If “Why?” is the first question in science, “Why not?” must be the second one. It’s interesting to think about why something does not exist in nature, such as a three-legged animal.
In an online lecture, David Jackson, a biologist in Earth and Planetary Sciences, was challenged to come up with “an animal or plant that does not and cannot exist”. Jackson told the audience that in nature, no species known to date has ever been born with a third leg.
Jackson pointed out that, however, many animals do use a particular three-legged pose for support. Examples include meerkats (猫鼬) resting on their tail and back feet and woodpeckers (啄木鸟) using tail feathers to weigh themselves against a tree trunk, which is more stable and requires less energy. Given that three-legged movement does work in some situations, why are there no animals with three legs?
The answer may be at the core of evolution. Over a long time in history, almost all animals have adapted themselves and developed into a body shape which is organized around a central point and can be divided into two similar halves. Butterflies are an excellent example. Not only can their body shape be divided into two matching halves, but also the patterns on each wing are exactly the same. The law of having two sides to everything has been in our DNA since the first animals appeared on the earth.
And it is important to remember that only those biological changes that prove to have brought advantages can be passed down to next generations. If there were three-legged animals, there would be some good reasons for that to happen. However, three-legged animals would not be able to run as fast as four-legged animals. And they would also not be as efficient as two-legged animals. Three legs would simply make climbing, walking, running, and sleeping more difficult.
“The non-existence of three-legged animals can also be seen as the result of natural selection,” Jackson explained to the curious audience.
1. How does the author introduce the topic of the text?A.By arousing readers' curiosity. |
B.By questioning readers openly. |
C.By presenting scientific figures. |
D.By describing recent research. |
A.To express his confusion. |
B.To challenge the audience’s belief. |
C.To lay the ground for the core question. |
D.To put forward some practical solutions. |
A.Some species born with three legs. | B.Butterflies with mirroring patterns. |
C.Meerkats resting on their back feet. | D.Woodpeckers standing on the trunk. |
A.Original health conditions. |
B.Beneficial biological changes. |
C.Possible individual advantages. |
D.Modern and healthy lifestyles. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Many of us enjoy watching animals in the wild. They usually make us pleased, cheer us up and, sometimes, even make us frightened. But do you know what they can teach us? Wild geese (鹅), for example, teach a very good lesson about teamwork.
In fall, Canada wild geese fly south to get away from Canada’s cold winter weather. They lift off in no order. Yet very quickly they form a V-shape, with one bird leading the flock (鸟群). Scientists have discovered that wild geese flying in a V-shape can help them to save energy. In this way, they can fly 70 percent farther without rest than those flying alone.
What can human learn from this?
Be cooperative. We have found that wild geese make sound in flight to encourage those that have fallen behind to keep up with the speed. Team members should regularly communicate with each other while working towards a common goal.
Set a good example. When wild geese are on the ground, if something frightens the leader, it might fly off. So does the flock. But if the leader stays calm, the flock will do the same. Wild geese and people usually emulate their leaders. When leading, we must remember that our actions and feelings will be passed on to our followers.
Whether it is in our personal lives or our work, we need other people. We are encouraged by their enthusiasm and energy. If we face the difficulties alone, the risks are greater. Like wild geese, when we work together, our burdens are lighter.
1. Why do Canada wild geese form a V-shape?A.To fight against coldness. | B.To promote cooperation. |
C.To maintain the team’s order. | D.To reduce their strength. |
A.Stop. | B.Control. | C.Warn. | D.Follow. |
A.Art of leadership. | B.Life of Wild Geese. |
C.Lessons from Wild Geese. | D.Secrets of Geese Flight. |
【推荐2】Coral reefs (珊瑚礁) are remarkably noisy ecosystems in oceans. The special noises bring many fish settling there and drive enemies away. When there’s a heat wave, ocean temperatures rise and the coral will lose its color and turn white. Its residents then leave for healthier places. Without the creature activity, reefs fall silent, a sign of dying. A study proves playing sounds of healthy reefs works on rebuilding energy of a reef. Researchers found the newcomers drawn in by the underwater speakers stuck around.
