组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:40 题号:20015932

Babies appear to know how to help those in need, according to researchers who studied signs of altruism in almost 100 children. Researchers who wanted to see whether children would give up their food to give it to a stranger without encouragement found the kids just did that — even when they were hungry.

The scientists recruited 96 19-month-old children. During the experiments, a child and a researcher sat across from each other. In the control group, the researcher threw a piece of fruit onto a plate beyond reach, but the child could reach. The researcher showed no expression and made no attempt to get the fruit back. In contrast, the researcher in the test group pretended to accidentally drop the fruit on the plate, and then reach for it unsuccessfully. This signaled to the opposite child that the adult wanted the fruit. Among the test group, 58 percent of the children picked up the fruit and gave it to the adult, compared to 4% in the control group.

Next, the team explored if children would still be generous when the cost was raised. The same scenes as the experiment above were repeated with a separate group of kids before their lunchtime, when they were likely to be hungry. Similarly, 37 percent of the test group handed over the fruit, compared with none in the control group.

The experiments were repeated four times. Researchers got similar results each time. Babies with siblings (兄弟姐妹) and babies from Latino or Asian families shared more of the fruit, the team also found.

Carter Morgan, lead professor of the study, said, “We often think of babies as selfish persons. But here we find that they are willing to help others even when it comes at some ‘cost’ to themselves.” Addressing why children with siblings or from certain cultural backgrounds were more likely to share, Morgan said , “ We believe this partly reflects what social psychologists call ‘interdependence’, which stresses the importance of interpersonal connections. These social experiences that shape attitudes towards sharing appear to have an effect very early in life.”

1. What does the underlined word “altruism” in Para.1 most probably mean?
A.Courage.B.Creativity.C.Selflessness.D.Independence.
2. What can we know about 19-month-old children from the experiments?
A.They can classify different fruits.
B.They understand signals for help.
C.They can express their needs freely.
D.They know what time to have lunch.
3. What is the difference of the second experiment compared with the first?
A.The second experiment was less persuasive.
B.Children in the second experiment were less generous.
C.Children in the second experiment were more likely to be hungry.
D.Children in the second experiment were more motivated to take the fruit for themselves.
4. What can we learn from the text?
A.Attitudes towards sharing change greatly as people get older.
B.Babies from families with an only child are more willing to share.
C.It’s easier to control babies’selfish desires when they are hungry.
D.Social experiences play a role in affecting babies’behavior of sharing.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,介绍了研究发现,追求完美会对身心健康产生严重后果。

【推荐1】If you are a perfectionist, you are probably familiar with the feeling of wanting to get everything just right. You may struggle with handing in papers, agonize over projects at work, and even worry about small errors from the past. High standards are one thing, but perfectionism is quite another. And as some researchers have discovered, pursuing perfection can have serious consequences to both mental and physical well-being.

According to researchers, perfectionists hold themselves to unrealistically high standards and become self-critical if they believe they haven’t met these standards. Perfectionists are also likely to feel guilt and shame if they experience failures, which often leads them to avoid situations where they are worried they might fail.

In one study, researchers looked at a total of 284 studies (with over 57,000 participants) and found that perfectionism was associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and eating disorders. They also found that people higher in perfectionism (i.e. participants who more strongly identified with perfectionist traits) also reported higher levels of overall psychological distress.

In an article published in 2016, researchers looked at how perfectionism and depression were related over time. They found that people higher in perfectionism tended to have increases in depression symptoms, which suggests that perfectionism may be a risk factor for developing depression. In other words, although people may think of their perfectionism as something that helps them succeed, it appears that their perfectionism may actually be harmful for their mental health.

Since perfectionism is associated with negative outcomes, what can someone with perfectionist tendencies do to change their behavior? Although people are sometimes hesitant to give up their perfectionist tendencies, psychologists point out that giving up on perfection doesn’t mean being less successful. In fact, because mistakes are an important part of learning and growing, embracing imperfection can actually help us in the long run.

1. Why does the author describe the scene in the first paragraph?
A.To introduce the topic.
B.To provide examples.
C.To support the author’s argument.
D.To define a concept.
2. Who can be defined as a perfectionist?
A.A person who is determined to achieve high goals.
B.A person who tends to feel sorry for what he has done.
C.A person who blames himself for not being that successful.
D.A person who holds high standards for themselves.
3. How can perfectionism be harmful?
A.It may lower one’s mental health.
B.It reflects one’s psychological level.
C.It results in depression immediately.
D.It stops one from recovering from depression.
4. What will be discussed in the following paragraph?
A.A call for not being a perfectionist.
B.Another side-effect of perfectionism.
C.Why perfectionism is harmful.
D.How to avoid perfectionism.
2022-05-20更新 | 168次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。燃烧化石燃料产生的气溶胶虽然对人体和环境有害,但也能帮助地球“降温”。研究人员希望通过收集更多的大气数据来弄清楚人类停止使用化石燃料后气温变化的确切数据。

【推荐2】Fossil fuels are rapidly warming the planet, and the aerosols (气溶胶) from their burning process kill millions of people each year. But those aerosols can also cool the atmosphere. It creates an odd climate contradiction. If we burn less gas, oil, and coal, we’ll stop loading the sky with planet-warming carbon, but we’ll also load it with fewer planet-cooling aerosols. But exactly how much cooling we get from aerosols, and how strong that effect will be as the world stops using fossil fuels, are huge questions among climate researchers.

