1. How many Britons, including children, are overweight according to experts?
A.A half. | B.A quarter. | C.Two thirds. |
A.A measure to deal with being overweight. |
B.A school to offer cooking lessons. |
C.A way to set up cooking clubs. |
A.They will be given in primary schools. |
B.They will be provided one hour a week. |
C.They will last for the whole school year. |
A.To teach children to cook healthy food. |
B.To train more cookery teachers for schools. |
C.To help students remember simple recipes. |
A.Buy the equipment. | B.Build new kitchens. | C.Help poor students. |
A.It was burned. | B.It was spotted. | C.It was torn. |
3 . Lawmakers in Massachusetts have introduced a law that would ban children in the seventh grade or younger from playing tackle football (冲撞式橄榄球). The Act for No Organized Head Impacts to Schoolchildren, or the NO HITS Act, was introduced last month in an effort to protect children’s heads from blows (重击) while at a particularly fragile age.
The bill would cause fines of up to $ 2,000 for each time the law is broken. People who frequently break the law, or those whose actions cause physical harm, would face bigger fines.
“It’s all about kids’ health and we have a number of studies that say that repeated contacts to the head are very bad for you and the younger that starts, the worse it is,” said Paul, who introduced the bill with House Minority Leader Bradley Jones .
According to a 2017 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers examining 111 brains belonging to former NFL (National Football League) players found the brain disease Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, or CTE, in 110 of them. The disease is associated with repeated head injuries, not just concussions (脑震荡), and is generally found in athletes, retired soldiers and others with a history of repetitive brain injuries, according to the Concussion Legacy Foundation, a non-profit organization that works to study, treat and prevent future cases of brain injuries among athletes and other at-risk groups.
Similar laws have been considered elsewhere in the country, including California and Illinois last year, though they didn’t secure enough votes to become law. Those against previously proposed (提议的) bans have argued that adequate progress has been achieved to make the sport safer and that the sport offers too many benefits for children to totally avoid it.
Several former NFL players, who have been directly or indirectly affected by CTE, have argued differently, however. “I made the mistake of starting tackle football at 9 years old. Now, CTE has taken my life away.Youth tackle football is all risk with no reward,” Nick Buoniconti, a former NFL player, told CNN last year.
1. Why was the law introduced by lawmakers in Massachusetts?A.To ban children from doing sports too young. |
B.To make tackle football safer for players. |
C.To keep young children from suffering brain injuries. |
D.To encourage the popularity of some safe sports. |
A.The fines of playing tackle football incorrectly. |
B.The causes of the new law in Massachusetts. |
C.The consequences of breaking the new law. |
D.The reason why the sport is forbidden. |
A.Brain injuries can really be prevented with action. |
B.Repeated head blows can result in brain diseases. |
C.NFL players used to pay much attention to CTE. |
D.Future cases of brain injuries can be reduced. |
4 . A new study published this week in the journal Nature Communications has concluded that a 100 percent change to organic food production in England and Wales would actually lead to a great increase in greenhouse gas emissions (排放). In turn, this would contribute to further climate change.
Although organic farming directly pours out fewer emissions than conventional farming — around 20 percent lower for crops and 4 percent for farm animals — it produces especially less food. As to this study’s findings, total organic agriculture in England and Wales would produce 40 percent less food. With less food in the market, the countries would need to increase food imports, which would produce more global greenhouse gas emissions.
Organic farming also increases the amount of absorbing carbon, a process where carbon dioxide (CO2) is “absorbed” out of the atmosphere and captured by plants and stored in the soil. However, even a total change to organic farming would only be equal to a tiny part of the higher emissions from overseas land use.
“We predict a drop in total food production of 40 percent under a fully organic farming process, compared to conventional farming, if we keep to the same national diet,” Dr Adrian Williams, lead author and reader in Agri-Environmental Systems at Cranfield University, said in a statement. “This results from lower crop quantity, because output is limited by a lower supply of nitrogen, which is mainly from other crops or solid waste from cattle on the grassland.”
Nevertheless, it is important to note that organic farming still holds some useful benefits for the environment, such as reducing exposure to chemicals and improving the varieties of creatures. In conclusion, the study suggests that organic farming will continue to play a key role in solving the world’s environmental problems. However, it’s just one part of a much wider solution.
1. What will total organic agriculture bring to England?A.More food imports. | B.More species crop. |
C.More main food. | D.More fresh oxygen. |
A.By changing CO2. | B.By giving off CO2. |
C.By producing CO2. | D.By taking in CO2. |
A.The advantages of organic farming. |
B.The results caused by organic farming. |
C.The solution to the environment problems. |
D.The ways to reduce organic farming. |
The day began like any other on Goldshore Beach. People were walking, running or simply sitting on the sandy beach, enjoying the warm sea air
Sabrina was frightened,but she soon kept her head.她警告她的父母有危险,
One of the studies looked at nearly 400 northern California third-graders.Those with TVs in their bedrooms scored about eight points lower on math and language arts tests than children without bedroom TVs.
