Sounds from human activity flood across the oceans, causing trouble to ocean creatures. And climate (气候) change may make some places even louder.
Researchers have expected the oceans to get noisier because of increasing human activity. “The more goods you buy, the more shipping you have, so the more noise you have.” says Luca Possenti, a scientist studying sound in the ocean at the Royal Netherlands Institute. But Possenti and his co-worker realized that climate change might also influence how sound travels through the water.
Human-caused climate change is changing ocean temperatures, salt levels and acidity (酸度). So Possenti’s team used computers to model how those factors (因素) influence noise levels across the world’s oceans.
When waters become more acidic, they can’t take in sound at some wavelengths as well, so those sounds can travel further, adding to the noise in some areas. This effect is relatively small. Other changes impact the sound level more, the researchers found. Changes to temperature and salt levels can change how well different layers (层) of the ocean mix, which, in turn, impacts how sound travels.
The team predicted (预测) models of the world in about 70 years if climate change continues. And then they compared them with models of the world now. In the North Atlantic, they saw an increase in sound levels in the upper 125 meters of the ocean. This was caused mostly by ice melting (融化) off of Greenland, forming a cold layer of water near the ocean’s surface. Sound traveling through water tends to go toward the coldest area. As a result, sound waves tended to get stuck in the cold top layer-spreading further out across the water, instead of traveling deeper. That increased the noisiness at this depth in the North Atlantic. The models suggested that a single ship could sound about five times as loud underwater because of this. Considering all the ship traffic between Europe and North America, that may stress animals, many of which communicate, and catch food with sound.
1. How is paragraph 2 developed?A.By quoting an expert. | B.By using examples. |
C.By making comparisons. | D.By presenting research findings. |
A.Effects of temperature changes. | B.Some risk factors for a nosier sea. |
C.Impacts of acidity on wavelengths. | D.Ways oceans mix and sound travels. |
A.Sea animals will be protected from noises. |
B.Added meltwater does more harm than good. |
C.Greenland is hit the hardest by climate change. |
D.The result of the research is based on prediction. |
A.Increase in salt levels. | B.Failure of acidity control. |
C.Change in the ocean depths. | D.Formation of a cold water layer. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Running and walking both offer their own unique benefits and risks. Here is something you need to know about the pros and cons (利弊) of each type of exercise - and which is best for your health goals.
●Running is better for weight loss than walking.
Both walking and running can help you lose weight.
●Walking is safer than running
●
Overall, both walking and running can help you achieve the recommended amount of exercise. There is no right choice for which is better for your health. Rather, deciding between walking and running depends on your unique goals and risk factors. For example, if you are older or have joint problems, walking may be the better option for you. However, if you’re pressed for time, running might be the more practical choice.
●Try the run-walk-run method.
The run-walk-run method involves alternating between running for a certain amount of time and walking for a set number of minutes. For example, you can run for two minutes and walk for one minute, or run for four minutes and walk for one minute.
After reading what is mentioned above, you may be able to choose the right type of exercise now.
A.Then repeat the cycle |
B.Choose to walk or run |
C.How to keep a balance between them |
D.However, running may be the better choice |
E.Whether you favour walking, running, or both |
F.While both running and walking are beneficial for you |
G.Because running means you’re going at a relatively faster pace |
Gwent Police have abandoned colors such as greys and browns of the 20th-century police cell(牢房)and have used color psychology to decorate them .
Ystrad Mynach station , which recently opened at a cost of £5 million has four cells with glass doors for prisoners who suffer from claustrophobia(幽闭恐怖症). Designers have painted the frames yellow , which researchers say is a calming color . Other cells contain a royal blue line because psychologists believe that the color is likely to encourage truthfulness .
The station has 31 cells , including 12 with a “live scan” system for drunken or disturbed prisoners , which detects the rise and fall of their chest . An alarm alerts officers if a prisoner’s breathing stops and carries on ringing until the door is opened .
Designers and psychologists have worked for years on color . Blue is said to suggest trust , efficiency , duty , logic , coolness , thinking and calm . It also suggests coldness and unfriendliness . It is thought that strong blues will stimulate clear thought and lighter , soft colors will calm the mind and aid concentration .
Yellow is linked with confidence , self-respect and friendliness get the color wrong and it could cause fear , depression and anxiety , but the right yellow can lift spirits and self-respect .
Ingrid Collins , a psychologist who specializes in the effects of color , said that color was an “ energy force ” . She said : “ Blue does enhance communication but I am not sure it would enhance truthful communication . ”
Yellow , she said , affected the mind . Red , on the other hand , should never be considered because it could increase aggression . Mrs. Collins praised the designers for using colors in the cells . Gwent is not the first British force to experiment with color to calm down or persuade prisoners to co-operate , In the 1990s Strathclyde Police used pink in cells based on research carried out by the US Navy .