Burning fossil fuels produces clouds of tiny particles (颗粒), which cool the climate in two main ways. “The little particles themselves act like little mirrors, and they reflect some sunlight straight back to space,” says University of Oxford climate scientist Duncan Watson-Parris.

The second way is more indirect: They influence the formation of clouds, which in turn affect the local climate. “Water vapor (水蒸气) in the atmosphere covers the aerosols and forms cloud droplets (云滴),” says Watson-Parris. If you load a given area with extra aerosols, the droplets end up being more numerous, yet smaller: There’s only so much water vapor to go around all the particles. Smaller droplets are brighter than bigger ones, which whitens the cloud, causing it to reflect more of the sun’s energy back into space.

In addition, the atmosphere is an extremely complicated 3D system stretching miles into the sky. Temperatures, humidity, and winds are changing constantly. And the aerosols caused by human activity are extraordinarily complicated. That’s why scientists can’t yet say that if we burn fewer fossil fuels and reduce aerosols by X amount, we can expect Y amount of warming. That’s why researchers like Watson-Parris have had a range of outcomes. More atmospheric data, they say, will help them get closer to concrete numbers.

If we find better ways to take existing aerosols out of the air, but continue to burn fuels that release planet-warming carbon dioxide, we’ll raise temperatures while eliminating the tiny particles that are compensating for (抵消) some of that heat. And that, Watson-Parris says, would be “a double blow.”

1. What remains unknown to climate researchers according to paragraph 1?
A.When the world can get rid of fossil fuels.B.What the best alternative to fossil fuels is.
C.How the aerosols will affect temperatures.D.How people will benefit from the aerosols.
2. What can contribute to cooling the climate according to paragraph 3?
A.Less water vapor.B.Whiter clouds.
C.Bigger droplets.D.Fewer particles.
3. What are the climate researchers probably doing at present?
A.Collecting more atmospheric data.B.Calling on people to reduce the aerosols.
C.Building up a better research model.D.Questioning Watson-Parris’s research results.
4. What does the underlined word “eliminating” in the last paragraph mean?
A.Comparing.B.Removing.
C.Monitoring.D.Distinguishing.
2023-07-19更新 | 24次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文为一篇说明文。文章介绍了物理学家Elisabetta Chicca用像昆虫的机器人模型让我们深入了解昆虫是如何完成导航工作的,以及它们是如何如此高效地完成任务的。

【推荐3】With a brain the size of a pinhead, insects perform fantastic navigational (导航的) abilities. They avoid obstacles and move through small openings. How do they do this, with their limited brain power? Understanding the inner workings of an insect’s brain can help us in our search towards energy-efficient computing, physicist Elisabetta Chicca of the University of Groningen demonstrates with her most recent result: A robot that acts like an insect.

In search of the neural (神经的) mechanism that drives insect behaviour, PhD student Thorben Schoepe developed a model of its neuronal activity and a small robot that uses this model to navigate. Schoepe’s model is based on one main principle: always steer towards the area with the least apparent motion.

He had his robot drive through a long “corridor”— consisting of two walls with a random print on it—and the robot centred in the middle of the corridor, as insects tend to do. In other virtual environments, such as a space with obstacles or small openings, Schoepe’s model also showed similar behaviour to insects.

“The model is so good,” Chicca concludes, “that once you set it up, it will perform in all kinds of environments. That’s the beauty of this result.”

The fact that a robot can navigate in a realistic environment is not new. Rather, the model gives insight into how insects do the job, and how they manage to do things so efficiently.

Chicca explains, “Much of robotics is not concerned with efficiency. We humans tend to learn new tasks as we grow up and within robotics. This is reflected in the current trend of machine learning. But insects are able to fly immediately from birth. An efficient way of doing that is hardwired in their brains. In a similar way, you could make computers more efficient.”

1. Why does Chicca want to study how the insect brain works?
A.To make computers more efficient.B.To make use of insects’ brain power.
C.To understand the habit of insects.D.To reveal the inner part of insects’ brain.
2. What does the underlined word “steer” in paragraph 2 mean?
A.Stretch.B.Stare.C.Drive.D.Work.
3. How did Chicca feel at the performance of her robot?
A.Regretful.B.Shocked.C.Confused.D.Satisfied.
4. What are the last two paragraphs mainly about?
A.How to make a robot that acts like an insect.
B.Why insects navigate more efficiently than robots.
C.Why a robot can navigate in a realistic environment.
D.How humans tend to learn new tasks as they grow up.
2024-05-28更新 | 31次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般