There’s a useful concept from psychology that helps explain why good people do things that harm the environment: the false consensus (共识) effect. That’s where we overvalue how acceptable and widespread our own behavior is in society. Put simply, if you’re doing something (even if you secretly know you probably shouldn’t), you’re more likely to think plenty of other people do it too. What’s more, you likely overestimate how much other people think that behavior is broadly OK.
This bias (偏见) allows people to justify socially unacceptable or illegal behaviors. Researchers have observed the false consensus effect in drug use and illegal hunting. More recently, conservationists are beginning to reveal how this effect contributes to environmental damage.
In Australia, people who admitted poaching (偷猎) thought it was much more widespread in society than it really was, and had higher estimates than fishers who obeyed the law. They also believed others viewed poaching as socially tolerable; however, in reality, more than 90% of fishers took the opposite stand on this. The false consensus effect has also shown up in studies examining support for nuclear energy and offshore wind farms.
Just as concepts from psychology can help explain some forms of environmental damage, so too can they help solve it. For example, research shows people are more likely to litter in areas where there’s already a lot of trash thrown around; so making sure the ground around a bin is not covered in rubbish may help.
Factual information on how other people think and behave can be very powerful. Energy companies have substantially reduced energy consumption simply by showing people their difference in electricity use compared to their neighbors. Encouragingly, stimulating people’s natural desire for social position has also been successful in getting people to “go green to be seen”, or to publicly purchase eco-friendly products.
As the research evidence shows, social standards can be a powerful force in encouraging and popularizing environmentally friendly behaviors. Perhaps you can do your bit by sharing this article!
1. Which example best illustrates the false consensus effect?A.A student spends long hours surfing the Internet. |
B.A blogger assumes many people dislike his posts. |
C.A smoker believes people generally approve of smoking. |
D.A driver frequently parks illegally in public places. |
A.It is contradictory. | B.It is impractical. |
C.It is widespread. | D.It is unacceptable. |
A.Develop green habits for better health. |
B.Choose green items that are easy to spot in stores. |
C.Join green movements for personal fulfillment. |
D.Make green choices that others can perceive. |
A.Justify social standards. | B.Publicize sustainable practices. |
C.Encourage technological innovations. | D.Highlight personal responsibilities. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】We have long been attracted by quick solutions that could increase our intelligence. Today, people’s hopes lie in brain training apps, some of which claim to result in smarter minds”. But is this quick solutions all that it is said to be?
There are plenty of brain training apps, but they all share the same characteristics: they turn mental exercises like simple arithmetic, memory tests and logic and pattern-matching problems into quick games. The more you play these mini-games, the smarter you will get — or so some apps tell us. It is really a big promise.
Many of the apps say they are backed by “science”, a claim I found surprising as a former neuroscientist. The concept that increasing intelligence would be as simple as practicing a few mini-games every day goes against what we have discovered about how humans think and learn.
After surveying a diverse spread of thousands of users across wide variety of apps, researchers at Western University in Canada discovered that “brain training has no appreciable effect on cognitive functioning in the ‘real world’, even after extensive training periods”. The positive effects that have been found are limited to the very specific mini-games and tasks that users are trained on, such as the ability to memorize lists of words or numbers, or perform mental arithmetic, with little benefit to other skills.
If you are expecting them to improve your ability to write novel or construct a complex spreadsheet, I am afraid you will want to look elsewhere.
Puzzle video games such as “Baba Is You” and “Returno the Obra Dinn” see players apply their skill at logic, memory and concentration in a far more complex way than any brain training mini-game.
1. What does the author say about brain training apps?A.They have scientific support. | B.They work in the form of games. |
C.They require problem-solving skills. | D.They are based on complex arithmetic. |
A.Supporting evidence for some brain training apps. |
B.A detailed description of some brain training apps. |
C.A further explanation of the use of some brain training apps. |
D.Questioning the exaggerated effects of some brain training apps. |
A.Limited. | B.Tremendous. | C.Damaging. | D.Far-reaching. |
A.A storybook. | B.A diary. | C.A magazine. | D.A biography. |
【推荐2】A new study suggests climate conditions in the Sahara Desert, one of hottest, driest and most deserted areas in the world, have changed from wet to dry a about every 20,000 years.
But previous evidence has suggested the Sahara did not always experience such extreme heat and dry conditions. At times, the Sahara Ranged to a very wet climate. This permitted plants and animals to develop and grow and led to the creation of human settlements. Now, they have discovered more evidence, which, the lead researcher David Mc Gee says, supports the idea that the Sahara's climate kept changing between wet and dry about every 20,000,years.
McGee reported these climate changes were mainly driven by changes in the Earth's(地轴)as the planet travels round the sun .This process affects the amount of sunlight between seasons. Every 20,000 years the Earth receives more strong summer sunlight. When the Earth's axis changes again, the amount of sunlight is reduced. This season change happened continuously every 20,000 years. The other part of the season produced rainy conditions, resulting in a wetter, greener, plant-rich environment. When the rainy activity weakens, the climate becomes hot and dry, like the Sahara remains today.