1. The expression “ tip the balance ” in Paragraph 1 probably indicates that the blue might __________ .
A.let suspects keep their balance |
B.help suspects to confess their crimes |
C.make suspects cold and unfriendly in law court |
D.enable suspects to change their attitudes to colors |
A.Scanning equipment . | B.Royal blue lines . |
C.Glass doors . | D.Yellow frames . |
A.the relationship between colors and psychology |
B.a comparison of different functions of colors |
C.the use of colors in cells to affect criminals’ psychology |
D.scientific ways to help criminals reform themselves in prison |
【推荐3】Recent research shows that listening to music improves our health in surprising ways. If we take a music lesson or two, that musical training can help raise our IQs and even keep us sharp in old age.
Music Reduces Pain
As Bob Marely once put it: “One good thing about music, when it hits you, you feel no pain.” Research at Drexel University found that music reduced pain more than standard treatments in cancer patients. Other research showed that music can ease pain in patients.
Music Keeps Your Brain Healthy in Old Age
A study with healthy older adults found that those with ten or more years of musical experience scored higher on cognitive (认知的) tests than musicians with one to nine years of musical study.
A study showed that students who listened to relaxing classical music for 45 minutes before turning in slept much better than students who listened to an audiobook or did nothing different from their normal routine. If you’re having trouble sleeping, try listening to a little Mozart before bedtime.
Music Raises IQ and Academic Performance
A.Music Relaxes People |
B.Music Helps You Sleep Better |
C.The non-musicians scored the lowest. |
D.Here are some amazing benefits of music. |
E.Therefore, standard treatments are strongly advised by doctors. |
F.But the selection needed to be either classical pieces or their choices. |
G.Research shows that learning music predicts higher scores in children. |
【推荐1】All too often, a choice that seems sustainable(可持续的) turns out on closer examination to be problematic. Probably the best example is the rush to produce ethanol(乙醇) for fuel from corn. Corn is a renewable resource —you can harvest it and grow more, almost limitlessly. So replacing gas with corn ethanol seems like a great idea.
One might get a bit more energy out of the ethanol than that used to make it, which could still make ethanol more sustainable than gas generally, but that’s not the end of the problem. Using corn to make ethanol means less corn is left to feed animals and people, which drives up the cost of food. That result leads to turning the fallow land — including, in some cases, rain forest in places such as Brazil — into farmland, which in turn gives off lots of carbon dioxide(CO2) into the air. Finally, over many years, the energy benefit from burning ethanol would make up for the forest loss. But by then, climate change would have progressed so far that it might not help.
You cannot really declare any practice “sustainable” until you have done a complete lift-cycle analysis of its environmental(环境的) costs. Even then, technology and public policy keep developing, and that development can lead to unforeseen and undesired results. The admirable goal of living sustainable requires plenty of thought on an ongoing basis.
1. What might directly cause the loss of the forest according to the text?A.The growing demand for energy to make ethanol. |
B.The increasing carbon dioxide in the air. |
C.The greater need for farmland. |
D.The big change in weather. |
A.the energy benefit | B.the forest loss |
C.climate change | D.burning ethanol |
A.impractical | B.acceptable | C.admirable | D.useless |
A.Technology. | B.Sustainability. |
C.Ethanol energy. | D.Environmental protection. |
【推荐2】Animal populations across the world have been reduced by 69% in less than 50 years, according to a new scientific report. The report’s authors are calling for urgent action to restore the natural world.
The Living Planet Report (LPR) is produced every two years by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and the Zoological Society of London. The most recent report, released on October 13, 2022, shows that almost 70% of the world’s monitored wildlife was lost between 1970 and 2018. The report is based on research from 195 countries around the world. Data was collected from almost 32,000 populations of 5,230 species.
Although the average global loss of wildlife is 69%, the rate is greater in the global south. Latin America and the Caribbean in particular have seen the sharpest fall, having lost 94% of their wildlife since 1970. Across the world, the biggest drop was in freshwater populations of wildlife — including almost 1,400 species of mammals, birds, fish, amphibians and reptiles — which have decreased by 83%.
The report identifies several causes for wildlife loss, including hunting, farming, the loss of forests, pollution and climate change. However, the report also promotes solutions, such as designing less destructive food production systems, urgently protecting the Amazon rainforest, limiting the use of fossil fuels, and creating new laws to protect our natural environment.
