组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科学技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:419 题号:19704034

Researchers from Texas A&M University have developed a new bioremediation technology (生物整治技术) using plant-based material and fungi (真菌) that could clean up per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also called “forever chemicals” or PFAS, are found in soil, water, and even human and animal blood and may be harmful to humans and other species. They are found just about everywhere, from food wrappers to clothing. These chemicals may affect the immune system and may cause liver damage. Extremely high exposures to PFAS may also be linked to cancer.

“PFAS do not degrade (降解) easily in the environment and are poisonous even in a very low concentration,” said Susie Dai, associate professor from Texas A&M. “They must be removed and destroyed to prevent human exposure and negative impacts on the ecosystem. PFAS are so stable and they can occur in water in a very low concentration and you have to concentrate them and then destroy them.”

The only way to actually get rid of these “forever chemicals” is by burning them, which is a long and expensive process. But Texas A&M researchers have found a new way to use a plant-based material that adsorbs the pollutants. As explained by ScienceDirect, adsorption is “The use of solids for removing substances from either gas or liquid.” The adsorbent material is then consumed by microbial fungi. The team recently published their findings for the process framework, which they call RAPIMER, in Nature.

“The plant’s cell wall material serves as a framework to adsorb the PFAS,” Dai explained. “Then this material and the adsorbed chemical serve as food for a microbial fungus. Then it’s gone, and you don’t have the disposal problem.”

This sustainable PFAS clean-up system could be mass-produced for commercial use, leading to a better way to remove these chemical pollutants from the environment. It could also come in handy as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers creating PFAS thresholds (阈值) to its water quality standards.

1. What is mainly explained in paragraph 2?
A.PFAS’s existing forms.B.PFAS’s doubtful origins.
C.PFAS’s potential dangers.D.PFAS’s wide applications.
2. What did Susie Dai say about PFAS?
A.They are unstable.
B.They degrade easily in the environment.
C.They survive longer in water than in the air.
D.They are poisonous even in a low concentration.
3. What happens after the plant-based material adsorbs the pollutants?
A.The material gets eaten.B.The material becomes solid.
C.The material falls into small pieces.D.The material goes on to adsorb fungi.
4. What is the author’s attitude towards the plant-based material?
A.Carefree.B.Worried.C.Positive.D.Reserved.
【知识点】 科学技术 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】On Sept 25, a team of doctors made medical history. In a two-hour procedure, led by Dr Robert Montgomery at New York University (NYU) Langone Health in the US, doctors successfully attached a kidney (肾) from a genetically-engineered (转基因的) pig to a human. The kidney functioned normally and wasn’t rejected (排斥) by the person’s immune system.

Montgomery said that the success was great. “It was a kidney that was immediately functioning,” Montgomery told CBS News.

The recipient (接受者) was a brain-dead patient with signs of kidney dysfunction (功能障碍) whose family agreed to the experiment before she was due to be taken off life support, researchers told Reuters.

For three days, the kidney was attached to the patient’s blood vessels (血管) by the upper leg and kept outside her body.

This kidney was never meant to serve as a permanently functioning organ for the patient. Instead, the point of the operation was to test whether the body would reject the organ. Researchers have been working toward the possibility of using animal organs, for example pigs’, for transplants for years. The problem lies in how to prevent the body from rejecting the organ.

This is where the idea of using an organ from a genetically-engineered pig came into play.

According to Popular Science, pig cells contain a sugar molecule (分子) that is foreign to the human body and causes organ rejection. Montgomery’s team thought that using a genetically-engineered pig that wouldn’t produce this sugar molecule would overcome the problem of organ rejection. This could give hope to many common people.

Montgomery said that the NYU kidney transplant (移植) experiment would bring hope for patients with kidney failure, possibly in the next year or two, CNN reported.

While there is still much to be done before entire pig organs are regularly used in people, the future itself is encouraging. Amy Friedman told The New York Times that she hopes that in the future, it will be possible to use other organs grown in pigs as well. “ It’s truly unbelievable to think of how many transplants we might be able to offer.”

1. What was the aim of the experiment?
A.To find out what causes kidney dysfunction.
B.To test if the animal organ would be rejected.
C.To study what causes the human body to reject an organ.
D.To see what kinds of animal organs could work in humans.
2. How did the researchers overcome the challenge ?
A.By enlarging the sugar molecule.
B.By adjusting the position of the kidney.
C.By using a genetically-engineered pig.
D.By adding a sugar molecule to the organ.
3. What’s the meaning of the experiment?
A.It developed a permanently functioning organ.
B.It provides a perfect solution to kidney failure.
C.It is the first time a brain-dead patient has been cured.
D.It marks a step toward using pig kidneys for transplants.
4. What’s Friedman’s attitude toward the prospect of using entire pig organs for transplants?
A.Doubtful.B.Worried.
C.Positive.D.Uncertain.
2021-11-25更新 | 136次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要讲述了可以通过在农田作物附近种植花卉来提高天敌的产量以消灭害虫,并保护农作物的方法。

【推荐2】Predatory (捕食类的) insects benefit greatly from flowers and can even survive for long periods of time on nectar (花蜜) and pollen (花粉) alone, according to a new study. Farmers can promote a production of natural enemies to defeat pests (害虫) by planting flowers near crops in their fields.

