Electrical devices(仪器) could soon use power made by human energy. Scientists say they have developed an experimental device that produces electricity from the physical movement of a person walking. British scientist Max Donelan and other scientists in Canada and the United States developed the device.
The device connects to a person’s knee. As the person walks, the device captures energy each time the person slows down. To do this, the device helps with the slowing down movement of the leg. The movements of the walking person push parts of a small machine that produces electricity. Using the device, an adult walking quickly could produce thirteen watts of electricity in just a minute. Donelan says walking at that speed could produce enough power to operate a laptop computer for six minutes.
There are several possible uses for the device. Developers say it could help people who work in areas without electricity to operate small computers. The device could also be used in hospitals to operate heart pacemakers(起搏器). It could even be used to assist in the movement of robotic arms and legs.
The experimental version of the device weighs about one and a half kilograms, but it is too costly for most people to buy. But the researchers hope to make a lighter, less costly version. An improved version should be ready in one year.
The developers hope the device will one day help developing countries. Nearly twenty five percent of people around the world live without electric power.
A similar product was invented in 2005 by Larry Rome of the University of Pennsylvania. He created a bag carried on a person’s back that also produces power from walking.
The knee device does not produce as much electricity as the bag. But the bag requires the walker to carry a load of twenty to thirty kilograms.
1. The second paragraph mainly talks about .A.who developed the device |
B.how the device works |
C.several possible uses for the devices |
D.how much electricity the device can produce |
A.produces power without adding more loads to the walker |
B.can produce more power in a much shorter time |
C.needs to be equipped with a battery |
D.can help the walker walk faster |
A.help housewives operate the washing machine |
B.make it much easier for us to go online |
C.produce more electricity than that invented by Larry Rome |
D.be applied in medicine to operate heart pacemakers |
A.First device powered by walking will soon be on the market |
B.Advanced technology brings in a new way to operate heart pacemakers |
C.Device gives new meaning to the idea of power walking |
D.Human energy will become a main source of electricity |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】When it came to design, Steve Jobs lived Apple’s “Think Different” mantra (信条). Many major corporations use design to benefit their bottom lines, but Apple’s entire ethos was design. And it was hardwired in Jobs. Even when he was heading NeXT, the educational-computer company he founded, product and graphic design drove his strategy. He went so far as to get special dispensation (授权) from IBM to commission the NeXT logo from Paul Rand, designer of the IBM, ABC, and Westinghouse logos. When Jobs returned to Apple, he took its design to new levels, profoundly influencing the look of 21st-century computer technology.
Apple products became designers’ best friends, forever altering the practice of everything from graphic design to architecture by placing production power in the hands of creators. Jobs realized that creative people were not simply his primary customers, they were the willing propagandists of the brand. He so keenly understood his end users, and treated them with respect, that they went forth and exponentially multiplied.
Jobs integrated a range of designers into all aspects of the company — from hardware to software, from product to package, from corporate identity to advertising. He found roles for graphic, industrial, interior, and user-experience designers. Jobs never slavishly (盲目地) reacted to the market’s fickle whims (率性) or wants; he accepted that his role was to educate people to the potential of personal technology and enhance their appreciation of design. He used design to alter behavior and consequently altered his users’ behavior through innovative design. Unlike many other tech companies, design was the engine in Jobs’s world. Designers were not injected as foreign organisms into the middle or end of the conceptual and engineering process, after the engineers and marketers did the meaningful work.
Jobs was an equal-opportunity design patron. He never distinguished, as many brand companies do, between high and low design for high-end and low-end markets. One brand fit all. Apple did not hide a discount sub-brand behind tasteless graphics — although fair discounts offered to educators and some professions were routinely available. Every customer got the same logo, package, and product.
Design was not used to mask shoddy goods or inflate prices. Jobs’s sense of quality was legend. He instilled his designers with extra pride.
Likewise it was expected that every Apple customer would experience pride of ownership. From the boxes in which adapters and earbuds were sold to the look of the apps that are now so ubiquitous, the end user expected the best, the clearest, the cleanest.
