1 . Ever wonder what happens to spacecraft after they get launched to space? Well, that is where my job as an instrument operations engineer comes in. My job consists of planning, generating, and operating scientific instruments in-flight. I am grateful for having worked on missions at Saturn, the Moon, and our own planet Earth.
When I was a high-schooler, I was unsure of what college I wanted to attend, or what major I wanted to choose. After receiving an email from a college called Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), I decided to apply to a summer program they were offering with the encouragement of my mom. After participating in that program, I knew that MIT was the right university for me. The passionate students and boundless opportunities developed a feeling of belonging in me that led me to apply and eventually get accepted.
The most exciting and fulfilling part of being an engineer is that I am able to work on projects that benefit humanity. When people think of the space industry, they picture the outer reaches of our solar system. What they may not imagine is the great body of work being done to study our own home-Earth. I am thankful to have a career that allows me to commit myself to that responsibility.
The highlight of my career has been witnessing the end of the Cassini mission to Saturn. Some of the people on the team had been working on the mission for longer than I had been alive, but they still treated me as one of their own. I was given the opportunity to operate the cameras that would catch breathtaking images of the planet. And when the Cassini spacecraft had run out of fuel, I quickly learned that it was not just the end of the mission, but the end of a team. The night we watched with bittersweet longing as its signal faded to nothing is something that I will always keep in my memories. And while Cassini will be remembered for its historic contributions, what I will remember it for is the team it brought together.
My friends often ask why a girl could achieve all these. I always grew up a big fan of fiction. I read the Harry Potter books and loved anything fantasy. I realized that a common theme of hero stories is that the hero must always make a choice to start their adventure. If you don’t pick up the sword in your own story because you are afraid of what may happen next, you risk not having a story at all.
1. Why did the author apply to MIT?A.The majors in MIT interested her. | B.Her mother urged her to go to MIT. |
C.She set this goal as a high-schooler. | D.A summer program made her love MIT. |
A.It’s easy to predict what she does. | B.It’s hard for a girl to have such a career. |
C.She is annoyed by being misunderstood. | D.She is proud to work for human well-being. |
A.Its historic contributions. | B.The team it brought together. |
C.Breathtaking images of the planet. | D.The opportunity to operate the cameras. |
A.Practice makes perfect. | B.No way is impossible to courage. |
C.Well begun is half done. | D.Time lost cannot be won again. |
2 . Do you want to love what you do for a living? Follow your passion. This piece of advice provides the foundation for modern thinking on career satisfaction. But this can be a problem.
I’ve spent the past several years researching and writing about the different strategies we use to seek happiness in our work. It became clear early in the process that the suggestion to evidence. However, it passionate about your complicated. “follow your passion” was flawed, for it lacks scientific doesn’t mean you should abandon the goal of feeling work. The reality emphasizes that the things are quite.
Passion is earned. Different people are looking for different things in their work, but generally, people with satisfying careers enjoy some combination of the following features: autonomy, respect, competence, creativity, and a sense of impact. In other words, if you want to feel passionate about your livelihood, don’t seek the perfect job, but seek to get more of these features in the job you already have.
Passion is elusive (难捉摸的). Many people develop the rare and valuable skills leading to passion, but still end up unhappy in their work. The problem is that the features leading you to love your work are more likely to be useful to you than your organization. As you become increasingly “valuable”, for example, your boss might push you toward traditional promotions that come with more pay and more responsibility, as this is what is most useful to your company. However, you might find more passion by applying your value to gain autonomy in your schedule or project selection.
Passion is dangerous. I’ve watched too many of my peers fall into anxiety and chronic job-hopping due to the “follow your passion” advice. The issue is expectations. If you believe we all have a pre-existing passion, and that matching it to a job will lead to instant workplace happiness, reality will always pale in comparison.
Work is hard. Not every day is fun. If you’re seeking a dream job, you’ll end up frustrated, again and again. Don’t set out to discover passion. Instead, set out to develop it. This path might be longer and more complicated than what most cheerful career guides might advocate, but it’s a path much more likely to lead you somewhere worth going.
1. People satisfied with their careers are _____.A.autonomous and passionate | B.creative and passionate |
C.respectable and sensitive | D.creative and competent |
A.Figuring out what one will do in the future. |
B.Matching the pre-existing passion to one’s work. |
C.Developing passion for what one is doing. |
D.Discovering skills that lead to interesting careers. |
A.it’s not easy to match our passion with our jobs |
B.we shouldn’t think everyone has a pre-existing passion |
C.high expectations of passion in jobs bring disappointment |
D.workplace happiness doesn’t require a pre-existing passion |
A.Neutral. | B.Disapproving. | C.Cautious. | D.Supportive. |
3 . Being a blogger can be good business. Don’t you believe it? Read on!