“Pollen and nectar are things that beneficial insects can survive on when pests aren't around. By planting a wide variety of flowers both early and late in the season, one can ensure a good effect that ensures the survival of predators throughout the growing season,” says Lene Sigsgaard, professor of the plant and environmental sciences department at the University of Copenhagen. This is good news for the green transition, as effective pest control can help reduce the use of agricultural pesticides. Besides, the presence of more flowers improves pollination and biodiversity, as they attract more insects and pollinators into fields.”

In order for predatory Insects to approach flower nectar, easily approachable open flowers need to be planted, as predatory insects aren't equipped with the long feeding tubes that bees have, the researchers say. Food from flowers boosts energy for predators. Specifically, the researchers found that across all predatory insects, females survive 2.2 times longer getting access to flowers, and males 1.7 times longer, compared to insects that only have access to water.

“It pays to design tomorrow’s agriculture so as to plant wild flowering plants alongside fields. For the greatest impact, we are looking at how to design flowering fields that benefit both predatory insects and pollinators. This will reduce the need for other forms of pest control while supporting biodiversity.” Lene says. The researchers recommend native, continuous flowers to create habitats for predatory insects, places where they can winter as well. It is also important to have a wide variety of species that produce flowers during different seasons and benefit different insects.

1. Why did the researchers suggest planting flowers next to crops?
A.To help crops grow faster.B.To make flowers grow stronger.
C.To make full use of natural resources.D.To ensure the supply of predatory insects.
2. What can we learn about predatory insects in Paragraph 3?
A.They mainly feed on nectar.B.They have difficulty getting energy.
C.They can live longer feeding on flowers.D.They can get access to any flowers easily.
3. What is implied in Lene’s words in the last paragraph?
A.Designing flowering fields properly has significant influence.
B.Maintaining biodiversity is important to agriculture.
C.It is beneficial to create various habitats for insects.
D.It is necessary to have good pest control.
4. What does the text mainly talk about?
A.A way to improve biodiversity.
B.A way to grow flowers fast and well.
C.A way to protect crops against pests in fields.
D.A way to increase agricultural production quickly.
2022-08-23更新 | 289次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约480词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。文章作者介绍了日本有名的HENN-NA餐馆使用机器人为人们提供服务,并分析了人工智能带来的利与弊。

【推荐3】Visitors to HENN-NA, a restaurant outside Nagasaki, Japan, are greeted by an odd sight:   their food being prepared by a row of humanoid robots that look like the Terminator. H. I. S., the company that runs the restaurant, as well as a nearby hotel where robots check guests into their rooms and help with their luggage, turned to automation partly out of necessity. Japan’s population is shrinking, and its economy is booming; the unemployment rate is only 2.8 percent. “Using robots makes a lot of sense in a country like Japan,” said CEO Hideo Sawada.

Sawada predicts that 70 percent of the jobs at Japan’s hotels will be automated in the next five years. “It takes about a year to two to get your money back,” he said. “But since you can work them 24 hours a day, and they don’t need vacation, eventually it’s more cost-efficient to use the robot.”

This may seem like a vision of the future best suited—perhaps only suited—to Japan. But according to Michael Chui, a partner at the McKinsey Global Institute, many tasks in the food-service and accommodation industry are exactly the kind that are easily automated. Chui’s latest research estimates that 54 percent of the tasks workers perform in American restaurants and hotels could be automated using currently available technologies.

The robots, in fact, are already here. Chowbotics, a company in Redwood City, California, manufactures Sally, a boxy robot that prepares salads ordered on a touch screen. Botlr, a robot butler, now brings guests extra towels and toiletries in dozens of hotels around the country.

This seems to be worrying. America’s economy isn’t developing nearly as smoothly as Japan’s, and one of the few bright spots in recent years has been employment in restaurants and hotels, which have added more jobs than almost any other industry. That growth, in fact, has helped dull the blow that automation has delivered to other industries. The food-service and accommodation industry now employs 13. 7 million American. Since 2013, it has accounted for more jobs than manufacturing.

These new positions once seemed safe from robots because they required a human touch in a way that manufacturing or mining jobs did not. When ordering a coffee or checking into a hotel, human beings want to interact with other human beings—or so we thought. The companies bringing robots into the service industry are betting that we’ll be happy to trade our relationship with robotic waiters or clerks for greater efficiency. They’re also confident that adding robots won’t necessarily mean cutting human jobs.

1. According to the writer, why was it partly out of necessity that H. I. S. turned to automation?
A.It’s hard to find employees in Japan.
B.The Japanese are used to using robots.
C.Robotic technology is advanced in Japan.
D.Japan’s economy develops less fast than expected.
2. According to Michael Chui, which of the following statements is true?
A.It is no easy job to automate tasks in the hotel industry.
B.Restaurant workers can be easily replaced by robots.
C.Technologies need upgrading to pave the way for robotic waiters.
D.Robots now perform 54% of the tasks in American restaurants and hotels.
3. Why does the automation in American restaurants and hotels seem worrying?
A.The manufacturing industry is waiting to be automated.
B.America’s economy is developing at an unexpected rate.
C.Automation has already had a negative effect on the service industry.
D.These two industries contribute much to America’s employment rate.
4. It can be inferred that companies bringing robots into the service industry think that ________.
A.the human touch may not matter that much
B.profit is more important than customer satisfaction
C.manufacturing or mining jobs require human interaction
D.robots will rob humans of their jobs at the cost of efficiency
2022-11-05更新 | 191次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般