组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 政治与经济 > 法律法治
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:216 题号:8929745

Traveling by subway can sometimes be quite an adventure, especially during rush hour. There are the times when you have to avoid cups of coffee that could spill (溅) on you. The smells of some passengers’ food are very strong, too. According to the Beijing subway passenger regulations, which went into effect on May 15th, passengers except babies and the sick are no longer allowed to eat or drink on the subway. Violators (违反者) who do not stop after being asked to will be asked to get off. The violation will also be recorded in the violators’ credit record.

Some support the rule. The reason is that the smell of food and drink can annoy other passengers. “The smell of food fills the carriage, causing people discomfort, especially in the hot summer, Besides, eating on the subway produces rubbish. And on subway trains, people often spill their drinks,” said Zheng Yiou, 17, a student from Hefei.

However, others question this rule. “Some citizens live so far from their work places that they have limited time to have breakfast before they go to work. Eating while they travel saves them time and decreases the chance that they will be late for work,” He Songlin, a 17-year-old student from Chengdu said, “And some people, like those with low- blood sugar levels, get sick if they can’t eat when they must.”

Other Chinese cities like Nanjing and Chengdu have similar regulations. Some foreign cities also ban eating and drinking on the subway. For example, eating and drinking have long been banned on the subway in Washington DC. Singapore fines people who eat or drink on the subway up to 500 Singapore dollars, which is RMB 2,417 yuan.

Chen Yanyan, a professor from Beijing University of Technology, believed we should consider the need of some people to eat or drink on the subway. “Commuters (上班族) and travelers are sometimes too busy to eat. Maybe we could learn from Tokyo, where there are many subway stations equipped with services, allowing passengers to eat and drink,” she said.

1. In which city was subway passenger regulations carried out on May 15th?
A.Chengdu.B.Nanjing.
C.Washington DC.D.Beijing.
2. What’s the punishment for the passengers who break the rules in Singapore?
A.Eating on the subway.B.Drinking on the subway.
C.Being fined up to 2417 yuan.D.Being asked to get off the train.
3. What is Chen Yanyan’s attitude to eating or drinking on the subway?
A.Worried.B.Sympathetic.
C.Doubtful.D.Uninterested
4. What would be the best title for the text?
A.Food and Drink Banned on Subway.
B.The Adventure of Subway Traveling
C.Ways to Eat and Drink on Subway.
D.The Services on Subway Stations

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】Families will be rewarded for the first time for putting out less rubbish under new plans to significantly promote recycling, especially of valuable materials like glass.

The new plan for collecting waste in England will scrap fines (罚款) for putting plastic in the wrong recycling bin. Instead, families will be offered rewards for recycling more rubbish measured by a microchip (芯片) in the rubbish bin. Caroline Spelman, an Environment Secretary, said, “It is better to use a plan that offers people rewards, rather than punishing them. We want to help those people who want to do the right thing by reducing waste and recycling at home. This means making sure communities are getting the collection services they want and not punishing hard-working families who make mistakes by putting bins out on the wrong day or leaving the waste in the wrong recycling bin.”

Though the punishment for putting waste in the wrong recycling bin has been given up, plans to try and remove the unpopular twice-a-week bin collections have largely failed despite the efforts of Eric Pickles, a Communities Secretary. Although Mrs. Spelman made it clear that communities will be supported in efforts to increase the times of collections, and the Conservative Party will not force local authorities to return to weekly collections. Most communities expect the introduction of weekly rubbish collections, as this will solve some of the problems about environment.

“We will continue to help local communities develop local solutions to collecting and dealing with family waste and will work with communities to meet families’ reasonable expectations for weekly collections, particularly of smelly waste.” said Mrs. Spelman.

1. What will families be rewarded for in future?
A.Producing less rubbish.B.Putting bins out on the right day.
C.Throwing rubbish into the bin.D.Leaving rubbish in the wrong recycling bin.
2. Which can replace the underlined word “scrap” in Para.2?
A.reduceB.removeC.increaseD.pay
3. What can we know from what Mrs. Spelman said?
A.The Conservative Party refuses the weekly collection.
B.Both Rewards and punishment should be carried out.
C.Local solutions to collecting family waste will be stopped.
D.People will not be punished for putting rubbish wrongly.
4. Which section of a newspaper does the text probably come from?
A.Travel.B.Literature.C.Environment.D.Medicine.
2021-01-28更新 | 52次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】Suppose your permanent residence, or hukou, was in Chongqing, you worked in Beijing and you needed to get a passport for a business trip abroad. What should you do?

