组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 人与动植物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:32 题号:22180832

Have you ever wondered why birds sing? Maybe you thought that they were just happy. After all, you probably sing when you are happy.

Some scientists believe that birds do sing some of the time just because they are happy. However, they sing most of the time for a very different reason. Their singing is actually a warning to other birds to stay out of their territory.

Do you know what a “territory” is? A territory is an area that an animal, usually the male, claims (声称) as its own. Only he and his family are welcome there. No other families of the same species are welcome. Your house is your territory where only your family and friends are welcome. If a stranger should enter your territory and threaten you, you might shout. Probably this would be enough to frighten him away.

If so, you have actually frightened the stranger away without having to fight him. A bird does the same thing. But he expects an outsider almost any time, especially at nesting (筑巢) season. So he is screaming all the time, whether he can see an outsider or not. This screaming is what we call a bird’s song, and it is usually enough to keep an outsider away.

1. Some scientists believe that most of the time bird’s singing is actually ________.
A.an expression of happinessB.a way of warning
C.an expression of angerD.a way of greeting
2. What is a bird’s “territory”?
A.A place where families of other species are not accepted.
B.A place where a bird may shout at the top of its voice.
C.An area for which birds fight against each other.
D.An area which a bird considers to be its own.
3. Why do birds keep on singing at nesting season?
A.Because they want to invite more friends.
B.Because their singing helps frighten outsiders away.
C.Because they want to find outsiders around.
D.Because their singing helps get rid of their fears.
4. How does the writer explain birds’ singing?
A.By comparing birds with human beings.B.By reporting experiment results.
C.By describing birds’ daily life.D.By telling a bird’s story.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述了一些人去村子里买青蛙,村民们为了赚钱,就抓了很多青蛙卖掉了。但是这样做的后果是昆虫变得多了,孩子们也更容易生病了。后来村民们意识到了这个问题,改变了做法,于是人与自然的平衡又恢复了。

【推荐1】It was a village in India. The people were poor. However, they were not unhappy. After all, their forefathers had lived in the same way for centuries.

Then one day, some visitors from the city arrived. They told the villagers there were some people elsewhere who liked to eat frog’s legs. However, they did not have enough frogs of their own, and so they wanted to buy frogs from other places.

This seemed like money for nothing. There were millions of frogs in the fields around, and they were no use to the villagers. All they had to do was catch them. Agreement was reached, and the children were sent into the fields to catch frogs. Every week a truck arrived to collect the catch and hand over the money. For the first time, the people were able to dream of a better future. But the dream didn’t last long.

The change was hardly noticed at first, but it seemed as if the crops were not doing so well. More worrying was that the children fell ill more often, and, there seemed to be more insects around lately.

The villagers decided that they couldn’t just wait to see the crops failing and the children getting weak. They would have to use the money earned to buy pesticide and medicines. Soon there was no money left.

Then the people realized what was happening. It was the frog. They hadn’t been useless. They had been doing an important job—eating insects. Now with so many frogs killed, the insects were increasing more rapidly. They were damaging the crops and spreading diseases.

Now, the people are still poor. But in the evenings they sit in the village square and listen to sounds of insects and frogs. These sounds of the night now have a much deeper meaning.

1. From Paragraph 1 we can learn that the villagers       .
A.were poor but somewhat contentB.worked very hard for centuries
C.dreamed of having a better lifeD.lived a different life from their forefathers
2. Why did the villagers agree to sell frogs?
A.The frogs made too much noise.B.They needed money to buy medicines.
C.They wanted to please the visitors.D.The frogs were easy money.
3. What can we infer from the last sentence of the text?
A.The harmony between man and nature is important.
B.Health is more important than money.
C.Happiness comes from peaceful life in the country.
D.Good old days will never be forgotten.
2023-10-13更新 | 9次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是说明文。文章主要介绍了研究人员在2023年4月26日的《公共科学图书馆·综合》(PLOS ONE)上报道说,尽管主人称宠物对他们有积极的影响,但它们并没有帮助缓解主人的整体压力或孤独感。

【推荐2】If you feel like you bonded with your pet during the pandemic(大流行病), you’re not alone.

Cat and dog owners in the United States gradually grew closer to their pets during the first two years of COVID-19. But these furry friends didn’t help with their owners’ overall stress or loneliness, despite owners citing their pets’ positive influences, researchers report April 26, 2023 in PLOS ONE. “The one very clear message is that the human-animal relationship is very complicated,” epidemiologist Hsin-Yi Weng of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind.

