1 . Hundreds of years ago, Charles Darwin predicted that facial expressions of emotion are universal. If you’ve ever seen an episode of the popular US TV drama Lie To Me, you will really
Is there really much truth behind this science of
Hand-to-face
Each micro-expression is unique to
A liar refuses eye contact. (X)
People look away when they are thinking carefully and considering each word before it is spoken, not just when they are
Guilty knowledge technique is effective. (√)
Policemen often use the guilty knowledge technique, mentioning something that only the guilty person will know about and show a(n)
A.realize | B.recognize | C.understand | D.remind |
A.appearances | B.postures | C.communication | D.gestures |
A.speaking | B.recognizing | C.indicating | D.noticing |
A.explanations | B.concentration | C.impression | D.expressions |
A.move | B.action | C.performance | D.gesture |
A.signaling | B.sighing | C.signing | D.maintaining |
A.clear | B.conscious | C.sure | D.unaware |
A.regularly | B.necessarily | C.meaningfully | D.probably |
A.holding on | B.holding up | C.holding back | D.holding with |
A.better than | B.less than | C.more than | D.rather than |
A.making out | B.working out | C.checking up | D.making up |
A.preferable | B.inevitable | C.reliable | D.suitable |
A.Quite a few | B.Very few | C.A few | D.Only few |
A.reaction | B.hesitation | C.impression | D.application |
A.stare | B.remark | C.response | D.reminder |
A scheme was first put forward recently by an expert that certain criminals should be sent to prison in their own home.
Advocates of the scheme pointed out that courts frequently sentenced first offenders to community service of some kind rather than send them to prison.
A more serious objection to the scheme was that the harsh life of prison was intended to be part of the deterrent to crime. A prisoner who was allowed to live at home would suffer no particular discomfort and thus not be deterred from repeating his crime. No immediate action was taken on the proposal. It was far too revolutionary and needed to be examined very carefully.
A.The idea, however, was not rejected. |
B.They should spend their lives in prison. |
C.It met with strong objections. |
D.Most of the criminal cases are unpredictable. |
E.Some critics rushed to take extreme cases. |
F.The shame of having a criminal record was adequate for them. |
A. intellectually B. grateful C. individuals D. rewarding E. participants F. awareness G. amazing H. physically I. local J. civilization K. reminder |
Last week, Special Olympic organizers made sure that all details were included to ensure that the athletes were properly welcomed and taken care of. Never before in the 39-year history of the Special Olympics has there been such a(n)
Throughout Shanghai, messages of “
In many countries, disabled people are neglected and not properly cared for. However, events such as the Special Olympics are raising the
The Special Olympics are a(n)
4 . America’s businesses are getting older and fatter, while many new businesses are dying in infancy.
A study last month by the Brookings Institution found that the proportion of older firms has grown steadily over several decades, while the survival rate of new companies has fallen. In addition, young people are starting companies at a sharply lower rate than in the past.
A new report from the National Association of Manufacturers shows a major cause: The cost of obeying government regulations has risen to more than $2 trillion (12.26 trillion yuan) annually, or 12 percent of the GDP, and this cost falls disproportionately on smaller, newer businesses.
It’s risky, difficult and expensive to start a business, and getting more so. Governments are imposing various new rules on a seemingly daily basis: health insurance, minimum wage increases and, most recently in California, compulsory paid sick days for even hourly employees. These regulations shift huge social welfare costs directly onto often-struggling small businesses, while being proportionally much less costly for larger companies.
This is partly an unintended issue of resources---established companies can cope with new costs more easily---but it’s also deliberate. For instance, big insurance companies got a seat at the table to help write Obama care, but less politically powerful firms---like medical device manufacturers---got squeezed.
Mature, successful corporations can employ ex-lawmakers with connections, distribute campaign contributions and even write regulations for themselves. They are also more likely to want to protect steady revenue streams than revolutionize their industry.
Major companies that have been so ill-managed they would otherwise collapse---airlines, car companies and banks---stagger(蹒跚)on because politicians ride to the rescue with bags of taxpayer money.
The genius of our unique system of government is the determination to protect and defend the rights of the individual over the rights of the nation. As such, the rise of a well-connected oligarchy(寡头政治)that protects big business at the expense of small business, and the established over the new, is opposite to American ideals.
Income inequality—which is directly caused by faulty government policy---is being promoted as the reason to impose more of that bad policy. But let’s be perfectly clear, we do not have a free market but one where government picks winners and losers through regulations and financial aids.
Politics is, and always has been, about balancing competing interests seeking to benefit themselves, and that’s as it should be, but the force of government should never be used to reduce competition, kill innovation or support and extend artificial monopolies(垄断)by harming the consumer, the taxpayer and the economy. Policy must breed our new and small businesses or see the as-yet undreamed of innovations that could be our bright future die in infancy.