And what about those Apple stores? Part museum, part retail mall — with great shopping bags, too. Rarely has design been so valued by a corporate CEO, and rarely is design’s value so inextricably tied to the reputation of a corporation. Jobs was a holistic designer — everything, everywhere, was designed well. And that is the essence of thinking different.
1. We can learn from Paragraph 1 that Steve Jobs ________.A.used design to make profits |
B.infused NeXT with the concept of design |
C.convinced Paul Rand to join his company |
D.designed Apple’s products in person |
A.apprehensive | B.indifferent | C.respectful | D.grateful |
A.was always catering for the favors of the public |
B.aimed to cultivate customers’ potential of graphic design |
C.was embodied in every aspect of his company |
D.had largely affected users’ buying intentions |
A.Every Apple user can own the products of the same level. |
B.Apple designed sub-brand products for some users. |
C.Its aim is to lift the overall prices of Apple products. |
D.Apple provides every customer with the best product. |
A.Steve Jobs treated every customer as equal. |
B.The creative design concept of Jobs has changed our world. |
C.Apple product is one of the best commodities nowadays. |
D.How Jobs developed his concept of design. |
【推荐2】With the development of science and technology, people find it increasingly difficult to keep pace with the most fashionable smart phones in the world, especially when smart phones are connected with robots. If any robot can take over the world, it’s RoBohon. He has all the information you put in your smart phone and can read human feelings. So everyone probably wants to own the cutest smart robot phone.
RoBohon is very useful. He can project photographs and films, tell you he loves you if he senses you are crying and do everything your smart phone can do.
RoBohon was created by Japanese electronics company SHARP. The robot phone, with a 2-inch screen fitted into its back, stands 20cm tall and weighs 390 grams. Most surprisingly, he can walk on his own legs around your home and act as a super cute personal assistant. He can even dance. He reads your text messages, announces phone calls, dries your tears and wakes you up. He can even recognize your face and call your name when you enter the room. He will be always at your side keeping you company and providing you with great comfort.
RoBohon can also serve as an alarm clock. The robot can be a wonderful partner in a small conversation. Though he is expensive, more than double the price of iPhone, who wouldn’t want a small personal assistant?
1. According to Paragraph 3, what can RoBohon do?A.Stand up. | B.Sing a song. |
C.Make a call. | D.Write text messages. |
A.It’s very tall. |
B.It can do something that humans do. |
C.It can’t read human feelings. |
D.It was created by a Japanese company. |
A.Most people can’t afford RoBohon. |
B.RoBohoa is cheaper than iPhone. |
C.RoBohon will be popular with some people, |
D.iPhone can take over the world. |
A.RoBohon: World’s Cutest Smart Phone |
B.Robot Phones Are Taking Over the World |
C.Smart Phones Are Changing the World |
D.Robot Phone RoBohon Is Based on iPhone |
【推荐3】As the saying goes, “An apple a day keeps the doctor away.” That’s because this healthy food choice is supposed to be full of nutrients. The apple at the supermarket, though, might be so old that it has lost many of its nutrients. But soon there might be a way to check the quality of fruit by scanning it.
Scientists at Food+Future coLAB have come up with the idea of a handheld spectrometer (分光仪) that scans food. The machine will work by shining infrared (红外线的) light on a piece of produce. By measuring how chemicals in the fruit or vegetable take in the light, the scanner can recognize the food’s chemical makeup.
“The machine can tell you exactly how old an apple is, how many calories it contains, what nutrients are present inside it, and even small differences in taste,” Greg Shewmaker of Food+Future coLAB recently said.
For the new machine to be useful to consumers, researchers first need to create a database that contains possible chemicals for a particular type of fruit, like an apple, for example. Scientists will need to scan lots of pieces of produce(农产品)to collect this data. The information collected will allow the scanners to tell customers the quality of fruit.
Once consumers know what’s inside an apple, they can decide if they want to buy it.
