On Sunday night, the police found a baby koala in a bag in the town of Wishart in Queensland, Australia, during a traffic stop. Queensland police spokesperson Michael Beatty said that the officers asked a 50-year-old driver if she had anything to report. She then told the officers that she had a baby koala in her bag.
“Not quite believing their ears, the officers cautiously opened the bag and found this lovely boy and we’ve called him Alfred,” the spokesperson said. “The young koala is about 6 months old and weighs 1.5 kg. It appears to be healthy, though it was very thirsty.”
The police are warning people who find koalas to turn them over to authorities, rather than try to take care of them themselves. Koalas are protected in parts of Australia, including in Queensland, where they have been listed as “threatened” under the Nature Conservation Act.
Of course, koalas are also violent animals. One particularly wild koala even attacked a farmer in South Australia when she was riding along a muddy road.
“As it started running towards me, I thought I’d better speed up,” the terrified farmer told reporters. “But the road was too muddy, So I abandoned my bike and ran away. Fortunately, it ran up and attached itself to the dirty wheel — perhaps mistaking it for a eucalyptus tree.”
Deakin University biologist Desley. Whisson has some tips in case you experience this predicament. “Koalas more generally run from than to people. The farmer did the right thing by moving away from her bike,” she said. “The best advice I can give to people is to not fight with a koala displaying unusual behaviour. Make sure that there is another object between you and the koala so that it can’t climb you. Or you can just simply run. Their fingers are very sharp.”
She also believed the koala might have been confusing the sound of the bike with that of a koala mate.
1. What do the police in Wishart most likely want to tell the public?A.Koalas are protected by law all over Australia. |
B.It is illegal for the public to keep koalas in Queensland. |
C.The public should stay away from violent animals. |
D.Baby koalas are too violent to be kept in bags. |
A.They enjoy climbing bikes. | B.They have good eyesight. |
C.They can be dangerous. | D.They weigh about 1.5kg. |
A.Boring animal. | B.Interesting event. |
C.Pleasant meeting. | D.Difficult situation. |
A.A research paper. | B.The Nature Conservation Act. |
C.A news report. | D.An announcement from the police. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Ranchers(农场主) and environmental advocates haven’t always seen eye to eye, but the differences between the two aren’t as extreme any more, as more and more ranchers have come around to the understanding that taking good care of the land supports both economic stability and environmental health.
“For some, ranching was pursued in the past with an emphasis on raising beef at the expense of everything else,” says Bill Bryan of the Montana—based Rural Landscape Institute in a recent Christian Science Monitor. “As a matter of necessity, the old way of ranching is giving way to a new pattern. Raising animals for the dinner table isn’t an activity that has to be at odds with the environment.”
According to the nonprofit World Wildlife Fund (WWF), grazing (放牧)—when done right—is key to maintaining biological diversity and ecosystem health across the Northern Great Plains, across 183-million-acre expanse of rangelands spanning five US states and two Canadian provinces.
This vast landscape evolved in harmony with large herbivores (食草动物), such as bison and elk, and must be grazed in order to remain healthy, reports WWF, which works with hundreds of ranchers across the region as part of its Sustainable Ranching Initiative. “Without grazing, woody vegetation, such as juniper and cedar creeps in and kills plants that threatened species, such as grassland birds, need to survive.”
Not surprisingly, many of the ranchers that are following in the forebears’ footsteps have been using what we now call “sustainable ranching practices” for decades already. One example is rotational (轮流的) grazing, that is moving cattle herds more frequently to different pastures(牧场), so they don’t overgraze any one particular patch of land.
A newer “best practice” involves depositing a quarter to half inch of cattle wastes on grazed land to kick-start the soil chemistry below while also absorbing significant amounts of methane (沼气)—the most potent greenhouse gas—before it can head for the atmosphere. This technique is now becoming more commonplace as today’s ranchers care about reducing their carbon footprints like no generation before them.
1. In the first two paragraphs, what does the writer imply about the relationship in the past between ranchers and environmentalists?A.They worked together to reduce the impact of grazing on the environment. |
B.They didn’t look each other in the eyes when they meet. |
C.They had great differences between each other. |
D.They both agreed that raising animals for food benefits the environment. |
A.be favourable to |
B.be in disagreement with |
C.stand a chance with |
D.be unusual for |
A.Many ranchers persist in prioritising raising cattle over anything else. |
B.Grazing done in the right way helps biological diversity and ecosystem. |
C.“Rotational grazing” has been recently employed to raise animals. |
D.Grazing contributes to trees competing favourably with plants. |
A.grazing can be functional in the chemistry field |
B.methane is another powerful greenhouse gas besides carbon dioxide |
C.ranchers tend to remove their footprints as they are grazing |
D.grazing has become more eco-friendly as time goes by |
【推荐2】If you think backyard and roof-top beehives (蜂箱) are helping save the bees, think again, experts say.
