director of didactics at Babbel. “Knowing another language helps to break barriers and to connect on a special level of shared understanding; be it while on the street, traveling, or in business.” Globally, more than half of the world can speak at least two languages.
“Different factors influence how easy or difficult it is to learn a new language,” says Plieninger. “If the language you’re learning is part of the same family as your mother tongue, it’s generally much easier to access.” Theoretically, English speakers should therefore be more comfortable with Germanic languages like German or Dutch, as both are historically very close to English. However, familiarity picked up in everyday life or in the classroom makes a big difference, which is why Americans feel at ease with Spanish and Britons with French.
Being multilingual can also be good for your health. Canadian scientist Ellen Bialystok found that speaking more than one language regularly from an early age improves cognitive abilities and can also delay symptoms of Alzheimer’s diseases.
1. How does the author prove his view?A.By making an interview. | B.By comparing online information. |
C.By researching language apps. | D.By referring to a survey. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Favorable. | C.Careful. | D.Negative. |
A.English-speakers find it uncomfortable with Dutch. |
B.English-speakers do not have any difficulty learning German. |
C.Compared with Americans, Britons find it harder to learn French. |
D.Compared with French, Americans find it easier to learn Spanish. |
A.Benefits of learning another language. | B.Advice on language learning. |
C.Key to success in career. | D.Relation between language and culture. |
A.If you talk to a man in his language, that goes to his heart. |
B.There is no quick success in learning, especially in language. |
C.Clear language depends on clear thinking. |
D.If you want to master a language, you need to learn its cultural background. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】The accent is the way you pronounce the words of a language. Everyone has an accent, and no one is accent-free. And for every accent, there are groups of people who react badly to it. These reactions are the result of prejudice. No accent is free from such prejudices.
I have held and expressed prejudices about other people’s accents. Over the decades, my experience of working with people from a wide range of backgrounds has led me to give up these prejudices. However, I still have prejudices that I find difficult to control in relation to some particular accents.
Language experts tell us that no accent is better than any other. But the reality is that the wider world likes the idea of simple rules which tell us what is right and wrong. We like to judge others on the basis of these rules. If you break these rules, you are somehow to blame. Jacob Rees Mogg recalls when he first stood unsuccessfully for election (选举) in Fife, Scotland: “I gradually realized that whatever I happened to be speaking about, the number of voters in my favor dropped as soon as I opened my mouth.”
And some people make their accents sound gentler when talking to people outside their circle of family and friends. However, Sky News ran a report recently in which a British woman Jemima was trying to sound less posh (上等人的), because she didn’t like random people telling her that she must be rich and from an upper-class background.
Lastly, it’s worth being reminded that people can be accented — even highly accented — and still be easily understood.
1. What does the author think of accent prejudice?A.It is reasonable. | B.It is hard to avoid. |
C.It should be banned. | D.It causes serious social issues. |
A.He was unwise. |
B.He spoke with an accent. |
C.He broke the election rules. |
D.He was unable to make himself understood. |
A.Change her accent. |
B.Speak the standard English. |
C.Pretend to be a well-educated person. |
D.Speak with the upper-class British accent. |
A.People had better speak without an accent. |
B.Everybody has prejudices about accents. |
C.People should be proud of their accents. |
D.People are judged by their accents. |
【推荐2】Recently, a group of scientists decided to find out what the funniest joke in the world was. This was obviously a difficult task, as no two people really agree about what is funny and what is not-especially when they are from different countries.
Here is the joke which the experts decided was the funniest joke in the world:
Two hunters were out in the woods. One of them fell to the ground. He didn’t seem to be breathing; his eyes were closed. The other hunter took out his mobile phone and called the emergency services.
“My friend is dead!” he cried to the operator. “What can I do?” The operator said, “Don’t worry. First, make sure he’s dead.” There was a silence, and then a shot was heard. Bang! The hunter’s voice came back on the line. He said, “OK, now what?”
This is perhaps amusing. Culturally, it depends on us knowing that often hunters are not considered to be very intelligent people, and that often they are quite violent. But perhaps this is not so all over the world. It’s also quite a “black” joke—a joke about something which isn’t really a funny subject. The experts also found the second funniest joke in the world. Here it is:
Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson went on a camping trip. After dinner, they went to sleep. Some hours later, Holmes woke up. “Watson, look up at the sky and tell me what you see.”
“I see millions of stars, Holmes,” replied Watson.
“And what do you infer from that?”
“Well, there are billions of stars... we are a small part of the universe...”
“Watson, you idiot (白痴)!” he said. “Someone has stolen our tent!”
I personally think this is better.
Can scientists in the end decide what is funny? Some things are much too complicated, even for scientists.
1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?A.Few jokes can make scientists laugh. |
B.Only scientists can find out the funniest joke. |
C.There are different jokes in different countries. |
D.People hold different opinions about what is funny. |
A.It is not so funny as the experts thought. |
B.It is really the funniest joke he has ever heard. |
C.It can greatly affect readers’ attitudes toward hunters. |
D.It shows that not all hunters are brave and intelligent. |
A.the reader’s feeling | B.the length of the joke |
C.the reader’s cultural background | D.the language that the teller uses |
A.Uninteresting Jokes | B.Different Kinds of Jokes |
C.The Funniest Jokes in the World | D.Tips on How to Make Others Laugh |
【推荐3】You're at dinner with your friends on Sunday and the waiter comes up to you and says, “Is this going to be on one check or?”
“Separate!” you all said, barely taking a breath to pause from your conversation.
And why would you? It's pretty usual to pay for your own meal, or to go Dutch.
But it wasn't always the custom to split the check when going out with friends. In fact, in early English society, it was seen as selfish to invite someone out to eat and not pay for their meal. The origins of the phrase "going Dutch" are a little complicated, but Steven Pincus, a historian from the University of Chicago who focuses on early modern Europe, helped us track the complex history of this idiom.
We have to take it back all the way to the 1600s. During the Anglo-Dutch Wars, there were multiple conflicts between the English and the Dutch over trade and naval power. That led to a rise in idioms from the English regarding their enemy, the Dutch: phrases like "Dutch courage," the false courage brought on by alcohol; or "Dutch reckoning," which is a ridiculously high bill on which you've likely been cheated. This was because the English saw the Dutch not only as a trading enemy,but also as a people with questionable morals. The English "claimed that the Dutch had been completely corrupted by their commitment to capitalism." (Funny how tides change, isn't it?)of course, as time changes, so does our sense of self. After all, who wants to pay for their friends' meals all the time? Maybe sometimes it's all right to do like the Dutch do.
1. What did people once do in English history if they dined out with friends?A.They split the check. | B.The inviter paid for the meal. |
C.They paid for their meals in turn. | D.one of the guests paid for the meal. |
A.They show respect to the Dutch. | B.They do harm to English language. |
C.They are associated with money. | D.They mean something dishonorable. |
A.the English table manners | B.the England and Dutch relationship |
C.the origin of some English phrases | D.the change in English history |
【推荐1】When using the Internet to fill-in gaps in one’s own knowledge — people believe they’re smarter and have a better memory than others, and incorrectly predict that they’ll perform better on future knowledge tests they take without Internet access, according to the new research.
“When we’re constantly connected to knowledge, we mistake the Internet’s knowledge for our own,” says Adrian Ward of the University of Texas. “Besides, the Google search process is also much like searching your own memory, which might cause people to confuse information found online with information in their own heads.”
To investigate that, Ward, in the first experiment, got participants to answer ten general knowledge questions either on their own or using online search. Then, they reported how confident they were in the ability to find information by using external sources, and in their own ability to remember information. Participants who used Google answered more questions correctly and were also more confident in their own memory.
In a second experiment, participants were made to answer the same ten general knowledge questions either on their own or using the online searching engine. Then, Ward told them they’d take second knowledge test without using any outside sources. Those who completed the first knowledge test with Google thought they’d know significantly more when forced to rely on their own memory in the future — suggesting they attributed their initial performance to their own knowledge, not to the fact they were using Google.
In a final experiment, participants were made to answer knowledge questions on their own, using Google, or with a version of Google that delayed search results by 25 seconds. Unlike those who used standard Google, participants who used “slow Google” weren’t more confident in their internal knowledge and didn’t predict higher performance on future tests. This suggests that in a world in which searching online is often faster than using our memory, we may know less but think we know more.
