组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 高中英语综合库
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
已选知识点:
全部清空
解析
| 共计 4 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约270词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校

1 . Natural. High quality. Unique.

That's Almased.


Selected ingredients (原料), an exceptional mix and production process: that's how we create the unique Almased effect.
➢Combination of ingredients that's more effective than individual nutrients (营养物质).
➢No artificial flavourings, fillers or sweeteners.
➢Supports fat-burning during digestion.
➢Supports resistance to common diseases.

Many products promise what only Almased can deliver. In order to achieve the unique Almased effect, it takes more than just mixing soy, yogurt and honey. The recipe for our Almased powder is as simple as it is unique: high-quality and natural soy, honey and yogurt.

SOY|The high-quality non-GMO soy (非转基因大豆) used in Almased is an environmentally friendly, sustainable source of plant protein. A single serving of Almased supplies 27 grams of protein.

HONEY|Unlike most regular honey, which is heat-treated, the raw honey in Almased is bursting with freshness even after it is canned. The honey's natural ingredients are still living and active when you open the can.

YOGURT|Cows that are naturally fed can even in turn encourage grass growth. This is why Almased sources its milk and yogurt from happy cows in Ireland and northern Germany, where they live in green grasslands.

Being a natural product, Almased has a very plain taste and can be prepared in many different ways. Whether you like it sweet or fruity, there are no limits to how you flavour it. This ensures Almased doesn't get boring and suits your personal taste perfectly. So quick and easy to prepare, Almased can be fitted into your daily routine with ease.

1. If you are on a diet, Almased could be a good choice because __________.
A.its nutrients are easier to absorbB.it can help burn fat
C.secret ingredients are includedD.it cures common diseases
2. Why does Almased stand out among other similar products?
A.It manages to mix different ingredients together.
B.Selected ingredients can stay fresh as ever.
C.Soy, yogurt and honey are specially treated.
D.Superior natural materials generate uniqueness.
3. What can we learn from the last paragraph?
A.Almased can replace our regular routine diet.
B.It's hard to make Almased appeal to everyone.
C.There seem various ways of serving Almased.
D.Almased has just the same taste as plain yogurt.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校

2 . On the night of 14th June 1904, New York’s Chinatown was in a deep gloom (低迷). For the past 20 years, the restaurants were filled with those crazy about a taste of real Chinese cooking “chop suey”. But suddenly, all that seemed at risk. A few days earlier, a chef named Lem Sen had arrived, saying he had invented it a decade before while working at a restaurant in San Francisco. His recipe had been stolen by an American diner to make money. Through his lawyer, he demanded restaurants pay him for using his recipe.

Chop suey was first mentioned by Chinese-American journalist Wang Chin Foo in a list of common dishes he thought most attractive to Western tastes. As he explained, “each Chinese cook has his own recipe. The main parts are pork, bacon, chicken, mushroom, bamboo shoots, onion, and pepper, while accidental ones are duck, beef, salted black beans etc. Yet it is often considered by Westerners that this is a ‘national dish of China’ more than any other dish they’ve known.”

Although a hyperbolic way to introduce this dish, it clearly showed that chop suey was indeed of Chinese origin. Where exactly its roots lay has been debated; but it was probably first cooked in Taishan, Guangdong, where most early immigrants to America had grown up. In 1866, the journalist Allan Forman noticed it as a delicious dish despite its “mysterious nature”, and nine years later, the first recipe appeared in magazines, with some un-Chinese ingredients thrown in.

It was not long before a myth making began. In 1896, Li Hongzhang visited New York, and newspapers mistakenly reported that while refusing Western dishes at a banquet (宴会), he had enthusiastically accepted a plate of chop suey. This caused a great hit, and many who never heard of it before simply assumed that it was introduced to the US by Li Hongzhang, which accidentally promoted the dish’s popularity.

1. What is the purpose of a chef’s story in paragraph 1?
A.To describe food history.B.To bring out chop suey.
C.To show risky business world.D.To introduce a law case.
2. What would Wang Chin Foo most agree with about chop suey?
A.Fixed ingredients.B.Its popularity overseas.
C.Un-Chinese nature.D.Mixed national identities.
3. When chop suey was introduced in a “hyperbolic” way, it was_________.
A.remarked beyond realityB.explained in greater details
C.praised in something commonD.commented based on the origin
4. What can be inferred about the myth making on chop suey?
A.Li Hongzhang promoted this dish.B.Its popularity was based on facts.
C.Mass media belonged to the root cause.D.Public opinions voiced acceptance.
2021-12-16更新 | 275次组卷 | 7卷引用:Unit 1 复习卷-2021-2022学年高中英语牛津译林版(2020)选择性必修第四册
阅读理解-阅读单选(约540词) | 困难(0.15) |
名校

3 . In 1953, when visiting his daughter’s maths class, the Harvard psychologist B.F. Skinner found every pupil learning the same topic in the same way at the same speed. Later, he built his first “teaching machine”, which let children tackle questions at their own pace. Since then, education technology (edtech) has repeated the cycle of hype and flop (炒作和失败), even as computers have reshaped almost every other part of life.

