1 . Having hundreds of friends online is no substitute for a handful of close friends in real life. Researchers discovered that people with only a few friends were at least as happy as those with far more if many of theirs were online. The number of ''peripheral others'', someone connected with online — former classmates and coworkers, for example — had no connection with how satisfied they felt.
Scientists did their study using data from two online surveys conducted on 1,496 people by a non-profit research organization. People taking part in the study revealed their ages, the make-up of their social networks, how often they had different types of social interactions, and their own feelings of well-being. They included details of how often and how they interacted with family or neighbours, and whether they included people who provided services for them in their networks. The number of close friends someone had was the only thing that influenced how satisfied they were with their social life.
''Loneliness has less to do with the number of friends you have, and more to do with how you feel about your friends,'' said Dr Bruine, an expert of the study. ''If you feel lonely, it may be more helpful to make a positive connection with a friend than to try and seek out new people to meet.''
In the study, they found older people tended to have smaller social networks. Younger people's were larger but this was mostly made up of ''peripheral others'' — not true friends, just people they knew — and did not contribute to their happiness.
Even variations in the number of family members or neighbours somebody spent time with did not affect how happy they were with their social life. Dr Bruine said her research echoed other findings showing people would be happier if a larger proportion of their online friends were actually their friends in reality.
She added, ''Stereotypes of aging tend to paint older adults in many cultures as sad and lonely. But the research shows that older adults' smaller networks didn't weaken social satisfaction and well-being. In fact, older adults tend to report better well-being than younger adults.''
1. What has a good influence on one's happiness according to the study?A.Having impersonal networks of friends. |
B.Meeting with close friends face to face. |
C.Helping familiar coworkers. |
D.Keeping in touch with family members online. |
A.Keep off using the Internet. |
B.Show their attitudes to happiness. |
C.Reveal their social life thoroughly. |
D.Find ''peripheral others'' from their friends. |
A.Parents living with their children. |
B.Older adults with fewer friends online. |
C.Those having fewer relatives or neighbours. |
D.Young people without friends in reality. |
A.treat | B.draw |
C.describe | D.criticize |
2 . What kind of amusing activities will you participate in during your life? Will you be spending your free time doing safe sports with little danger or will you always be one of the first people to try the next popular extreme activity? Scientists have been interested in finding out why some people seem to prefer dangerous activities.
Although there are exceptions, researchers have found that in most cases men are less cautious than women. Men often try to impress women by proving that they are courageous and fearless, and they are more likely to take risks when women are watching them or when they are competing against other men.
Research also shows that as people get older they usually behave more responsibly and avoid taking unnecessary risks. In addition, when people are in stable relationships, they seem to be less attracted to daring activities.
Some people seem to be more daring than others, but there are many different types of risks and some people take one type of risk, but not another Psychologists have identified a number of categories of risk. These include financial risks, risks related to health and safety, amusing risks and social risks. Psychologists discover that some people will take risks in one area, but not in another. Just if a person enjoys bungee (蹦极) jumping, it doesn't mean he or she will take chances when investing (投资) money or that he will tell a joke to a group of strangers.
Interestingly, research shows that women take more social risks than men. They are more likely to make career changes as they get older and to express unpopular opinions in business meetings.
Yet, at the end of the day, the likelihood of particular people taking a risk depends on their personalities. In general, optimistic people are more likely to take risks because they focus on the possible positive outcomes of their actions. On the other hand, those with opposite personality are much more likely to avoid taking a chance.
1. What have researchers discovered about women?A.They are always changing jobs. | B.They are good at doing business. |
C.They are more willing to take risks. | D.They are more conservative than men. |
A.To attract women to watch them. | B.To have favorable effects on women. |
C.To announce risks are too dangerous. | D.To show their strength to the competitor. |
A.The potential consequences. | B.Their characters. |
C.Their problems of finance. | D.The focuses of their work. |
A.People's sense of taking risks. | B.Risks at people's different ages. |
C.Different types of people's risks. | D.Risks between men and women. |
3 . Nothing good generally comes of a conversation that start with the words, "I think you should probably sit down before I tell you this.”
