组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:114 题号:19794807

Some people say that the planet is getting smaller, that there are few places left to explore, and that the age of exploration will be over soon.

I would argue instead that there has never been a greater need to explore. That’s because the stage for all exploration is the natural world, and nature is experiencing a rapid decline. It is by exploring that we understand and when we understand we develop an appreciation for what is found. Ultimately, only the things we appreciate are worth protecting.

As the golden age of exploration weakens, so does the richness of life on Earth. It isn’t just that there are fewer blank areas on the map; it is that wild places and spaces have been progressively carved up (瓜分). Visiting the Okavango Delta or Kalahari Desert, for example, no longer implies a self-supported expedition. Field stations pop up in important national parks and remote sensing by satellite becomes commonplace.

In the next century, I believe we will need larger and wilder areas. We will need the wilderness, not just for the protection of it, but because it is an important part of the ecosystems from which we gain our necessities like clean water, food and materials. If we succeed, then expeditions — brief travels into the wild that seek to answer questions, monitor populations, and inspire action — will have a renewed sense of purpose. More importantly, they greatly help the public experience, understand and appreciate nature.

Based on my own research expedition which aims to understand “edge effects” — how the changes in temperature at forest edges impact animals, I find it important that today’s scientists continue to spend time in the field. It is here that they begin to understand how seemingly unrelated environmental interactions influence their study system. Sometimes, it’s difficult to know which is important to measure until you stand out there on the forest edge.

It is the young generation that is the main force to lead the next wave of expeditions. The measure of their success will be whether there are still well-preserved wild places for expeditions in the future. Their leadership is needed now, more than ever.

1. What’s the purpose of this text?
A.To suggest understanding nature by keeping exploring.
B.To advise people not to travel to unknown places.
C.To inform us about the reduced biodiversity.
D.To call on the public to support the study.
2. What can we know about the expedition in wild spaces from Paragraph 3?
A.It is difficult for explorers to make progress.
B.It is more accessible with the help of technology.
C.It promotes the development of satellite technology.
D.It requires explorers to take sufficient heavy equipment.
3. What does the underlined part “pop up” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Appear unexpectedly.B.Close temporarily.
C.Develop quickly.D.Differ greatly.
4. What does the author realize after his research expedition?
A.The significance of scientists’ field trip.
B.The difficulty of carrying out fieldwork.
C.The need to expand the edges of forests.
D.The influence of his study on the environment.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了凯特·格林和其他五人在夏威夷莫纳罗亚火山山顶与世隔绝地生活了四个月,体验了在火星上的生活可能是什么样子。

【推荐1】Heavy space suits, limited electricity and water, no communication with the outside world, or no fresh fruits and vegetables, you wouldn’t be mistaken if you’re picturing a space mission to Mars. And that’s exactly what NASA wanted with their copied Mar’s training programming.

For four months, Kate Green and five others lived in isolation(隔离)at the top of the Hawaiian volcano of Mauna Loa. Though not real astronauts, they lived, worked, and slept inside of a specially built circular house in order to understand what life on Mars could be like. In her new book, Once Upon a Time I Lived on Mars: Space, Exploration, and Life on Earth, Kate writes about her experiences and what human exploration really means.

Here’s some of what she wrote: "As expected, while I was away on Mars my home changed as well. When an astronaut comes back, Earth isn’t where it was. The whole system has changed from under and all around. It’s like anything, though. You leave and come back, and home isn’t what it was. But sometimes leaving is the only way to know it was ever home in the first place."

In the days and weeks after returning to Earth, my partners and I ate fresh fruits and vegetables and we shared some of our more personal observations during the mission, all in service, we believed, of a better imagined future trip to Mars. Those early days back home are something of being unclear, though I do recall the strength of certain sensations(知觉). Loud noises easily frightened me. It took days for me to not actively notice even the slightest wind on my skin.

Although tough and unknown, we must believe that we humans can better explore space through our on-going efforts.

1. Why did Kate and her partners live in the circular house?
A.To train an astronaut.B.To earn a lot of money.
C.To experience virtual life on Mars.D.To collect writing materials for a book.
2. What can we infer from the third paragraph?
A.The home on Mars has changed.
B.The earth system has been damaged.
C.Only leaving makes you know the meaning of home.
D.Kate has to adapt to two different living conditions.
3. What is the author’s attitude towards the space exploration?
A.Unconcerned.B.Doubtful.C.Positive.D.Unclear.
4. From which is the text probably taken?
A.A biology textbook.B.A science magazine.
C.A fitness paper.D.A travel brochure.
2022-07-03更新 | 110次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了在疫情的情况下,疫苗并不能有效的阻止新冠的传播,最有效的办法是戴上口罩,保持适当距离。

【推荐2】The vaccine (疫苗) news continues to seem very encouraging. Britain started its mass vaccination effort and the U. S. isn’t far behind. But there is still one dark cloud hanging over the vaccines that many people don’t yet understand. The vaccines will be much less effective at preventing death and illness if they are introduced into a population where the coronavirus is still severe-as is now the case in the U.S.