The scientists based their research on dust collected from ocean sediment(沉积物)in the Atlantic Ocean bottom off the coast of West Africa. The dust contained layers (层)of ancient sediment built up over millions of years. Each layer could contain traces of Saharan dust as well as the remains of life forms. This information was used to assess over what time period the dust had built up. This led to the overall finding that the Saharan changes from wet to dry climates happened every 20,000 years.
David McGee said that today we only see the Sahara Desert as an extremely deserted and “inhospitable” place. The new study suggests that the area's climate has changes between grasslands and a much wetter environment, and back to dry climates, even over the last quarter million years. McGee says he thinks the latest research can be valuable in studying the Sahara's history as it relates to human settlement.
1. What does the new study find about the Sahara Desert?A.It is one of the hottest, driest and most deserted areas in Africa. |
B.It always experiences extreme conditions because of its position. |
C.Its climate changes between wet and dry about every 20,000 years. |
D.Its environmental conditions stop plants and animals from surviving. |
A.Rainy activity. | B.Solar radiation. |
C.Human activity. | D.Global environment. |
A.By analyzing ocean life. |
B.By studying Sahara’s history. |
C.By collecting dust on the coast. |
D.By examining mean sediment. |
A.Unsuitable to live. | B.Insignificant lo study. |
C.Unable to explore. | D.Impossible to change. |
【推荐3】Everyone knows they feel amazingly good and refreshed after a good night’s sleep but now scientists have discovered it can help you to live longer too. According to a study in the US, healthy sleeping habits mean men can live almost five years longer, and women for two years. It also found that sleep improves our health and reduces the risk of heart disease.
However, the study by the American College of Cardiology(心脏病学)shows it’s not just about how long you sleep; the quality of your sleep is important, too. Dr Frank Qian, who led the study, said sleep must be restful. The researchers said that sleep of high quality for adults depended on five fundamental elements: getting seven to eight hours of sleep each night; having trouble falling asleep no more than twice a week; having trouble staying asleep no more than twice a week; not using medicine to get to sleep; and waking up feeling rested at least five days a week.
Each factor was given one point, with a maximum of five points for the highest quality of sleep. The researchers looked at the results of a survey of 172,321 people in the US that measured their health habits, including sleep, over five years. They found that people who had all five points were likely to live longer and lead healthier lives than those who had sleep difficulties.
According to the Sleep Charity, a good night’s sleep can improve people’s memory and immune(免疫)system. Dr Qian admits that no one’s sleep is perfect—everyone has a late or restless night sometimes. However, he said, “Even from a young age, if people can develop these good habits of getting enough sleep, making sure they are sleeping without too many distractions, which originate from daily troubles or noisy surroundings. And gradually it can greatly benefit their overall long-term health.”
The study was based on people reporting their own sleep habits rather than recording them scientifically, so this may have affected the results and more research is needed.
1. What can be inferred from Paragraph 1?A.People with bad sleep may always feel unsettled. |
B.Good sleep can benefit mental and physical health. |
C.People with good sleeping habits can recite knowledge better. |
D.Healthy sleeping habits can prevent people from many diseases. |
A.Sleep’s quality is more vital than its length. |
B.Sleep’s quality lies in five important factors. |
C.People who meet five factors are bound to live much longer. |
D.People with sleep difficulties are likely to have a bad memory. |
A.Pills. | B.Assignments. | C.Bothers. | D.Routines. |
A.The analyses of more samples. | B.The survey of more sleep issues. |
C.The study of more influential elements. | D.The more scientific methods of research. |
阅读下列短文,从每题所给的四个选项 (A 、B 、C 和 D )中,选出最佳选项。
A survey has shown that what you do on a plane can be determined by which nationality is listed on your passport.
According to the results of an international passenger survey, Australians are the biggest drinkers on board with 36 percent choosing to down the hatch, compared to 35 percent of Americans and 33 percent of Brits.
The Airline Passenger Experience Association(APEX) spoke to around 1,500 people, aged 18 and older, who have travelled by plane at least once during the last three months and were living in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, China, Singapore, Australia and Brazil.
The results found Chinese travelers are most likely to nod off once the seat-belt sign switches off. They are also the first to take out their credit card for some in-flight shopping and the biggest fans of gaming. Americans on the other hand like to use their time in the air more productively — when not drinking — choosing to work while flying at 35,000 feet.
Meanwhile, Brits and Germans are the best at making chat with random strangers — spending 50 percent more time than any other nationality. Comparatively, Brazilians conduct their conversations online via email, messaging apps or social media.
Despite plane food having a bad reputation, seven out of ten interviewees said they were happy to eat up on the selection of in-flight snacks and meals. In-flight magazines were also popular with four out of five passengers.
The international flyers did however express their desire for better in-flight entertainment. “The industry has greatly improved the comfort, entertainment and onboard service, and passengers are accepting those improvements.” said Russell Lemieux, APEX executive director. “At the same time, passengers are demanding more from their air travel experiences which will drive more improvements touching all aspects of the journey.” he added.
