Episodic memory (情景记忆) allows humans to revisit past personal experiences in their minds, and it was once thought to be a special skill of humans. Although there are still arguments about the extent of this type of memory in non-human animals, scientists have proved that creatures like rats and dogs can pass tests that are developed to assess episodic memory over the past two decades. “Curiously, there is a lack of research investigating dolphins’ episodic memory,” University of Cambridge cognitive (认知的) scientist James Davies says. Therefore, this surprising fact encourages him to fill this gap.
The team used “where” and “who” questions in their research, each on a different test. Each dolphin was first trained to retrieve a ball from the water, and then trained to get a ball by approaching a person holding it in front of them while ignoring an empty-handed person standing at a different spot. During this training, the locations were randomized (使随机化) and the person holding the ball differed each time, so that those details were irrelevant to learning the retrieving behavior. Then, for the tests, the dolphins were asked to retrieve the ball as they had learned to do, but after 10 minutes, something changed-this time, the ball couldn’t be seen, as it was now behind one of the two people’s backs. In the “where” tests, the ball was hidden in the same spot as in the training, but both people had been changed, while in the “who” tests, the locations of the people changed but the ball remained with the person who’d had it previously.
Eight dolphins went through each of the two tests, separated by at least 48 hours. All the dolphins got it right in choosing the correct spot on the “where” experiments, and seven achieved success on the “who” experiments.
Kelly Jaakkola, a psychologist, says that based on their cognitive skills, dolphins are a good candidate for having episodic-like memory, and this study goes really far in showing that. She also says, “The more we look for such capabilities in non-human animals, the more species we’ll likely find them in.” She adds, “An exciting question is therefore ‘Where do we draw that line? Which animals do have it, which animals don’t, and what sort of cognitive or neurological or social characteristics do those animals share? ’ That’s going to be the fun part of the game.”
1. What does the underlined word “retrieve” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?A.Fetch. | B.Move. | C.Throw. | D.Play. |
A.The locations of the people involved in the tests. |
B.The memory tasks that dolphins need to perform. |
C.The ability of dolphins to communicate with humans. |
D.The dolphins’ characteristics related to their memory processing. |
A.Dolphins pass the tests as a result of training. |
B.It is very likely that dolphins are affected by people during the tests. |
C.Scientists will probably find episodic memory in all non-human animals. |
D.The influence of dolphins’ familiarity with a location or a person is avoided. |
A.Dolphins Are the Most Intelligent Animals |
B.Dolphins May Remember Personal Experiences |
C.Episodic Memory Is Important for Humans and Animals |
D.A Scientific Method Is Used to Study Dolphins’ Memory |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】We've known for years that plants can see,hear,smell and communicate with chemicals.Now, reported New Scientist,they have been recorded making sounds when stressed.
In a yet-to-be-published study, Itzhak Khait and his team at Tel Aviv University, in Israel, found that tomato and tobacco plants can make ultrasonic(超声的)noises. The plants "cry out" due to lack of water,or when they are cut. It's just too high-pitched(音调高的)for humans to hear.
Microphones placed 10 centimeters away from the plants picked up sounds in the ultrasonic range of 20 to 100 kilohertz(干赫兹)。Human hearing usually ranges from 20 hertz to 20 kilohertz."These findings can change the way we think about the plant kingdom,”they wrote.
On average,"thirsty"tomato plants made 35 sounds an hour,while tobacco plants made 11. When they were cut,tomato plants made an average of 25 sounds in the following hour,and tobacco plants 15.Unstressed plants produced less than one sound per hour,on average.
Perhaps most interestingly,different types of stress led to different sounds.The researchers trained a machine-learning model to separate the plants' sounds from those of the wind,rain and other noises of the greenhouse.In most cases,it correctly recognized whether the stress was caused by dryness or a cut.Water-hungry tobacco appears to make louder sounds than cut tobacco,for example.Although Khait and his colleagues only looked at tomato and tobacco plants,they think other plants also make sounds when stressed.
If farmers could hear these sounds,said the team,they could give water to the plants that need it most.As climate change causes more droughts,they said this would be important information for farmers. "The sounds that drought-stressed plants make could be used in precision(精准) agriculture, "said Anne Visscher at the Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew,in the UK.