Ward says that the research has major implications for education, as students might devote less time and energy to gaining knowledge if they already feel knowledgeable. “Maybe we can use our limited cognitive resources in a more effective and efficient way,” Ward says.
1. How does Adrian Ward draw his conclusions?A.By carrying out a series of experiments. | B.By referring to previous related research. |
C.By comparing ways of using the Internet. | D.By analyzing the effects of Internet access. |
A.Compared. | B.Owed. | C.Referred. | D.Devoted. |
A.It can improve one’s mental development. | B.It can affect the way we think about ourselves. |
C.It can make one become smarter academically. | D.It can change our view of our own intelligence. |
A.Show more experiments. | B.Give some suggestions. |
C.Provide a certain theory. | D.Analyze a real-life phenomenon. |
【推荐2】In the recently opened Our Broken Planet exhibition in London’s Natural History Museum, a small piece of dark material covered with faint holes is on show in a display container. The nodule(小块)could easily be mistaken for coal, but its true nature is much more interesting.
The nodule is a combination of metals and oceanographers have discovered trillions of them on Earth’s ocean floors. Each is rich in some of the most important elements for making the electric cars, wind turbines and solar panels that we need to replace the carbon-emitting motors, power plants and factories now damaging our climate.
These nodules could therefore help humanity save itself from the ill effects of global warming, argue mining companies who say their exploitation should be rated an international priority. By mining up chunks(块)from the deep we can slow the burning of our planet’s surface.
“We desperately need substantial amounts of metals contained by these nodules to build electric cars and power plants,” says Hans Smit, chief executive of Florida’s Oceans Minerals, which has announced plans to mine for nodules. “We cannot increase land supplies of these metals without having a significant environmental impact. It’s our only alternative.”
Other researchers disagree, however. They say mining deep-sea nodules would be disastrous for our already stressed, plastic-ridden, overheated oceans. Delicate, long-living residents of the deep—shells, fish, corals and squids—would be erased by mining. At the same time, mud with poisonous metals would be sent upwards to disturb marine food-chains.
“It is hard to imagine how seabed mines could workably operate without destroying the ocean species,” says UK marine biologist Helen Scales, a view shared by David Attenborough, who has called for a pause on all deep-sea mining plans. “In this case it means the destruction of an ecosystem, an issue worth the best attention from every entity(实体)involved.” he says.
For better or worse, these mineral nodules are going to play a critical role in determining our future—either by releasing us from our current ecological headaches or by stimulating even more fatal outcomes.
1. What is the nodule on display?A.An attractive artificial artwork. |
B.A difficult-to-tell chunk of coal. |
C.An oceanic piece rich in metals. |
D.A container for electric materials. |
A.Metals for power plants. |
B.Land supplies of metals. |
C.Massive production of electric cars. |
D.Underwater mining for specific metals. |
A.Disapproving. | B.Skeptical. | C.Objective. | D.Conservative. |
A.They can be used both for good and for bad. |
B.Their exploitation can bring opposing effects. |
C.They contain beneficial and harmful elements. |
D.Their exploiters cannot reach agreement till now. |
【推荐3】A team of engineers at Harvard University has been inspired by Nature to create the first robotic fly. The mechanical fly has become a platform for a series of new high-tech integrated systems. Designed to do what a fly does naturally, the tiny machine is the size of a fat housefly. Its mini wings allow it to stay in the air and perform controlled flight tasks.
“It’s extremely important for us to think about this as a whole system and not just the sum of a bunch of individual components,” said Robert Wood, the Harvard engineering professor who has been working on the robotic fly project for over a decade. A few years ago, his team got the go-ahead to start piecing together the components. “The added difficulty with a project like this is that actually none of those components are off the shelf and so we have to develop them all on our own,” he said.
They engineered a series of systems to start and drive the robotic fly. “The seemingly simple system which just moves the wings has a number of interdependencies on the individual components, each of which individually has to perform well, but then has to be matched well to everything it’s connected to,” said Wood. The flight device was built into a set of power, computation, sensing and control systems. Wood says the success of the project proves that the flying robot with these tiny components can be built and manufactured.
While this first robotic fly is linked to a small, off-board power source, the goal is eventually to equip it with a built-in power source, so that it might someday perform data-gathering work at rescue sites, in farmers’ fields or on the battlefield. “Basically, it should be able to take off, land and fly around,” he said.