The idea begins with Tim Gordon, a biologist, who studies the influence of sounds on various underwater animals at the scenic Great Barrier Reef in Australia. What Gordon and his research group heard on a normal reef struck them as a wonder. It’s therefore so upsetting for them that reefs became so quiet as they died. That got him thinking: could sounds help renew dying reefs? Vast sections of the Great Barrier Reef have turned white during the past five years. But how could a seawater temperature increase of as little 1℃cause such extensive influence?
Living reefs house thousands of tiny animals, known as coral polyps (珊瑚虫). They live amongst the bone remains of their ancestors. Those polyps have a close relationship with algae (海藻) called zooxanthellae, who live inside a coral polyp’s tissues. They give coral its bright appearance. The algae use sunlight to mark raw sugar. This feeds not only the algae, but also the coral polyps.
Corals and algae grow well in tropical waters. But when the water gets too hot, the tiny algae become damaged. That causes corals to throw them out. Without their colorful companions, the coral polyps become transparent (透明的). Then the bone-like framework the polyps live in shows through. The reef turns white. If the sea water stays too warm, the polyps don’t get enough food. Eventually they die. The noise-making creatures that have lived around them now must go in search of a new neighborhood. They leave behind a bare—and silent—reef.
1. How do the sounds help reefs recover?A.By energizing dying corals. |
B.By attracting creatures back. |
C.By scaring reefs’ enemies away. |
D.By reducing the heat wave’s effect. |
A.Varieties of underwater animals. |
B.The sound of a healthy reef. |
C.The scene of the Great Barrier Reef. |
D.The influence of seawater temperature. |
A.Heat waves. | B.Coral polyps. |
C.Zooxanthellae. | D.Bone remains of coral polyps. |
A.How the ecosystem works in oceans. |
B.How a coral reef gradually dies. |
C.How creatures depend on each other. |
D.How rising temperature affects coral reefs. |
【推荐3】Australia’s Great Barrier Reef has lost more than half of its corals since 1995 due to warmer seas driven by climate change, a study has found. Scientists found all types of corals had suffered a decline across the world’s largest reef system. The sharp falls came after mass bleaching(白化)events in 2016 and 2017. More mass bleaching occurred this year. “There is no time to lose-we must sharply decrease greenhouse gas emissions ASAP,” the researchers said.
The study, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, was conducted by marine scientists at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies in Queensland. Scientists assessed the health and size of coral colonies across the reef from 1995 to 2017. They found populations had dropped by more than 50% in all coral sizes and species, but especially in branching and table-shaped corals. These are the large, structural species which usually provide habitats for fish and other marine life.
Prof Terry Hughes, a study co-author, said these coral types had been “worst affected” by the back-to-back mass bleachings which damaged two-thirds of the reef. Bleaching occurs when corals under stress drive out the algae-known as zooxanthellae(虫黄藻)-that give them colour.
Corals can recover if normal conditions return, but it can take decades. A study in 2019 found that damaged coral colonies had struggled to recover because most of the adult corals had died. “A lifeful coral population has millions of small, baby corals, as well as many large ones,” said lead author Dr Andy Dietzel. “Our results show the ability of the Great Barrier Reef to recover its resilience is compromised compared to the past, because there are fewer babies, and fewer large breeding adults.”
1. What has been found in the study of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef ?A.All types of corals has been on the rise. |
B.Over half of its corals have been lost. |
C.Mass bleaching events came after the sharpest falls. |
D.The variety of sea creatures has dropped. |
A.Greenhouse gas emissions. | B.Loss of habitats. |
C.Evolution of corals. | D.Lack of algae. |
A.Indifferent. | B.Concerned. | C.Positive. | D.Enthusiastic. |
A.Great Barrier Reef has lost half of its corals since 1995. |
B.Great Barrier Reef has suffered mass bleaching. |
C.Global Warming has caused warmer seas. |
D.Sea pollution has caused the loss of corals. |
Their study of hundreds of men and women also found that people who feel satisfied with their lives always have lots of close friends and regularly make new ones.
While it is not clear whether our friends make us happy or we make friends because we are happy, the researchers say it is clear that we should maintain our friendships. Psychologist Richard Tunney said, “Whatever the reason is, actively working on friendships in the same way as to maintain a marriage is a prerequisite (必备条件) to happiness.”