You have to go back to Chongqing, which is 1,500km away, and apply to local public security authorities for the passport, because in China public services are closely linked to hukou. But a new regulation, which is part of the hukou reform, will make this annoying experience a thing of the past.

The regulation targets China’s newly introduced residence permit system, which will take effect on Jan 1, 2016. It allows people who don’t have local hukou to receive more access to basic public services in the cities where they are living. These include education, basic employment services, automobile registration, and passport and ID card application processing.

You can apply for a residence permit at the local police station, which has jurisdiction (管辖权) over the area where you live. The documents needed for the permit application include your ID card, photos and materials that prove that you have a job, a place to live, or that you are studying at an education institution.

To certify that you have a place to live, a house rental contract or property ownership certificate will do. For employment, a business license, job contract, or employment certificate can do the trick. If you are a student applying for the permit, show your student card or other documentation issued by your school.

Despite all this, maybe you are still not happy about not having a local hukou. Don’t worry. People will have a chance, as the country is reforming the hukou system further.

1. What is the purpose of the first 2 paragraphs?
A.To introduce the topic of the passage.B.To emphasize the focus of the passage.
C.To summarize the main idea of the passage.D.To arouse the readers’ interest of reading
2. People who want to apply for a residence permit should ________.
A.receive more access to basic public services
B.provide proofs of identification
C.present a house rental contract
D.show your student card or other documentation
3. What does the underlined word “certify” in para 5 mean?
A.applyB.proveC.permitD.test
4. What will the writer tell us in the following paragraph?
A.China plans to create a new hukou system
B.Getting a hukou may be easier with new policies
C.Other reforms that will bring people more happiness
D.People will not need hukou in China soon.
2020-11-16更新 | 34次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约440词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】They hide in trees, hang from helicopters, even follow people down on motorcycles—all so that they can snap a shot of a celebrity. They are paparazzi—photographers who make a living by taking pictures of the rich and famous.

This September, California, a state with plenty of celebrities, passed a law aimed at taking action against paparazzi. The law forbids photographers from entering private property to take pictures, from using high-tech devices to take pictures of people on private property, and from “persistently following in order to take a picture.” Violators can be fined or spend time in prison. The United State Congress is considering passing a similar law.

Supporters of the California law say it will protect the privacy of celebrities, whom paparazzi have been bothering for years. Opponents (反对者) say the law restricts photojournalists from doing their job.

Most celebrities seem to like having their pictures taken when they are in public at award shows or other events. After all, it’s free publicity. But when they’re not in public, they say, photographers should leave them alone. Yet paparazzi have been known to secretly look in windows and worse. Actor Michael J. Fox said that paparazzi have even “tried to pretend to be medical personnel at the hospital where my wife was giving birth to our son.”

Celebrities have as much right to their privacy as anyone else, supporters of the law state. Supporters further argue that the California law is a fair way to keep the press at bay, because the law still allows photographers to do their job. It only punishes them, supporters say, when they violate celebrities’ privacy.

Opponents of the law say it violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (美国宪法第一修正案), which guarantees that no laws will be made to limit “the freedom of speech, or of the press.”Although some people might not consider paparazzi a part of the legal press, the California law does not single out paparazzi. It applies to photographers working for any publication.

Opponents of the law are also concerned about its wording. “Does ‘persistently’ mean following someone for six minutes, six seconds, or six days?” asked lawyer Douglas Mirell. The wording of the law is too vague, critics complain, and could be used to punish almost any news photographer.

The United States needs a free press to keep the public informed about important news, paparazzi law opponents say. Limiting the press in any way, they argue, limits the freedom of all.

1. Which of the following will be considered illegal by the new California law?
A.Paparazzi slipping into the house of a famous person to take a shot.
B.Paparazzi taking photos of famous people with high-tech cameras.
C.Paparazzi hiring helicopters as a fast means of transportation.
D.Paparazzi rushing towards filming sites on motorcycles.
2. Supporters of the new law believe that ________.
A.it prevents the media from getting worse
B.it gives photographers a fair way to compete
C.punishment forces paparazzi to quit their job
D.privacy of famous people needs special protection
3. Opponents of the new law are concerned that _________.
A.it will violate paparazzi’s privacy
B.the First Amendment will be changed
C.some photographers will be wrongly accused
D.people will not be informed of important news
4. What is the author’s attitude towards the new California law?
A.Critical.B.Neutral.C.Approving.D.Skeptical.
2018-06-30更新 | 172次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般