And so it came to pass. Away for Christmas, we got a call from kind friends at home, our neighbour's house had caught fire while they were out. The fire didn't spread to our house but the smoke very much did.
It's weeks of either throwing out, or sending away for specialist cleaning, every single thing into which smoke could have permeated(渗透)because the particles(微粒) are an ongoing health risk and washing isn't enough. Anything soft—sofas and carpets and children’s teddy bears, clothes—is suspected. We will be seeing in the New Year in a decidedly minimalist fashion.
What I didn't expect to feel, however, is this lucky. Friends and neighbours have come together with incredible generosity. We will never again underestimate the closeness of the village community in which we live, or the innate kindness that is most people's natural reaction to trouble, and are grateful to be reminded of so much that is good. But that's not the only thing I've learned. For in a sense, we have a chance to start again.
The surprise on being forced to think about what might urgently need replacing is how short the list of essentials seems; how much we must have been hanging on to out of habit, and how much we have been conditioned to think was important.
It's all too easily assumed that family history lives in tangible(有形的)things— old photographs, a dress bought decades ago for a night heavy with memories — but that's not quite right. These things were only reminders of what we already carry with us in head and heart.
Walking through the house, sweeping up the broken glass, I realised that the answer to the old question of “What would you save in a fire? ” is actually that nothing really matters but each other.
1. What happened to the author's house?A.It caught a fire. |
B.It was affected by a fire. |
C.It was broken into by friends. |
D.Its windows were broken. |
A.something that may be damaged. |
B.something that may not be genuine. |
C.something that may not be so good. |
D.something that may be dangerous. |
A.People around him were cold to others' trouble. |
B.His friends and neighbours were so generous. |
C.People in his community were close to each other. |
D.He was so lucky to find much that was good. |
A.Worried. | B.Surprised. |
C.Excited. | D.Contented. |
4 . Jake and Max Klein are twin brothers who have a passion for volunteering. Their family have always done community
So, Kids That Do Good was
Jake and Max are
A.surveys | B.services | C.duties | D.businesses |
A.sort out | B.play with | C.give up | D.put away |
A.travelling | B.volunteering | C.cooking | D.recycling |
A.Unfortunately. | B.Happily | C.Honestly | D.Gratefully |
A.shy | B.awkward | C.weak | D.young |
A.task | B.ability | C.chance | D.determination |
A.public | B.similar | C.sharp | D.direct |
A.joked | B.blamed | C.denied | D.praised |
A.advised | B.allowed | C.named | D.created |
A.judgment | B.difference | C.comment | D.decision |
A.plan | B.effort | C.project | D.experiment |
A.pleased | B.satisfied | C.amazed | D.interested |
A.connected | B.exposed | C.contributed | D.attracted |
A.familiar | B.patient | C.busy | D.content |
A.remembering | B.describing | C.celebrating | D.building |
5 . A Utah man who has been in a wheelchair for more than three decades has created a pheasant hunt for people like him who need help getting into the outdoors.
Clint Robinson broke his neck after being thrown off a horse at a rodeo (竞技) 32 years ago. He’s done his best to keep getting into the outdoors to hunt and fish, the Daily Herald in Provo reports.
The event he calls “Wheelchairs in the Wild” pairs people that have physical disabilities with hunters who help them with whatever they need. Many go in off-road vehicles.
“What we’re trying to do is get new injured people back out into the field trying to get them back out, enjoying the outdoors and wildlife that’s out there and show them that there’s other things that they can do besides sitting in the house doing nothing,” Robinson said.
The youngest hunter at last year’s event was 13-year-old Missy Cowley who has spina bifida (脊柱裂). Her father loves to hunt but didn’t know how to accommodate (安排) her wheelchair. Her mother, Cindy Cowley, said it was amazing to find a program that allowed her daughter to go hunting.
“We always told her when she was little, you can do everything you want to do…but we just got to figure out a way,” Cindy Cowley said. “But we really didn’t know how we were going to get her up there to hunt.”