Khait's report also suggests that insects can hear the sounds up to 5 meters away and respond. For example,a moth(蛾子)may decide not to lay eggs on a water-stressed plant.Edward Farmer. at the University of Lausanne,Switzerland,is doubtful.He said that the idea of moths listening to plants is"a little too speculative”。
If plants are screaming(尖叫)for fear of their survival,maybe we should be glad we can't hear them.
1. Paragraph 3 mainly explains_______.A.where humans differ from plants |
B.how the research was carried out |
C.what the findings of the study are |
D.why humans can't hear the cries of plants |
A.All plants make sounds when they feel hungry. |
B.Stressed plants make more sounds than unstressed ones. |
C.Tobacco plants are more afraid of thirsty than being cut. |
D.The more stressed a plant is,the louder sounds it makes. |
A.Surprising. |
B.Uncertain. |
C.Incorrect. |
D.Unique. |
A.Deaf humans |
B.Stressed plants |
C.Silent screams |
D.Precision agriculture |
【推荐2】Pets are like our family members and their good health is something that is very important to all pet owners. Just as the pollutants, such as carbon monoxide (一氧化物) and carbon dioxide in the air, affect our health, these same environmental nasties can affect our pets too.
Air purifiers have been brought into use in recent years. They work to remove harmful chemicals known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other environmental pollutants from the air.
Whether the air purifier improves or damages the health of our animals is also something we have to consider. The air purifiers are safe for pets, but only if they do not produce any ozone (臭氧) byproduct.
Picking the wrong air purifier type can quickly make things worse for our pets. On the other hand, picking the correct air purifier can lead to a big increase in the quality of life for them.
A.At present many homes are equipped with these useful devices. |
B.Before buying an air purifier, we should keep two aspects in mind. |
C.Pet owners always pay close attention to the physical health of their pets. |
D.Even the smallest pets shouldn’t be able to access the insides of air purifiers. |
E.This greatly depends on the type of air purifier and air cleaning technology used. |
F.So always check the product specifications and try to find a model that does not produce any carbon monoxide. |
G.A 2008 study published in Brain and Cognition showed that dogs’ brains were negatively affected by the heavy pollution levels. |
【推荐3】Ever wondered if dogs can learn new words? Yes, say researchers as they have found that talented dogs may have the ability to learn new words after hearing them only four times.
While previous evidence(以前的证据)seems to show that most dogs do not learn words, unless very well trained, a few individuals(个体) have shown some extraordinary(不一般的) abilities, according to a study published in the journal Scientific Reports.
“We wanted to know under which conditions the talented dogs may learn new words,” said researcher xuekw Claudia Fugazza from the Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary(匈牙利). For the study, the team involved(包含)two gifted dogs, Whisky and Vicky Nina. The team exposed(暴露)the dogs to the new words in two different conditions.
In the exclusion-based(基于排除的)task, presented with seven known toys and one new toy, the dogs were able to select(选择)the new toy when presented with a new name. Researchers say this proves that dogs can choose by exclusion(排除)when faced with a new word, they selected the only toy which did not have a known name.
However, this was not the way they would learn the name of the toy. In fact, when they were presented with one more equally(同等地)new name to test their ability to recognize the toy by its name, the dogs got totally confused and failed.
The other condition, the social one, where the dogs played with their owners who pronounced the name of the toy while playing with the dog, proved to be the successful way to learn the name of the toy, even after hearing it only 4 times. “The rapid learning that we observed seems to equal children’s ability to learn many new words at a fast velocity around the age of 18 months,” Fugazza says. “But we do not know whether the learning mechanisms(机制)behind this learning are the same for humans and dogs. ”
To test whether most dogs would learn words this way, 20 other dogs were tested in the same condition, but none of them showed any evidence of learning the toy names, confirming(确认)that the ability to learn words rapidly in the absence(缺乏)of formal training is very rare(少) and is only present in a few talented dogs.
1. What was the purpose of the study published in Scientific Reports?A.To better train dogs’ ability to learn new words. |
B.To further make sure of previous evidence about dogs. |
C.To confirm the dogs can learn words. |
D.To find out suitable conditions for gifted dogs’ new-word learning. |
A.Slow to understand. | B.Quick to learn. |
C.In puzzlement. | D.In surprise. |
A.Learning through playing applied to most dogs. |
B.The social condition helped dogs learn new words. |
C.Dogs’ new-word learning turned out to be less effective. |
D.Dogs shared similar learning mechanisms with children. |
A.speed | B.quality |
C.time | D.journey |
【推荐1】Now researchers are looking closely at how “green” our payment systems are. They’ve found buyers can help cut some environmental costs, no matter how they pay.
To measure the full “cost” to society of money, researchers examined the life cycle of a U. S. penny. People mine zinc(锌) and copper(铜) rocks at different places. Multiple steps go into separating the metals from these rocks. The metals then go to a factory. Copper coats each side of a thicker zinc layer. Then the metal is shaped into disks known as coin blanks. Those disks travel to U.S. Mint plants. Different processes there form the disks into coins.
Packaged coins travel to banks that are part of the Federal Reserve, the United States’ central bank. These banks ship the pennies out to local banks for release to the public. All of those steps use energy and produce waste.
Years later, Federal Reserve banks collect worn-out pennies. These are melted and destroyed. Again, every step requires energy—and produces pollution.
But cash is more than just pennies. Most countries also use banknotes or bills. Great Britain began its switch from cotton-fiber paper to plastic in 2016. Shonfield, one of the researchers, compared the environmental impacts of the two types of bills.
Both types of bills had advantages and disadvantages, he found. On balance, their report found, plastic bills last longer. So over time, “you don’t have to create nearly as many banknotes with plastic notes as with paper,” Shonfield says. That cuts the overall need for raw materials and energy. And, he adds, plastic bills are thinner than paper ones. More of them fit into ATMs than older paper bills. So, keeping the machines full takes fewer trips.
Shonfield’s group concluded that about 31 percent of those environmental impacts came from making coins. A much bigger share—64 percent—came from energy for running ATMs and transporting bills and coins. Fewer ATMs and more renewable energy could reduce those impacts, the study concluded.
1. What feature of “disks” is mentioned?A.They are of different value. | B.They have nothing on them. |
C.They are of different sizes. | D.They are made of plastic. |
A.By doing various experiments. | B.By observing the way people pay. |
C.By examining the life cycle of a penny. | D.By analyzing the raw materials of coins. |
A.Paper bills produce less waste than coins. |
B.Pennies will retire from the stage of history. |
C.Coins make use of less energy than paper bills. |
D.Plastic bills are more environmentally friendly. |
A.The ways we pay affect our planet. |
B.Money produces most waste when in use. |
C.“Green” payment systems are catching on. |
D.E-payment can also pollute the environment. |
【推荐2】Over a million children have developed some form of intellectual (智力) disability over the past two decades after being exposed to chemicals including flame retardants, pesticides, lead, and mercury, a study has revealed.
The study focused on the four chemicals, which can be crossed from a mother to her unborn baby through the placenta(胎盘)and cause neurodevelopmental damage. The researchers looked at data from past studies, including blood samples taken from women of childbearing age and 5-year-olds.
Over the period, flame retardants, resulted in 738,860 cases of intellectual disability and an estimated 162 million lost IQ (智商)points, followed by lead at 330,684 cases, pesticides at 111,830, and mercury at 8,860. In recent years, pesticides and flame retardants have overtaken lead and mercury as the chemicals responsible for the biggest loss of IQ among children.
The researchers believe this is due to regulations cutting down the use of these chemicals. For instance, lead has been banned from gasoline, paint and drinking water systems in the U.S. and plants are not allowed to pump out mercury.
The researchers acknowledged limitations to their study, including that the exposure-response relationships might not relate to all populations. Positively, they found a huge drop in the estimated loss of IQ points among children.
Lead researcher Abigail Gaylord, commented: "Our findings suggest that our efforts to reduce exposure to heavy metals are paying off, but that harmful exposures in general continue to represent a terrible risk to people's physical, mental, and economic health. "Unfortunately, the minimal policies in place to remove pesticides and flame retardants are clearly not enough," she said.
She also added. Frequently opening windows to let persistent chemicals found in furniture electronics, and carpeting escape, and eating certified organic produce can educe exposure to these harmful things"
1. Which contributes most to the loss of children's IQ?A.Flame retardants. | B.Pesticide. |
C.Lead. | D.Mercury. |
A.A school report. | B.A science fiction. |
C.A scientific research. | D.A chemistry book. |
A.It has received bad response from all populations. |
B.It has no previous information to refer to. |
C.It covers only part of the population. |
D.It is not supported by government policies. |
A.Four chemicals harming children. |
B.Regulations cutting down the use of heavy metals. |
C.Environment risking people's physical and mental health. |
D.Children IQ lowered by exposure to harmful chemicals. |
【推荐3】People with bigger brains tend to score higher on standardized tests of intelligence, according to new study findings.