Commenting on the report, Marco Lambertini, director general of WWF International, called the figures “terrifying”, and said “we need to restore nature and not simply halt its loss.” In December 2022, world leaders are meeting in Montreal for the 15th UN Biodiversity Conference, also known as COP 15. The authors of the LPR say that this is an opportunity for a global plan to deal with wildlife loss and restore nature. “Government leaders must step up at COP 15,” said Lambertini. “The world is watching.”
1. What does the author mainly want to show by listing the numbers in the first three paragraphs?A.The causes of the urgent situation. |
B.The detailed process of the research. |
C.The severity of wildlife loss worldwide. |
D.The drop in freshwater populations of wildlife? |
A.Stop hunting and farming. |
B.Ban the production of wildlife food. |
C.Offer legal protection of natural environment. |
D.Replace the fossil fuels with renewable energy |
A.Accept. | B.Stop. | C.Fear. | D.Suffer. |
A.Objective. | B.Indifferent. |
C.Ambiguous. | D.Concerned. |
【推荐3】Last summer, I was sent to take photos that could communicate the urgency of climate change in northern Canada. When I arrived at an abandoned village on Resolute Bay, I scanned the shore with my camera. Suddenly, I spotted a bear lying on the ground. It didn’t move for almost an hour. But when it finally stood up, I had to catch my breath. The bear’s once strong body was just skin and bones; every step that it took was painfully slow.
When I posted the photos on social media, I wrote, “This is what starvation may look like. I wonder whether the global population of 25, 000 polar bears would die the way this bear is dying.”
I did not say that this particular bear was killed by climate change. But news organizations around the world focused on it. The first line of the story published in National Geographic read, “This is what climate change looks like” — with “climate change” highlighted in yellow. Other news agencies even adopted more dramatic headlines.
It was estimated that my photos had been read by about 2.5 billion people around the world. But there was a problem: Most people and the news agencies didn’t recognize or misunderstood the real message I tried to send with them. Many people expressed gratitude that I’d provided shocking evidence on climate change, while others who are still trying to deny the existence of climate change charged me with spreading false information.
Perhaps I had made a mistake in not telling the full story — that I was looking for pictures that might foretell the future and that I didn’t know what had happened to this particular polar bear.
I can’t say that this bear was starving because of climate change, but I am happy that my photos have moved the conversation about climate change to the forefront, where it must remain until this problem is solved.
Until then, when I come across a scene like this one, I will again share with the world — and take pains to be sure that my intention is clear.
1. How did the author feel when the bear stood up?A.Shocked. | B.Scared. | C.Excited. | D.Relieved. |
A.The story. | B.The photo. | C.A starving bear. | D.Climate change. |
A.Provide more direct evidence on climate change. |
B.Show the link between the bear and climate change. |
C.Warn the possible results of climate change. |
D.Expose the false information about climate change. |
A.To admit his mistake. | B.To clarify his true intention. |
C.To please his readers. | D.To show off his amazing trip. |
【推荐1】I’m a big believer in mind-wandering now and then — especially when I’m out for a walk. There’s something about being in nature that helps me let go of daily worries and allows my mind to wander where it will go, which makes me feel great.
I admit, though, I’ve been perplexed by previous studies showing how mind-wandering can make me less productive or upset. But it turns out this contradiction (矛盾) between my personal experience and science may best be explained by the latest study.
Previous research suggests a wandering mind is an unhappy mind — we tend to be less happy when we’re not focused on what we’re doing. That’s likely true if mind-wandering keeps you from achieving your goals. However, when people find their wandering thoughts more interesting, their moods actually improve. Similarly, thinking about people you love produces positive results.
In the latest study, participants were reminded randomly via cell phone over three days to report how they were feeling and how much their thoughts were freely moving and related to what they were doing. After analyzing the data, the researchers found that when people’s thoughts were off-task, they generally felt more negative — similar to what earlier studies showed. But if their thoughts were free-moving, it had the opposite effect, helping people feel happier.
People aren’t built to be “on” all of the time. Taking a mind-wandering break might be good for our creativity, happiness and even productivity. And, as long as it’s employed during times when complete focus isn’t required, it may improve our well-being without damaging performance.
“My hope is that people will explore the limits of mind-wandering a bit more and try to mind-wander in a way that is bigger, more fantastical, more personally meaningful, and further into the future,” says Claire Zedelius, formerly of the University of California, Santa Barbara. “If people just really allowed themselves to freely use this tool, they might be able to focus on creative solutions to big problems.”