Meet Gary Vaynerchuk (GaryVaynerchuk.com)
Gary Vaynerchuk is a New Yorker who gained Internet fame because of a video blog that talked about everything related to wine. Through online video blogging, he built his wine business from a $3-million-dollar a year wine retail store to a $60-million-dollar wine wholesale business. Gary Vaynerchuk has built a multi-million-dollar empire relating to his personal brand.
Meet Rand Fishkind (moz.com)
Rand Fishkind is college dropout (辍学生) who started blogging about SEO (Search Engine Optimization) back in 2004 while working for a family-run web development company. He was also providing SEO consulting services for a few small clients. SEOmoz has left the consulting business since then and focuses on creating awesome SEO software instead. The company makes millions of dollars each month.
Meet Pat Flynn (SmartPassiveIncome.com)
Pat is one of the most inspirational bloggers in the world. After losing his job, he was forced to struggle to support his growing family. He started a website called Smart Passive Income to track his progress with various websites and online money-making- projects. He has since built massive followers and readership thanks to his honesty. Over the last 6 months, Pat has earned on average, around $50,000 per month.
Meet Andrew Sullivan (thedishdaily.com)
Andrew started his blog, The Daily Dish, near the end of 2000. By the middle of 2003, he was receiving about 300,000 unique visits per month. Just this year, Andrew made some big changes and decided to work on The Daily Dish full-time. On launch day in 2013, the blog reportedly took in over $330,000, charging $20/month per reader.
1. After Gary Vaynerchuk started his video blog, ________.A.he spent most of his time making videos |
B.he fell in love with learning about wine |
C.his online security has been threatened |
D.his wine business really took off |
A.To learn how to find a job online. |
B.To learn how to make money online. |
C.To read very inspiring real-life stories. |
D.To know about the history of various websites. |
A.Being a successful blogger is very difficult. |
B.The Internet has greatly influenced our life. |
C.Successful bloggers can make a great fortune. |
D.Everyone can succeed as long as he doesn’t quit. |
4 . Innovation for Everyone – Career Skills for Life
Invitation to Alumni (校友) Networking Event Organized by University of Warwick and British Council
We are delighted to invite you to an alumni networking event on Tuesday 14 March, 7-9 pm at the Le Royal Méridien Hotel, Shanghai. The event is organized by the University of Warwick and the British Council and is open to all alumni.
Come and join us for refreshments, followed by four short presentations on the importance of innovation and entrepreneurship (创业) skills in your career and the launch of new career initiatives for students and alumni, before spending time networking with friends and other UK alumni over a buffet dinner.
The place for this event is the Le Royal Méridien Hotel, No.789 Nanjing East Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai. The Le Royal Méridien Hotel is located in People's Square in Shanghai and is easily accessed by subway, bus or taxi.
DATE AND TIME
Tue 14 March 2017
19:00 – 21:00 CST
LOCATION
Le Royal Méridien Hotel
No.789 Nanjing East Road
Huangpu District
Shanghai
PROGRAMME
7:00 pm | Registration and welcome refreshments |
7:15 – 7:25 pm | “An overview of Graduate Employability (就业能力) among UK-educated Chinese Alumni and British Council Activities to Support Alumni Career Development”, Cathy He, Head of Education Services, British Council |
7:25 – 7:35 pm | “The Importance of Career Planning: from the SJTU Viewpoint”, Mr Shen, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Careers |
7:35 – 7:45 pm | “The Importance of Innovation Skills Throughout Your Career: An Employer Viewpoint”, John Hung, Managing Partner, China Consumer & Industrial Products Industry and Automotive Sector, Deloitte, China |
7:45 – 7:55 pm | “New Resources to Enhance the Employability of Chinese Students and Graduates”, Esther de Perlaky, International Manager, University of Warwick |
8:00 – 9:00 pm | Networking and banquet buffet dinner |
Free but up to 80 tickets, please register via READ MORE.
1. The main purpose of holding this alumni networking event is ________.A.to invite the alumni for refreshments |
B.to spend time networking with the alumni |
C.to help the alumni to launch new career initiatives |
D.to share the experience of innovation and career skills for life |
A.UK-educated Chinese Alumni |
B.only from University of Warwick |
C.UK-educated Alumni and their friends |
D.UK-educated Chinese Alumni and from the SJTU |
A.How to improve the employability of the alumni. |
B.How to help the alumni find and improve employment. |
C.How to enhance the employability in career development. |
D.How to make career planning and train the alumni’s innovation skills. |
Two hundred years ago, a device began to dominate the world of work—the clock. With its arrival, people were paid on the basis of how many hours they worked, rather than their material output, and were required by the owner to turn up for a set shift.
The clock’s authoritarian rule may at last be weakening. Working remotely has brought a greater degree of freedom. A survey across six countries found that flexible working was viewed very positively, improving both people’s work-life balance and productivity. Flexible workers even scored more highly on a sense of “belonging” to their organization than those on a nine-to-five schedule.
