组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 天体和宇宙
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:124 题号:21317706

The combined quantity of water on Earth has varied over the course of our planet’s geological history, and it still does.

Today, Earth includes some 1,386 million cubic kilometres of water, a volume that includes water in oceans, lakes and rivers, plus ground water, vapour in the atmosphere, and the frozen water of glaciers and ice caps. On the young Earth — some four billion years ago — vast quantities of water were added to the planet by ice-containing comets (a mass of ice and dust that moves around the sun and looks like a bright star with a tail) that struck us, eventually making our world a “blue planet”. But such events became increasingly rare in Earth’s more recent history, and today we are in an age during which Earth is losing water.

The water loss is due to the fact that particles (微粒) sometimes escape Earth’s gravity to travel into space. This is particularly true of the light hydrogen atoms that form part of water molecules (分子) together with oxygen. Every time the atmosphere loses hydrogen, we lose one of the building blocks of water. Scientists estimate that Earth loses about 3kg of hydrogen per second. At this pace, Earth would run out of water in three billion years — but that assumes that we don’t get any new water supplies.

New water need not come from space — it might come from the inside of the Earth. At depths below 50km, minerals contain water that is not reckoned within the water cycle. Some of it dates back to Earth’s formation; the rest is part of slow geological exchange between the planet’s layers. When Earth’s plates sink and melt, deep minerals can release these bound water molecules so that they can subsequently rise to the surface via volcanic eruptions, adding to the planet’s overall water resources.

1. How did Earth become a “blue planet” in geological time?
A.By getting water from cometsB.By making use of glaciers.
C.By releasing its inside water.D.By storing water in the ocean.
2. What is the scientists’ attitude towards the water loss on Earth?
A.Serious.B.Regretful.C.Uncertain.D.Unworried.
3. The underlined word “reckoned” in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to “________”.
A.lockedB.displayedC.countedD.marked
4. What can be the best title for the text?
A.Where Can Water Be Stored?B.Could Earth Run Out of Water?
C.How Can New Water Be Found?D.Will There Be More Water on Earth?

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】This summer, NASA launched its latest robot Perseverance on a seventh-month journey to Mars. During the past decades, robot explorers on Mars have made great discoveries about the red planet, but they have never found clear-cut signs of creatures currently living there. Life, at least as we know it on Earth, simply does not seem probable on the Martian surface.

“If there’s any life on Mars now, it needs at least some liquid water,” Dr. Sumner said. “The surface of Mars now is very dry. Extremely dry. If there’s life on Mars now, it would be found deep underground.” Actually, there has been some evidence that liquid water is locked away beneath the surface, so perhaps there are sunless ecosystems hidden there, which are beyond the direct reach of our rovers and landers.

“Recent findings of methane and other gases in what’s left of Mars’ atmosphere are a potential signature,” Dr. Farley said, supporting the theory about underground water. Many microbes on Earth produce methane, so it is possible that the gas on Mars could be related to alien life-forms deep underground.

However, methane can also be created by a wide range of natural processes that have nothing to do with life. Some experts, like Dr. Sumner from the University of California Davis, say that the presence of the gas on Mars is “not a surprise” because it has all the geological processes it needs to produce the gas without life.

But even if we never find Martians, “Mars is a place we can go to answer some of the questions about life on Earth,” Dr. Sumner said. The red planet remains a time capsule of the era when life first began on our own world, and the direction it could have gone had all the factors that made our world possible, yet it turned out just not the right way.

1. Where can life on Mars possibly be?
A.In the methane.B.On the surface.
C.In the underground.D.In the atmosphere.
2. Why is methane a potential signature of life on Mars?
A.It proves the existence of microbes on Mars.
B.Some forms of life on Earth can produce the gas.
C.Underground water has something to do with the gas.
D.It shows different kinds of gas exist in the air on Mars.
3. What does Dr. Sumner suggest in paragraph 4?
A.Methane doesn’t actually exist on Mars.
B.Methane is a necessary condition of life.
C.Scientists have predicted the existence of methane.
D.The discovery of methane doesn’t guarantee life on Mars.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.Arguments about life on Mars.B.The value of exploring Mars.
C.NASA’s new robot on Mars.D.Discovery of water on Mars.
2021-08-07更新 | 172次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一片说明文。文章主要探讨了月球对于地球地震爆发的不为人知的影响。

【推荐2】The moon’s gravity constantly pulls at the Earth. Its pull on the ocean is undeniable but some scientists have been studying less visible effects, which may be able to trigger some earthquakes, if the time is right. With the appearance of bigger and more complete dataset, this effect of the moon has started to show from the data. And it seems that in some cases, the moon did help trigger earthquakes around the world. With these huge databasets, they started to get some small but significant correlation. Chris Scholtz, a geologist and professor at Columbia Climate School, said, one place where the moon’s impact is seen clearly is in underwater earthquakes. That makes sense, given the moon’s pull on the oceans.