Softwares to “personalize” learning can help hundreds of millions of children stuck in miserable classes—but only if edtech supporters can resist the temptation to revive harmful ideas about how children learn. Alternatives have so far failed to teach so many children as efficiently as the conventional model of schooling, where classrooms, hierarchical year-groups, standardized curriculums and fixed timetables are still the typical pattern for most of the world’s nearly 1.5 billion schoolchildren. Under this pattern, too many do not reach their potential. That condition remained almost unchanged over the past 15 years, though billions have been spent on IT in schools during that period.

What really matters then? The answer is how edtech is used. One way it can help is through tailor-made instruction. Reformers think edtech can put individual attention within reach of all pupils. The other way edtech can aid learning is by making schools more productive. In California schools, instead of textbooks, pupils have “playlists”, which they use to access online lessons and take tests. The software assesses children’s progress, lightening teachers’ marking load and allowing them to focus on other tasks. A study suggested that children in early adopters of this model score better in tests than their peers at other schools.

Such innovation is welcome. But making the best of edtech means getting several things right. First, “personalized learning” must follow the evidence on how children learn. It must not be an excuse to revive pseudoscientific ideas such as “learning styles”: the theory that each child has a particular way of taking in information. This theory gave rise to government-sponsored schemes like Brain Gym, which claimed that some pupils should stretch or bend while doing sums. A less consequential falsehood is that technology means children do not need to learn facts or learn from a teacher—instead they can just use Google. Some educationalists go further, arguing that facts get in the way of skills such as creativity. Actually, the opposite is true. According to studies, most effective ways of boosting learning nearly all relied on the craft of a teacher.

Second, edtech must narrow, rather than widen, inequalities in education. Here there are grounds for optimism. Some of the pioneering schools are private ones in Silicon Valley. But many more are run by charter-school groups teaching mostly poor pupils, where laggards (成绩落后者) make the most progress relative to their peers in normal classes. A similar pattern can be observed outside America.

Third, the potential for edtech will be realized only if teachers embrace it. They are right to ask for evidence that products work. But skepticism should not turn into irrational opposition. Given what edtech promises today, closed-mindedness has no place in the classroom.

1. According to the passage, education technology can ________.
A.decrease teachers’ working load
B.facilitate personalized learning
C.help standardize curriculums
D.be loved by schoolchildren
2. Which example best argues against the underlined sentence in Para. 4?
A.The students who are better at memorization tend to be less creative.
B.Schools with bans on phones have better results than high-tech ones.
C.Shakespeare was trained in grammar but he penned many great plays.
D.Lu Xun’s creativity was unlocked after he gave up studying medicine.
3. The author believes that edtech functions well only when it is ________.
A.at the service of teaching
B.limited in use among pupils
C.aimed at narrowing the wealth gap
D.in line with students’ learning styles
4. What is the main purpose of the passage?
A.To stress the importance of edtech.
B.To introduce the application of edtech.
C.To discuss how to get the best out of edtech.
D.To appeal for more open-mindedness to edtech.
2021-05-31更新 | 2309次组卷 | 8卷引用:Unit 1 复习卷-2021-2022学年高中英语牛津译林版(2020)选择性必修第四册

4 . When Earth was just a tiny young thing,it birthed many new continents - then it swallowed them all up, leaving just a few traces behind, a new study shows.

These first continents had a special skill for living fast and dying young, but in doing so, they paved the way for solid continents that eventually led to the emergence of plate tectonics(版块运动), the new study suggests.

For hundreds of millions of years, the current continents have been more or less stable. But very little is known about the continents that existed early on in Earth's history.

To learn more about that early history, the researchers used computers to model the interactions of rock and magma(岩浆) in the Earth’s crust(地壳) and below. The modeling showed that the earliest continents, known as the Hadean (4.6 to 4.0 billion years ago), were weak and likely to destruction. Modern continents have a comprehensive high tensile strength, meaning it’s hard to tear them apart by stretching.

By the time the Archean (4.0 billion to 2.5 billion years ago) began ending the Hadean, the crust which had first formed was almost entirely replaced by the seeds of the modern continents.

In a sense, the researchers found, those lost Hadean continents made the later, more stable continents possible.

The emergence of continents at the close of the Hadean also contributed fertilizer that would later help seed life on Earth, the researchers wrote. Bits of them broke off and entered the atmosphere and oceans, providing necessary nutrients for the life forms that soon emerged.

1. Compared with the modern continents, the Hadean was________.
A.youngerB.firmerC.weakerD.bigger
2. What is true about the Hadean according to the researchers?
A.It existed 4.0 million years ago.B.It disappeared before the Archean began.
C.It helped make more stable continents.D.It provided all the necessary nutrients.
3. How does the author support his ideas?
A.By listing researchers’ findings.B.By giving a lot of examples.
C.By making comparisons.D.By listing a lot of numbers.
4. Where can we probably read the passage?
A.A science fiction.B.A science magazine.
C.A travel brochure.D.An encyclopedia.
共计 平均难度:一般