1 . The US government just hired a researcher who thinks we can beat aging with fresh cloned bodies and brain updates. Jean Hébert, a new hire with the US Advanced Projects Agency for Health, is expected to lead a major new initiative around “functional brain tissue replacement”, the idea of adding youthful tissue to people’s brains.
The brain renewal concept could have applications such as treating stroke (中风) victims, who lose areas of brain function. But Hébert, a biologist at the Albert Einstein school of medicine, has most often proposed total brain replacement, along with replacing other parts of our body, as the only reasonable means of avoiding death from old age.
The idea sounds practical since there are already organ transplants. The trickiest part is your brain. That ages, too, shrinking dramatically in old age. But you don’t want to replace it with another—because it is you.
And that’s where Hébert’s research comes in. He’s been exploring ways to “progressively” replace a brain by adding bits of youthful tissue made in a lab. The process would have to be done slowly enough. in steps, that your brain could adapt, relocating memories and your self-identity.
Hébert has been carrying out initial experiments with mice, removing small sections of their brains and injecting slurries of embryonic cells (胚胎细胞). It’s a step toward proving whether such youthful tissue can survive and take over important functions.
To be sure, the strategy is not widely accepted, even among researchers in the aging field. “On the surface it sounds completely crazy, but I was surprised how good a case he could make for it,” says Matthew Scholz, CEO of aging research company Oisin Biotechnologies, who met with Hébert this year. Scholz is still doubtful though. “A new brain is not going to be a popular item,” he says. “The surgical element of it is going to be very severe, no matter how you slice it” Now, though, Hébert’s ideas appear to have gotten support from the US government.
1. What function does brain replacement perform according to Hébert?A.Brain replacement helps people fight against death. |
B.Brain replacement stops brain shrinking in old age. |
C.Brain replacement makes old people much smarter. |
D.Brain replacement cures patients suffering a stroke. |
A.Hardly. | B.Completely. | C.Gradually. | D.Immediately. |
A.Supportive. | B.Objective. | C.Critical. | D.Doubtful. |
A.Replacing Your Brain Little by Little | B.Slowing Down Aging in Your Real Life |
C.A Biologist Treating Your Brain Disease | D.A Researcher Hired by the US Government |
2 . The text came at 4:30 P. M., when my husband, Martin, was at his hockey game. “I don’t feel well. John’s driving me to the hospital.” I called him and he told me his arm hurt. Then I
Later, I learned that John, a nurse, drove Martin to the hospital when he saw Martin dropped to his
Once Martin was finally stable, I learned that the
Then I read about Katrysha, a woman in our community who had gone into cardiac arrest several years earlier, whose story
A.imagined | B.heard | C.minded | D.kept |
A.respond | B.wait | C.hesitate | D.listen |
A.body and mind | B.hands and knees | C.teeth and gums | D.heart and soul |
A.immediately | B.differently | C.excitedly | D.coldly |
A.puzzle | B.faint | C.pulse | D.tool |
A.possibility | B.means | C.courage | D.pace |
A.shameful | B.fortunate | C.creative | D.realistic |
A.rescue | B.attempt | C.success | D.recovery |
A.Instead | B.Therefore | C.Otherwise | D.However |
A.beyond | B.among | C.over | D.within |
A.contradicted | B.mirrored | C.interrupted | D.reminded |
A.elected | B.forbidden | C.meant | D.forced |
A.terrified | B.relaxed | C.encouraged | D.annoyed |
A.finishing | B.turning | C.freezing | D.breaking |
A.homeless | B.tireless | C.fearless | D.powerless |
1. What’s wrong with the woman?
A.She has a toothache. | B.She has a stomachache. | C.She has a headache. |
A.She is too tired. | B.She has a high fever. | C.She has a high blood pressure. |
A.Take some medicine. | B.Pay attention to diet. | C.Take a further physical exam. |
4 . What is Ozempic face? A term you probably shouldn’t use.
The medication (药) Ozempic has taken the world by storm—largely due to rumored use by some celebrities and the wealthy thanks to its weight loss effects.
But some physicians want to shift this narrative.
Ozempic was originally developed for the treatment of Type-2 diabetes (糖尿病), but it has also been shown to cause weight loss—which led to the approval of Wegovy. It’s the same medication as Ozempic, but is taken and administered only for the purpose of weight loss.
These medications have the potential to improve the health and lives of many people. While they can have some side effects, they do not cause “Ozempic face” — a term that’s been increasing in popularity but experts say is unfounded.
Ozempic face is not a medical term and is generally not a problem for people who have taken the medication appropriately. It is a term that has been used by some people to describe the appearance of sagging (下垂的) skin after weight loss.
Does Ozempic change your face? No. Ozempic itself does not cause over loss of weight in the face. But, if someone loses a lot of weight in a short amount of time, most often when they weren’t overweight or obese to begin with, they may have a gaunt (憔悴的) appearance.
Dr. Judy Korner, a Professor of Medicine at Columbia University, says the negative remarks about what one’s face looks like after weight loss is part of a pattern of abuse against obese patients.
“What’s been going on (with Ozempic) is the focus on people who are using it inappropriately. And it’s making a mockery out of obesity, which is a disease,” she says. “We now are finally having medications that can effectively target this disease, and the focus is completely on the wrong thing instead of focusing on the people who are taking the medication correctly and whose health has been improved because of that.”
1. How does Ozempic attract the attention of the world today?A.By its weight lose effects. | B.By its extremely efficient effect. |
C.By celebrities’ wide use of it. | D.By doctors’ expert explanations. |
A.To prove Ozempic’s popularity. | B.To show Ozempic’s development. |
C.To mention Ozempic’s purpose. | D.To indicate Ozempic’s minor effect. |
A.Try to enjoy Ozempic’s side effect. | B.Take Ozempic correctly if necessary. |
C.Take Ozempic to lose his weight. | D.Stop worrying about Ozempic face. |
A.For introduction. | B.For recommendation. |
C.For clarification. | D.For promotion. |
5 . Drugs that could save tens of thousands of lives in Britain should be prescribed (开药) to three times as many patients as at present, medical experts recommended after a study showed these drugs have great effects on heart disease and stroke (中风).
British research has shown that statins, a class of drug that lowers cholesterol (胆固醇), can prevent a third of all cases of heart disease or stroke in patients at highest risk. If statins were given to 10 million high-risk patients, they could save at least 50,000 lives a year worldwide. In Britain, where heart disease is the leading cause of death, statins could save up to 10,000 lives a year.
Studies have found that safety issues surrounding statins were so tiny that they were significant. The risk of muscle problems was only about one in ten thousand. Fears that statins could increase deaths from other diseases, such as cancer, were assuaged by the study. At present, only people with high cholesterol are prescribed statins, but the eight-year study found that anyone at risk of heart disease or stroke could benefit. Statins are now given to fewer than one in twenty people aged over 40, mostly men with heart disease or high cholesterol. Under the recommendation, this would increase to one in eight.
A total of 20,000 volunteers aged 40 to 80 took part in the study, which looked at the effects of statins on patients for whom the benefits were uncertain. The guidelines previously said that female patients aged over 65 would not benefit from the drug, but the five years of monitoring all types of patients at high risk of heart attacks and stroke showed that everyone benefited as much from statins. The new recommendations will be easy to put into practice because statins are readily available and the patients who benefit from them most are already known to doctors.
1. What does paragraph 2 focus on?A.Main diseases in Britain. | B.Side effects caused by statins. |
C.Positive effects of statins. | D.The numbers of heart disease cases. |
A.Eased. | B.Discovered. | C.Ignored. | D.Compared. |
A.The effects of the drug are unclear. | B.The drug can be widely prescribed. |
C.The drug hardly benefits female patients. | D.The drug should be limited in application. |
A.To call for the monitoring of drug studies. | B.To explain different ways of testing drugs. |
C.To seek improvement in the drug research. | D.To spread medical experts’ recommendation. |
6 . French surgeons have performed what they said on Wednesday was the world’s first partial face transplant — giving a new nose, chin and lips to a woman attacked by a dog.
Specialists from two French hospitals carried out the operation on a 38-year-old woman on Sunday in the northern city of Amiens by taking the face from a brain-dead woman, who had hanged herself just hours before the operation. Her family agreed on the operation.
“The patient is in an excellent state and the transplant looks normal.” The hospitals said in a brief statement after waiting three days to announce the pioneering surgery. The woman had been left without a nose and lips after the dog attacked her last May, and was unable to talk or chew properly. Such injuries are “extremely difficult, if not impossible” to repair using normal surgical techniques, the statement said. The statement did not say what the woman would look like when she had fully recovered, but medical experts said she was unlikely to resemble the woman who had been the source of her new face. The operation was led by Jean-Michel Dubernard, a specialist from a hospital in Lyon who has also carried out hand transplants. Skin transplants have long been used to treat burns and other injuries, but operations around the mouth and nose have been considered very difficult because of the area’s high sensitivity to foreign tissue. Teams in France, the United States and Britain had been developing techniques to make face transplants a reality.
There was a short-term risk for the patient if blood vessels (脉管) became blocked, a medium-term danger of her body rejecting the new skin and a long-term possibility that the drugs used could cause cancers. Experts say that although such medical advances should be celebrated, the transplant had thrown up moral and ethical (伦理的) issues. Little is known about the psychological effect of the transplant.
1. What makes the woman’s operation extremely challenging?A.The patient’s unstable mood. |
B.The doctor’s lack of surgical techniques. |
C.The masses’ unacceptance of this transplant. |
D.The damaged area’s high sensitivity to transplanted tissues. |
A.Heart damage. | B.Organ rejection. |
C.Side effect of the drugs. | D.Block of blood vessels. |
A.The woman had used the dead woman’s whole face. |
B.Such transplants have been performed by top doctors. |
C.The woman will suffer from psychological damage soon. |
D.There has arisen a moral and ethical debate about the operation. |
A.First Face Transplant Opens Debate. |
B.French Woman has First Partial Face Transplant. |
C.Risks and Ethical Problems of a Face Transplant. |
D.A Complete Face Transplant of a French Woman. |
7 . The Heimlich Maneuver Guideline
In the early 1970s, Henry J. Heimlich, MD, developed a first aid technique for choking, known as the Heimlich maneuver.