Dr.Tunney, of Nottingham University, quizzed more than 1,700 people about their satisfaction with their lives and the state of their friendships. Those with five friends or fewer had just a 40 percent chance of being happy.
In other words they were more likely to be unhappy than happy. Ten was the first number at which people were more likely to be happy than unhappy. The happiest people were those with dozens of friends, according to the study, which was carried out for the National Lottery (彩票).
For women, this meant having 33 friends; for men, the number was 49. Dr. Tunney said, “People who were extremely satisfied with their lives had twice the number of friends of people who were extremely dissatisfied.” Women tended to have fewer friends than men but formed tighter relationships.
Interestingly, the study found that childhood friends are no more likely to make us happy than people we become close to later in life. Lottery winners, however, have a different opinion on life.They are always happier than others despite spending their time with a small circle of old friends. This could be because they trust people they’ve known for a long time.
1. What’s the best title for this passage?
A.The Secret to Happiness Is to Make New Friends |
B.Having at Least 10 Good Friends Makes People Happy |
C.Why Most People Like to Make Friends Regularly |
D.Men’s and Women’s Friends Are Different |
A.People with few friends are sure to be unhappy. |
B.Our friends can make us happy. |
C.Happiness may come from a good marriage life. |
D.We may become happier if we have more friends. |
A.enjoy making new friends |
B.make new friends easily |
C.like staying with old friends |
D.have no time to make friends |
A.it’s enough for one person to have ten friends |
B.unhappy people must have few friends |
C.childhood friends make people happier than adulthood ones |
D.friendships play a major role in people’s life |
【推荐2】Cotton bags have become a means for brands, retailers and supermarkets to convey a planet-friendly mindset — or, at least, to show that the companies are aware of the overuse of plastic in packaging.
Earth-friendly? Not exactly. It turns out the wholehearted embrace of cotton bags may actually have created a new problem. An organic cotton bag needs to be used 20,000 times to make up for its overall impact of production, according to a 2018 study by the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark. That is equal to daily use for 54 years — for just one bag. The production of cotton bags is water-intensive, and figuring out how to deal with a bag in an environmentally low-impact way is not nearly as simple as people think, according to Travis Wagner, an environmental science professor at the University of Maine.
In sharp comparison with the frequent use of cotton bags, the disposal (处理) of the bags remains less satisfying. Only 15 percent of the 30 million tons of cotton bags produced every year actually is sent to be recycled. Even when a bag does make it to a treatment facility, most dyes (染料) used to print logos onto them are PVC-based and thus not recyclable; “they’re extremely difficult to disintegrate (分解) chemically,” said Christopher Stanev, the co-founder of Evrnu, a Seattle-based textile recycling firm. Printed patterns have to be cut out of the cloth; Mr. Stanev estimates 10 to 15 percent of the cotton Evrnu receives is wasted this way.
That’s not to say cotton is worse than plastic, or that the two should even be compared. While cotton can use pesticides and has dried up rivers from water consumption, lightweight plastic bags use greenhouse gas-emitting fossil fuels and will fill up the oceans.
Buffy Reid, of the knitwear label & Daughter, stopped production of her cotton bags in April this year. Aesop is converting the composition of its shopping bags to a 60 — 40 blend of recycled and organic cotton. Designer Ally Capellino recently employed a new material, while Hindmarch introduced a new version of her original cotton bag, this time made from recycled water bottles.
In the end, the simplest solution may be the most obvious. “Not every product needs a bag,” Comey says.
1. According to paragraph 2, what can we learn about cotton bags?A.It is easy to recycle cotton bags. |
B.Using cotton bags is earth-friendly. |
C.Producing cotton is water-consuming. |
D.Producing cotton bags poses no harm to the earth. |
A.A large amount of water is wasted. |
B.Printed patterns on cotton bags cannot be recycled. |
C.Dyes used to print logos are easy to break down. |
D.Most cotton bags end up being recycled. |
A.Cotton is worse than plastic. |
B.Plastic is worse than cotton. |
C.Both are favorable to the earth. |
D.Both have disadvantages. |
A.Cotton bags — a new fashion |
B.Not every product needs a bag |
C.Cotton bags — a way to be earth-friendly |
D.Are cotton bags harmless to the environment? |
【推荐3】Ask a teacher to name the most annoying invention of recent years and they will often mention the mobile phone. Disturbed by the problems they create, many head teachers have ordered that pupils should keep their phones switched off at school. Others have told pupils to leave them at home.