A second study, looking at nearly 1,000 grown-ups in New Zealand,found lower education levels among 26-year-olds who had watched lots of TV during childhood.
In the California study, children with TVs in their rooms but no computer at home scored the lowest,
While this study does not prove that bedroom TV sets caused the lower scores,
7 . A man recently helped a woman, who had been knocked down by a car in Taizhou, Jiangu province, reach a hospital. But before doing so, he took a photograph of the scene with the woman to avoid being charged with knocking her down. Several similar cases were reported across the country during the Spring Festival, leaving people with mixed feelings, says Cao Pengcheng in an article in People's Daily.
Altruism(利他主义) is part of Chinese culture, and there is no lack of good Samaritans(乐善好施者) in the country. But recently, says Cao, some good Samaritans were blackmailed by the people who they helped. It made altruism a tough issue.
Cao says that it is a good thing for people to become more business-minded.but it is one thing to do as cost-benefit analysis (分析) in business, and quite another to measure whether a person in need is worth helping. I people always make such materialistic calculation(物质计算),they will further lower social and moral (道德) standards.
Fortunately,says Cao,there are still people like the man in Taizhou who deepen our belief in altruism and kindheartedness by continuing to help others, despite knowing that the existing system and rules in the county do not offer enough protection for good Samaritans.
1. What did the man do in Taizhou?A.He charged the woman with knocking him down. |
B.He helped the woman knocked down by a bicycle. |
C.He sent the woman knocked down by him to a hospital. |
D.He took a photo of the scene before helping the woman. |
A.Appreciated. | B.Threatened. | C.Killed. | D.Helped. |
A.will lower social and moral standards |
B.is bad for doing business with others |
C.is good for helping a person in need |
D.will slow down people's business mind |
A.To Help or Not to Help | B.Traditional Chinese Culture |
C.A Bad Traffic Accident | D.How to Do Good Business |
8 . Today, an increasing number of people are always looking at their mobile phones with their heads down. These people are called the “Heads-down Tribe (低头族)”. Are you a heads-down tribe member? Heads-down tribe members now can be seen everywhere.
Using mobile phones may cause accidents and even cost a lot of money. Also, more and more interesting and strange facts happen to the “Heads-down Tribe”. Let’s have a look at an interesting TV report. A man in America kept using his mobile phone on his way home. As a result, he knocked into a big lost bear on the street. When he lifted his eyes from the phone, he was so scared that he turned around and ran away quickly as possible. Another fact is that we can often see people in the restaurant eating face to face but looking at their own mobile phones. It’s strange that they don’t talk to the ones who sit opposite to them during the meal. Some of them even have fun communicating with others on the phone.
Mobile phones are helpful and necessary tools for modern life. Are mobile phones good or bad? It depends on how people use them. Let’s be “healthy” users and try to be the “Heads-up Tribe”.
1. A mobile phone good or bad? It depends on_____ .A.how people use them |
B.how people look at them |
C.how people watch them |
D.how people make them |
A.In the desert. | B.At a zoo | C.On the street | D.At a park |
A.Heads-down Tribe members now can be seen everywhere. |
B.Using mobile phones may cause accidents and even cost a lot of money. |
C.Mobile phones are helpless tools for modern life. |
D.We can often see people in the restaurant eating face to face but looking at their own mobile phones |
A.They are cool children. |
B.They are dangerous drivers. |
C.They are good at using the Internet. |
D.They are always looking at their mobile phones. |
A.Drive your car carefully |
B.Use mobile phones properly |
C.Be a heads-down tribe member |
D.Throw away your mobile phones |
9 . Children model themselves largely on their parents. They do so mainly through identification. Children identify with (“把……和……联系起来”) a parent when they believe they have the qualities and feelings that are
A parent's actions
Isolated events, even dramatic ones, do not necessarily have a permanent
In the same way, all children are not influenced
A.informed | B.characteristic | C.conceived | D.indicative |
A.gesture | B.expression | C.way | D.extent |
A.behavior | B.words | C.mood | D.reactions |
A.person | B.humans | C.creatures | D.adult |
A.in turn | B.nevertheless | C.also | D.as a result |
A.eyes | B.parents | C.peers | D.behaviors |
A.negative | B.cheerful | C.various | D.complex |
A.modify | B.copy | C.give up | D.continue |
A.mature | B.influenced | C.unique | D.independent |
A.idea | B.wonder | C.stamp | D.effect |
A.luckily | B.for example | C.at most | D.theoretically |
A.death | B.rewards | C.advice | D.teaching |
A.even | B.at all | C.alike | D.as a whole |
A.Oh | B.Alas | C.Right | D.As |
A.result | B.effect | C.scale | D.cause |
A.Scared. | B.Relieved. | C.Embarrassed. |