However, the study author Dr. Michael A.McDaniel of the Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond emphasized that these findings represent a general trend, and people with small heads should not automatically believe they are less intelligent. For instance, Albert Einstein's brain was "not particularly large", McDaniel noted." There's some relationship between brain size and intelligence on the average, but there's plenty of room for exceptions," he said.
Interest in the relationship between brain size and intelligence grew in the1830s, when German anatomist(解剖学家) Frederich Tiedmann wrote that he believed there was "an unquestionable connection between the size of the brain and the mental energy displayed by the individual man". Since that statement, scientists have conducted numerous studies to determine if Tiedmann's assertion was correct. Most studies have looked into the link between head size and intelligence. More recently, however, researchers have published additional studies on brain size and intelligence, measured using MRI scan(核磁共振成像扫描).
For his study, McDaniel analyzed more than 20 studies that looked into the relationship between brain size and intelligence in a total of 1,530 people. The studies showed that on the average, people with larger brain volume tended to be more intelligent. The relationship between brain volume and intelligence was stronger in women than men, and in adults than in children. McDaniel notes in the journal Intelligence.
McDaniel is not sure why the relationship was stronger for adults and women. "Other research has shown that women, on the average, tend to have smaller brains than men, but score just as well—if not higher—in tests of intelligence," he said.
McDaniel insisted that the relationship between brain size and intelligence is not a "perfect" one. "One can certainly find lots of examples of smaller-sized people who are highly intelligent," he said, "But, on the average, the relationship holds."
1. What does the text mainly talk about?A.MRI scans are applied to intelligence. |
B.On the average, a bigger brain means higher IQ. |
C.Dr McDaniel did well in his intelligence study. |
D.Scientists are interested in Tiedmann's idea. |
A.Albert Einstein was intelligent |
B.the result of intelligence test was false |
C.being hard working is more important than intelligence |
D.brain size doesn't necessarily decide the level of intelligence |
A.many scientists agreed with him |
B.numerous studies have failed to prove his idea |
C.MRI scan became popularly used |
D.lots of researchers were interested in the connections between head size and intelligence |
【推荐1】Scientists recently discovered that pictures on cave walls at Creswell Crags are the oldest known in Great Britain. But they didn’t find out in the usual way.
Archaeologists (考古学家) often date cave art with a process called radiocarbon dating. The technique can measure the age of carbon found in charcoal (木炭) drawings or painted pictures. Carbon is an element found in many things, including charcoal and even people. But in this case, there was no paint or charcoal to test. People carved the pictures of animals and figures into the rock using stone tools. The scientists had an “aha!” moment when they noticed small rocks stuck to the top of the drawings. The small rocks must have formed after the drawings were made.
“It is rare to be able to scientifically date rock art,” said Alistair Pike, an archaeological scientist at Britain’s University of Bristol. “We were very fortunate that some of the engravings (雕刻) were covered by stalagmites (石笋).”
When a test proved that the stalagmites formed 12,800 years ago, the scientists knew the art underneath them had to be at least that old. And some of the animals shown are now extinct — another clue that the art is quite old.
The artists came to Creswell Crags. This place is one of the farthest points north reached by our ancient ancestors during the Ice Age. At that time, much of the North Sea was dry, so people could move about more easily.
Some tools and bones found there are 13,000 to 15,000 years old. They show that the travelers hunted horses, reindeer, and arctic hares. Their artwork is similar to art in France and Germany. It tells scientists that the Creswell Crags artists must have had a close connection to peoples several thousand kilometers away — another important evidence of understanding how humans spread out across the world.
