组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:44 题号:22731272

There’s a useful concept from psychology that helps explain why good people do things that harm the environment: the false consensus (共识) effect. That’s where we overvalue how acceptable and widespread our own behavior is in society. Put simply, if you’re doing something (even if you secretly know you probably shouldn’t), you’re more likely to think plenty of other people do it too. What’s more, you likely overestimate how much other people think that behavior is broadly OK.

This bias (偏见) allows people to justify socially unacceptable or illegal behaviors. Researchers have observed the false consensus effect in drug use and illegal hunting. More recently, conservationists are beginning to reveal how this effect contributes to environmental damage.

In Australia, people who admitted poaching (偷猎) thought it was much more widespread in society than it really was, and had higher estimates than fishers who obeyed the law. They also believed others viewed poaching as socially tolerable; however, in reality, more than 90% of fishers took the opposite stand on this. The false consensus effect has also shown up in studies examining support for nuclear energy and offshore wind farms.

Just as concepts from psychology can help explain some forms of environmental damage, so too can they help solve it. For example, research shows people are more likely to litter in areas where there’s already a lot of trash thrown around; so making sure the ground around a bin is not covered in rubbish may help.

Factual information on how other people think and behave can be very powerful. Energy companies have substantially reduced energy consumption simply by showing people their difference in electricity use compared to their neighbors. Encouragingly, stimulating people’s natural desire for social position has also been successful in getting people to “go green to be seen”, or to publicly purchase eco-friendly products.

As the research evidence shows, social standards can be a powerful force in encouraging and popularizing environmentally friendly behaviors. Perhaps you can do your bit by sharing this article!

1. Which example best illustrates the false consensus effect?
A.A student spends long hours surfing the Internet.
B.A blogger assumes many people dislike his posts.
C.A smoker believes people generally approve of smoking.
D.A driver frequently parks illegally in public places.
2. How did most Australian fishers view the issue of poaching?
A.It is contradictory.B.It is impractical.
C.It is widespread.D.It is unacceptable.
3. What do words “go green to be seen” refer to in paragraph 5?
A.Develop green habits for better health.
B.Choose green items that are easy to spot in stores.
C.Join green movements for personal fulfillment.
D.Make green choices that others can perceive.
4. What is a recommended approach to solving environmental problems?
A.Justify social standards.B.Publicize sustainable practices.
C.Encourage technological innovations.D.Highlight personal responsibilities.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了研究表明没有证据表明脑力训练应用程序可以使人更聪明。

【推荐1】We have long been attracted by quick solutions that could increase our intelligence. Today, people’s hopes lie in brain training apps, some of which claim to result in smarter minds”. But is this quick solutions all that it is said to be?

There are plenty of brain training apps, but they all share the same characteristics: they turn mental exercises like simple arithmetic, memory tests and logic and pattern-matching problems into quick games. The more you play these mini-games, the smarter you will get — or so some apps tell us. It is really a big promise.

Many of the apps say they are backed by “science”, a claim I found surprising as a former neuroscientist. The concept that increasing intelligence would be as simple as practicing a few mini-games every day goes against what we have discovered about how humans think and learn.

After surveying a diverse spread of thousands of users across wide variety of apps, researchers at Western University in Canada discovered that “brain training has no appreciable effect on cognitive functioning in the ‘real world’, even after extensive training periods”. The positive effects that have been found are limited to the very specific mini-games and tasks that users are trained on, such as the ability to memorize lists of words or numbers, or perform mental arithmetic, with little benefit to other skills.

If you are expecting them to improve your ability to write novel or construct a complex spreadsheet, I am afraid you will want to look elsewhere.

Puzzle video games such as “Baba Is You” and “Returno the Obra Dinn” see players apply their skill at logic, memory and concentration in a far more complex way than any brain training mini-game.

1. What does the author say about brain training apps?
A.They have scientific support.B.They work in the form of games.
C.They require problem-solving skills.D.They are based on complex arithmetic.
2. What is paragraph 3 mainly about?
A.Supporting evidence for some brain training apps.
B.A detailed description of some brain training apps.
C.A further explanation of the use of some brain training apps.
D.Questioning the exaggerated effects of some brain training apps.
3. Which best describes the effects that brain training apps have on memory?
A.Limited.B.Tremendous.C.Damaging.D.Far-reaching.
4. Where is the text probably taken from?
A.A storybook.B.A diary.C.A magazine.D.A biography.
2024-03-15更新 | 85次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】A new study suggests climate conditions in the Sahara Desert, one of hottest, driest and most deserted areas in the world, have changed from wet to dry a about every 20,000 years.