Missy Cowley said it was a great experience that also allowed her to meet other people who use wheelchairs. “This is wonderful. I can actually do it,” Missy said. “It was really fun. And I love being outdoors.”
Jerry Schlappi, officer from Division of Wildlife resources, who helped with the event, said Robinson is a perfect role model showing other wheelchair users with disabilities that they don’t have to give up what they love.
1. What can we know about Clint Robinson from the text?A.He began to usea wheelchair thirty years ago. |
B.He used to be interested in hunting and fishing. |
C.He liked riding horses before getting disabled. |
D.He is now more physically active than before. |
A.The benefits of his event. | B.The purposes of his event. |
C.The processes of his even. | D.The difficulty with his event. |
A.To show the effects of disabilities. |
B.To explain the problem with hunters. |
C.To show people’s interest in hunting. |
D.To think highly of Robinson’s event. |
A.Hope Is brought back To Hunters with Disabilities. |
B.Man Organizes hunting Event For Wheelchair Users. |
C.Hunting Event Is Benefiting The Physically Disabled. |
D.Wheelchair Users Are Supposed To Get Into Nature. |
A.On Tuesday morning. | B.On Wednesday afternoon. | C.On Friday morning. |
7 . What are the basic elements, or parts, of good manners? Certainly, a strong sense of justice is one; politeness is often
Another element of politeness is empathy (同理心), a
Yet another element of politeness is the ability to treat all people
Politeness is the key to a happier world.
1.A.nothing | B.anything | C.something | D.everything |
A.walking | B.running | C.riding | D.driving |
A.Behind | B.Ahead | C.After | D.Before |
A.ash | B.black smoke | C.dust | D.steam |
A.cleaner | B.wider | C.flatter | D.straighter |
A.Believing | B.Confirming | C.Finding | D.Guessing |
A.Yes | B.No | C.Obviously | D.Probably |
A.put up | B.do away | C.catch up | D.go on |
A.technique | B.way | C.behavior | D.quality |
A.reduce | B.understand | C.cure | D.remove |
A.working | B.begging | C.dining | D.performing |
A.However | B.Otherwise | C.Therefore | D.Meanwhile |
A.legs | B.eyes | C.fingers | D.teeth |
A.sat down | B.turned around | C.took a look | D.held it tight |
A.watched | B.checked | C.hid | D.tightened |
A.seemed | B.managed | C.pretended | D.happened |
A.Luckily | B.Finally | C.Happily | D.Sadly |
A.tried | B.failed | C.managed | D.meant |
A.alike | B.friendly | C.warmly | D.nicely |
A.Ever | B.Specially | C.Especially | D.Even |
![](https://img.xkw.com/dksih/QBM/2019/11/29/2344500385865728/2347733761867776/STEM/b6f0c6b5a4854ae0b50c6e2e48435ca4.png?resizew=606)
The world is full of weirdos who pretend to be normal for fear of drawing unnecessary attention to themselves and I am one of them. All my life, I have been trying very hard to avoid developing any permanent
It seems I am always attached to the good
It also began to
I don’t think I can or need to find a panacea(灵丹妙药)for my “problem” and of course, I don’t expect others to offer help. In most cases, when one takes in another man’s poison,
9 . A 74-year-old man is pounding(沉重地走)the pavement in the hope of finding a kidney for his sick wife. Wayne Winters began walking along the streets near his home in Farr West, Utah early this month with a sandwich board containing an unusual request. “Need Kidney for Wife, "the sign reads. Winters' phone number and his wife Deanne's blood type are also included.
Deanne has severe kidney failure and is in need of a transplant. Desperate to do something to help his sick wife, Winters walks along the streets armed with a new suitnew shoes, and his sign with a piea(恳请)for a kidney. Though he doesn' t walk fast. Winters' unusual method of tracking down a kidney for Deanne has attracted plenty of attention. In addition to the motorists and passers-by who have seen Winters out walking miles a day, his request for a kidney has now hit the In ternet and attracted the attention of millions more people.