1. What does the word “perplexed” underlined in paragraph 2 probably mean?A.Confused. | B.Convinced. |
C.Created. | D.Rejected. |
A.A wandering mind remains unhappy. |
B.Free-moving wandering is common. |
C.Wandering thoughts are interesting. |
D.Off-task thoughts lead to negativity. |
A.The significant roles of mind-wanderers. |
B.Advice on being a better mind-wanderer. |
C.Benefits of free-moving mind-wandering. |
D.Plans for future studies on mind-wandering. |
A.How Mind-wandering Shapes Your Future |
B.Mind-wandering Is the Root of Happiness |
C.How Mind-wandering Can Do Good to You |
D.Mind-wandering Is Beneficial to Creativity |
【推荐2】A new study by the British government has discovered the mental well-being of the country’s teenage girls has worsened.
The survey, which included 30, 000 14-year-old students in 2005 and 2019, showed 37 percent of girls with psychological stress, up from 34 percent in 2005. British boys’ stress level was actually seen to fall over the same time period, from 17 percent to 15 percent. The report’s authors pointed out the “advent of the social media age” could be a major contributing factor for increased stress among teenage British girls.
“The adolescent years are a time of rapid physical, cognitive and emotional development,” Pam Ramsden, a lecturer in psychology at the University of Bradford in the United Kingdom, wrote in a recent blog post. “Teenagers interact with people in order to learn how to become competent adults. In the past, they would engage with parents, teachers and other adults in their community as well as extended family members and friends. Now we can also add social media to that list of social and emotional development.”
Throughout adolescence, girls and boys develop characteristics like confidence and self-control. Since teenage brains have not completely developed, teens don’t have the cognitive awareness and impulse(冲动)control to keep from posting inappropriate content Furthermore, this content can easily be spread far and wide with disastrous influences.
“Social media can also feed into girls’ insecurities about their appearance,” Ramsden said. These sites are often filled with images of people with body type unattainable to the normal person. However, these images and the messages tied to them gradually become societal standards.
“Social media allows girls to make comparisons among friends as well as celebrities and then provides them with ‘solutions’ such as extreme dieting tips and workouts to reach their goals,” Ramsden said. “Concerns about body image can negatively impact their quality of life preventing them from having healthy relationships and taking uptime that could be better spent developing other aspects of their personalities.”
1. How does the survey tell us the negative impact of social media?A.By making experiments. | B.By raising a question. |
C.By making comparisons | D.By analyzing causes and effects. |
A.Supportive | B.Indifferent | C.Critical. | D.Concerned. |
A.to get rid of the bad effects of social media | B.to follow the celebrities’ example |
C.to be concerned about their body image | D.to make comparisons among friends |
A.The well-being of teenagers in Britain |
B.The social media’s negative effect in Britain. |
C.The development of teenagers in Britain |
D.How to interact with teenagers in Britain. |
【推荐3】Languages around the world continue to disappear at an alarming rate. According to the UNESCO Atlas of Languages in Danger, there are 6,700 languages spoken in the world, 40 percent of which are in danger of disappearing. And the majority under threat are languages spoken by Indigenous(本土的)peoples around the world.
When an Indigenous language is lost, not only do we lose the knowledge built up by the community of its speakers, but also the world’s cultural and biological(生物学的)diversity is endangered. For example, where there are most species of plants and animal, there are most languages spoken. When a new species is “discovered” by scientists, you can bet your bottom dollar that the native people living in that area would already have had a name for that species and be highly knowledgeable about it. These languages are biological encyclopedias, and if they are no longer spoken, this wisdom and understanding is lost to humanity forever. “We human beings should care about indigenous languages in the same way as we should care about the loss of the world’s variety of plants and animals, its biodiversity,” Steven Pinker, a respected linguist and Harvard Professor, said.
Fortunately, efforts are being made to bring attention to and preserve these languages, along with the cultural and biological diversity they represent. And education is at the heart of the idea. The United Nations has declared 2019 as The International Year of Indigenous Languages so as to raise awareness, and to teach those who haven’t been aware of the contributions they can make. Similarly, UNESCO’s International Fund for Cultural Diversity is providing money to educational projects in the hope of bringing Indigenous language and knowledge into school.
1. How does the author show the seriousness of the problem in paragraph 1?A.By making a comparison. | B.By listing numbers. |
C.By quoting a famous person. | D.By providing examples. |
A.They help scientists find new species. |
B.Many of them are at risk of dying out. |
C.People speaking these languages are more knowledgeable. |
D.They contribute to the cultural and biological diversity. |
A.To educate people to protect indigenous languages. |
B.To promote people’s awareness of the United Nations. |
C.To bring indigenous language and knowledge into school. |
D.To celebrate the success of indigenous language protection. |
A.Languages and Biodiversity | B.Indigenous Languages Explained |
C.Preserving Indigenous Languages | D.The Loss of Indigenous Languages |