文章大意:本文是说明文。文章讲述了研究表明背景噪音可能会减缓我们的阅读速度但是不会影响我们理解书面文本。这项研究还有一些有趣的观点。特别是,它研究了我们如何改变我们的阅读方式来补偿听觉或视觉噪音,并阐述了两个理论。
8 . Background noise—like the chatter in a coffee shop or the drone of passing traffic—might slow our reading speed, but according to a study of Russian readers, it doesn’t _________ how our brain understands written text.
_________, if you’re wondering whether you should be listening to podcasts or music while working, the study has some interesting points to make. In particular, it examined how we might change our reading style to compensate for auditory noise and visual distractions such as typos or poor formatting.
“Overall, previous studies reported a harmful effect of both auditory and visual noise on reading fluency and _________, though their results varied,” write linguistics researcher Nina Zdorova and colleagues. “So far, none of the studies exploring the influence of noise _________ it in the framework of the language processing theories.”
One of the language processing theories examined was the noisy channel model, which proposes that our brain deals with noise by looking at the meaning of _________ words more and at entire sentences less. We then use a bit of smart guesswork to _________ the overall meaning and relationships between words.
The second theory is the good enough model; that’s when our brains aren’t analyzing every single detail of a text but instead only grabbing enough words for a ‘good enough’ understanding. By focusing less on the precise words, our brains can _________ some cognitive resources to deal with noise.
To see how reading was affected by noise _________ these models, the researchers ran two experiments: one on auditory noise (71 participants) and one on visual noise (70 participants). When it came to the auditory noise test, background chatter from overlapping podcasts caused people to spend longer looking at the key section of sentences before completing their reading. This extra time could _________ the noise, meaning sentence comprehension isn’t affected by it. In the visual noise test, comprehension remained the same while reading speed __________. That’s a bit __________ considering previous studies, but the researchers think people just wanted to finish the task, with the visual noise an uncomfortable distraction.
“In both experiments, we observed that longer total reading time was
__________ with an accuracy increase for incorrect sentences,” write the researchers.
There’s a lot going on in this study, but overall it’s a bigger win for the good-enough language processing theory and an indication that auditory and visual noise doesn’t make us __________ any more or less on any particular comprehension method while we’re reading.
With so many variables to measure in terms of what’s being read and what the __________ noise is, further study is required to learn more. __________ potential distractions may not interrupt your reading as much as you think.
1. A.reinforce | B.estimate | C.affect | D.interpret |
2. A.First of all | B.For example | C.Above all | D.To start with |
3. A.context | B.efficiency | C.comprehension | D.device |
4. A.evaluated | B.identified | C.established | D.employed |
5. A.individual | B.different | C.new | D.unfamiliar |
6. A.confirm | B.imply | C.refer | D.infer |
7. A.exploit | B.spare | C.commit | D.consume |
8. A.on account of | B.regardless of | C.in regard to | D.in contrast to |
9. A.make up for | B.live up to | C.catch up with | D.put up with |
10. A.declined | B.shrank | C.expanded | D.increased |
11. A.embarrassing | B.depressing | C.puzzling | D.annoying |
12. A.associated | B.compared | C.replaced | D.mixed |
13. 14. A.accompanying | B.strange | C.deafening | D.distant |
15. A.Therefore | B.However | C.Instead | D.Otherwise |