组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:202 题号:2998025
We are not who we think we are.
The American self-image is spread with the golden glow of opportunity.We think of the United States as a land of unlimited possibility,not so much a classless society but as a place where class is mutable—a place where brains,energy and ambition are what counts,not the circumstances of one's birth.
The Economic Mobility Project, an ambitious research led by Pew Charitable Trusts, looked at the economic fortunes of a large group of families over time, comparing the income of parents in the late 1960s with the income of their children in the late 1990s and early 2000s.Here is the finding: "The 'rags to riches' story is much more common in Hollywood than on Main Street. Only 6 percent of children born to parents with family income at the very bottom move to the top.
That is right, just 6 percent of children born to parents who ranked in the bottom of the study sample, in terms of income, were able to bootstrap their way into the top. Meanwhile, an incredible 42 percent of children born into that lowest are still stuck at the bottom,having been unable to climb a single rung of the income ladder.
It is noted that even in Britain---a nation we think of as burdened with a hidebound class system-children who are born poor have a better chance of moving up. When the studies were released,most reporters focused on the finding that African-Americans born to middle-class or upper middle-class families are earning slightly less,in inflation-adjusted dollars,than did their parents.
One of the studies indicates,in fact,that most of the financial gains white families have made in the past three decades can be attributed to the entry of white women into the labor force.This is much less true for African-Americans.
The picture that emerges from all the quintiles,correlations and percentages is of a nation in which,overall,"the current generation of adults is better off than the previous one",as one of the studies notes.
The median income of the families in the sample group was $55,600 in the late 1960s; their children's median family income was measured at $71,900.However,this rising tide has not lifted all boats equally.The rich have seen far greater income gains than have the poor.
Even more troubling is that our nation of America as the land of opportunity gets little support from the data.Americans move fairly easily up and down the middle rungs of the ladder,but there is "stickiness at the ends" —four out of ten children who are born poor will remain poor,and four out of ten who are born rich will stay rich.
1. What did the Economic Mobility Project find in its research?
A.Children from low-income families are unable to bootstrap their way to the top.
B.Hollywood actors and actresses are upwardly mobile from rags to riches.
C.The rags to riches story is more fiction than reality.
D.The rags to riches story is only true for a small minority of whites.
2. It can be inferred from the undertone of the writer that America,as a classless society,should ________.
A.perfect its self-image as a land of opportunity
B.have a higher level of upward mobility than Britain
C.enable African-Americans to have exclusive access to well-paid employment
D.encourage the current generation to work as hard as the previous generation
3. Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the passage?
A.The US is a land where brains,energy and ambition are what counts.
B.Inequality persists between whites and blacks in financial gains.
C.Middle-class families earn slightly less with inflation considered.
D.Children in lowest-income families manage to climb a single rung of the ladder.
4. What might be the best title for this passage?
A.Social Upward Mobility.
B.Incredible Income Gains.
C.Inequality in Wealth.
D.America Not Land of Opportunity.
2014·四川成都·一模 查看更多[4]

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约490词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?

Don't dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don't appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations-trucking, financial advice, software engineering — have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.

This isn't to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn't go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.

The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums — from grammar school to college —   should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.

The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven't been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.

Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.

Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.

1. what does the underlined word “their” in the second paragraph refer to?
A.Low-income workers.B.Robot owners.
C.Robots.D.Researchers of the study.
2. Which of the following is true?
A.All jobs will be threatened by the coming of robots.
B.Optimists' opinions on new tech find little support.
C.Issues arising from automation need to be tackled.
D.Negative consequences of new tech can be avoided.
3. Education in the age of automation should put more emphasis on_______.
A.innovative potentialB.job-hunting skills
C.communication skillsD.cooperative spirit
4. The author suggests that tax policies be aimed at            .
A.encouraging the development of automationB.boosting incomes
C.easing the hostility between rich and poorD.bridging the income gap
2021-08-18更新 | 114次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】A few years ago, I started to notice big shifts in teens’ behavior. Around 2010, teens started to spend their time much differently from the generations before. These teens and young adults all have one thing in common: Their childhood or adolescence coincided with the rise of the smart phone. For this reason, I call them iGeneration.

