组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 社会
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 41 道试题
书信写作-慰问信 | 较难(0.4) |
名校
1 . 假如你是杭州外国语学校的学生会主席李华,请你用英语给杭州娃哈哈进出口有限公司总经理宗馥莉女士写一封信,表达对她刚刚痛失她的“民族企业家父亲——宗庆后老先生”的慰问。内容包括:
1.表达哀思;
2.对娃哈哈集团的希望和建议。
condolences—慰问;吊唁
Dear Ms. Zong,

I’m Li Hua from Hangzhou Foreign Language High School.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要论述了租衣服比买衣服更环保的问题,分析了衣服租赁服务给环境带来的影响。
2 . Directions: Complete the following passage by using the words in the box. Each word can only be used once. Note that there is one word more than you need.
A. increases B. investigated C. comparison D. sustainable E. advertised
F. accessible G. process H. footprint I. discourage   J. causes   K. promote

Clothing rental is a hot new industry and retailers are demanding to get on board in hopes of attracting green shopper.

But is renting fashion actually more environmentally-friendly than buying it, and if so, how much more? Journalist and author Elizabeth Cline     1     this question and concluded that it’s not as     2     as it seems.

Take shipping, for example, which has to go two ways if an item is rented-receiving and returning. Cline writes that consumer transportation has the second largest carbon     3       of our collective fashion habit after manufacturing.

She writes, “An item ordered online and then returned can send out 20 kilograms of carbon each way, and     4     up to 50 kilograms for rush shipping. By     5     the carbon impact of a pair of jeans purchased from a physical store and washed and worn at home is 33.4 kilograms, according to a 2015 study by Levi’s.”

Then there’s the burden of washing, which has to happen for every item when it’s returned, regardless of whether or not it was worn. For most rental services, this usually means dry cleaning, a high impact and polluting     6    . All the rental services that Cline looked into have replaced perchloroethylene, an air pollutant that     7     cancers, still used by 70 percent of US dry cleaners, with alternatives, although these aren’t great, either.

Lastly, Cline fears that rental services will increase our appetite for fast fashion, simply because it’s so easily     8    . There’s something called “share washing” that makes people waste more precisely because a product or service is shared and thus is regarded as more eco-friendly. Uber is one example of this,     9     as “a way to share rides and limit car ownership.” and yet “it has been proven to     10     walking, bicycling, and public transportation use.”

Renting clothes is still preferable to buying them cheap and throwing them in the dustbin after a few wears, but we shouldn’t let the availability of these services make us too satisfied. There’s an even better step-that’s wearing what is already in the closet.

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文体。文章主要讨论了在数字时代,由于信息过载和注意力经济,批判性思维不再是唯一重要的技能,而更为关键的是“批判性忽视”的技能。

3 . In the days before the Internet, critical thinking was the most important skill of informed citizens. But in the digital age, according to Anastasia Kozyreva, a psychologist at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development, and her colleagues, an even more important skill is critical ignoring.

As the researchers point out, we live in an attention economy where content producers on the Internet compete for our attention. They attract us with a lot of emotional and eye-catching stories while providing little useful information, so they can expose us to profit-generating advertisements. Therefore,we are no longer customers but products, and each link we click is a sale of our time and attention. Toprotect ourselves from this, Kozyreva advocates for learning the skill of critical ignoring, in which readers intentionally control their information environment to reduce exposure to false and low-quality information.

According to Kozyreva, critical ignoring comprises three strategies. The first is to design ourenvironments, which involves the removal of low-quality yet hard-to-resist information from around. Successful dieters need to keep unhealthy food out of their homes. Likewise, we need to set up a digital environment where attention-grabbing items are kept out of sight. As with dieting, if one tries to bank onwillpower not to click eye-catching “news”, he’ll surely fail. So, it’s better to just keep them out of sightto begin with.

The next is to evaluate the reliability of information, whose purpose is to protect you from false and misleading information. It can be realized by checking the source in the mainstream news agencies which have their reputations for being trustworthy.

The last goes by the phrase “do not feed the trolls.” Trolls are actors who internationally spread false and hurtful information online to cause harm. It may be appealing to respond to them to set the facts straight, but trolls just care about annoying others rather than facts. So, it’s best not to reward their bad behaviour with our attention.

By sharpening our critical ignoring skills in these ways, we can make the most of the Internet while avoiding falling victim to those who try to control our attention, time, and minds.

