1. Which place are the speakers in?
A.Toronto. | B.Manila. | C.Vancouver. |
A.The snow there is less. |
B.The snow there is deeper. |
C.It’s hotter than Manila in winter. |
A.He watched the snow falling. |
B.He made a snowman. |
C.He cleared the road. |
A.Missing school. | B.Losing electricity. | C.Driving in the snow. |
1. What does the woman plan to do today?
A.Walk the dog. |
B.Take the dog to a vet. |
C.Eat out with the man. |
A.Two years old. | B.Ten years old. | C.Eleven years old. |
3 . Forests might be the best tool humans have to fight climate change. Plants naturally absorb CO2 and release oxygen as part of photosynthesis (光合作用), but trees can process a lot more because of the size of their trunks, green leafy crown, and root structures. This filtering (过滤) and storage capacity is part of the United Nations’ Great Green Wall plan to plant an 8,000 km (5,000 mile) long tree belt across the African continent.
More recent projects like Trillion Trees, the World Economic Forum’s 1T, and the UN’s follow-up Great Green Wall for Cities highlight forest regeneration as the most effective nature-based solution for CO2. For example, the Great Green Wall for Cities project would create urban green areas. Once completed, the wall will capture an estimated 0.5~5 billion tons of CO2 every year. And, if well managed, its urban forests could also reduce air temperature, lower flood risk, and improve air quality.
City trees are actually sucking more CO2 out of the atmosphere than that was thought. Now Boston University studies show that forest edges grow almost twice as quickly and store carbon faster than trees deep inside the forest. Projects influenced by botanist Akira Miyawaki are now creating tiny community forests across the planet. Miyawaki's micro-forests are much denser (稠密) than traditional woods. They store 30 times more CO2 than common forests and offer 30 times better noise and dust reduction, say his followers.
Dave Nowak is a researcher at the US Forest Service who has studied using trees to reduce carbon for years. Trees not only cool their surroundings, they also recycle tiny pollutants. But figuring out which exact species work best to improve air quality depends on many factors including soil, local climate, and site conditions, says Nowak. Urban planners can start by using the US Forest Service iTree Tools to choose the best trees for each locality. Another tool, American Forests’ Tree Equity Score Analyzer, helps planners to target urban forests in disadvantaged areas.
1. What will happen based on Great Green Wall?A.More rare plants will be grown. |
B.A long tree belt will appear across Africa |
C.Better tools will be used to battle climate change. |
D.More projects will work together to reduce air temperature. |
A.Cleaning the air. | B.Developing new tools. |
C.Forest regeneration. | D.Air temperature control. |
A.Effective. | B.Costly. | C.Helpless. | D.Questionable. |
A.Great Green Wall Will Make Long Tree Belts |
B.Planting More Trees Will Reduce Air Pollutants |
C.Researchers Are Studying Climate Change Further |
D.Forest Projects Will Help Rebalance Earth’s Climate |
4 . It was a stormy March morning in 2019 off Australia’s Western Coast, when whale researcher John Totterdell and his students caught sight of the chase in the water. The scene was a mess. The first thing they spotted was about twenty black and white shapes in the water—a group of killer whales surrounding something. From the boat, all Totterdell could make out was a much larger gray blue animal at the center.
Within seconds they realized a pack of killer whales were attacking a blue whale. The whale was about 70 feet long and it was fighting back. But the killer whales, which were only about a third as big, were making coordinated(联合的) attacks and working together to kill their target. It went on for hours and eventually, the blue whale got weaker.
Sensing their opportunity, two killer whales leapt on top of the blue whale, forcing it under the water until it eventually drowned. While killer whales were known to attack blue whales, the team of researchers were the first to ever document a successful attack. They published their findings in the journal Marine Mammal Science. Their work definitely shows that killer whales, which actually belong to the dolphin family, are the top hunter in the ocean. They are so fierce(凶猛的) that even great white sharks seem to be scared of them.
According to researchers who had marked white sharks with a tracking device off the coast of California, just the presence of a group of killer whales drove away the sharks for months. Also in their favor is the close nature of killer whales' families. The group is led by a matriarch(女家长) and once they have a skill, they pass it along from one generation to the next within their family group. So, with each successful strike against a blue whale, they are relearning and expanding their culture.
1. What did John Totterdell and his students find in the water?A.A big storm that was forming. |
B.A boat surrounded by some whales. |
C.The water forming different shapes. |
D.A hunting between different sea animals. |
A.Stupid. | B.Cooperative. | C.Hopeless. | D.Tiring. |
A.They made a record of it. | B.They drowned the blue whale. |
C.They drove away the killer whales. | D.They created Marine Mammal Science. |
A.Killer whales are never scared of sharks. |
B.The arrival of the researchers drove away the sharks. |
C.Female killer whales are always much fiercer than male ones. |
D.Killer whales’ hunting skills are probably better than their ancestors’. |
5 . If Mars were the popular kid in school, Venus (金星) would be the unwelcome one sitting in the corner, largely ignored. Venus has nearly the same mass and size as Earth, but being closer to the sun, it gets nearly twice as much heat from the sun.
However, instead of having a climate that is just a warmer version of Earth’s, Venus’s surface and atmosphere are unbearable: clouds of sulphuric acid (硫酸) blanket the planet, while at ground level, it is hot enough to melt lead. Despite this, there is now a sign that Venus may harbour life. Jane Greaves at Cardiff University, UK, and her colleagues recently detected (发现) phosphine (磷化氢) in Venus’s atmosphere, with one potential explanation that it is the by-product of biology. That is because the only way this gas is made on Earth is in laboratories or by microbes (微生物). Though this doesn’t mean it was produced by life on Venus, attempts to find non-biological explanations for its presence have so far failed. Our best way of confirming or rejecting the possibility of life on Venus is to go and have a proper look. While Mars has been the focus of interplanetary (行星间的) exploration efforts lately, the phosphine discovery lets people look at Venus in a new light. As NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine tweeted: “It’s time to prioritize Venus.”
In the months and years to come, computer simulations(模拟) will be used to further study the possible chemistries of the atmosphere on Venus. More laboratory experiments will be conducted to try to identify other ways the phosphine there could be produced. However, there is no guarantee that these efforts will reveal the true nature of this substance on Venus. A newly-proposed strategy is to directly sample the atmosphere and surface of Venus. By doing so, we would be able to take direct measurements of phosphine.
The discovery of phosphine in Venus’s atmosphere is a great accomplishment. The scientific efforts may be just what we need to finally refocus on this neglected world. Possibly, the quiet kid in the corner may get the last laugh
1. Which description about Venus is NOT true?A.It has the unbearable surface and atmosphere. |
B.It has nearly the same mass as Earth. |
C.It is almost as large as Earth. |
D.It has a warmer Earth-like climate. |
A.This kind of gas is very common. | B.There might exist signs of life. |
C.Many products can be made with it. | D.Experiments were once conducted there. |
A.The necessity to analyse phosphine. |
B.The power of computer simulations |
C.The importance of observations. |
D.The approaches to exploring phosphine |
A.Casual | B.Doubtful. | C.Supportive. | D.Unclear. |
6 . Reilly, my daughter’s dog, enjoys running about in the huge backyard all day. Despite his
Sometimes, he will hold his bowl in his mouth,
One day, Reilly
Some time later, the big dog was back and not
A.peaceful | B.active | C.simple | D.boring |
A.thankfully | B.amazedly | C.fixedly | D.nervously |
A.proving | B.hoping | C.promising | D.admitting |
A.work | B.rule | C.choice | D.game |
A.kitchen | B.yard | C.street | D.park |
A.hungry | B.angry | C.lonely | D.thirsty |
A.hid | B.disappeared | C.suffered | D.changed |
A.required | B.guided | C.allowed | D.inspired |
A.curious | B.awkward | C.careless | D.worried |
A.respond to | B.care for | C.turn to | D.look for |
A.kind-hearted | B.simple-minded | C.cold-blooded | D.empty-handed |
A.dirty | B.smelly | C.warm | D.expensive |
A.Anybody | B.Everybody | C.Nobody | D.Somebody |
A.talking | B.singing | C.shouting | D.arguing |
A.deal | B.mystery | C.danger | D.reminder |
A visually-challenged man from Beijing recently hiked (徒步) 40 days to Xi’an, as a first step
On the 1,100 kilometer journey, the man Cao Shengkang,
Cao and Wu also collected garbage along the road, in order to promote environmental
In the last five years. Cao
Now, Cao has started the second part of his dream to walk along the Belt and Road route. He flew 4, 700 kilometers
8 . Professor Veena Sahajwalla, 2022 Australian of the year, has created a solution to our massive trash problem: waste microfactories. These little trash processors (处理器)—some as small as 500 square feet— house a series of machines that recycle waste and transform it into new materials with thermal technology. The new all-in -one approach could leave our current recycling processes in the dust.
In 2018 she launched the first microfactory, establishing a model of recycling that enables businesses and communities to develop commercial opportunities while addressing local waste problems. A second one began recycling plastics in 2019. Now, her lab group is working with university and industry partners to commercialize their patented Microfactory technology. “The small scale of the machines will make it easier for them to one day operate on renewable energy, unlike most large manufacturing plants. The approach will also allow cities to recycle waste into new products on location, avoiding the long, often international, high-emission journeys between recycling processors and manufacturing plants. With a microfactory, gone are the days of needing separate facilities to collect and store materials, extract (提取) elements and produce new products,” says Sahajwalla.
Traditionally, recycling plants break down materials for reuse in similar products-like melting down plastic to make more plastic things. Sahajwalla’s invention advances this idea by taking materials from an old product and creating something different. “The kids don’t look like the parents,” she says. Sahajwalla refers to this process as “the fourth R,” adding “re -form” to the common phrase “reduce, reuse, recycle”.
Professor Veena Sahajwalla’s programs help to develop innovation and promote cooperation with industry, ensuring that sustainable materials and processes become commercially practical solutions for dealing with waste.
1. What is the purpose of the first paragraph?A.To introduce a new type of trash processor. |
B.To introduce the process of recycling waste. |
C.To prove the seriousness of the trash problem. |
D.To show the current situation of trash recycling. |
A.The founding of waste microfactories. |
B.The influences of waste microfactories. |
C.The advantages of waste microfactories. |
D.The shocking scale of waste microfactories. |
A.Extracting materials from the waste. |
B.Generating new materials with waste. |
C.Updating the whole recycling process. |
D.Transforming waste into similar products. |
A.A fiction novel. | B.A business report. |
C.A science magazine. | D.A chemical textbook. |
Climate change is already affecting wildlife all over the world, but certain species are suffering more than others. Polar animals
It's not just polar animals that are in trouble. Apes like orangutans, which live in the rainforests of Indonesia, are
Sea turtles (海龟) rely on nesting beaches
Climate change won't just affect animals; it's already having
10 . Greenhouse gas emissions would rise if all farms in England and Wales went organic. Though the emissions of each farm would go down, much more food would have to be imported, as the amount they would produce would decrease greatly.
“The key message from my perspective is that you can't really have your cake and eat it,” says Laurence Smith, now at the Royal Agricultural University in the UK, who was part of the team that ran the numbers. Smith is a supporter of organic farming and says “there are a lot of merits of the organic approach”, but his analysis shows that organic farming has downsides too.
Farming and changes in land use, such as cutting down forests, are responsible for a third of all greenhouse gas emissions. That means reducing farming emissions and the land needed for farming is required to limit further global warming.
Smith and his colleagues found that emissions per unit of food are, on average, 20 per cent lower for organic crops and 4 per cent lower for organic animal products. However, organic harvests per hectare (公顷) are also lower on average. For wheat and barley, for instance, harvests are just half of those of conventional farms. This means 1.5 times as much land would be needed to grow the same amount of these foods.
The estimated increase in emissions varies greatly, depending on where the extra farmland comes from. If only half comes from turning grassland into farms, the increase could be as low as 20 per cent. If grassland that would otherwise have been reforested is turned into farmland, emissions could nearly double.
This doesn't necessarily mean people should stop eating organic produce, says Smith. People might choose organic food for other reasons, such as to reduce their pesticide exposure (though contrary to popular belief, organic farmers do use pesticides) or for the sake of wildlife.
Going 100 per cent organic could also harm global biodiversity. The extra land used for farming would mean the land available for wildlife would be smaller and more fragmented (碎片化的).
Smith says the best option may be to use some organic and conventional farming methods at the same time.
1. Why may greenhouse gas emissions increase if a country goes organic?A.Organic farms take longer to build. |
B.The agricultural output will increase greatly. |
C.The emissions of each farm unit will increase. |
D.Greater demand for imported food will be created. |
A.Changes. | B.Challenges. | C.Advantages. | D.Differences. |
A.Organic harvests per unit are greater than traditional harvests. |
B.Organic farming needs more farmland to feed a country. |
C.Global warming could be brought under control. |
D.Land was not used in a responsible way. |
A.Stopping using pesticides. |
B.Eating less organic produce. |
C.Going back to traditional farming. |
D.Adopting mixed farming methods. |