What makes iGen different? Growing up with a smartphone has affected nearly every aspect of their lives. They spend so much time on the Internet, texting friends and on social media that they have less leisure time for everything else. Whether it’s going to parties, shopping at the mall, or watching movies, iGen teens are participating in these social activities at a significantly low rate.

Some parents might worry about their teens spending so much time on their phones because it differs from the way they spent their own adolescence. But it is not just different——in many ways, it’s actually worse. Spending less time with friends means less time to develop social skills. A 2014 study found that sixth graders who spent just five days at a camp without using screens ended the time better at reading emotions on others’ faces, suggesting that iGen’s screen-filled lives might cause their social skills to shrink.

In addition, in the annual Monitoring the Future survey, the percentage of iGen teens who read a non required book every day dropped from 60 percent in 1980 to only 16 percent in 2015. Perhaps as a result, average SAT critical reading scores have dropped 14 points since 2005.

iGen shows another break with the previous generations; Depression, anxiety, and loneliness have shot upward with happiness declining. The teen suicide rate increased by more than 50 percent, as did the number of teens with clinical—level depression.

Parents used to worry about their teens spending too much time with their friends—they were a distraction, a bad influence, a waste of time. But it might be just what iGen needs now.

1. How are iGen teens different from the, generations before?
A.They are more skillful in high-tech products.B.They stay in close contact with friends.
C.They prefer to live a virtual life than a real one.D.They spend their adolescence with smartphones.
2. Why is the “annual Monitoring the Future survey” mentioned in paragraph 4?
A.To stress the importance of reading the required books.
B.To explain the reason why iGeneration reads less.
C.To introduce the extracurriculum reading situation of iGeneration.
D.To show the influence of reading on iGen teenagers’ mental health.
3. What is the fifth paragraph mainly about?
A.Depression and anxiety are the common symptoms of mental problems.
B.Mental problems can be found in large numbers of iGen teens.
C.Net-addicted teenagers are more likely to suffer from mental problems.
D.iGen teens’ mental problems are getting more and more attention.
4. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.How the Smartphone Affected an Entire Generation of Kids?
B.Parents Are Getting Serious about Teen Smartphone Addiction.
C.Smartphones for Teens: Smart or Stupid?
D.Smartphones Are Changing iGen Teen’s Lifestyle.
2020-08-25更新 | 23次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,介绍了不少国家为了人类的利益而猎杀野生动物的行为,生物学家认为我们应该兼顾动物保护和人类发展。

【推荐3】The words “protect animals” appear everywhere in books and on screens, because some animals are even in danger of dying out. But sometimes the reality can be a little different from what people read or watch.

About 300 black bears were killed in Florida, the US, in October, 2015.It’s been the first bear hunt in the state since 1994.Local officers explained that the black bear population(a)had grown to 3,500 and become a menace to local people.In the past two years, bears have hurt at least four people in Florida.

Months ago ,the Swiss government allowed the locals to kill a wolf.This was because the wolf killed 38 sheep, and it was a great loss to some local farmers. Days ago in China, three old men were caught by the police for killing a serow(鬣羚), a kind of protected animal.They said they killed the animal because it ate the plants they grew.

However, these stories don’t always mean that animal protection stops because of human interests especially when it is related to economic development.A man named Zhou Weisen set up a wild animal base in Guilin, Guangxi. He saved over 170 tigers and about 300 bears.His base also offered jobs to local people.

“There may never be a standard answer to the question of whether we should give more attention to the environment or human development,”said Robert May, a British expert at Oxford University. “But we shouldn’t put either one to one side, as the future is uncertain.”

1. What does the underlined word “menace”in paragraph 2 probably mean?
A.Tradition.B.Threat.C.Benefit.D.Relief.
2. Why did the Swiss government allow the locals to kill the wolf?
A.The wolf killed a serow.
B.The wolf was caught by the police.
C.The wolf ate the plants the farmers grew.
D.The wolf caused economic loss to local farmers.
3. Why did the author mention Zhou Weisen’s story in paragraph 4?
A.To show that animal protection stops.
B.To prove animal protection is important.
C.To explain protecting animals can bring economic development.
D.To stress that animal protection must give way to human interests.
4. Which of the following might Robert May agree with?
A.Human interests should be considered first.
B.We should focus on the future rather than the present.
C.Humans can kill animals when their interests are harmed.
D.Keeping the right balance between the environment and human interests is important.
2023-03-10更新 | 64次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般