1. What can we learn about the attention economy from paragraph 2?
A.It offers little information.B.It features depressing stories.
C.It saves time for Internet users.D.It seeks profits from each click.
2. Why does the author mention dieters in paragraph 3?
A.To discuss the quality of information
B.To prove the benefits of healthy food.
C.To show the importance of environments.
D.To explain the effectiveness of willpower.
3. What should we do to handle Internet trolls according to the text?
A.Reveal their intention.B.Turn a deaf ear to them.
C.Correct their behaviour.D.Send hard facts to them.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.Reasons for critical thinking in the attention economy.
B.Practising the skill of critical ignoring in the digital age.
C.Maximizing the benefits of critical ignoring on the Internet.
D.Strategies of abandoning critical thinking for Internet users
2024-01-17更新 | 490次组卷 | 21卷引用:江西省宜春市丰城市第九中学2023-2024学年高二下学期第一次月考英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文为一篇说明文。文章介绍了天然染色工艺的回归。

4 . In 2022, campaign group Fashion Revolution Chelsea dye a garden for its Chelsea Flower Show presentation. An ancient craft, natural dyeing is a practice whose time has come again, with hand tie-dyed fashion also making a comeback in recent years.

The revival has been encouraged by Covid lockdowns, “which allowed people to explore the craft at home, says natural-dyeing enthusiast and teacher Susan Dye. It’s unlikely, though, that the practice would have caught on in quite the same way if not for a continually growing discomfort about fashion’s heavy footprint. From carbon emissions to animal cruelty, fashion is under considerable inspection. “Put it this way, 97% of dyes used in the industry are petrochemically (石油化学产品) based,” says sustainable fashion consultant Jackie Andrews, who helped advise the UN Ethical Fashion Initiative. We’ve got net zero targets which mean we’re going to have to remove all those petrochemicals from the manufacturing cycle.

Fashion is a huge polluter. According to the UN Environment Program, the industry is responsible for up to one-fifth of all industrial water pollution—due to the fact that most clothes today are produced in poorer countries where regulation is weak and enforcement weaker. Waste water is dumped directly into rivers and streams, poisoning the land as well as the water sources of people and animals who rely on them.

It’s easy to see why someone who cares about people, planet and animals, as well as clothes, might turn to natural plant dyeing. From the beauty of the raw materials—often wild plants-to the property of only bonding with natural fiber like cotton and linen (亚麻布) from the minor footprint of recycling old clothing that has grayed or faded over time to the vibrant and long-lasting dyeing results, plant dyeing feels like a quiet act of rebellion. This is why, while beginners start with simply changing their clothes’ color, new worlds open. Many of today’s natural dyers grow their own dye plants, run local community workshops, and advocate for change in industrialized fashion systems and beyond.

1. What is the main reason for the growing discomfort mentioned in paragraph 2?
A.The adoption of petrochemical-based dyes
B.The disturbing consequences of the fashion industry.
C.The fashion industry’s focus on luxurious designs.
D.The challenging net zero targets to be achieved.
2. How does the author illustrate Fashion is a huge polluter?
A.By making a comparison.B.By listing numbers
C.By giving examples.D.By introducing a new topic
3. What does the underlined phrase a quiet act of rebellion in paragraph 4 refer to?
A.A protest against turning to natural fiber.
B.An objection to recycling old clothing
C.A resistance to vibrant colors in natural dyeing
D.A struggle for a sustainable fashion industry
4. What would be the most suitable title for the passage?
A.The Environmental Impact of Natural Dyeing
B.The Return of Natural Dyeing with Ethical Appeal
C.Fashion Revolution’s Dye Garden Presentation
D.The Petrochemical Dye Industry and Its Challenges
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了德国和丹麦的研究人员研究噪声对人们健康产生的影响,呼吁政治家们关注噪声污染并采取措施解决噪声污染。

5 . Sleeping in a noisy room isn’t only distracting (使人分心的), and it can also harm your health. Although researchers have known for decades that long­term loud noises can harm us, it’s only recently become recognized as a widespread problem.

In a new review of previously published studies, researchers from Germany and Denmark took a look at the ways in which noises, such as an airplane passing by or jackhammer digging in the ground, can affect our hearts. Perhaps the most obvious impact of a loud sound while you are sleeping is that it can wake you up. But, even if you don't remember hearing the noise or you don’t physically get out of bed, it can disrupt you in ways you may not realize.

“Noise is not just causing annoyance, but it actually makes us sick,” said Dr. Thomas Münzel, a professor at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. “Regardless of where the sound is coming from, if it gets louder than 60 decibels (分贝),it can increase the risk of heart disease.”

When our body hears these noises, it reacts with a stress reaction. In this case, these sudden and unexpected noises cause hormones(荷尔蒙) to speed up and eventually damage the heart. Although the chance that a single noise will affect you is unlikely, it’s the continuous exposure (接触) to the sound that can finally affect you.

“But our heart health isn’t the only cause for concern. Long-term noise may also raise the risk of type 2 diabetes (糖尿病), depression, and anxiety disorders,” he warns. In the future, Münzel plans to examine how noises from cars, planes, and other vehicles affect the brain. But despite the amount or the depth of research he conducts, it’ll take the help of politicians to improve the effect of noise on our health.