Knowing fruit quality may also affect how a store prices produce. “We can price produce based on the nutritional value,” Shewmaker explained. Food+Future coLAB has already created a working model of its machine. It says you may see one in your local supermarket within the next few years. Then deciding whether you’ve picked the healthiest fruit will be just a quick scan.
1. What do we know about the spectrometer?A.It is powered by infrared light. |
B.It is not useful in many customers’ eyes. |
C.It can help customers decide which fruit to buy. |
D.It can improve the quality of fruit and vegetables. |
A.information about the chemicals in fruit |
B.a database about the types of fruit |
C.possible chemicals about the fruit |
D.a large number of products |
A.It makes a store more attractive. |
B.It enriches customers’ knowledge about food nutrition. |
C.It creates a database about the chemical makeup of fruit. |
D.It provides price reference for produce. |
A.The Fruit Scanner | B.The Priced Fruit |
C.How to Scan Fruits | D.How to Pick Fruits |
【推荐1】Scientists may one day be able to destroy viruses in the same way that opera singers break wine glasses. New research mathematically determined the frequencies at which simple viruses could be shaken to death.
The capsid (壳) of a virus is something like the shell of a turtle, said physicist Otto Sankey of Arizona State University. “If the shell can be damaged by mechanical vibrations (震动), the virus can be destroyed.”
Recent experimental evidence has shown that laser (激光) pulses with the right frequency can kill certain viruses. However, locating these resonant (共振的) frequencies is a bit of trial and error. Experiments must try various conditions, Sankey said.
To further this search, Sankey and his student Eric Dykeman have developed a way to calculate the vibrations of every atom in a virus shell. From this, they can determine the lowest resonant frequencies. An experiment has recently shown that pulses of laser light can cause destructive vibrations in virus shells. Sankey said, “Like pushing a child on a swing from rest, one sudden push gets the virus shaking.”
However, it is difficult to calculate what sort of push will kill a virus, since there can be millions of atoms in its shell structure. A direct calculation of each atom’s movements would take several hundred thousand Gigabytes of computer memory, Sankey explained.
The team plans to use their technique to study other, more complicated viruses. However, it is still a long way from using this to destroy the viruses in infected people. “This is such a new field, and there are so few experiments that the science has not yet had enough time to prove itself,” Sankey said. “We remain hopeful but remain skeptical at the same time.”
1. What is the new way to kill viruses?A.Replacing viruses’ capsids with shells. |
B.Breaking viruses’ capsids by vibration. |
C.Locating the position of certain viruses. |
D.Damaging the conditions that viruses like. |
A.To prove how simple the new theory is. |
B.To explain how to start the virus shaking. |
C.To suggest the idea comes from our real life. |
D.To show the destructive power of vibrations. |
A.The shell structure of viruses. |
B.The lack of computer memory. |
C.The challenging part of the research. |
D.The importance of atoms’ movement. |
A.Disapproving. | B.Worried. |
C.Uncaring. | D.Positive. |
【推荐2】Search “toxic parents”, and you’ll find more than 38, 000 posts, largely urging young adults to cut ties with their families. The idea is to safeguard one’s mental health from abusive parents. However, as a psychoanalyst, I’ve seen that trend in recent years become a way to manage conflicts in the family, and I have seen the severe impacts estrangement (疏远) has on both sides of the divide. This is a self-help trend that creates much harm.
Research by Karl Pillemer, a professor at Cornell University, indicates that 1 in 4 American adults have become estranged from their families. I believe that’s an undercount, because others have stopped short of completely cutting off contact but have effectively broken the ties.
“Canceling” your parent can be seen as an extension of a cultural trend aimed at correcting imbalances in power and systemic inequality. Certainly the family is one system in which power has never been balanced. In 1933, the psychoanalyst Sándor Ferenczi warned that even the simple indication that someone has more power than we do could potentially be damaging.
Today’s social justice values respond to this reality, calling on us to criticize oppressive and harmful figures and to gain power for those who have been powerless. But when adult children use the most effective tool they have-themselves-to gain a sense of security and ban their parents from their lives, the roles are simply switched, and the pain only deepens.