Winters said he was inspired to pound the pavement on behalf of his wife after seeing a story online about another man who did the same thing and got national attention. Rush hour is his favorite time to walk up and down the streets because drivers are slowed down.
Though he hasn't had any success yet, Winters remains confident he will find a kidney for
Deanne, and says he won’t rest until he makes it. Winters has stated even after a match for Deanne is found, he will continue to raise awareness about kidney donation because it is now his Mlife mission". In fact, the back of his current sign includes a message aimed at helping others in need. It read," 1,000 kidneys are needed in Utah and Idaho. "
The National Kidney Foundation reports the average wait for an individual s first kidney transplant is over three and a half years, and can vary depending on health, compatibility(兼 容性)and availability of organs. The organization also notes over 3,000 new patients are added to the kidney waiting list each month, and 13 people die each day while waiting for a life-saving kidney transplant.
1. Why is the old man walking along the streets?A.To help his sick wife. | B.To do some exercise. |
C.To look for something he has lost. | D.To appreciate the sights of the city. |
A.Others' advice. | B.A moving movie. |
C.A story online. | D.His devotion to his wife. |
A.Optimistic and kind. | B.Patient and generous. |
C.Passive and stubborn. | D.Positive and successful. |
A.A kidney transplant is a life-saving operation. |
B.Getting a suitable kidney for a patient is not easy. |
C.New patients that are added to the kidney waiting list. |
D.The success of a kidney transplant depends on several factors. |
10 . Cooperation at work is generally considered a good thing.The latest survey by the Financial Times of what employers need from MBA graduates found that the ability to cope with a wide variety of people was what managers have wanted most.However,managers always find ways to balance the benefits of teamwork, which helps ensure that everyone is working towards the same goal.With the dangers of “groupthink”,critics are reluctant to point out a plan 's drawbacks for fear of being excluded by the group.The disastrous Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba in 1961 was a classic case of groupthink.Skeptics were unwilling to challenge John F.Kennedy, the newly elected American president.
Modern communication methods prove that cooperation is more frequent.Workers are constantly in touch with each other via e-mail messaging groups or mobile calls .However, does that develop, or lower performance? A new study by three American academics, tried to answer this question They set a logical problem( designing the shortest route for a travelling salesman visiting various cities ) Three groups were involved: one where subjects acted independently; another where they saw the solutions posted by team members at every stage; and a third where they were kept informed of each other' s views only intermittently.
The survey found that members of the: individualist group.reached the: premier solution more often than the constant cooperators but had a poorer average result The intermittent cooperators found the right result.as often as the individualists, and got a better average, solution.When it comes: to: perfect generation, giving: people a, bit of space to, a solution seems to be a great idea.Occasional cooperation can.be quite beneficial: most people have benefited from a colleague’s brainwave or (just as often)wise advice to avoid a, particular course of action.
Further clues come from.a book, Superminds, by.Thomas, Malone of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He says that three factors determine the collective intelligence of cooperating groups: social intelligence (how good people were at rating the emotional states of others); the extent to which members took part equally in conversation (the more equal, the better). and the cooperation of women in the group( the higher, the better Groups ranked highly in these areas cooperated far better than others did.
In short, cooperation may be a helpful tool but it does not work in every situation .
1. The author uses the example of The Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba in Paragraph 1 to__________.A.prove that team players are skilled at communication. |
B.prove that critics are unwilling to challenge anybody. |
C.show that teamwork cannot always improving a situation. |
D.show the danger of groupthink is not very serious. |
A.those who do not cooperate but obtain the best solution. |
B.those who are never informed of others’ views. |
C.those who cooperate with others occasionally. |
D.the constant cooperators with a poor average result. |
A.Group members cooperating all the time. |
B.Group members in a good emotional state. |
C.Equal distribution of men and women. |
D.Equal participation in the communication. |
A.The meaning of teamwork. |
B.In what ways teamwork operates. |
C.Cooperation is, a useful tool. |
D.Situations where teamwork works. |