1. We can learn from the passage that___________.A.over several decades, new companies have grown steadily. |
B.mature, successful corporations prefer to maintain their stable incomes. |
C.less politically powerful firms also have their voice in making regulations. |
D.The cost of obeying government regulations falls equally on all businesses. |
A.the state economy may depend on those innovative businesses. |
B.the rise of a well-connected oligarchy is contrary to American ideals. |
C.income inequality is what the government should take action to resolve. |
D.the government picks winners and losers through the law of free market. |
A.big insurance companies have better relationship with Obama. |
B.most of the ex-lawmakers work in mature, successful corporations. |
C.larger and older firms have a command of resources of various aspects. |
D.politicians like providing financial aids to the companies of worse operation. |
A.contented. | B.confident. |
C.convinced. | D.concerned. |
Ask Helpful Hannah
Dear Helpful Hannah,
I’ve got a problem with my husband, Sam. He bought a smartphone a couple of months ago and he took it on our recent ski vacation to Colorado. It was a great trip except for one problem. He has a constant desire
I recently read an article about “nomophobia,”
Who would have thought that little devices like these could have brought so much trouble!
Sick and Tired Sadie
A. hooked | B. lifeline | C. enroll | D. pull | E. plus | F. exclusively |
G. delicate | H. popularized | I. experiment | J. specifically | K. boom |
China’s male beauty vloggers go viral as gender attitudes shift
Blushes, eyeshadows and concealers are no longer
The popularity of male beauty vloggers is leading a(n)
Even in 2018, parents can
The change in gender ideals has been influenced by South Korean pop culture, where male celebrities and boy bands have
Wang Zilu, 22, has used makeup for three years –
“The first time I put on makeup, it took me an entire afternoon,” he recalled. “The most difficult part was eye shadow – how to mix and match different colors without making it ugly.”
Makeup, for some, has gone from a fun hobby to a profitable
But even with more young Chinese men trying out a bit of blush, not everyone’s used to it just yet.
7 . As data and identity theft becomes more and more common, the market is growing for biometric(生物测量) technologies—like fingerprint scans—to keep others out of private e-spaces. At present, these technologies are still expensive, though.
Researchers from Georgia Tech say that they have come up with a low-cost device(装置) that gets around this problem: a smart keyboard. This smart keyboard precisely measures the cadence(节奏) with which one types and the pressure fingers apply to each key. The keyboard could offer a strong layer of security by analyzing things like the force of a user’s typing and the time between key presses. These patterns are unique to each person. Thus, the keyboard can determine people’s identities, and by extension, whether they should be given access to the computer it’s connected to—regardless of whether someone gets the password right.
It also doesn’t require a new type of technology that people aren’t already familiar with. Everybody uses a keyboard and everybody types differently.
In a study describing the technology, the researchers had 100 volunteers type the word “touch” four times using the smart keyboard. Data collected from the device could be used to recognize different participants based on how they typed, with very low error rates. The researchers say that the keyboard should be pretty straightforward to commercialize and is mostly made of inexpensive, plastic-like parts. The team hopes to make it to market in the near future.
1. Why do the researchers develop the smart keyboard?A.To reduce pressure on keys. | B.To improve accuracy in typing. |
C.To replace the password system. | D.To cut the cost of e-space protection. |
A.Computers are much easier to operate. |
B.Fingerprint scanning techniques develop fast. |
C.Typing patterns vary from person to person. |
D.Data security measures are guaranteed. |
A.It’ll be environment-friendly. | B.It’ll reach consumers soon. |
C.It’ll be made of plastics. | D.It’ll help speed up typing. |
A.A diary. | B.A guidebook | C.A novel. | D.A magazine. |
8 . Don’t Drop the Ball
Drop prevention risk assessment is really important. Everyone knows objects get dropped on work sites – there’s nothing radical about that. In Australia, mining has the third highest fatality rate of any industry (4.4 fatalities per 100,000 workers in 2015), and in less well-documented areas like India the fatality rate is even higher. A lot of these fatalities come from dropped objects. It’s worth trying to address this and work out just how big the risk is and where it comes from. At the end of the day, safety should be a priority in any industry and it should come as no surprise that addressing safety issues early can actually save money, long-term, for companies. It doesn’t look good for a mining company if people are getting injured and equipment damaged from falling objects.
The risks from dropped objects come from all sorts of areas; it’s not just a matter of dropped tools. We’re talking about sites characterized by a lot of activities, where all sorts of things can come loose or fall, whether its light fittings or objects like rocks falling off transporting belts. The risks are largely personal but are also financial: if a piece of equipment gets damaged it will need replacing. That’s a pretty strong inspiration for companies to address these risks. In terms of frequency, here in Australia we’re looking at around 18% of compensation claims coming from workers being hit by moving objects, but those are just the claims – the frequency is likely higher. Around 28% of deaths and injuries come from such incidents, too. As I said earlier, that’s just Australia; some industries don’t keep statistics, but I wouldn’t be surprised to find other countries report comparable rates. That’s a lot of accidents that could be prevented with adequate safety measures.
It’s important to take an active approach. It’s a lot easier and cheaper to address these risks during the installation or maintenance phases by adding barriers to the inside of guard railings on walkways and transporting systems and adding nets to fixed devices. There are safety mechanisms available, but it’s up to the companies to install them. It is a lot more efficient to add barriers right from the start rather than waiting for an accident and then thinking, “Should we be safer?”, when they should have reduced these risks from the start.