A vaccine is like a fire hose (消防龙头). A vaccine that is 95 percent effective, as Moderna’s and Pfizer’s versions appear to be, is a powerful fire hose. But the size of a fire is still a bigger determinant of how much destruction occurs.

At the current level of infection in the U. S.(about 160,000 confirmed new infections per day), a vaccine that is 95 percent effective — distributed at the expected pace — would still leave a terrible toll (伤亡人数) after it was introduced. Almost 36 million or so Americans have caught the virus, and more than 600,000 have died. This is far worse than the toll in a different situation where the vaccine was only 50 percent effective. However, it’s worth pausing for a moment on this comparison. If the U.S. maintained its current infection rate and Moderna and Pfizer announced that their vaccines were only 50 percent effective, a lot of people would panic.

But the reality we have is actually worse. How could this be? No vaccine can get rid of a pandemic immediately, just as no fire hose can put out a forest fire. While the vaccine is being distributed, the virus continues to do damage.

There is one positive way to look at this: Measures that reduce the virus’s spread — like mask-wearing, social distancing and rapid-result testing — can still have great consequences. They will save many lives in coming months.

1. According to the passage,what is the public’s attitude to the effects of the vaccine?
A.Critical.
B.Optimistic.
C.Worred.
D.Neutral.
2. How does the author mainly present his argument?
A.By giving definitions.
B.By classifying facts.
C.By drawing comparisons.
D.By appealing to emotions.
3. We can infer from Paragraph 3 that ________.
A.fewer people will die if the infection rate is lower
B.the US have controlled the spread of the coronavirus
C.the death toll in the next months will be reduced a lot
D.the vaccines are less effective than expected
4. Which does the author think is a better way to save lives?
A.Improving the effectiveness of the vaccines.
B.Producing a greater variety of vaccines.
C.Looking at the situation in a positive way.
D.Wearing masks and practicing social distancing.
2022-12-06更新 | 48次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。研究发现,草原上野火发生的频率随着大型食草动物的灭绝而大幅增加。

【推荐3】Many large plant eaters have been wiped out in the past 50,000 years. Now a study has found that the continents that lost the most of these animals had the biggest increases in wildfires in grasslands.

“There’s evidence today that herbivores (食草动物) can limit wildfires by reducing fuel load,” says Allison Karp at Yale University. “In fact, some advocates of rewilding argue that restoring large herbivores can help reduce wildfires.”

A few studies have already found that there have been more fires in specific regions after the loss of large herbivores during the past 50, 000 years. Karp and her colleagues decided to look at the global picture by analyzing two databases from official websites. One, called HerbiTraits, has information on all herbivores larger than 10 kilograms that have lived in the past 130, 000 years. The other, called the Global Paleofire Database, has records of charcoal (木炭) deposited in lakes from 160 sites worldwide, which show changes in fire activity nearby.

The team found that the biggest increases in fire activity were in the continents, such as South America, which lost the most large herbivores, with lower increases where there were fewer extinctions, such as in Africa.

“The relation between herbivore extinctions and changes in fire activity is really strong,” Karp says.

Karp says her study cannot tell us anything about the effects of this increased fire activity. But other studies suggest that they were dramatic. After humans wiped out Australia’s large herbivores, for instance, increased fire activity led to a great loss of the continent s vegetation.

The reasons for the loss of so many large herbivores around the world during this period are still debated. It’s clear that many were hard hit by climate changes related to the last ice age, but human hunting may have been the killer factors in most cases.

1. What does Allison Karp mainly convey in paragraph 2?
A.Herbivores help to reduce wildfires.B.Most large herbivores are in danger.
C.Rewilding has met many challenges.D.Wildfires are very common worldwide.
2. How did Allison Karp and her colleagues draw their conclusion?
A.By doing experiments in labs.B.By comparing previous studies.
C.By analyzing two existing databases.D.By collecting online questionnaires.
3. Which of the following best explains the word “dramatic” underlined in paragraph 6?
A.Beneficial.B.Tiny.C.Confusing.D.Shocking.
4. From which section of a newspaper is the text most probably found?
A.Travel.B.Environment.C.Technology.D.Agriculture.
2022-06-07更新 | 142次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般