1. How often is the Noetic Learning Math Contest held?
A.Twice a year. | B.Once a year. | C.Once every two years. |
A.Solve 15 problems in 45 minutes. |
B.Solve 20 problems in half an hour. |
C.Solve 30 problems in 45 minutes. |
A.A “Team Winner” medal. |
B.A “Team Achievement Plaque” medal. |
C.A “National Honor Roll” medal. |
Climate protection strategy is fascinating the globe during the 19th Asian Games, not just athletic talent .
Avoiding fireworks during the opening ceremony promotes environmental awareness. Traditional fireworks displays are fun
The Games Village gave residents a “Low Carbon Account” as part of the green measures. Carbon points
3 . When the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA), the world’s governing body for soccer, claimed that the 2022 World Cup in Qatar would be “a fully carbon-neutral (碳中和) event”, it attracted worldwide laughter from the environmentalists.
World Cup hosts often maintain that stadiums built for the event will remain in constant use after its conclusion—a claim that allows them to spread their carbon footprint over many years. But it’s hard to believe the claim. After all, Qatari soccer culture is still undeveloped. Even soccer- mad countries such as Russia, Brazil and South Africa-hosts of the previous three men’s World Cups-have been left with a group of relatively useless stadiums.
In addition to the carbon cost of the stadiums, Qatar expects to see 1, 300 daily flights to and from the country during the World Cup. But that’s not the only source of airplane emissions. The grass seeds to give rise to the tournament’s green pitches (球场) have been flown in from North America on climate-controlled planes. And these fields won’t water themselves. The groundskeepers who maintain the eight stadium pitches, as well as the 136 practice fields, douse each field with 10, 000 liters of water every day in the winter. In the summer the pitches require a surprising amount of 50, 000 liters each.
Soccer isn’t alone in this. Three recent Olympics-Tokyo 2020, Rio de Janeiro 2016 and Sochi 2014-earned some of the worst environmental sustainability scores. All this raises an important question: Is it even possible to stage a carbon-neutral sports mega event? The ever- expanding size of these events likely puts net-zero emissions out of reach. One recent study found that between 1964 and 2018, the soccer World Cup and the Olympics were about 60 times as large in terms of the number of sports, athletes, journalists, spectators, marketing and costs involved.
The large sports events, as they are currently organized, are unsustainable. Since FIFA and the International Olympic Committee made more environmental claims back in the 1990s, their events have only become bigger, and their effects have only become more severe.
1. What did environmentalists think of FIFA’s claim about the 2022 World Cup?A.It made no sense. |
B.It was worth promoting. |
C.It attracted no attention. |
D.It lived up to their expectations. |
A.They are of great cultural value. |
B.They are of not much use. |
C.They have been completely transformed. |
D.They have produced long-term benefits. |
A.The great scale of the 2022 World Cup. |
B.The difficulty in hosting the 2022 World Cup. |
C.The high carbon cost of the 2022 World Cup. |
D.The huge economic input of the 2022 World Cup. |
A.Critical. |
B.Mixed. |
C.Favorable. |
D.Unclear. |