Recent studies show that a large percentage of teens today are getting their cigarettes from stores, mostly gas stations or convenience stores. As teens continue to be able to buy their own cigarettes, more and more communities begin to punish those who sell cigarettes to the teens.
One community has experienced success in their attempts to stop the sale of tobacco products to children. Woodridge, Illinois, started a program seven years ago which forbade and strictly punished the sale of tobacco products to children. The entire program includes local licensing of vendors (小贩), repeated undercover inspections to see if the sale to children has stopped, and education programs in schools. Woodridge has become a model community as other communities are moving to stop teen tobacco use.
A recent national study showed that 36.5% of females, and 40.8% of males buy their cigarettes from stores, whether it is a gas station or a supermarket. Hopefully, as more and more sellers see the trouble they face if caught selling to children, they will stop selling.
True, tightening down on stores that sell tobacco to children isn’t going to completely stop the problem of teen tobacco use. Teens continue to get them from other sources. But it definitely does prevent their efforts. With more education in schools, and perhaps stronger punishments for teens caught with tobacco, more and more teens will see the problems with the tobacco usage, and will stop the habit.
1. To stop teens from smoking, more and more communities are ________.
A.punishing those who sell cigarettes to teens more severely |
B.punishing teens caught with tobacco more severely |
C.educating those who sell cigarettes about the danger of teen smoking |
D.stopping the sale of tobacco products in stores |
A.Local licensing to tobacco sale. | B.Repeated undercover inspections. |
C.Education programs in schools. | D.Stronger punishment of teens caught smoking. |
A.teens can only buy cigarettes from gas stations and convenience stores |
B.more communities have succeeded in stopping teen tobacco use |
C.More males than females have the habit of smoking in America |
D.Punishment alone cannot solve the problem of teen tobacco use |
A.Negative | B.Optimistic | C.Uncertain | D.Uncaring |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】In mammals,loud calls usually serve as alarm signals that warn fellow species of an enemy or other danger. On the other hand, screams from humans can have very different meanings, as Swiss researchers now report in the journal “PLoS Biology”. Human’s screams are not always only associated with negative emotions such as fear, pain, anger and grief, but also positive emotions such as joy and pleasure.
Sascha Frühholz and his colleagues from the University of Zurich studied how many types of human screams there are, how accurately test subjects can distinguish them, and which brain regions are involved in processing such sound signals. To do this,they first made sound recordings of different screams. Twelve men and women were to put themselves in situations where they reacted with a brief scream. The predetermined situations included, for example: an attack by an armed stranger,celebration about a sporting victory of their favorite team, the threat of an opponent(对手).
From the recordings, the researchers finally selected 420 screams. From this, they identified six distinct categories of screams, including three of alarming characters (cries of pain, anger, and fear) and three non-alarming screams (as expressions of great pleasure, extreme joy, and desperate sadness). Contrary to all expectations, the subjects reacted to non-alarming screams more quickly and recognized the emotion expressed with it more reliably than with alarming screams. This was also confirmed by images of the brain using functional magnetic resonance imaging(FMRI).
Until now, researchers assumed that humans also detect and process perceived alarm signals particularly quickly in the form of screams, as this is an important survival mechanism(生存机制), says Frühholz. But unlike monkeys and other mammals, non-alarming screams would have become more important for communication. “This changed priority is probably due to needs that have evolved in the evolution of complex human social relationships.”
1. What does the text mainly talk about?A.Human’s expressions. |
B.A research on screams. |
C.A survival mechanism. |
D.Mammals’ alarm signals. |
A.Cries of pain. | B.Anger. |
C.Fear. | D.Desperate sadness. |
A.All-mammals are more sensitive to alarming screams.。 |
B.All humans survive owing to quicker reaction to screams. |
C.Non-alarming screams are more useful for human communication. |
D.Alarming screams are more important than non-alarming screams. |
A.To spread and advocate. | B.To argue and discuss. |
C.To recommend and introduce. | D.To compare and inform. |
【推荐2】From the roar of a crowd to the quiet of a library, sound and silence might seem like polar opposites. However, according to a new research, our brains perceive them in the same way. Silence may not be a sound, but scientists say we can truly hear it.
In this new study, researchers examined how people experience silence using well-known auditory illusions (错觉). The illusions are meant to test the perception of noise, but for the study, the team adapted them to measure people’s response to silence, instead.
“If you can get the same illusions with silences as you get with sounds, then that may be obvious that we literally hear silence after all.” Chaz Firestone, a co-author of the study and cognitive scientist at Johns Hopkins University, says in a statement.
In the study, participants were tricked by these “silence illusions” in a similar way to how people are typically fooled by the sound versions of the experiments.
The researchers prepared seven experiments and tested them on 1,000 study participants. In one experiment, researchers played a recording that sounded like background noise in a crowded place. In the first half of the recording, the background noise was interrupted by two separate periods of silence. In the second half, one continuous period of silence was inserted (嵌入). Researchers asked participants which silence felt longer- the combination of the first two periods of silence, or the second uninterrupted one. Most participants thought the continuous silence was longer, but it was actually the same length as the two shorter silences combined.
These results were consistent with previous research that examined auditory illusions, which used two separate sounds and one continuous sound. With that illusion, people also perceived the continuous sound as longer than the two separate ones together.
Similar findings across the seven experiments suggested that humans experience silence and sound in much the same way: They can distort (扭曲) our perception of time.
1. Why did researchers use auditory illusions in the new study?A.To help people perceive sounds. | B.To test people’s adaptability to noise. |
C.To measure how people respond to silence. | D.To remind people to be quiet in the library. |
A.Illusions of silence fool people’s brains. |
B.The three periods of silence are of the same length. |
C.Sound is usually difficult for people to perceive. |
D.Participants chose a recording and played it. |
A.A diary. | B.A journal. | C.A novel. | D.A guidebook. |
A.We can truly hear silence like a sound. |
B.Sound and silence are actually the same. |
C.Auditory illusions affect our perception ability. |
D.Our brain has the ability to perceive sound and silence. |
【推荐3】Wildfires are a major source of air pollution. They are also predicted to worsen as climate change progresses.
Within the smoke particles produced by these fires is a wide range of organic chemical compounds known as “brown carbon”. Brown carbon absorbs sunlight, and in doing so, contributes to global warming.
Over time, the brown carbon is bleached by chemical reactions with oxidants (氧化剂) in the atmosphere (such as ozone) and becomes white. This means that it stops absorbing light and stops warming Earth.
This bleaching process is heavily dependent on atmospheric conditions, which vary across regions. The longer it takes for brown carbon to become white, the greater an impact it can have on the environment.
As atmospheric chemists living in a region frequently polluted by wildfire smoke, we wanted to know more about these effects.
Aerosols are microscopic liquid and solid particles (微粒) suspended in the atmosphere. They’re smaller than the width of a human hair, but are still made up of many molecules. Aerosol particles are everywhere and have a large effect on both health and the climate. When aerosol particles interact with light, a portion of the light is absorbed but the rest reflects and scatters off of the particles.
For most types of aerosol particles, the amount of light being absorbed is negligible. That means a lot of the light reflects back to space. Through this mechanism, some of the pollution we create actually masks the full impact of greenhouse gases.
Some aerosol particles, however, are coloured, which means they are absorbing some light. Any light from the sun that is absorbed instead of getting reflected back into space is converted into heat and warms the planet.
Aerosol particles from smoke contain brown carbon. The various molecules that make up brown carbon are similar to some organic dyes (染料), overall giving it a characteristic brown colour. However, when ozone in the atmosphere reacts with brown carbon, it can transform it into new colourless molecules that do not warm the earth.
1. Which of following can make brown carbon less harmful?A.The constantly spreading wildfires. |
B.The worsening climate change. |
C.The chemical reactions with ozone. |
D.The slowly bleaching process. |
A.They reflect most of the light. |
B.They equal a human hair in width. |
C.They affect our health in a large scale. |
D.They expand the impact of greenhouse gases. |
A.Insignificant. | B.Unavoidable. |
C.Inaccessible. | D.Unacceptable. |
A.Adding some dyes to smoke. |
B.Making the smoke colorless. |
C.Absorbing light from the sun. |
D.Transforming particles into molecules. |
【推荐1】Sulphur-crested cockatoos (葵花凤头鹦鹉) are common in western Australia, where they normally live in wooded areas. But as forests have been cut down, cockatoos have gotten used to living near people. Scientists report that people in Sydney, Australia are in a battle with these birds.
Last year, scientists at the Max Planck Institute reported that the cockatoos had learned how to open the covers of trash bins. That’s not an easy job. The cockatoos must lift the heavy cover with their beaks (喙) and then walk along, pushing the cover up until it falls over.
When scientists first began studying the cockatoos in 2018, only three areas near Sydney had cover-opening cockatoos. A year and a half later, cockatoos in 44 different areas knew the trick. This time the scientists weren’t just studying cockatoos. They were also studying humans.
The scientists spent weeks studying more than 3,200 trash bins in four different areas of Sydney. They wanted to see how many bins were protected and what methods were used.
In one area, over half the bins were protected. The most common way of protecting the bins was to put a brick or some other heavy objects on the cover. Some people put things like rubber snakes on the top of their bins. The scientists discovered that the humans were teaching each other tricks, too. In most neighborhoods, many people used the same cockatoo-stopping methods as their neighbors.
The researchers say it’s like a race between humans and cockatoos to learn new ways of doing things. Now many cockatoos have learned how to push heavy items off the bins. As a result, humans have figured out ways to attach the items to the top of their bins. The scientists describe the situation as a “human-wildlife conflict”. They expect these conflicts will become more common as humans take over more areas that used to be wild.
1. What can we infer about the cockatoos from the text?A.They like copying humans’ behavior. |
B.They are newly found in Australia. |
C.They don’t like living with people. |
D.They are very clever birds. |
A.How the cockatoos learned the trick. |
B.Why the birds in more areas did the trick. |
C.How humans responded to the birds’ trick. |
D.Why humans taught the birds to do the trick. |
A.They wanted their habitat back. |
B.They intended to make humans angry. |
C.They could adopt new ways to open bins. |
D.They disliked looking for food themselves. |
A.A battle over trash bins between cockatoos and humans |
B.A human-wildlife conflict all over Australia |
C.A problem caused by cockatoos to humans |
D.A big problem of “homeless” cockatoos |
【推荐2】The Atlanta-based Coca-Cola company is cooperating with a Danish company to create a 100% recyclable soda bottle.
Plastic is one of the biggest polluters in our environment. And Coca-Cola was named the world's number one plastic polluter in 2020. It is the most frequently littered plastic bottle in 51 out of 55 countries!
While plastic is incredibly useful, it is also unfamiliar to Earth. The bacteria in the soil cannot degrade (降解) plastic back into carbon dioxide and water, because it cannot recognize the molecules (分子) in plastic. This is not the only issue. When plastic eventually does degrade, thanks to the sun, it releases greenhouse gas emissions and harmful chemicals into the environment, only worsening the climate issues already present.
Coca-Cola has finally responded to growing concerns, one of which is to replace the plastic bottle with a paper bottle.
Creating a paper bottle is challenging. The paper bottle must still follow the same safety standards as the plastic bottles. Another issue is the possibility of paper flaking into the liquid.
The first paper bottle will be tested in Hungary this summer. The bottle is made of a single piece of paper-fiber-based material instead of separate parts, which would weaken the bottle. Because paper cannot come into direct contact with the drink, a water-resistant plant-based coating is inside the bottle. There is no clear solution for the paper top yet.
Even if the paper bottles are successful, it will be some time before companies use them to replace cheap and easy-to-produce plastic. Despite this, Coca-Cola's steps towards sustainability are still steps towards a brighter future.