But previous evidence has suggested the Sahara did not always experience such extreme heat and dry conditions. At times, the Sahara Ranged to a very wet climate. This permitted plants and animals to develop and grow and led to the creation of human settlements. Now, they have discovered more evidence, which, the lead researcher David Mc Gee says, supports the idea that the Sahara's climate kept changing between wet and dry about every 20,000,years.

McGee reported these climate changes were mainly driven by changes in the Earth's(地轴)as the planet travels round the sun .This process affects the amount of sunlight between seasons. Every 20,000 years the Earth receives more strong summer sunlight. When the Earth's axis changes again, the amount of sunlight is reduced. This season change happened continuously every 20,000 years. The other part of the season produced rainy conditions, resulting in a wetter, greener, plant-rich environment. When the rainy activity weakens, the climate becomes hot and dry, like the Sahara remains today.

The scientists based their research on dust collected from ocean sediment(沉积物)in the Atlantic Ocean bottom off the coast of West Africa. The dust contained layers (层)of ancient sediment built up over millions of years. Each layer could contain traces of Saharan dust as well as the remains of life forms. This information was used to assess over what time period the dust had built up. This led to the overall finding that the Saharan changes from wet to dry climates happened every 20,000 years.

David McGee said that today we only see the Sahara Desert as an extremely deserted and “inhospitable” place. The new study suggests that the area's climate has changes between grasslands and a much wetter environment, and back to dry climates, even over the last quarter million years. McGee says he thinks the latest research can be valuable in studying the Sahara's history as it relates to human settlement.

1. What does the new study find about the Sahara Desert?
A.It is one of the hottest, driest and most deserted areas in Africa.
B.It always experiences extreme conditions because of its position.
C.Its climate changes between wet and dry about every 20,000 years.
D.Its environmental conditions stop plants and animals from surviving.
2. What is the direct reason for Sahara's climate changes?
A.Rainy activity.B.Solar radiation.
C.Human activity.D.Global environment.
3. How did the researchers acquire the evidence?
A.By analyzing ocean life.
B.By studying Sahara’s history.
C.By collecting dust on the coast.
D.By examining mean sediment.
4. What does the underlined word “inhospitable” probably mean?
A.Unsuitable to live.B.Insignificant lo study.
C.Unable to explore.D.Impossible to change.
2019-04-19更新 | 163次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了一项研究来说明良好睡眠习惯的好处。

【推荐3】Everyone knows they feel amazingly good and refreshed after a good night’s sleep but now scientists have discovered it can help you to live longer too. According to a study in the US, healthy sleeping habits mean men can live almost five years longer, and women for two years. It also found that sleep improves our health and reduces the risk of heart disease.

However, the study by the American College of Cardiology(心脏病学)shows it’s not just about how long you sleep; the quality of your sleep is important, too. Dr Frank Qian, who led the study, said sleep must be restful. The researchers said that sleep of high quality for adults depended on five fundamental elements: getting seven to eight hours of sleep each night; having trouble falling asleep no more than twice a week; having trouble staying asleep no more than twice a week; not using medicine to get to sleep; and waking up feeling rested at least five days a week.

Each factor was given one point, with a maximum of five points for the highest quality of sleep. The researchers looked at the results of a survey of 172,321 people in the US that measured their health habits, including sleep, over five years. They found that people who had all five points were likely to live longer and lead healthier lives than those who had sleep difficulties.

According to the Sleep Charity, a good night’s sleep can improve people’s memory and immune(免疫)system. Dr Qian admits that no one’s sleep is perfect—everyone has a late or restless night sometimes. However, he said, “Even from a young age, if people can develop these good habits of getting enough sleep, making sure they are sleeping without too many distractions, which originate from daily troubles or noisy surroundings. And gradually it can greatly benefit their overall long-term health.”

The study was based on people reporting their own sleep habits rather than recording them scientifically, so this may have affected the results and more research is needed.

1. What can be inferred from Paragraph 1?
A.People with bad sleep may always feel unsettled.
B.Good sleep can benefit mental and physical health.
C.People with good sleeping habits can recite knowledge better.
D.Healthy sleeping habits can prevent people from many diseases.
2. Which of the following may Dr Frank Qian agree with?
A.Sleep’s quality is more vital than its length.
B.Sleep’s quality lies in five important factors.
C.People who meet five factors are bound to live much longer.
D.People with sleep difficulties are likely to have a bad memory.
3. Which of the following can replace the underlined word “distractions” in Paragraph 4?
A.Pills.B.Assignments.C.Bothers.D.Routines.
4. What will be needed for the study to offer more convincing findings?
A.The analyses of more samples.B.The survey of more sleep issues.
C.The study of more influential elements.D.The more scientific methods of research.
2023-05-31更新 | 77次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般