However, education researchers at The University of Nottingham believe it is time that phone bans were reassessed, because mobile phones can be a powerful learning aid, they say. Dr Elizabeth Hartnell-Young and her colleagues have reached this conclusion after studying the consequences of allowing pupils in five secondary schools to use either their own mobile phones or the new generation of ‘smartphones’ in lessons.
During the nine-month experiment, 14 to 16-year-old pupils used the phones for a wide range of educational purposes, including creating short movies, setting homework reminders, recording a teacher reading a poem, and timing experiments with the phones’ stopwatches. The smartphones, which could be connected to the Internet, also allowed pupils to access revision websites, log into the school email system, or transfer (转存) electronic files between school and home.
The research involved 331 pupils in schools in Cambridgeshire, West Berkshire and Nottingham. “At the start of the study, even pupils were often surprised at the thought that mobile phones could be used for learning,” Dr Hartnell-Young said. “After their hands-on experience, almost all pupils said they had enjoyed the project and felt more inspired.”
Some teachers found that pupils who lacked confidence gained most from the project. However, they recognized that greater use of mobile phones in schools could cause problems.
1. We can infer from the first paragraph that .A.teachers are strongly against students owning mobile phones |
B.mobile phones should be developed to meet students’ needs |
C.students are free to use their mobile phones at school |
D.mobile phones are usually forbidden to be used at school |
A.all enjoyed the project very much |
B.didn’t know what they were used for |
C.didn’t fully realize the learning functions of mobile phones |
D.were surprised that they were allowed to use mobile phones in schools |
A.Older pupils. | B.Pupils who were not confident. |
C.Younger pupils. | D.Pupils who were confident. |
A.mobile phones can actually help students learn |
B.mobile phones begin to be widely used in schools |
C.too much use of mobile phones in schools can cause problems |
D.the mobile phone is considered the most annoying invention of recent years |
【推荐1】The technology that connects us has revolutionized the world over the past decade, changing how people interact and in many ways changing our lives for the better. However, some say the most significant development in tech is its unexpected consequences.
Robert Scoble, the chief strategy officer at the spatial computing agency Infinite Retina, said that the “biggest change over the last decade is how technology has appeared in almost every part of our lives.” Everything from smartphones to TVs to daily items like barbecue grills has become available with the Internet connected. But with many of our devices “always on”, a certain mistrust of technology has appeared. The FBI just issued a warning about smart TVs, saying there is the potential that “TV producers and app developers may be listening in on and watching you” via an internet-connected TV.
Meanwhile, over the past decade, a new social rule has been formed that remains almost impossible to escape: If you participate in most of the online world, your activity and data will most likely be monitored and stored somewhere, by someone.
“It’s a fact of our digital life now, that everything we do online now is monitored and someone will find a way to make a profit on it,” said Santo Domingo, a reporter.
As more people become aware of not only the benefits but also the threats of new technologies, Scoble said he has noticed “there’s much resistance to new technology now”. One example is the resistance many are putting up to facial recognition technology.
Some big tech companies have started to make changes after being faced with criticism, although some critics say it’s still not enough, including lawmakers who blamed Mark Zuckerberg at a recent hearing for Facebook’s ad policy. The major tech giants like Facebook, Google and Twitter have also strengthened their security and content moderation teams in recent years and do more to cooperate with each other about threats than they did before.
1. Why do some people refuse to accept technology?A.It changes their lifestyles. | B.It affects their life quality. |
C.It may disturb their privacy. | D.It will break with tradition. |
A.To show people’s attitudes to new technology. | B.To further explain the side effects of technology. |
C.To encourage people to use technology smartly. | D.To make a list of the limitations of technology. |
A.They have been kept in control. | B.They are ignored around the world. |
C.The survival of humans is under threat. | D.Some measures are being taken to avoid them. |
【推荐2】A new paper claims that the birds can understand a certain kind of pattern, displaying an ability that scientists once thought was unique to humans.