1. What can you probably see in the flight according to the passage?
A.Brazilians choose to drink. |
B.Americans do in-flight shopping. |
C.Germans chat to kill the time. |
D.The Chinese switch off the seat-belt sign. |
A.passengers from one nation have little in common |
B.most passengers like to read in-flight magazines |
C.more than half of the passengers don’t enjoy plane food |
D.most people tend to use in-flight time to have a good sleep. |
A.Flyers care little about entertainment. |
B.Flyers are not satisfied with the improvements. |
C.Flyers are expecting better flight experiences. |
D.Flyers have more and more demands from airlines. |
A.To entertain readers with interesting stories. |
B.To encourage people to behave well in public. |
C.To criticize impolite behaviors on the plane. |
D.To inform readers of the results of a survey. |
When you think of documentaries, you may think of them as long, boring programs. But documentaries can be wonderful and bring stories from the real world into our homes. With fascinating footage(影片片段)and stories, documentaries encourage us to think about interesting issues we wouldn’t necessarily know about.
So, what makes a good documentary, and what should we pay attention to when we watch one? Here, we offer a few easy strategies to help you get the most out of watching documentaries.
Pay attention to the themes
While watching a documentary, keep your eyes and ears peeled for the themes people talk about and what ideas they focus on. Is it meant to be informative or raise a certain emotional response?
Think critically
Listen to what the people in the documentary are saying and ask yourself the following questions: If you were debating with someone or introducing a new concept, would you say the things the people in the documentary are saying? Do the arguments make sense?
Check the sources
If you’re sitting at the computer and can’t think of anything to do, why not look up the points the documentary made and see if they are accurate? You could even read more about what is presented in the documentary.
Who are the creators?
The creators or financial backers of a film will usually be involved with how the subject matter is presented. For instance, as the documentary 2016: Obama’s America was directed in large part by a conservative writer, it’s not surprising that it’s critical of President Obama from the beginning.
1. Which of the following is the most proper to describe documentaries?
A.non-fictional | B.controversial |
C.subjective | D.thoughtful |
A.inform us of factors of good documentaries. |
B.help us enjoy documentaries better. |
C.introduce ways of making documentaries. |
D.help us figure out themes of documentaries. |
A.Because the author dislikes Obama. |
B.Because it is a persuasive example. |
C.Because it is quite popular in China. |
D.Because it is directed by a writer. |
A.it’s better to think twice about what is in documentaries. |
B.financial backers often appear in documentaries. |
C.it is always difficult to get the themes of documentaries. |
D.many points of documentaries are not accurate. |
【推荐3】Vincent Willem van Gogh is a great Dutch painter. In 2017 one of his paintings was sold for $81 million. 2021 seemed to be Vincent Willem van Gogh’s year. There were at least five different exhibits in nearly 40 U.S. cities regarding his works. It’s astonishing to know he sold only a few paintings in his lifetime, for only small sums of money. How did this now-famous painter fail to escape mainstream attention after his death? It was probably thanks to a woman.
Six months after Van Gogh died, his beloved brother Theo passed away. This was extra tragic because Theo had expected to raise the profile of his brother’s works. Fortunately, Johanna van Gogh-Bonger married Theo shortly before his death. Born in 1862, Johanna worked as an English teacher at two different girls’ schools before her marriage. When Theo died, she was left with their son and a sizable art collection. That’s when she decided to pursue Theo’s wishes. “Johanna assumed responsibility for Van Gogh’s artistic legacy, During her lifetime, she devoted herself to raising awareness of Vincent’s art and letters,” says Luijten, the author of a biography of Johanna.
Johanna broke her neck to improve Van Gogh’s name. To do this, she selectively sold his works and inspired writers and art critics to write about his paintings though she was refused many times. Johanna didn’t lose heart. She lent some pieces to well-known museums and organized countless exhibitions and sales. “One of Johanna’s major achievements was the organization of an exhibition at the Stedelijk Museum in 1905, where she united no less than 484 of Van Gogh’s works. “A Van Gogh exhibition of this scale would never again be matched,” Luijten explains. Another strategic move occurred in 1914 when Johanna published Van Gogh’s letters. Theo had kept hundreds of letters. “This was of vital importance, as following the publication of the letters, the appreciation of Van Gogh as an artist increased further,” says Luijten.
“Despite Van Gogh’s brilliance, he wouldn’t be remembered to the level seen today without the influence of Johanna. Johanna van Gogh-Bonger is perhaps not a household name, but she is a force that shouldn’t be underestimated in making Van Gogh well-known,” said Luijten.
1. Which can best describe Johanna from the text?A.Creative and determined. | B.Ambitious and aggressive. |
C.Insightful and stubborn. | D.Positive and accessible. |
A.Set out. | B.Tried her best. | C.Couldn’t wait. | D.Was willing. |
A.The life story of Van Gogh. | B.The great contribution of Van Gogh’s brother. |
C.The popularity of Van Gogh’s paintings. | D.The woman making Van Gogh known. |