It is hardly surprising that workers prefer flexibility. Working a rigid eight-hour schedule is incredibly restricting. Those are also the hours when most shops are open, when doctors and dentists will take appointments, and when repairmen are willing to visit. Parents on a conventional routine may be able to take their children to school in the morning but are unlikely to be able to pick them up in the afternoon. Many families find themselves constantly struggling with schedules and giving up precious holiday time to deal with domestic emergencies.
On reflection, it is not too shocking that home-workers feel they are more productive. After all, few people have the ability to concentrate solidly for eight hours at a stretch. There are points in the day where people want to stare out of the window or go for a walk; these may be moments when they find inspiration or recharge themselves for the next task. When they do this in an office, they risk the boss’s disapproval; at home, they can work when they are most motivated.
Of course, working remotely carries dangers: people may lose all separation between work and home life, and are likely to be stressed. To inject some human contact, companies may embrace a mixed model in which workers go into the office for part of the week. But overall, office-workers’ freedom from time restrictions is to be welcomed. The clock was a cruel master and many people will be happy to escape its dominion.
1. What decided the workers’ pay after the clock appeared?2. Please paraphrase the underlined sentence in your own words.
3. Please decide which part of the following statement is false, then underline it and explain why.
Working remotely is viewed positively because it brings lots of benefits and it is perfect.
4. As a student, what do you think of remote learning? (about 40 words)
6 . Mind Your"Q's”
Both IQ and EQ are considered important to our career success.
Every profession will require adaptability and flexibility.Say you are an accountant.Your IQ gets you through the examinations to become qualified.Your EQ helps your connect with an interviewer,land a job,and develop relationships with clients and colleagues
All three quotients are somewhat complementary,since they all help you solve problems and therefore adapt.An ideal candidate possesses all three,but not everyone does.
Natalie Fratto,a vice-president at Goldman Sachs,suggests three ways AQ might show in potential candidates:if they can picture possible versions of the future by asking"what if questions;
if they can unlearn information to challenge presumptions;and if they enjoy exploration or seeking out new experiences.
Over the next three years,120 million people in the world's largest economies may need to be reskilled because of automation,according to a 2019 IBM study.
A.AQ is now increasingly being sought at the hiring level. |
B.One good thing about AQ is that experts say you can work to develop it. |
C.We may not all be comfortable with the pace of change-but we can prepare. |
D.This is because an algorithm(算法)can do these tasks faster and more accurately than a human. |
E.But today,as technology redefines how we work,the skills we need to thrive in the job market are developeing too. |
F.Having IQ but no EQ would leave you struggling to embrace new ways of working using your existing skills. |
G.Then,when systems change or aspects of work are automated,you will need AQ to accommodate this innovation and adapt to new ways of performing your role. |
7 . Collaboration at work is generally seen as a good thing. The latest survey by the Financial Times of what employers want from MBA graduates found that the ability to work in a team, to work with a wide variety of people and to build, maintain and expand a network of people were three of the top five skills that managers wanted.
But managers always have to balance the merits of teamwork, which help ensure that everyone is working towards the same goal, with the dangers of “groupthink”, when some don’t point out the faults of a plan to fit in with others. When people are aware of the views of others, there is a tendency for them to follow, as participants are reluctant to look foolish by deviating from the majority view. The same effect may lead to stock-market bubbles.
Modern communication methods mean that collaboration is more frequent. Workers are constantly in touch with each other via e-mail, messaging groups or mobile calls. But does that improve or worsen performance?
A new study by Ethan Bernstein, Jesse Shore and David Lazer, three American academics, tried to answer this question. They set a logical problem (devising the shortest route for a travelling salesman visiting various cities). Three groups were involved: one where subjects acted independently; another where they saw the solutions posted by team members at every stage; and a third where they were kept informed of each other’s views only intermittently (间歇地).
The survey found that members of the individualist group reached the best solution more often than the constant collaborators, but had a poorer average result. The intermittent collaborators found the right result as often as the individualists, and got a better average solution.
When it comes to idea generation, giving people a bit of space to find a solution seems to be a good idea. Occasional collaboration can be a big help; most people have benefited from a colleague’s wise advice to avoid a particular course of action.
Close teamwork may be vital in the lower reaches of a group, but at the top, someone has to make a decision. At this stage, intense collaboration may be less helpful. Fashion houses with co-creative directors are rated as less creative by industry experts than brands that were individually led. Co-led teams of Himalayan climbers are more likely to suffer deaths than those with single leaders. Experts think that co-leadership “creates uncertainty over who is really in charge”. The battles between Sandy Weill and John Reed when they were co-chief executives of Citigroup in the late 1990s were infamous. Less than 5% of companies in the Fortune 500 have used a co-CEO structure since 1989. In short, collaboration may be a useful tool, but it doesn’t work in every situation.