Researchers tested whether crows can grasp the concept of recursion (递归), which they define as “the process of embedding (嵌入) structures within similar structures” in their paper published in Science Advances. Humans use recursion in language when we embed one clause within another to form a complex sentence. For example, if a human says, “The ball the bat hit flew,” they’ve nested the clause “the bat hit” inside of “the ball flew”.
Scientists have long wondered whether understanding these patterns is unique to humans. In the early2000s, linguists thought that human language was the only form of animal communication that uses recursion.
However, in a2020study, researchers proposed that rhesus macaque monkeys might be able to create recursive sequences (序列)as well. The monkeys performed at the level of 3-to 5-year-old human children given the same task, but they need more training to do so.
In the new study, the researchers performed a similar experiment or two crows. They trained the birds to peck at sets of brackets, such as{}and [], in a recursive pattern, for example, {[]}. During training, the crows received birdseed balls for successfully forming recursive sequences.
Then, when presented with pairs of brackets that they hadn’t seen before, such as([]). the crows correctly formed embedded structures around 40 percent of the time. They had similar success rate to children and performed better than the monkeys in the 2020 study. They didn’t need the extra training the monkeys received.
“It is a small sample size, which means you can’t make generalizations about populations of crows, but that wasn’t the point,” Stephen Ferrigno, a scientist who was not involved in the new paper, said, “All you need is a single example showing that crows can do this. ”
1. Which of the following can be an example of recursion?A.The cat, scared, ran away. |
B.The cat ran away instantly it spotted a snake. |
C.The cat the boy shouted at ran away. |
D.The cat ran away, which was a relief to the rat. |
A.Non-verbal animals are not able to grasp recursion. |
B.Monkeys’ success rate of forming recursive sequences is below 40% |
C.Monkeys outperform children in grasping recursion. |
D.Crows require the most training to create recursive sequences. |
A.It is easy to conduct further research. |
B.The populations of crows can’t be generalized. |
C.The new study alone can prove the result. |
D.We should be optimistic about the future of crows. |
A.To call for the protection of crows. |
B.To reveal the findings of a study. |
C.To explain the unique ability of crows. |
D.To compare crows’ intelligence with humans’. |
【推荐3】When migratory bird ecologist Brian Evans first started hearing about dead birds across Washington, D. C. in mid May, he "wrote it off." Bird deaths in the spring are common-only 30 percent of young songbirds typically survive to the next season. And with people stuck at home during the pandemic, "we're noticing these things." Evans says. "Everybody got into birds last year, and then this year they realize birds have awful lives!"
Then, while Evans was in his garden on May 28, his neighbor came over to tell him about a bird she had just found on the road. "It looked like it was blind," she said, "and it was shaking. When she walked up to it, it didn't budge." "That's when this little flash went off in my head saying, that's pretty unusual." Evans says. "That's not your typical dying young birds."
Later that day, a colleague started texting him photos of dead birds. Half an hour after that, another neighbor called him to look at a bird that had crusty (暴躁的) eyes and couldn't balance. "I grabbed it and took it to City Wildlife," he says. "I went in there, and they were like, oh, yeah, this is really serious."
"This event is remarkable," Evans says. "What makes it significant is the number of birds that have been ill or have died and the number of species that have been impacted." Cases have also appeared in a variety of birds. "One American crow was just standing in the street," near his house in May, Evans says. "It was very unusual. It died as I was preparing to take it to City Wildlife."
However, total and even statewide numbers remain tricky to determine, says Evans. "I'm still desperately trying to understand the distribution of the epidemic", he says.
On July 2, the US Geological Survey, which is working with wildlife agencies in the affected states, announced that "no definitive causes of illness or death have been determined at this time."
1. How did Evans react after hearing about dead birds first?A.He realized the misery of birds. | B.He put down what he had heard. |
C.He didn't take the thing seriously. | D.He found out the cause of their death. |
A.Move. | B.Attack. | C.Feed. | D.Scream. |
A.To explain the cause of the disease. | B.To stress the severity of the crisis. |
C.To show the need of protecting birds. | D.To express his sympathy for suffering birds. |
A.The bird death is being ignored in America. |
B.The total species of American birds remain a mystery. |
C.The death of mass birds in the US puzzles scientists. |
D.The number of dying birds in America is decreasing. |