A recent study conducted in Montreal found that places with the largest increase in honeybees kept by humans had the fewest wild bee species—with small bees, which are only able to fly shorter distances to find food, appearing to be especially at risk.
“The honeybee has been promoted as the symbol of helping the environment and the variety of living species on the earth, and really it’s not that,” says Gail MacInnis, a researcher at Concordia University. “You would never start keeping chickens to help save wild bird species.”
“Honeybees are among the most common insects in the world, but they aren’t native to many of the places where they are found,” says Sheila Colla, a professor at York University. “Honeybees are very successful invaders (入侵者),” Colla says. These bees can fly long distances and are able to effectively communicate with one another through dance language. Introducing honeybee hives to an area can be a problem for local wild bees, which often end up competing for the same food sources.
Should we stop keeping bees in the cities then? Colla gives us an answer in some way. “There is room for it in cities. It’s just right now we’re not managing it very responsibly in certain places,” she says. It is suggested that cities and towns that allow beekeeping should have caps on the number of hives and require people to register their bee hives. Beekeepers also need to understand the responsibility they’re taking on.
1. Why does Gail MacInnis mention “keeping chickens”?A.To introduce a new topic. | B.To show how to save wild birds. |
C.To make her idea easily understood. | D.To share chicken-keeping knowledge. |
A.Competition for food. | B.Risk of being killed. | C.Less communication. | D.No habitat. |
A.Saving the honeybees. | B.Building hives in cities. |
C.Making room for honeybees. | D.Keeping honeybees responsibly. |
【推荐3】Tigers are faced with many threats, including poaching(偷猎), illegal trade and habitat loss to name a few. It’s little wonder that their population has declined from 100,000 a century ago to just 3,500 today.
But despite these challenges, Nepal’s wild tigers have successfully returned from the edge of extinction with a 190 per cent population increase since 2009. According to Nepal’s National Tiger and Prey Survey 2022, there are now 355 wild tigers in the country, compared to 121 in 2010. This amounts to a 190 per cent increase, meaning that the country nearly tripled its tiger population.
Ginette Hemley, Senior Vice President for wildlife conservation at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), said,“Tigers in Nepal and everywhere else that they live in Asia, about 10countries, were on a steady decline because of two key reasons. The most immediate reason was poaching for the illegal animal trade. The second reason was loss of habitat.”
To achieve this comeback in tiger numbers, Nepal laid ban on poaching, with anti-poaching groups patrolling protected areas. Another factor in the country’s success was the restoration of corridors to promote the safe passage and genetic distribution of tigers in protected areas.
Hemley said,“ Nepal really does stand out as a leader in conservation,especially for tigers. There is support for conservation of tigers at the highest level of government. That has translated into really effective habitat conservation, bolstering the protection of tigers in national parks, the wildlife reserves.” As well as government support, she pointed to community involvement in conservation projects as a reason for Nepal’s success. Hopefully, we will continue to see a recovery in the tiger population, as well as measures taken to protect local communities.
1. What does the author think of the decrease of the tiger population?A.It’s surprising. |
B.It’s puzzling. |
C.It’s expected. |
D.It’s abnormal. |
A.The success of tiger conservation. |
B.Efforts made by a few Nepalese. |
C.The serious decrease of tigers. |
D.Challenges of protecting tigers. |
A.guarding |
B.walking |
C.trapping |
D.judging |
A.The specific reasons for protecting tigers. |
B.The government’s attitude to tiger conservation. |
C.The author’s ambiguous attitude to tiger conservation. |
D.The work local communities have done to protect tigers. |
【推荐1】The true Olympic spirit has been displayed by Canadian cross-country ski coach Justin Wadsworth, who helped Russian athlete Anton Gafarov with his broken ski during the Men’s Sprint Free Semifinals.
Gafarov’s start wasn’t smooth. He fell three times, crashing early in the race and breaking his ski. It was clear that Gafarov was out of the race for the men’s finals and wouldn’t be able to compete for medals. Still, he wanted to finish in front of the home crowd, but his left ski was too badly damaged in the crash and its base had come off. The Russian skier faced finishing the race by walking to the line, not skiing.
However, the Russian’s fall was seen by Canadian coach Justin Wadsworth, who immediately ran on to the course and helped Gafarov. “I went over and gave him one of Alex Harvey’s, a member of the Canadian team who didn’t qualify for the finals. It was about giving Gafarov some dignity (尊严) so he didn’t have to walk to the finish area,” Wadsworth said. “We help because we know everyone works so hard in our sport,” says Wadsworth, who was an Olympic skier for the S before becoming a coach. “Everyone wants fair results. It was a matter of allowing Gafarov to finish the race.”
Gafarov was thoughtful about his performance. “My fall cost me a broken ski and a pole,” said Anton Gafarov, adding that he decided to continue fighting for the finals despite all the difficulties.
