组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 社会
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 3 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了德国和丹麦的研究人员研究噪声对人们健康产生的影响,呼吁政治家们关注噪声污染并采取措施解决噪声污染。

1 . Sleeping in a noisy room isn’t only distracting (使人分心的), and it can also harm your health. Although researchers have known for decades that long­term loud noises can harm us, it’s only recently become recognized as a widespread problem.

In a new review of previously published studies, researchers from Germany and Denmark took a look at the ways in which noises, such as an airplane passing by or jackhammer digging in the ground, can affect our hearts. Perhaps the most obvious impact of a loud sound while you are sleeping is that it can wake you up. But, even if you don't remember hearing the noise or you don’t physically get out of bed, it can disrupt you in ways you may not realize.

“Noise is not just causing annoyance, but it actually makes us sick,” said Dr. Thomas Münzel, a professor at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. “Regardless of where the sound is coming from, if it gets louder than 60 decibels (分贝),it can increase the risk of heart disease.”

When our body hears these noises, it reacts with a stress reaction. In this case, these sudden and unexpected noises cause hormones(荷尔蒙) to speed up and eventually damage the heart. Although the chance that a single noise will affect you is unlikely, it’s the continuous exposure (接触) to the sound that can finally affect you.

“But our heart health isn’t the only cause for concern. Long-term noise may also raise the risk of type 2 diabetes (糖尿病), depression, and anxiety disorders,” he warns. In the future, Münzel plans to examine how noises from cars, planes, and other vehicles affect the brain. But despite the amount or the depth of research he conducts, it’ll take the help of politicians to improve the effect of noise on our health.

“Politicians have to take into account, in particular, the new findings,” Münzel said, “As for aircraft noise and airports, it is important to make new laws and set new lower noise limits that protect people living close by the airport instead of the owners of the airport.”

1. What do researchers from Germany and Denmark find?
A.Noise does little harm to people who are asleep.
B.Noise can cause people’s memory to get worse sharply.
C.Noise has been a widespread concern for a long time.
D.Noise louder than 60 decibels may cause heart disease.
2. Which word can replace the underlined word “disrupt” in Paragraph 2?
A.Defeat.B.Harm.C.Attract.D.Discourage.
3. What can we infer from the last two paragraphs?
A.Politicians should take action to handle noise pollution.
B.Münzel will continue other studies on brain diseases.
C.Benefits of airport owners are more important than health.
D.Attention should be paid to heart health and other diseases.
4. Which can be the best title for the text?
A.Who Is to Blame for Noise PollutionB.What Should Be Done to Stop Noise
C.How Münzel Carried Out His ResearchD.How Noise Pollution Harms Our Body
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。研究人员发现,当人类与机器人一起工作时,同样的事情也会发生。当人们对一项任务的个人贡献不会被注意到时,他们就会减少努力,这可能要归咎于糟糕的管理风格,因为个人的工作没有得到认可。

2 . People tend to cut corners and allow trusted workmates to do their work when working as a team. Now researchers have found that the same thing happens when humans work with robots.

Dietlind Cymek at the Technical University of Berlin in Germany and her colleagues designed an experiment to test whether humans would put in less effort when they think that their personal contribution to a task won’t be noticed.

In the experiment, the researchers asked a group of 42 people to examine images of circuit boards (电路板) for errors using a computer that tracked their work. Half of them looked at boards that had already been checked by a robot, and half were told that they were the only ones responsible for quality control.

People working in partnership with the robot caught fewer errors, after they had already seen that the robot had successfully flagged lots of errors.

The researchers say such teamwork could lead to a drop in motivation if individual effort isn’t visible and warn that there could be safety risks if teams of people and robots work on safety-related tasks in the same way.

Kathleen Richardson at De Montfort University in Leicester, UK, says it is fine to use robots as long as they are effective, but that they should be considered tools rather than workmates or team members. “It just strikes me that workers think when a tool can do something, they let it,” says Richardson.

This is probably down to poor management style, in which individual work isn’t recognised. “I bet you if there was an motivation behind it, and if the humans could get extra pay for spotting errors in the circuit boards, then they’d put a bit more effort into it,” she adds.

1. What is the experiment mainly about?
A.Workplace safety.B.Management style.
C.Industrial innovation.D.Working productivity.
2. What do we know about the people working with robots in the experiment?
A.They preferred to work individually.
B.They paid less attention to their work.
C.They were not appreciative of robots’ effort.
D.They worried about being replaced by robots.
3. What is Richardson’s attitude towards human-robot cooperation?
A.Favorable.B.Unclear.C.Uninterested.D.Doubtful.
4. What does Richardson suggest the management do?
A.Correct errors.B.Increase work time.
C.Reward hard work.D.Encourage teamwork.
3 . 最近,你们班就“是否应该帮助陌生人”展开了讨论,同学们就这一话题意见不一,你的看法如何?根据所提供的信息,以“Should We Help Strangers?”为题,写一篇短文。

原因

赞成

帮助他人是美德;
帮助他人就是帮助自己;

反对

怕陷入麻烦;
怕被误解;

你的观点?(至少两点)

注意:
1.表达清楚,语法正确,上下文连贯;
2.必须包括表格中所有的相关信息,并适当发挥;
3.词数:100左右(正文的开头已给出,不计入总词数);
4.不得使用真实姓名、校名和地名等。
参考词汇:美德virtue

Should We Help Strangers?

Recently our class had a discussion about whether we should help strangers. Different students have different opinions.


_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
共计 平均难度:一般