Wood says the design offers a new way to study flight mechanics and control at insect-scale. Yet, the power, sensing and computation technologies on board could have much broader applications. “You can start thinking about using them to answer open scientific questions, you know, to study biology in ways that would be difficult with the animals, but using these robots instead,” he said. “So there are a lot of technologies and open interesting scientific questions that are really what drives us on a day to day basis.”
1. Which of the following statements was the difficulty engineers met while making the robotic fly?A.They did not have sufficient fund. |
B.No ready-made components were available. |
C.There was no model in their mind. |
D.It was hard for them to assemble the components. |
A.The robotic fly has been put into wide application. |
B.The robotic fly consists of a flight device and a control system. |
C.The robotic fly can collect information from many sources. |
D.The robotic fly can fly well with the cooperation of individual components. |
A.The robotic fly can replace animals in some experiments. |
B.Animals are not allowed in biological experiments. |
C.The robotic fly is designed to learn about insects. |
D.There used to be few ways to study how insects fly. |
A.The development of robotic fly. |
B.Robotic fly promotes engineering science. |
C.Harvard’s efforts in making robotic fly. |
D.Robotic fly imitates real life insect. |
【推荐1】“The climate crisis may lead the human race to shrink (缩小) in size, as mamnals with smaller frames appear better able to deal with rising global temperatures,” a leading fossil expert has said.
Prof Steve Brusatte, a palaeontologist at the University of Edinburgh, suggested that the way in which other mammals have previously responded to periods of climate change could offer an insight into humans’ future.
He described the potential plight (困境) of people as similar to that of early horses, which became smaller in body size as temperatures rose around 55 million years ago, a period called the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum.
Writing in The Rise and Reign of the Mammals, Brusatte notes that animals in warmer parts of the world today are often smaller than those in colder areas, an ecological principle known as Bergmann’s rule.
“The reasons are not entirely understood, but it is probably, in part, because smaller animals have a higher surface area relative to their volume (体积) than big animals and can thus better give out excess heat,” he writes.
Brusatte said that becoming smaller was “a common way that mammals deal with climate change”. He added, “That’s not to say every species of mammal would get smaller, but it seems to be a common survival trick of mammals when temperatures spike pretty quickly, which does raise the question: if temperatures do spike really quickly, might humans dwarf, or might humans get smaller? And I think that’s certainly reasonable.”
In a recent study, researchers studying human remains over the past million years have also suggested that temperature is a major predictor of body size variation, while scientists studying red deer have said that warmer winters in northern Europe and Scandinavia may lead to the body size of these animals becoming smaller.
However, not all experts agree that rising temperature causes mammals to shrink. Prof Adrian Lister, of the Natural History Museum in London, said the relationship shown by the recent human remains study is weak, while the strong connections between temperature and mammal body size may often be down to the availability of food and resources.
Lister is also skeptical that humans will shrink as the climate heats. “We are not really controlled by natural selection,” he said. “If that was going to happen, you’d need to find large people dying before they could reproduce (生育) because of climate warming. This is not happening in today’s world. We wear clothes, and we have got heating, just as we have got air conditioning if it is too hot.”
1. What does Prof Steve Brusatte’s research suggest?A.Early horses extended the body size as temperatures rose around 55 million years ago. |
B.Animals in warmer parts of the world today are more active than those in colder areas. |
C.Mammals with smaller frames are worse at dealing with rising temperatures. |
D.The climate crisis may lead the human race to become smaller in size. |
A.Smaller animals have a higher surface area relative to their volume. |
B.Temperature is a major predictor of body size variation. |
C.Smaller animals have better access to food and resources. |
D.Humans are not really controlled by natural selection. |
A.Fall. | B.Vary. | C.Change. | D.Rise. |
A.The availability of food and resources has nothing to do with the shrink of mammals. |
B.The relationship between rising temperatures and the shrink of mammals is rather convincing. |
C.Studying human remains is the best way to know the effect of rising temperatures on mammals. |
D.The relationship between rising temperatures and the shrink of mammals is not so logically forceful. |
【推荐2】There is nothing in the US quite like Black Friday. Before midnight on Thursday, in malls across the US, people start queuing up outside the locked entrances of stores, making longer and longer lines, holding coupons (优惠券), sipping coffee and hot chocolate, rubbing their hands and stamping (跺脚) their feet for warmth, excitedly chatting, and waiting for the clerks to open the door when the time arrives.