Gafarov believed the race should be finished in any way possible. “It was a matter of principle to hold on to the end,” he added. He is not devastated (毁灭) by his failure and is eager to take part in the next Winter Olympics despite back problems due to injuries.
1. What happened to Gafarov during the Men’s Sprint Free Semifinals?A.He lost his ski in the unlucky crash. |
B.He gave up the race after falling three times. |
C.He got the gold medal for the men’s finals. |
D.He had his ski broken in the early race. |
A.He felt happy for Gafarov’s bad luck in the race. |
B.He knew what price Gafarov paid for the competition. |
C.He was angry with his player’s not qualifying for the finals. |
D.He once worked hard to become an Olympic skier for Canada. |
A.Every dog has its day. | B.Rome isn’t built overnight. |
C.Never give up in face of difficulty. | D.There is no end to learning. |
A.The Olympic Spirit | B.The Unlucky Day |
C.The History of Olympic Games | D.The Winning Gold Medal |
【推荐2】Climbers targeting peaks above 5,000 meters in the Tibet autonomous region, including the north side of Qomolangma, now have to apply for a permit, according to a rule issued by Chinese sports authorities.
To make climbing safer, or at least less deadly, the General Administration of Sport and the sports bureau of Tibet released a notification (通知) requiring climbers to send an application to the bureau at least a month in advance of their planned climb. It said climbing without permits will be strictly forbidden.
“In recent years, cases of injuries, missing people and deaths have been witnessed as a result of illegal climbing,” the notification said. “Climbing is a highly professional sport with high risk. Most illegal climbers lack professional skills, facilities and tour guides. Such activities will interfere with orderly climbing and bring risks, not only to the climbers themselves but also rescuers. They will also lead to a loss of personal or national property.”
Applications will need to detail each individual climber’s personal information, proposed climbing routes and related plans. Climbers are also being asked to obey related rules to protect mountain environments. The notification also urged regional government departments to strengthen safety checks and the prohibition of illegal climbing, encourage residents to join regular patrols near major climbing routes and promote public education on climbing safety.
In a previous interview with China Daily, Kul Bahadur Gurung, general secretary of the Nepal Mountaineering Association, said difficult weather conditions, lack of experience and support personnel, and the commercialization (商业化) of expeditions were the main reasons for the high death toll on the world’s highest peak. “Since the number of people reaching the summit of Everest is increasing, everyone thinks it is easier to climb and everyone can climb, which is a totally false idea,” he said.
1. Why is a permit needed for Qomolangma climbers?A.To stop illegal climbing. | B.To provide training ahead. |
C.To limit the number of climbers. | D.To collect climbers’ information. |
A.Test. | B.Change. | C.Replace. | D.Disturb. |
A.Its content. | B.Its purpose. | C.Its background. | D.Its impact. |
A.It’s a totally false idea. | B.It should be eco-friendly. |
C.It’s highly professional. | D.It should be non-profitable. |
【推荐3】John Banville has received three major literary prizes. In 2005 he won the Man Booker Prize for his novel The Sea (his 14th book). He has been proposed repeatedly as a candidate (候选人) for the Nobel Prize in Literature.
The writer had been resting on his couch when he received a call from a man half an hour before the true winners would be revealed at an awarding ceremony on Thursday. The man on the phone claimed to be Mats Malm, the secretary of the Nobel Prize Committee and he told Banville he would be awarded the prize of this year. And then he also read Banville a formal statement of the achievements he would print about the writer’s work.
“He was so convincing that I rang everybody I could think of to tell them about this good news.” Banville recalled. But 40 minutes later Banville received a phone call from his daughter who had seen the live announcement. She told her father, “It’s not you!”
“I realized then that it must have been a hoax. I rang everybody again and said, ‘Don’t buy the champagne and stop throwing your hats in the air!’” said Banville. A voicemail left on Banville’s phone shortly after the announcement explained that there had been a last-minute disagreement among decision-makers. But, after a close listen to the message, Banville noticed that voice was “deeper” than that of the real Mats Malm and lacked the same “smooth” grasp of English. He has since shared the message with the Swedish Academy to investigate the incident.
1. The underlined word “hoax” in the last paragraph probably means_______.A.trick | B.game | C.event | D.joke |
A.many people considered John Banville was a talented and productive writer |
B.he has been proposed repeatedly as a candidate for the Nobel Prize in Literature |
C.the man who called claimed to be the secretary and sounded very convincing |
D.the so called secretary called half an hour before the awarding ceremony |
A.suspicious and worried | B.shocked and disappointed |
C.sad and ashamed | D.angry and guilty |
A.who was responsible for the hoax will soon be revealed |
B.the Nobel Prize Committee planned the incident behind the scenes |
C.the voicemail left on Banville’s phone was probably a cheat |
D.John Banville will one day be awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature |