组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:29 题号:7694730

On April 2,we said goodbye to Tiangong I,China’s first space lab.According to the China Manned Space Agency(中国载人航天),Tiangong I re-entered the Earth’s atmosphere (大气层) and fell into the South Pacific Ocean.

There are many spacecraft that are still in orbit above the Earth.They are flying at heights ranging from 300 to 1,000 kilometers.After finishing their trips,they will all re-enter the Earth's atmosphere like Tiangong I.

There are two types of re-entries:controlled(受控的)re-entry and uncontrolled re-entry.

Some satellites(卫星)and manned spacecraft come back to the Earth in a controlled re-entry.Scientists calculate(计算)the path of the falling spacecraft and its speed.They can guide the spacecraft to fall in a chosen area.In 2017,Tianzhou I,China's first cargo(货运)spacecraft,was directed to fall in the South Pacific Ocean.

Some spacecraft may have problems while in space,or are simply no longer usable after a certain amount of time.These craft come back in an uncontrolled re-entry.It is hard to tell when and where these spacecraft will fall until the last few hours.The US space station Skylab came back partially uncontrolled in l979.Parts of the station fell in western Australia,but no one was injured.

During re-entry,most of the spacecraft will burn up while passing through the Earth's atmosphere.Only a small amount of the debris(碎片)will reach the ground.

The debris typically ends up falling into the ocean,China Daily reported.Tiangong I weighs about 8.5tons.The amount of debris that falls to the Earth might be about l to 1.5 tons, the Beijing News reported. That is about the same weight as a car.

1. The debris from Tiangong I ________.
A.fell into the South Pacific ocean
B.fell in western Australia
C.fell in the central part of the US
D.fell into the North Pacific Ocean
2. When the spacecraft finishes its trip,it will ________.
A.burn up and disappear
B.re-enter the Earth's atmosphere
C.speed up and fly back to Earth
D.enter another orbit and stay in space
3. Which of the following is TRUE about the US space station Skylab?
A.It came back in a controlled re-entry.
B.Some people were injured by its debris.
C.It was hard to tell where it would fall in advance.
D.It was directed to fall into the ocean.
4. This story most likely comes from ________.
A.a storybookB.a government report
C.a science magazineD.a movie review

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约480词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐1】Since 2016, the U=U (Undetectable=Untransmittable) campaign, started by Bruce Richman, who was diagnosed with HIV in 2003, has teamed up with 570 other organizations in 71 countries to share the message: “In most of these countries people have been taught to fear HIV and people with HIV. Now we’re turning a corner.”

The impact of this and other prevention strategies and campaigns has begun to reduce new infection rates. As is reported, the number of new diagnoses in San Francisco has dropped by more than 50 per cent since 2006, in large part because of this “treatment as prevention” approach, also known as TasP.

But more work is needed, for example, on a vaccine. For some other viruses, vaccines work by mimicking(模仿)the biochemistry of people who seem to be naturally protected from infection. “For HIV, we don’t have a good naturally protective correlate to work with,” says Lundgren, an official in UNAIDS. Another difficulty is the lack of a good animal model for human HIV infections. Potential vaccines that show promise in monkeys infected with the similar simian immunodeficiency virus have not been successful in human clinical trials.

There are also hopes for an HIV cure, but this has been harder to come by than expected. The main problem with trying to cure HIV is that there is a hidden reservoir of the virus in the body. That is why the leading strategy in the hunt for a cure is the “kick and kill” approach. T his aims to kick HIV out of cells that act as a reservoir and then kill the virus.

While focusing on such scientific problems to make a cure a possibility in future, researchers at pharmaceutical company Gilead are also making progress when it comes to the potential for longer-acting treatments. At the moment, antiretroviral(抗逆$专录病毒的)drugs must be taken on a daily basis and this can prove difficult for some.

Winston Tse,a senior scientist at Gilead, is working on a treatment that looks to be particularly effective and could take the form of a long-acting injection. He and his colleagues have set their sights on a protein that surrounds and protects the HIV RNA genome which is essential to viral(病毒的)life including its ability to infect new cells. The team is developing compounds that interfere with this protein and so prevent the virus to reproduce.

It is this focus on prevention and treatment that makes the UNAIDS goal potentially achievable—removing AIDS as a public health risk by 2030. “I would love a cure, but I’m investing my time into the strategy of testing, treating and prevention, because I think that’s the way to end this disease,” says Richman.

1. What is the purpose of “U=U campaign”?
A.To call on more countries to fight HIV.B.To offer help to people with HIV.
C.To appeal to people to face HIV.D.To promote the TasP approach.
2. Researchers have difficulty in trying vaccines because       .
A.many people are scared of HIVB.animal trials don’t work on humans
C.monkeys are infected with virusesD.there is a hidden reservoir in the body
3. What do we know about the “kick and kill” approach?
A.It is less effective than expected.B.It destroys the reservoir of the virus.
C.It kills the virus out of the cells.D.It       belongs to the antiretroviral drugs.
4. What can we infer from the UNAIDS goal??
A.AIDS will become a public health risk by 2030.
B.A cure for AIDS is more important than prevention.
C.Doing more trials is the solution to stopping AIDS.
D.Researchers are confident in preventing AIDS in future.
2018-12-11更新 | 108次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约480词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐2】“Deep reading” —as opposed to the often superficial reading we do on the Web —is an endangered practice, one we ought to take steps to preserve as we would a historic building or a significant work of art. Its disappearance would jeopardize(危及) the intellectual and emotional development of generations growing up online, as well as the preservation of a critical part of our culture: the novels, poems and other kinds of literature that can be appreciated only by readers whose brains, quite literally, have been trained to understand them.