1. Why is drop prevention risk assessment important?A.People seldom knows the extent of risk. |
B.Many bosses consider their reputation. |
C.Many deaths are caused by falling objects. |
D.Companies need to save a lot of money. |
A.Light devices on the transporting belt. |
B.Personal injury and equipment damage. |
C.Safety issues and corporate development. |
D.Compensation claims and statistics. |
A.The frequency is higher though some industries do not have statistics. |
B.Some 46 percent of deaths and injuries resulted from such incidents. |
C.Four out of ten people died in incidents like this every year. |
D.There have been more incidents in Australia than anywhere else. |
A.To find a security mechanism. | B.To reduce the use of tools. |
C.To replace the damaged equipment. | D.To install some security equipment. |
9 . As advances in auto-technology have placed a huge number of self-driving machines on our roads and sidewalks, a side product has materialized in recent years: robot-babysitting.
In Phoenix, human attendants will remotely monitor Google’s upcoming Waymo robot-taxis, using the cars cameras to evaluate and adapt to passenger or road challenges. State safety regulations typically require that auto-vehicles be accompanied at all times by humans. These professionals’ job titles range from “robot handler” to “safety driver,” but they have essentially the same responsibilities: monitoring robot behavior for safety and performance, and answering questions about the technology. Broadly speaking, robot-babysitting jobs fall under the umbrella of careers in automation, which include maintenance, engineering, and programming.
However, some observers note that certain kinds of robot-babysitting –-- the kind that is boring and doesn’t require much education –-- can make for thankless work. The safety drivers who sit in self-driving cars have described their roles as“exhausting” and “demanding,” and many told me about the constant pressure to stay vigilant at all times. “It’s incredibly hard to sit in a chair and stare at a computer without doing anything for eight hours,” Ramsey said. “But you do not need a Ph.D. to do it.” In March 2018, the field of robot babysitting took a beating when a self-driving Uber in Tempe, Arizona, hit a 49-year old named Elaine Herzberg. Dashcam footage showed that Rafaela Vasquez, the car’s safety driver, had not been looking at the road when the accident occurred. Investigators are deciding if Vasquez will be charged with murder.
According to the McKinsey Global Institute, 10 million to 800 million jobs globally could be lost to automation by 2030. In the long term, it’s inevitable that robot-babysitters will go the way of elevator operators and lamplighters. But they’ll also birth new robot-related roles.“A huge number of jobs will be created as auto-vehicles are loosed into the environment,” Ramsey said. In 2016, Bosch started training students from Schoolcraft College, a community college in Michigan, in auto-vehicle repair: Toyota has trained students in maintenance as well. “We might even see a return to low-level jobs where people come and fuel the car for you,”Ramsey said. “Until we can wirelessly charge, someone needs to refuel them.” The hardest-to-automate industries, as it happens, are the ones that require looking after humans: childcare, education, health-care aides. Robot babysitters might feel like they have gained the job of the future. But in fact, real babysitters might be better positioned.
1. Robot-babysitting jobs do NOT include _______________.A.answering the questions about the technique. |
B.observing the certain kinds of the robot-babysitter. |
C.monitoring the potential problems of the auto-vehicles. |
D.maintaining the vehicles which are out of order. |
A.grateful | B.suspicious | C.fit | D.alert |
A.A lot of opportunities will be created. |
B.A large number of people will be out of work. |
C.Auto-vehicles will become much cheaper. |
D.Many people will turn to buying auto-cars. |
A.The Rise and Fall of Robot Babysitters. |
B.The Future of Auto-Vehicles. |
C.The Life and Employment of the Future. |
D.The Position of Robot Babysitters. |
Holding Parents Responsible—An Unfair Punishment
The rise in teen crime suggests that some parents are failing at their parental tasks. To correct the problem, lawmakers in some states require parents to serve jail time. They hope that this punishment will motivate parents to take their responsibilities seriously.
Despite public support for parental responsibility laws, many people think that the laws are unfair. They suggest that parents should not be punished for the criminal acts of their children, unless it can be shown there is a related fault on the parents’ part. For example, if young teenagers are arrested for drinking alcohol supplied by parents, then parents should be held responsible because they helped the teenagers break the law. People who oppose parental responsibility laws also believe that punishing parents is unlikely to create a change in the kids’ behavior. These people argue that parents may not be at fault. The children of good parents can fall in with the wrong kids and get into trouble, they say. Worse yet, if mom is in jail, there may be no one at all to control her kid. That lack of control may then lead to more crime.
The unfortunate fact is that jailing a mom or dad punishes the rest of the family. The jailed parent cannot work to help feed the family or pay the rent. A parent who is sent to jail for the crimes of a teenager may also be fired from a job for missing too much work. Furthermore, little evidence exists to support the idea that the threat of punishment improves a parents’ ability to control a teenager. The problem is that some teens cannot be controlled by their parents, even if the parents try hard to control them. These struggling parents are not ignoring their parental responsibilities. Opponents of parental responsibility laws say that parents who are in this situation need help, not a jail sentence.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________