When the pandemic outbreak began, Weng and his colleagues recognized it as an unfortunate but unique opportunity to find out the dynamics of pet ownership during a large-scale event. The team launched a survey asking about people’s stress, loneliness and relationships with their pets. Participants reflected on their emotions before the pandemic and during lockdown.

Analyzing responses from more than 4,200 individuals, the team found that cat and dog owners felt they steadily bonded with their pets between the pre-pandemic and recovery phases. Spending more time at home and being separated from other people might explain those strengthened relationships, the researchers say.

But pets effects on mental health were a little indistinct. Although the authors expected pets to buffer stress and loneliness, people with furry companions had similar loneliness levels and sometimes even higher stress levels compared with non-pet owners. The results did suggest though that having a pet buffered the loneliness related to romantic relationships, or lack thereof.

On average, people without pets reported the lowest amounts of stress while cat owners had the highest. Affording everyday care, especially during lockdown, may have contributed to pet owners stress, the team suggests.“There are two sides of having a pet,” Weng says. While they provide companionship, pets also add extra responsibilities.

1. What can we learn from the report in PLOS ONE?
A.People felt bonded with loneliness.
B.Owners lived closer with their pets.
C.Pets didn’t relieve people’s overall stress.
D.Pets had little positive influence on their owners.
2. For what purpose did the researchers carry out the survey?
A.To organize a large scale event.
B.To reflect on pet owners
C.To analyze responses from individuals.
D.To explore the changes of pet-owner relationship.
3. What does the underlined word “buffer” mean in paragraph 5?
A.Cause.
B.Ease.
C.Experience.
D.Suffer.
4. Who may have more stress?
A.People with cats as pets.
B.People in romantic relationships.
C.People without furry pets.
D.People spending more time at home.
2023-07-10更新 | 43次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】There have been numerous wake-up calls about the effects of climate change on sea life. As ocean waters heat up, they are making coral lose color. Growing levels of carbon dioxide are making seawater more acidic. Now climate change is starting to affect fish's sense of smell, a phenomenon that will worsen in the coming years if global warming continues growing.

A sense of smell is what the fish can't do without. They use it to find food, detect upcoming danger, escape from predators (捕食者)find safe environments, and even recognize one another. "Future levels of carbon dioxide can have large negative effects on the sense of smell of fish, which can affect fish population numbers and the entire ecosystem, ”said an ocean life expert. "This can be prevented, but we must reduce carbon emissions now before it's too late.”

Experts believe that about half of carbon dioxide emissions produced by human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels--have over time ended up in the oceans, lowering the pH of seawater, and making it more acidic.

Researchers found that sea bass (鲈鱼)exposed to the more acidic conditions swam less and were less likely to react when encountering the smell of a predator. Also, they were more likely to "freeze", a sign of anxiety, according to the study. They found the longer the fish were in high CO2,the worse they got along. The researchers also measured the ability of the fish to detect certain odors (气味)in different levels of acidity (酸度)。 The study showed that their ability to detect and respond to some odors connected with food and threatening situations was more strongly affected than other odors.

The research is important because 20 percent of the protein consumed by 3 million people comes from seafood, and about 50 percent of this comes from fish caught from the wild. “Therefore, increases in carbon dioxide in the ocean have the potential to affect all fish species, including those that many people rely on food and livelihood, "the ocean life expert warned.

1. What do we know from the first paragraph?
A.Global warming will continue in the coming years.
B.Global warming is starting to affect fish's sense of smell.
C.The temperature of seawater is rising to a dangerous level.
D.Few people are worried about the impact of climate change.
2. Why does the author attach great importance to the sense of smell of fish?
A.It can affect the survival of fish.
B.Fish can stay safe with their sense of smell.
C.Fish rely on their sense of smell to find food.
D.Fish can find each other by their sharp noses.
3. Why does the author mention human activities in the text?
A.He wants to blame human beings for global warming.
B.He wants to criticize human beings for overuse of fossil fuels.
C.He concludes that human activities can destroy the sense of smell of fish.
D.He concludes that human activities can improve the ecosystem of the ocean.
4. What is the author's attitude toward the future of fish industry?
A.Satisfied.B.Enthusiastic.C.Disappointed.D.Concerned.
2020-12-18更新 | 49次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般