1. What is the third paragraph mainly about?A.The uses of plastic. | B.The trouble with plastic. |
C.The degradation process of plastic. | D.The difficulty in degrading plastic. |
A.It has a waterproof coating. |
B.Its separate parts will weaken the bottle. |
C.It will go into production before next summer. |
D.It is made entirely of paper-fiber-based material. |
A.Unconcerned. | B.Doubtful. | C.Promising. | D.Disappointed. |
A.Say Goodbye to Coca-Cola Bottles |
B.Coca-Cola Company's Contributions |
C.Plastic, a Threat to Our Environment |
D.Coca-Cola May Come in Paper Bottles |
【推荐3】Throwing handfuls of bread to birds has long been seen as harmless enough. But in recent years, some scientists have suggested that bread might not do birds’ digestive systems any good, saying that as uneaten food rots down, the water quality worsens and algal blooms can occur. Plus, by encouraging birds to gather in one place, the build-up of droppings may result in outbreaks of disease too. Meanwhile, many cities have signs telling us not to feed pigeons and gulls, which are considered an “annoyance” due to the mess they make, and scattering bread inevitably attracts rats and mice.
It seems that the public has accepted these warnings, and that fewer of us now feed birds this way. In October, a sign went up in a Derbyshire park claiming that the local birds were dying of starvation, and urging visitors to feed them as before. When online posts about the notice went viral, feathers flew as people debated the benefits of handing out bread to birds.
Paul Stancliffe of the British Trust for Ornithology(BTO) points out that there’s insufficient scientific evidence for bread harming birds, adding that, as little research has been done, it could even turn out to be beneficial. ① “We just don’t know,” he says. Although bread is a heavily processed “unnatural” food intended for humans, that alone may be insufficient grounds for not feeding it to birds.
In the 1980s, the Wildfowl & Wetland Trust (WWT) carried out a comparative study of different flocks of mute swans, and the birds that consumed the most bread had weaker muscles, implying that a bread-heavy diet might be the cause. “Our official line is that bread is okay for ducks, geese and swans, but only in moderation,” says WWT’s Peter Morris. “However, this advice comes with several other warnings.” ② The first is that it’s best offered in winter, when there is less plant and insect food around. In spring and summer, too much artificial food may not be a good idea, since young birds have to learn how to look after themselves and natural food will contain a wider range of nutrients to help them grow.
“Just like us, birds need a varied diet to stay healthy,” says a spokesperson for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds(RSPB). “Although ducks, geese and swans can digest all types of bread, too much can leave them feeling full without giving them all of the important vitamins, minerals and nutrients they need.” ③
When bird feeding first became popular in the UK in the 19th century, some Victorians encouraged tough love, arguing that such handouts would only make our feathered friends lazy and dependent on welfare. ④ Morris says that there is a theory that wild birds can get “hooked” on easy meals, losing interest in other types of food. Another danger, he says, is that birds fed regularly end up accustomed to humans, placing themselves at greater risk of predation(捕食).
1. How can feeding birds with bread affect our urban life?A.Birds’ mess can attract many rats and mice. |
B.Birds’ gathering in one place disturbs our peace. |
C.Bread goes bad and the water quality will suffer. |
D.Human beings are likely to be infected with bird flu. |
A.they will become bigger in size with stronger muscles |
B.lack of certain nutrients negatively influences their health |
C.their digestive system will be damaged by artificial food |
D.they would soon choose bread rather than natural food |
A.① | B.② | C.③ | D.④ |
A.Is feeding birds a wise choice? | B.Why not feed our bird neighbours? |
C.Can we treat birds as friends? | D.When do birds need our food aid? |
【推荐1】For decades the message to students in the United Slates has been nearly the same: You need to go to college. Students have heard this message loud and clear, ever since their childhood. However, while encouraging students to further their education after high school is a noble and well-intentioned action, the current system in the United States has created some damaging side effects.
The largest and most well-known consequence is the student debt. Tuition and fees at our-year universities have risen by around 54% since 1999. Total student debt in the U.S. is estimated at around $1.6 trillion, so much that even the world’s richest man Jeff Bezos would have to increase his wealth by nearly nine times to pay off all of it.
Although the price of acquiring a bachelor’s degree has gone up, the relative value of having the actual degree has been watered down by the fact that holding a degree is now an expectation, not a bonus. The poor return on investment is also evidenced by the massive waves of students earning degrees in fields where there simply are not enough jobs for the number of graduates, leaving young adults in debt and out of work.
The push for students to go to college has also prevented them from considering careers in important fields that don’t necessarily require a four-year degree, such as construction and manufacturing. Despite the good pay and benefits in these industries, the lack of new blood has lded to growing shortages of both workers and skills,causing delays and higher costs in project like road repairs and infrastructure (基础设施) improvements.