“Politicians have to take into account, in particular, the new findings,” Münzel said, “As for aircraft noise and airports, it is important to make new laws and set new lower noise limits that protect people living close by the airport instead of the owners of the airport.”

1. What do researchers from Germany and Denmark find?
A.Noise does little harm to people who are asleep.
B.Noise can cause people’s memory to get worse sharply.
C.Noise has been a widespread concern for a long time.
D.Noise louder than 60 decibels may cause heart disease.
2. Which word can replace the underlined word “disrupt” in Paragraph 2?
A.Defeat.B.Harm.C.Attract.D.Discourage.
3. What can we infer from the last two paragraphs?
A.Politicians should take action to handle noise pollution.
B.Münzel will continue other studies on brain diseases.
C.Benefits of airport owners are more important than health.
D.Attention should be paid to heart health and other diseases.
4. Which can be the best title for the text?
A.Who Is to Blame for Noise PollutionB.What Should Be Done to Stop Noise
C.How Münzel Carried Out His ResearchD.How Noise Pollution Harms Our Body
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。研究人员发现,当人类与机器人一起工作时,同样的事情也会发生。当人们对一项任务的个人贡献不会被注意到时,他们就会减少努力,这可能要归咎于糟糕的管理风格,因为个人的工作没有得到认可。

6 . People tend to cut corners and allow trusted workmates to do their work when working as a team. Now researchers have found that the same thing happens when humans work with robots.

Dietlind Cymek at the Technical University of Berlin in Germany and her colleagues designed an experiment to test whether humans would put in less effort when they think that their personal contribution to a task won’t be noticed.

In the experiment, the researchers asked a group of 42 people to examine images of circuit boards (电路板) for errors using a computer that tracked their work. Half of them looked at boards that had already been checked by a robot, and half were told that they were the only ones responsible for quality control.

People working in partnership with the robot caught fewer errors, after they had already seen that the robot had successfully flagged lots of errors.

The researchers say such teamwork could lead to a drop in motivation if individual effort isn’t visible and warn that there could be safety risks if teams of people and robots work on safety-related tasks in the same way.

Kathleen Richardson at De Montfort University in Leicester, UK, says it is fine to use robots as long as they are effective, but that they should be considered tools rather than workmates or team members. “It just strikes me that workers think when a tool can do something, they let it,” says Richardson.

This is probably down to poor management style, in which individual work isn’t recognised. “I bet you if there was an motivation behind it, and if the humans could get extra pay for spotting errors in the circuit boards, then they’d put a bit more effort into it,” she adds.

1. What is the experiment mainly about?
A.Workplace safety.B.Management style.
C.Industrial innovation.D.Working productivity.
2. What do we know about the people working with robots in the experiment?
A.They preferred to work individually.
B.They paid less attention to their work.
C.They were not appreciative of robots’ effort.
D.They worried about being replaced by robots.
3. What is Richardson’s attitude towards human-robot cooperation?
A.Favorable.B.Unclear.C.Uninterested.D.Doubtful.
4. What does Richardson suggest the management do?
A.Correct errors.B.Increase work time.
C.Reward hard work.D.Encourage teamwork.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约290词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章讲述一项研究,表明人工智能的兴起将导致“收入不平等”加剧及研究人员对机器人化的态度和建议。

7 . According to a new study from Oxford Economics, a rise in artificial intelligence will result in an increase in “income inequality” as they estimate that 20 million manufacturing jobs will be lost in the next 11 years. In China alone, there could be 14 million robots taking work currently done by humans by 2030. While in the United States, more than 1.5 million workers would have lost their employment to technology by 2030.

The report predicts the use of robots worldwide has increased to 2.25 million over the past two decades. The researchers said, “As a result of robotisation, tens of millions of jobs will be lost, especially in poorer economies that rely on lower-skilled workers, which will therefore translate into an increase in income inequality.”

However, the researchers noted how “robotisation” has the potential to boost productivity and economic growth. They predicted a 5.3 percent rise in global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2030.The report said, “This means adding an extra $4.9 trillion per year to the global economy by 2030(in today’s prices).”

The report remained positive about the use of automation and urged lawmakers not to sand in the way of robots in the workplace, despite the threat of job losses.

The researchers said, “These findings should not lead policy-makers to seek to prevent the adoption of robot technology. Instead, the challenge should be to distribute the robot profits more evenly by helping workers prepare for and adapt to the big changes it will bring about. Explore all policy options from training, initiatives (新方案) and new welfare programs such as universal basic income.”

1. What is the number of potential job loss in Oxford Economics report based on?
A.Accurate figures.B.Official statistics.
C.Artificial intelligence.D.Approximate calculation.
2. What can we infer about the trend of robotisation in manufacturing industry?
A.It may enlarge the gap between rich and poor.
B.It has helped increase the global income.
C.It may increase international competition in lawmaking.
D.It has been universally recognized.
3. What do the researchers suggest to policy-makers in the last paragraph?
A.Boosting national economic development.
B.Providing citizens with lifelong education.
C.Slowing down the spread of robot technology.
D.Protecting workers’ interests by making new plans.
4. What’s the researchers’ attitude towards “robotisation”?
A.Skeptical.B.Favorable.C.Conservative.D.Tolerant.
语法填空-短文语填(约220词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是新闻报道。新闻报道了欧洲人正在努力降低能源消耗,但能源支出仍在不断攀升,欧洲国家公民也在自愿采取行动,减少消费。
8 . 阅读下面短文,在空白处填入 1 个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。

Eat or heat?

No more ironing, limited oven use and showering at work—Europeans are trying to keep energy use down but the bills still keep climbing. Costs of energy for British consumers will rise by 80% from October,    1     will take the average annual household bills to £3, 549. This makes the energy crisis severer than    2     of the 1970s and 1980s.

Keetley    3     (lose) his job as a council adviser in April and lives on £600 a month from a social security scheme. Half of that goes on rent, he said, with the remainder barely covering the     4       (essential). He now eats one meal a day and although he has reduced energy consumption to a minimum, he spends more than 15% of his income on energy bills. “    5     cost of living has increased and yet you are expected to live on the money    6     (provide) for when there wasn’t a crisis... I either can have my heating on or eat,” Keetley said.

A household is defined as living in fuel poverty if it is low income and needs to spend 10% or even    7       (much) of its income on energy, according to UK charity National Energy Action and other British charities. Experts agree that despite this     8       (be) a hard season, Europe will       9       (undoubted) make it through the winter, but the concern is    10     will happen next year.

阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。保持忙碌能摆脱负面情绪,让人快乐起来。本文作者建议人们不要坐着啥也不做。

9 . The secret to happiness is keeping busy, research has found.Keeping the mind occupied with tasks—no matter how meaningless—keeps off negative emotions, the study found.

However, the bad news is that humans are seemingly born to be lazy in order to save energy, according to Professor Christoper Hsee, a behavioral scientist at Chicago University.

In a study, 98 students were asked to complete two surveys. After they had completed the first, they were made to wait 15 minutes to receive the next one. They were given a choice of either banding in the first survey nearby or at a more distant location they had to walk to. No matter which choice they made, they received a chocolate bar. It turned out that about two-thirds (68 students) chose the lazy option. Those who had taken the walk reported feeling happier than those who had stayed put (呆在原处).

Prof. Hsee concluded that keeping busy helped keep people happy. He said the findings, reported in the journal Psychological Science, might have an effect on policies.

“Governments may increase the happiness of idle citizens by having them build bridges that are actually useless,” he suggested.

As for ordinary people, he advised, “Get up and do something. Anything. Even if there really is no point to what you are doing, you will feel better for it.” He added, “Thinking deeply or engaging in self-reflection can be regarded as keeping busy, too.”

“You do not need to be running around, You just need to be engaged, either physically or mentally.”

1. Keeping busy can make people happy because ________.
A.it can help people get rid of laziness
B.it can make people sleep better
C.it can help get rid of negative emotions
D.it can give people a sense of achievement
2. Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the passage?
A.Policies may be influenced by the findings.
B.The officials have taken Prof. Hsee’s advice.
C.In the study half students handed in the first survey nearby.
D.Governments can increase citizens’ happiness by building bridges.
3. What can we infer from the passage?
A.Everybody is born to be happy.
B.Only by keeping working all the time can you gain happiness.
C.Prof. Hsee’s finding was published in Psychological Science.
D.Keeping busy goes against human nature.
4. What is the best title for the passage?
A.What is Happiness
B.The Secret of Happiness: Keeping Busy
C.The Finding of Research: Do What You Like
D.Take Life correctly
10 . 最近,你们班就“是否应该帮助陌生人”展开了讨论,同学们就这一话题意见不一,你的看法如何?根据所提供的信息,以“Should We Help Strangers?”为题,写一篇短文。

原因

赞成

帮助他人是美德;
帮助他人就是帮助自己;

反对

怕陷入麻烦;
怕被误解;

你的观点?(至少两点)

注意:
1.表达清楚,语法正确,上下文连贯;
2.必须包括表格中所有的相关信息,并适当发挥;
3.词数:100左右(正文的开头已给出,不计入总词数);
4.不得使用真实姓名、校名和地名等。
参考词汇:美德virtue

Should We Help Strangers?

Recently our class had a discussion about whether we should help strangers. Different students have different opinions.


_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
共计 平均难度:一般