Black Friday, the day after Thanksgiving, which fell on Nov 28,2014, “has become in recent decades a special American holiday”, said the International Business Times. Indeed, up to 147 million Black Friday shoppers were expected to put up with the dark of night and the elbows(手肘)of other shoppers so that they could bring home some bargains, according to the US National Retail Federation.
But why does the shopping festival have such a name?
The name was first used in Philadelphia in the 1970s. The streets and sidewalks of the city became so packed with traffic and crowds on the day after Thanksgiving Day that the local police did not look forward to it. Because of this, they called the day “Black Friday”, said The Huffington Post. However, others believe that Black Friday takes its name from the fact that because of the increase in sales on the day, shops are able for the first time in the year to move out of the “red” – that is, debt – and into the “black”, or profit. Businesses, of course, try to take advantage of this day. A decade ago, retailers (零售商) opened at 5 or 6 am. Now, many of the big stores open at midnight.
People really seem to like the whole experience of queuing up before midnight, “for it isn’t just about the bargains”, noted CNN. “For many shoppers, it’s just fun to be part of a large crowd. Those who go to the malls at midnight are driven by the same thing that makes a million people get together in Times Square each New Year’s Eve.”
1. Which of the following statements about Black Friday is TRUE?A.It is a special day in the US on which government hands out coupons to customers. |
B.It is a shopping festival in the US that falls on the second Friday after Thanksgiving. |
C.It has been a traditional American holiday since the founding of the nation. |
D.It is an opportunity for Americans to get things they want at a much lower price. |
A.at the beginning of the 20th century in the US |
B.by American people who expected to bring home bargains after Thanksgiving Day |
C.by the police to show their displeasure toward heavy traffic caused by shopping crowds |
D.to describe the bad weather on the day |
A.usually help each other to find good bargains |
B.have great fun as part of the waiting crowd |
C.have a lot of complaints about the service of the retail clerks |
D.have to wait until 5 to 6 am to start shopping |
A.The shopping habits of Americans. |
B.An introduction to the origin and influences of Black Friday. |
C.Tips on how to get good bargains on Black Friday. |
D.People’s mixed feelings toward Black Friday. |
【推荐3】Elements of Latin have made their way into many western countries. Data varies, but as much as 70% of words in English have a Latin or Greek root. By learning more about these roots and how they combine (结合) to create words, you will have an advantage in understanding new words, even if you’ve never seen them before.
The great thing is that you’re not learning the whole language with its grammar. You just need to memorize some parts of the vocabulary that you often see in English. So how do word roots work?
Every word has a root. This part contains the key to a word’s meaning. Take the word “happy”, for example. This word only contains the root, which means full of joy. Some words, however, have extra parts. We call these affixes (词缀), including prefixes, the part attached before the root, and suffixes, the part attached behind the root. Based on the additional meaning of the prefixes and suffixes, the meaning of the final word will be shaped to mean something new.
Take the word “autobiography” for example. The root is “bio”, meaning life. You may have noticed that many words with “bio” have something to do with life or living beings—biology, biography, and so on. When the suffixes “graph”, meaning to write, is added to it, it means a story about someone’s or something’s life. “Auto” means by oneself. Altogether, an “autobiography” is a story about a person’s life, written by the person himself or herself.
In a word, a better grasp of word roots can make you understand the English language better, and will help you with your vocabulary recognition and memory skills.
1. What’s needed to understand new words with roots?A.A good understanding of Latin or Greek. | B.A full understanding of grammar. |
C.The ability to recognize different parts of words. | D.The ability to speak various Western languages. |
A.It can’t form a word by itself. | B.It is a necessary part of a word. |
C.It is more important than affixes. | D.It has a relatively simple meaning. |
A.The science that is related to living things. |
B.A person who does research about chemistry. |
C.A person who does research about living things. |
D.The study of chemical reactions occurring in living things. |
A.Secret of understanding new words. | B.Latin’s way into Western language. |
C.Amazing power of affixes. | D.Tips on language exams. |