Colleges and universities remain critical to our nation. But as a society, it would benefit us greatly to acknowledge that college isn’t the only form of higher education and career preparation. Students and young adults have more options than they think and informing them of those opportunities can go a long way toward making higher education as a whole more effective, efficient and affordable.
1. How does the writer support his argument in paragraph 2?A.By providing examples. | B.By giving numbers. |
C.By explaining the logic. | D.By showing the effects. |
A.Reduced. | B.Increased. | C.Reflected. | D.ignored. |
A.Low salaries and benefits. | B.High degree requirements. |
C.The trend of going to college. | D.The lack of job opportunities. |
A.How College Graduates End up in Debt | B.What A College Degree Really Brings |
C.Who Is to Blame for The Worker Shortages | D.Why We Should Rethink Going to College |
【推荐2】Celebrated educator, author, and motivational speaker Baruti Kafele takes school leaders on a self-reflective journey in his latest publication by asking thirty five focused and intentional questions from one fundamental question “Is my school a better school because I lead it?”, which is also the title of the book.
In this book, which is one of best-selling self-reflection guides, Kafele offers those seeking to improve the quality of instruction in their institutions hard-won wisdom on such matters as guaranteeing a first-rank culture and climate, confirming emergency preparedness, and much more. The book is centered around three key focus areas as you ask yourself the question: your opinion, your evidence, and your staff’s views.
If you’re struggling to transform your practice, improve teacher satisfaction, and—most important of all—encourage students to be superior academically, the book will inspire you. An audio(音频) and text summary of this book is available in the ASCD Leadership Summaries for Educators library. Members can get a softcover at a discount.
About the author
Kafele is not only the author of 12 books, but also the former leader of four urban schools. He wins more than 150 educational, professional, and community awards. One example of his great leadership is Newark Tech, which now wins national recognition. It has developed from being a low-performing one in need of improvement into one that is regarded as excellent.
Book details
Publication Type Books; Guides—Non-Classroom Use
Product No. 120013
ISBN 978-1-4166-2689-3
Page Count 96
1. What does Kafele’s latest book feature?A.Common problems in schools. | B.Three focuses of school leaders. |
C.A series of guiding questions. | D.His experience in school management. |
A.A book. | B.A school. | C.A publisher. | D.An award. |
A.To advertise a book. | B.To introduce an author. |
C.To give a book review. | D.To provide suggestions. |
【推荐3】Pushing Back School Starting Times
It’s January. The outdoor temperature has fallen below 5℃ in the morning. Have you ever complained that you still have to get up at 6 a.m. and arrive at school before 7 a.m.? Do you wish you could have a long nice lie-in?
You are not alone if your answer is “Yes!” In the United States, many high school students are unhappy with their school starting times, too. According to a survey in 2018, only in two states-Alaska and Connecticut-do schools start after 8:30 a.m.
That may soon change.
There are plenty of reasons to think the law will benefit students. According to a number of medical organizations, circadian rhythms—the 24-hour biological cycles that govern our waking and sleeping, among other things-keep changing throughout our lives. During our teenage years, we are more alert in the afternoon and require more sleep in the morning. A combination of poor sleep habits and early school starting times means most young people aren’t getting enough sleep.
However, many parents are strongly opposed to such changes. Those who cannot start work later say they won’t be able to drop their children off at school before they go to work. They also fear that later starting times will mean later ending times, resulting in fewer opportunities for their children to take part in after-school activities, hold part-time jobs and care for younger siblings.
Supporters, however, argue that it is appropriate for the state to set a minimum health-and-welfare standard, as it does in many other areas.
A.Sleep deprivation is associated with problems in attention, behavior and learning. |
B.Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, hopes students will benefit from their extra time in bed guaranteed by the law. |
C.Anthony Portantino, the California senator who introduced the law, believes evidence of the change’s benefits will soon win over opponents. |
D.Some politicians in California say Mr Newsom’s decision about when schools start should be left to school districts. |
E.Last October, Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, signed a law that cuts 2.7 million of the state’s schoolchildren some loose. |
F.Many US states have responded to the scientific evidence and begun to move starting times back. |