1. How did the scientists feel when they found rocks on the top of the drawings?A.Fairly confusing. | B.Pleasantly surprised. |
C.Completely satisfied. | D.Extremely proud. |
A.Some pictures were covered by stalagmites formed long ago. |
B.The majority of the animals carved into the stone are extinct. |
C.The cave is one of the farthest points in the world. |
D.The art was carved into the stone with stone tools. |
A.How ancient people crossed the North Sea. |
B.Why some of the animals have died out. |
C.How humans spread out across the world. |
D.What ancient people had for food at that time. |
A.Cave Art About Animals Is Most Beautiful |
B.Cave Art Is Found In the Usual Way |
C.Cave Art Turns Out to Be Britain’s Oldest |
D.Cave Art Has a Great Influence on Britain |
【推荐2】Whether shyness is part of your child’s personality or just something they feel when they are in front of a group of strangers, it is a typical experience. “Shyness isn’t always as socially valued as more outgoing personalities. However, we should step back and think about different personalities and their unique advantages,” said Pérez-Edgar, professor of psychology (心理学) at The Pennsylvania State University. “Everyone can feel shy at times. And those who are especially shy often have happy social lives --they just aren’t likely to be the liveliest person in a crowded room.”
But there are things to watch out for. If your children are avoiding situations that are important or could be enjoyable for them because they’re feeling nervous, it might be time to take action, said Chiappini, a child expert. “That could mean not speaking in class, trouble making friends, or not joining in activities they like.” she said.
Chiappini recommended first saying something like: “You seem a little nervous or unsure about who everyone is/what to say . We haven’t met them before and that can feel a little uncomfortable.” From there, you can encourage them to join someone or say something when they are ready ---with the promise that you will be there to support them, she added.
The more we avoid situations where kids may feel shy, the more anxiety (担心) we will have about them in the future. But that doesn’t mean to push your child into the deep end.
“We may have to deal with the situation step by step. For example, you may have to encourage your child just to make eye contact during an outing before expecting them to ask someone a question,” Chiappini said.
1. What may Pérez - Edgar agree with?A.Shyness is not as bad as people have thought. |
B.Children are more likely to feel shy than adults. |
C.Shy people like to stay with lively people. |
D.It’s difficult for people to get over shyness. |
A.When they ask for instructions from others. |
B.When they feel nervous in school activities. |
C.When they try hard to mix with other children. |
D.When they are absent from important situations. |
A.Tell their kids what they should say. |
B.Ask their kids how they are feeling. |
C.Help their kids stay away from some situations. |
D.Show their kids they understand how they feel. |
A.Parents should be strict with the shy children. |
B.Parents should push the shy children to be outgoing. |
C.Parents should be patiently guide the shy children. |
D.Parents should encourage shy children to make eye contact with them. |
【推荐3】Hey Jude is the Beatles song most likely to be bellowed by a choir of thousands. Any good song needs to be singable, but Hey Jude goes further: It's yellable and flexible. Into the gap after “Nahh, na, na, nahh-na-na, nahh”, you can slot(把....放入) almost any pair of syllables.
It's a crowd-pleaser. This month, Hey Jude was the No.1 Beatles song on Apple Music; On Spotify, it was No.4. So, of all the countless classics the Beatles recorded, Hey Jude is one of the four that younger music lovers most want to hear. What is its secret?
Written by McCartney, Hey Jude bears his signature touch: empathy(同情) set to elegance. As McCartney melodies go,it's direct, running straight into its title, just like She Loves You. The tune and the idea of the lyrics came to McCartney in 1968, when he was driving from London to Surrey to see Julian Lennon after John had left him for Yoko Ono, a Japanese singer and songwriter. Hey Jude began as Hey Jules, like an arm around the shoulder of a five-year-old, so the compassion was there all along.
By then, Lennon and McCartney were writing separately, but still acting as each other's sounding board. After working on Hey Jude some more, McCartney invited Lennon to his house and played it to him. One line, “The movement you need is on your shoulder”, was there as a placeholder(占位符). McCartney thought “it's not that good”,but Lennon believed“that's the best line in it”.
These exchange,recounted by McCartney in 1994, had two consequences, beyond preserving the line.“You love it twice as much", he said; it would forever remind him of Lennon: It's an emotional point in the song.
1. What do we know about Hey Jude?A.It was a gift for Yoko Ono. | B.It is named after McCartney' s son. |
C.It is one of the most popular Beatles songs. | D.It was completed all by McCartney. |
A.To comfort Julian. | B.To make a fortune. |
C.To help John Lennon. | D.To make himself more popular. |
A.Confident and stubborn | B.Enthusiastic and hardworking. |
C.Talented and warm-hearted. | D.Humorous and friendly. |
A.A moving love story |
B.A devoted father and his son |
C.Hey Jude, the most valuable gift from the Beatles |
D.How Hey Jude became one of our favorite Beatles songs |