1. What does the underlined word “deviating” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?A.Suffering. | B.Differing. |
C.Varying. | D.Ranging. |
A.constant collaborators had the poorest average solution |
B.all subjects had the chances to visit a variety of cities |
C.individualists found the right result the most often |
D.occasional collaboration promoted performance |
A.fashion houses were more likely creative with a single authority |
B.Himalayas climbers work together to avoid potential deaths |
C.Sandy Weill and John Reed were not so creative leaders |
D.successful companies have one Chief Executive Officer |
A.What is collaboration? | B.When does collaboration work? |
C.Why collaboration is highly valued? | D.How to callborate with others in a team? |
8 . An interview is a discussion with someone in which you try to get information from them.
A great deal is provided by this personal contact: you are another human being, and interviewees will respond to you, in bodily presence, in an entirely different way from the way that they would have reacted to questionnaires that came through their letterboxes or to emails.
If you take the trouble to schedule a visit, you can be more or less guaranteed of a response. Most importantly, though, you will be able to relate to interviewees while you are talking to them.
A.This is a ready-made support for you. |
B.Its nature varies with the nature of the interviews. |
C.You will be able to hear and understand what they are saying. |
D.Your decision should influence the way that you look, sound and behave. |
E.The information may be facts or opinions or attitudes or any combination of these. |
F.Each involves the interviewer in fact-to-face contact or telephone contact with another person. |
G.You will be using these clues to make informed guesses about what the interviewees might really mean. |
9 . The volunteer work experience is a great way to give back to the community.
As you are considering the volunteer work experience you want to get, you might start by considering your interests and where you hope to take your career. If you really enjoy working with kids and want to become a teacher, volunteering in an after-school or tutoring program can be a great place to start.
A.It also improves your job skills |
B.If you don’t know how to hunt for a job |
C.Certain skills can help you get volunteer chances |
D.You should find a larger organization in the community |
E.Such nonprofit organizations can really need volunteers |
F.If you like animals, animal rescue centers can be your best choice |
G.Once you’ve narrowed down the type of volunteer work experience |
10 . GOING TO UNIVERSITY is supposed to be a mind-broadening experience. That statement is probably made in comparison to training for work straight after school, which might not be so encouraging. But is it actually true? Jessika Golle of the University of Tübingen, in Germany, thought she would try to find out. Her result, however, is not quite what might be expected. As she reports in Psychological Science this week, she found that those who have been to university do indeed seem to leave with broader and more inquiring minds than those who have spent their immediate post-school years in vocational (职业的) training for work. However, it was not the case that university broadened minds. Rather, work seemed to narrow them.
Dr. Golle came to this conclusion after she and a team of colleagues studied the early careers of 2,095 German youngsters. The team used two standardized tests to assess their volunteers. One was of personality traits, including openness, conscientiousness(认真)and so on. The other was of attitudes, such as realistic, investigative and enterprising. They administered both tests twice—once towards the end of each volunteer’s time at school, and then again six years later. Of the original group, 382 were on the intermediate track, from which there was a choice between the academic and vocational routes, and it was on these that the researchers focused. University beckoned for 212 of them. The remaining 170 chose vocational training and a job.
When it came to the second round of tests, Dr. Golle found that the personalities of those who had gone to university had not changed significantly. Those who had undergone vocational training and then got jobs were not that much changed in personality, either—except in one crucial respect. They had become more conscientious.
That sounds like a good thing, certainly compared with the common public image of undergraduates as a bunch of lazybones. But changes in attitude that the researchers recorded were rather worrying. In the university group, again, none were detectable. But those who had chosen the vocational route showed marked drops in interest in tasks that are investigative and enterprising in nature. And that might restrict their choice of careers.
Some investigative and enterprising jobs, such as scientific research, are, indeed beyond the degreeless. But many, particularly in Germany, with its tradition of vocational training, are not. The researchers mention, for example, computer programmers and finance-sector workers as careers requiring these traits. If Dr. Golle is correct, and changes in attitude brought about by the very training Germany prides itself on are narrowing people’s choices, that is indeed a matter worthy of serious consideration.
1. Which of the following can best replace “beckoned for” in Paragraph 2?A.Examined. | B.Attracted. |
C.Organized. | D.Recognized. |
A.The degreeless have not changed in personalities. |
B.Going to university is a mind-broadening experience. |
C.Working straight after school narrows people’s minds. |
D.College students pride themselves on their education. |
A.college students enjoy a very good public image |
B.the undergraduates have changed significantly in attitude |
C.the degreeless are much better at dealing with challenging tasks |
D.people show less interest in investigative jobs due to vocational training |
A.Concerned. | B.Optimistic. |
C.Unclear. | D.Sceptical. |