Often, what I see in my practice are cases of family conflict mismanaged, power dynamics turned upside down rather than negotiated. I see the terrible effect of that trend; situations with no winners, only isolated (孤独的) humans who long to be known and feel safe in the presence of the other.
The catch is that after estrangement, adult children are not suddenly less dependent. In fact, they feel abandoned and betrayed, because in the unconscious, it doesn’t matter who is doing the leaving; the feeling that remains is “being left”. They carry the ghosts of their childhood, tackling the emotional reality that those who raised us can never truly be left behind, no matter how hard we try.
What I have found is that most of these families need repair, not permanent break-up. How else can one learn how to negotiate needs, to create boundaries and to trust? How else can we love others, and ourselves, if not through accepting the limitations that come with being human? Good relationships are the result not of a perfect level of harmony but rather of successful adjustments.
To pursue dialogue instead of estrangement will be hard and painful work. It can’t be a single project of “self-help”, because at the end of the day, real intimacy (亲密关系) is achieved by working through the injuries of the past together. In most cases of family conflict, repair is possible and preferable to estrangement—and it’s worth the work.
1. Why do young people cut ties with the family?A.To gain an independent life. |
B.To restore harmony in the family. |
C.To protect their psychological well-being. |
D.To follow a tendency towards social justice. |
A.Response. | B.Problem. | C.Operation. | D.Emphasis. |
A.break down boundaries | B.gain power within the family |
C.live up to their parents’ expectations | D.accept imperfection of family members |
A.To advocate a self-help trend. | B.To justify a common social value. |
C.To argue against a current practice. | D.To discuss a means of communication. |
【推荐3】Wildlife in New York City tends to be headline news. These animals' admirable ability to live with humans in peace draws our attention and sympathy. Yet, what most New Yorkers don't even know is that another animal, the Quaker Parrot, has invaded (入侵) the city with surprising results.
Quaker parrots originally came from the mild regions of Argentina and Brazil. The details related to the birds' arrival to the U. S. have become a thing of legend. During the 1960s, workers at JFK International Airport reported that the parrots—then products of the pet trade—escaped from broken shipping trunks (箱子). Others say the birds escaped from their homes or were intentionally released by their owners, some of whom may have been unprepared to deal with the birds' unpleasant screams. Either way, the birds have now infiltrated (渗透) all five districts in New York within the last five years. They've also expanded into the lower Hudson Valley and major cities around the U. S.
Each bird is born knowing how to build a nest, although this skill is adjusted slightly with age and experience. The birds use their soft feet to build these free-standing nests in between tree forks. Nest structures can grow to the size of a refrigerator, housing up to 200 pairs of birds. Each nest can weigh more than a ton.
Unfortunately, these parrots' unique habit of building nests on public facilities can cause their homes to catch fire, taking down the electrical network. Con Edison, New York City's energy services company, realized about 14 years ago that these nests were behind a series of Power outages (停电) in Brooklyn. So the company partners with wildlife specialists to carefully remove nests from dangerous areas before they become a security risk.
Despite the challenges these parrots present for the public, they are one of the few invasive species stories with a fairly happy outcome. The parrots seem to pose no risk of overpopulating the neighborhood or outcompeting native species for food. And public service corporations arrange special teams to keep equipment free from birds, and the parrots have become a largely welcomed addition to New York's wildlife scene.
1. What do we know about Quaker parrots according to the passage?A.They have charming voices. | B.They are from South America. |
C.They are only active in New York. | D.Their nests look like a refrigerator. |
A.Size. | B.Screams. |
C.Popularity. | D.Nest building. |
A.The birds are welcome. | B.The birds need protection. |
C.The birds are in danger. | D.The birds are trouble makers. |
A.Magical Birds' Nest. | B.Prefer Jungle to Buildings? |
C.Parrots Living in Urban Jungle. | D.Help Parrots Survive in Cities? |