组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:37 题号:21017298

A recent study led by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) has found that living close to spaces with trees may be better than grassy or paved (铺砌的) areas for children ‘s long-term development.

Many previous studies have argued that exposure to green spaces is associated with better memory and attention in early childhood, higher academic achievement, and fewer behavioral and emotional problems. However, this is the first study to explore whether the type of vegetation makes a difference in these positive associations.

For the study, the researchers analyzed data from over 27,500 children in the Vancouver area, who were followed from birth to five years of age (between 2000 and 2005). By the time they were five, the participant’s kindergarten teachers reported on their physical health, mental well-being, social competence, emotional maturity, communication skills, language development, and general knowledge. By looking at maps of where the children lived, the researchers were able to compare their social competence developmental outcomes to their residential aresa.

While children with the greatest exposure to vegetation ( either trees or grass ) had the highest developmental scores, those exposed mainly to paved surfaces had the lowest ones. However, the study revealed that living close to tree-filled areas in early childhood led to better developmental scores than being exposed to grass-covered environments. This may be due to the fact that tree-filled areas are better in reducing air pollution, noise and heat than more open green spaces, while also contributing to a higher degree to support restoration from mental tiredness. Grassy spaces, however, are more likely to encourage group activities, benefiting children’s social well-being, according to the research.

Although more research is needed, these findings may be useful to urban planners. “Taken together, our findings suggest that transforming paved surfaces into green spaces and, in particular, increasing the amount of trees in neighborhoods may positively affect early childhood health and development,” concluded study senior author Matilda van den Bosch at ISGlobal.

1. What does the recent study focus on?
A.How kids adapt to the environment.
B.Whether previous studies are correct.
C.The benefits of green spaces to children.
D.The effect of various vegetation types on kids.
2. What is the 3rd paragraph mainly about?
A.The research process.B.The research subjects.
C.The research outcomes.D.The research application.
3. Which of the following is the most favorable to child development?
A.Paved surfaces.B.Open green spaces.
C.Areas with tree cover.D.Grass-covered areas.
4. What does the author intend to tell us in the last paragraph?
A.A major limitation of the study.B.A suggestion for city planers.
C.A possible plan for tree planting.D.An explanation of the study findings.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】When consumers see a food, what they expect makes the palate (味觉) taste certain flavors. The strong associations between color and flavor are well established in the scientific community. Research on the subject dates back to the 1970s. For example, consumers expect yellow foods to be sour and black foods to be bitter.

Branding, packaging and color quality of the product itself play a big part in creating and maintaining expectations. Food brands have long understood this and worked to establish standards. Federal regulations grade the color of orange juice. Businesses provide color- matching services for companies to select the right color for a particular product. In some cases, color can overpower other senses and convince people they taste flavors that aren't there.

The Penn State researchers set out to confirm long-standing research into the relationship between color and taste. And they found what consumers see when they eat matters as much as- if not more than- what they taste, and the links could be more flexible than many thought in some cases.

“This might have potential impacts in the food industry if a company were to launch a new flavoured product with a color. Some consumers might not learn or accept a new color and flavor pairing (配对) as well as others," Penn State Food Science doctoral candidate Molly J. Higgins said in a written statement.

But while today's consumers have expectations of flavors of items with different colors, they also have expectations that natural materials are used. While these materials are often preferable, they present a challenge. General Mills changed artificial dyes (染料) to natural ones in Trix cereal. Consumer anger followed. Many found the earthier tones (土黄色) depressing, despite no change in flavor. Chemicals and all, they wanted the original back. The company eventually switched back, choosing to treat color as being more important than other things.

1. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as for creating and maintaining expectations for products?
A.Color quality.B.Branding.C.Shape.D.Packaging.
2. What do Molly J. Higgins' words suggest in Para. 4?
A.An expected food color attracts consumers more.
B.Most people choose foods based on their colors.
C.Not all consumers welcome a new color-taste pairing.
D.Companies should release new products regularly.
3. Why is General Mills mentioned in the last paragraph?
A.To stress the importance of color in food selection.
B.To stress the possibilities facing food companies.
C.To stress the difficulty in using artificial materials.
D.To stress the difference between color and taste.
4. What can be the theme of the text?
A.Why do foods have different colors?B.How deep are color-taste associations?
C.What factors affect the flavors of food?D.Do different colors mean different responses?
2021-05-20更新 | 83次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】A large team of researchers cooperated with multiple institutions across Europe, has found evidence backing up work by Persi Diaconis in 2007 in which he suggested tossed (掷) coins are more likely to land on the same side they started on, rather than on the reverse. The team conducted experiments designed to test the randomness of coin tossing and posted their results on the Arxiv Preprint Server.