Recent research in cognitive science and psychology has demonstrated that deep reading —slow, immersive, rich in sensory detail and emotional and moral complexity—is a distinctive experience, different in kind from the mere decoding of words. Although deep reading does not, strictly speaking, require a conventional book, the built-in limits of the printed page are uniquely helpful to the deep reading experience. A book’s lack of hyperlinks(超链接), for example, frees the reader from making decisions —Should I click on this link or not? —allowing her to remain fully immersed in the narrative.

That immersion is supported by the way the brain handles language rich in detail, indirect reference and figures of speech: by creating a mental representation that draws on the same brain regions that would be active if the scene were unfolding in real life. The emotional situations and moral dilemmas that are the stuff of literature are also vigorous exercise for the brain, propelling us inside the heads of fictional characters and even, studies suggest, increasing our real-life capacity for empathy (认同).

None of this is likely to happen when we’re browsing through a website. Although we call the activity by the same name, the deep reading of books and the information-driven reading we do on the Web are very different, both in the experience they produce and in the capacities they develop. A growing body of evidence suggests that online reading may be less engaging and less satisfying, even for the “digital natives” to whom it is so familiar. Last month, for example,   Britain’s National Literacy Trust released the results of a study of 34,910 young people aged 8 to 16. Researchers reported that 39% of children and teens read daily using electronic devices, but only 28% read printed materials every day. Those who read only onscreen were three times less likely to say they enjoy reading very much and a third less likely to have a favorite book. The study also found that young people who read daily only onscreen were nearly two times less likely to be above-average readers than those who read daily in print or both in print and onscreen.

1. What does the author say about deep reading”?
A.It serves as a complement to online reading.
B.It should be preserved before it is too late.
C.It is mainly suitable for reading literature.
D.It is an indispensable part of education.
2. Why does the author advocate the reading of literature?
A.It helps promote readers’ intellectual and emotional growth.
B.It enables readers to appreciate the complexity of language.
C.It helps readers build up immersive reading habits.
D.It is quickly becoming an endangered practice.
3. In what way does printed-page reading differ from online reading?
A.It ensures the reader’s cognitive growth.
B.It enables the reader to be fully engaged.
C.It activates a different region of the brain.
D.It helps the reader learn rhetorical devices.
4. What do we learn from the study released by Britain’s National Literacy Trust?
A.Onscreen readers may be less competent readers.
B.Those who do reading in print are less informed.
C.Young people find reading onscreen more enjoyable.
D.It is now easier to find a favorite book online to read.
2020-10-14更新 | 328次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约450词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要谈论科学家首次在人体血液中检测到微塑料污染。

【推荐3】Microplastic pollution has been detected in human blood for the first time, with scientists finding the tiny particles(微粒) in almost 80% of the people tested.

The discovery shows the particles can travel around the body and may live in organs.The impact on health is as yet unknown. But researchers are concerned as microplastics cause damage to human cells in the laboratory and air pollution particles are already known to enter the body and cause millions of early deaths a year.

Huge amounts of plastic waste are left in the environment and microplastics now pollute the entire planet, from the top of Mount Everest to the deepest oceans. People were already known to consume the tiny particles via food and water as well as breathing them in, and they have been found in the faeces (排泄物) of babies and adults.

The scientists analysed blood samples from 22 healthy adults and found plastic particles in 17. Half the samples contained PET plastic, which is commonly used in drinks bottles, while a third contained polystyrene, used for packaging food and other products. A quarter of the blood samples contained polyethylene, from which plastic carrier bags are made.

“Our study is the first indication that we have polymer particles(聚合物颗粒) in our blood — it's a breakthrough result,” said Prof Dick Vethaak, an expert at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. “But we have to extend the research and increase the sample sizes, the number of polymers assessed, etc.” Further studies by a number of groups are already under way, he said.

“It is certainly reasonable to be concerned,” Vethaak said. “The particles are there and are transported throughout the body.”He said previous work had shown that microplastics were 10 times higher in the faeces of babies compared with adults and that babies fed with plastic bottles are taking millions of microplastic particles a day.

Vethaak acknowledged that the amount and type of plastic varied considerably between the blood samples. “But this is a pioneering study,”he said, with more work now needed. He said the differences might reflect short-term exposure before the blood samples were taken, such as drinking from a plastic-lined coffee cup, or wearing a plastic face mask. "

The big question is what is happening in our body?" Vethaak said. “Are the particles retained in the body? Are they transported to certain organs, such as getting past the blood-brain barrier? And are these levels sufficiently high to cause disease? We urgently need to fund further research so we can find out. ”

1. What could be inferred from Paragraph 2?
A.Air Pollution particles can cause death eventually.
B.Microplastics can be deadly to humans.
C.There is no evidence that microplastics harm human cells.
D.Microplastics can travel throughout body and damage organs.
2. What can we learn about microplastics from Paragraph 4?
A.They are found in most people.
B.Polyethylene found in blood samples might be taken from drinks bottles.
C.A quarter of the blood samples contained PET particles.
D.Half of the microplastics in the blood samples were likely introduced by drinking from plastic containers.
3. The underlined part “this is a pioneering study”in Paragraph 7 probably means______       .
A.we are the pioneers in the field of plastic researchB.we need more blood examples
C.we are entering a whole new field of researchD.this is an extremely important study
4. Which section of the newspaper may this article be found in?
A.Political.B.Fashion.C.Food.D.Environment.
2022-07-02更新 | 45次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般