Scholtz and his team set out to study how the moon could be using its power on the earthquakes on the Axial Volcano. Earthquakes here are about tenfold more likely to happen when the tide has gone out. Their study found an explanation for the link between the moon and earthquakes. It showed they were caused by the weight of the ocean pressing down on a volcano’s magma chamber. Then when the tide is low, less water presses down on the chamber. This, in turn, puts more pressure on the fault-line, making it more likely to move and create an earthquake.

It’s not just in the oceans where the moon is causing disaster. The moon also causes tiny, but important, tides in rocks. “While fluids can flow, rocks can just slightly change their shape by the tidal force which promotes stress accumulation,” said Scholtz. If rocks are already over-stressed, even a small stress — the pull of the moon — can create a crack in the rock. “If surrounding rocks are also unstable, the fracture can speed up to involve large fault patches. The final outcome is an earthquake,” said Scholtz. Of course, this only happens in very specific circumstances, for instance, when the pressure from the moon’s gravitation al pull lines up perfectly with the fault-line of the earthquakes.

1. What has long been recognized as the moon’s effect on the earth?
A.Earthquake.B.Tide.C.Volcanic eruption.D.Hurricane.
2. Which plays a key role in Chris Scholtz’s discovery?
A.Big data.B.Their team cooperation.
C.His initial guess.D.Previous research results.
3. According to Scholtz’s research, how does the moon affect earthquakes?
A.By pulling on the oceans of the earth.B.By applying invisible force to the earth.
C.By changing the earth’s physical structure.D.By putting pressure on the fault-lines of the earth.
4. Which of the following can be the best title of this passage?
A.The Moon — The Decisive Factor for Earthquakes
B.The Tides — The Moon’s Constant Pull at the Earth
C.The Gravity — A Hidden Trigger behind Earthquakes
D.The Earthquake — A Frightening Result from Over-stressed Rocks
2024-03-02更新 | 81次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约490词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Back in 2015 my colleague Adam Frank of the University of Rochester and I were having lunch near Columbia University's campus in New York City. As at Fermi's lunch 65 years earlier, the conversation was about the nature of spacefaring species. And inspired by Fermi's mental calculation, we were trying to craft an investigative strategy that made the fewest possible unsubstantiated assumptions and that could be somehow tested or constrained with real data. At the center of this exercise was the simple thought that waves of exploration or settlement could come and go across the galaxy, with humans happening to come into being in one of the lonely periods.

This idea relates to Hart's original fact: that there is no evidence here on Earth today of extraterrestrial(外星的)explorers. But it goes further by asking whether we can obtain meaningful limits on galactic(星系的)life by constraining the exact length of time over which Earth might have gone unvisited. Perhaps long, long ago extraterrestrial explorers came and went. A number of scientists have, over the years, discussed the possibility of looking for artifacts that might have been left behind after such visitations of our solar system. The necessary scope of a complete search is hard to predict, but the situation on Earth alone turns out to be a bit more manageable. In 2018 another of my colleagues, Gavin Schmidt of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, together with Adam Frank, produced a critical assessment of whether we could even tell if there had been an earlier industrial civilization on our planet.

As fantastic as it may seem, Schmidt and Frank argue—as do most planetary scientists—that it is actually very easy for time to erase essentially all signs of technological life on Earth. The only real evidence after a million or more years would boil down to isotopic or chemical stratigraphic anomalies—odd features such as synthetic molecules, plastics or radioactive fallout. Fossil remains and other paleontological markers are so rare that they might not tell us anything in this case.

Indeed, modern human urbanization covers only on order of about 1 percent of the planetary surface, providing a very small target area for any paleontologists(古生物学家)in the distant future. Schmidt and Frank also conclude that nobody has yet performed the necessary experiments to look exhaustively for such non-natural signatures on Earth. The bottom line is, if an industrial civilization on the scale of our own had existed a few million years ago, we might not know about it. That absolutely does not mean one existed; it indicates only that the possibility cannot be completely eliminated.

1. The word “unsubstantiated”(in paragraph 1)is closest in meaning to ________.
A.unconsciousB.unknownC.unnaturalD.unsupported
2. What assumption was the author and his colleague's investigative strategy built on?
A.No other species have ever settled on Earth except human beings.
B.Extraterrestrial explorers come and go at increasingly short intervals.
C.No spacefaring species have visited the Earth since humans emerged.
D.Extraterrestrial explorers once built an industrial civilization on Earth.
3. It can be inferred from the passage that if we want to prove if there used to be an industrial civilization on Earth, we should________.
A.turn to isotopic or chemical stratigraphic anomalies
B.find as many signs of technological life as possible
C.unearth more fossil remains than we do now
D.leave behind synthetic things like plastics
4. According to the passage, what are Schmidt and Frank most likely to agree with?
A.Human urbanization should be expanded for the sake of research.
B.We cannot say for sure that no civilization existed before ours.
C.Non-natural signatures on Earth have been studied exhaustively.
D.An industrial civilization came into being a few million years ago.
2021-07-05更新 | 193次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般