For many years, the coin toss has represented a fair way to choose between two options—which side of a team goes first, for example, who wins a tied election, or gets to eat the last cookie. Over the years, many people have tested the randomness of coin tossing and most have found it to be as fair as expected—provided a fair coin is used. But, Persi Diaconis noted, such tests have only tested the possibility that a fair coin, once tossed, has an equal chance of landing on heads or tails. They have not tested the likelihood of a fair coin landing with the same side up as that when it was. He suggested that a coin tossed into the air spends more time there with its initial side facing up making it more likely to end up that way, as well. He suggested that the difference would be slight, however — just 1%. In this new effort, the research team tested Diaconis’ ideas.

The experiment involved 48 people tossing coins made in 46 countries to prevent design bias (偏见) for a total of 350,757 coin tosses. Each time, the participants noted whether the coin landed with the same side up as when it was launched. The researchers found that Diaconis was right — there was a slight bias. They found the coin landed with the same side up as when it was launched 50.8% of the time. They also found there was some slight change in percentages between different individuals tossing coins.

The team concludes that while the bias they found is slight, it could be meaningful if multiple coin tosses are used to determine an outcome — for example, flipping a quarter 1,000 times and betting $1 each time (with winning of 0 or 2$ each round) should result in an average overall win of $19.

1. Why is the coin toss often used to make decisions?
A.It can help people win an election.
B.It gives each side an equal chance of winning.
C.It seems the quickest and easiest way to reach a decision.
D.It provides a sense of mystery and excitement for those involved.
2. What did the Diaconis’s research team find in their experiment?
A.The coin toss is a fair process.B.The coin toss is a biased process.
C.The coin toss is a random process.D.The coin toss is an unpredictable process.
3. How did the research team get the conclusion of the experiment?
A.By analyzing collected data.B.By comparing different factors.
C.By tracking experimental process.D.By monitoring different participants.
4. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.The research team did not use real coins in their experiment.
B.Coin tossing has been used for many years to settle disputes.
C.The research team found the coin toss is fairer than previously thought.
D.The author does not believe the coin toss is a fair way to make decisions.
2023-12-19更新 | 78次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了Ferl教授和他的团队如何在月球土壤中种植植物的实验过程,以及他们的实验结果可能如何应用于解决地球上的食物挑战。

【推荐3】Twelve grams of moon arrived at Ferl’s laboratory in an undecorated delivery box. Ferl, a gardening expert at the University of Florida, had waited more than a decade for that moment. The small box of dirt held some of the last remaining unopened samples of moon dust, called regolith, collected by astronauts on the lunar missions. Despite months of practice, he lifted the sample with trembling hands. “It’s freaky, scary stuff,” he says, “mean, what happens if you drop that?” Ferland his team were about to become the first researchers to grow plants in actual lunar soil.

The experiment was part of a lunar research which aims to send humans back to the moon later this decade in a more sustainable way. Longer duration stays require astronauts to have a source of food. “All of human exploration has been driven by the ability to keep crews fed,” says Gil, a researcher not involved in the study. And Ferl’s experiment offers a significant first step in this journey.

To test the moon soil, Ferl’s team divided the samples into 12 pots of 900 milligrams a piece and planted seeds in them. The seeds developed successfully, but the plants had trouble growing healthy roots. The moon soil lacks important microbes, which play a significant role in regulating plant growth hormones (激素), reducing environmental stress, and absorbing essential nutrients. Without natural microbes, the plants struggled to absorb nutrients and manage stress. Additionally, the lack of water can cause the soil to become difficult to work with.

The seedlings failed to grow strongly in regolith alone, but Ferl hopes to continue studying how life might take hold in otherwise low-yield soil, with an eye toward both boosting humanity’s prospects off the planet and improving agriculture in low-yield soils here at home. “Most of us are not going to go to space,” he says, “But if we can engineer a way to produce these kinds of crops in such an unforgiving environment — like the lunar surface — we can apply that to meet our food challenges in areas that just can’t grow food anymore.”

1. How did Ferl feel when receiving the box?
A.moved and surprised.B.scared but curious.
C.worried but relieved.D.cautious and nervous.
2. Why did Ferl carry out the experiment?
A.To feed the crew of his research team.
B.To ensure food supply for space exploration.
C.To provide sustainable energy for lunar missions.
D.To send the astronauts back to the moon in a shorter time.
3. What can be done to improve lunar crops production?
A.Adding microbes and watering it properly.
B.Dividing regolith equally and managing stress.
C.Growing healthy roots and making regolith dry.
D.Choosing suitable seeds and regulating hormones.
4. What is the last paragraph mainly about?
A.The original goal of the study. B.The limitation of space farming
C.The application of the experiment result. D.The factors causing the experiment failure.
2024-05-27更新 | 56次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般