Knowing when to use the Heimlich maneuver can be vital in emergency situations. If a person appears unable to speak or starts motioning toward their throat, they are likely choking.
The National Safety Council provides the following steps to help a person who is choking, if they are still conscious. First of all, stand behind the person with one leg forward between the person’s legs. And then, put your arms around the person and locate their belly button. Place the thumb side of one fist against the stomach just above their belly button.
Avoid giving small kids hard candy, ice cubes, and popcorn. Cut foods that kids can easily choke on into tiny pieces. This can include grapes and other fruit, raw carrots, hot dogs, and chunks of cheese. Avoid laughing or talking while chewing and swallowing.
A.How to prevent choking. |
B.Choking is an incredibly scary experience. |
C.How to prepare for the Heimlich Maneuver |
D.In these cases, it’s crucial to help immediately. |
E.If the patient is unresponsive, call medical help immediately. |
F.Use quick thrusting movements five times or until they expel the item. |
G.Dr. Heimlich developed this method after reading an article about accidental deaths. |
8 . While some allergies (过敏症) disappear over time or with treatment, others last a lifetime. For decades, scientists have been searching for the source of these lifetime allergies.
Recently, researchers found that memory B cells may be involved. These cells produce a different class of antibodies known as IgG, which war d off viral infections. But no one had identified exactly which of those cells were recalling allergens or how they switched to making the IgE antibodies responsible for allergies. To uncover the mysterious cells, two research teams took a deep div e into the immune cells of people with allergies and some without.
Joshua Koenig and his team conducted extensive research, analyzing over 90,000 memory B cells from individuals with birch (桦树) and dust mite (尘螨) allergies, as well as those without allergies, using RNA sequencing. This analysis revealed a specific type of memory B cell, termed MBC2, that plays a crucial role in the immune response that leads to allergies. In further studies involving individuals with peanut allergies, the sameMBC2 cells were found to increase in number and produce IgE antibodies during treatment s aimed at desensitizing (脱敏) the body to peanut allergens.
Parallel research by Maria Curotto de Lafaille and her team at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai confirmed these findings, showing an abundance of similar memory B cells in children with peanut allergies compared to those without. These cells were found to be primed to switch from producing protective IgG antibodies to the allergy-causing IgE antibodies. This switch is facilitated by the production of RNA for IgE, which does not translate into the protein until the cells encounter allergens. A protein called JAK, crucial for signaling this transition, has been identified, suggesting that inhibiting JAK could prevent the production of IgE antibodies.
By identifying and targeting the memory cells responsible for allergic reactions, it may be possible to predict the course of an individual’s allergy and potentially eliminate the allergic response altogether. Cecilia Berin from Northwestern University emphasizes the potential of this research to wipe out not just individual allergies but all allergic responses by focusing on the elimination of these specific memory B cells. This promising direction suggests a future where lasting relief from allergies could become a reality.
1. Why did scientists investigate the immune cells of individuals with and without allergies?A.To explore the distinctions between IgG and IgE. |
B.To uncover new antibodies known as IgG and IgE. |
C.To reveal cells associated with the development of allergies. |
D.To identify cells responsible for defending against allergies. |
A.MBC2s make antibodies and proteins that prevent allergies. |
B.Allergists are capable of predicting whether an allergy will last or disappear. |
C.JAK plays a role in controlling antibody production when exposed to allergens. |
D.Memory B cells generate both RNA for IgE and the corresponding protein. |
A.The cells are dying. | B.The cells are switching antibody types. |
C.The cells are not functioning well. | D.The cells are resistant to treatment. |
A.RNA Sequencing Is Applied in Immunology Research |
B.Specific Cells Related to Peanut Allergies Are Identified |
C.Unmasking Cells’ Identities Helps Diagnose and Treat Allergies |
D.Newfound Immune Cells Are Responsible for Long-lasting Allergies |
9 . When colds and flu hit, many people automatically turn to over-the-counter (OTC) medicines to push through and treat their symptoms. Although these medicines are easily accessible and widely used, it might come as a surprise to many people to learn that they are not risk-free. A study estimated that every year, 26,735 people went to the emergency room for harmful events related to OTC cold and cough medicines.
When two or more drugs are used together, their interactions can sometimes produce unexpected harmful effects. Physicians are typically knowledgeable about potential drug interactions, so it is very important for patients to ask their healthcare providers which OTC medicines are safe for them to use.
It is also important to read the package ingredients of OTC medicines closely to avoid duplication of doses (剂量重复). Cold medicines are typically made up of multiple ingredients. A person who takes a single-ingredient medicine paired with one of these multi-ingredient medicines can receive an unsafe dose of that ingredient.
While everyone could potentially experience adverse effects from cold and flu medicines, some groups—including older adults, children and pregnant women—may be at greater risk. Older people who are using prescribed drugs to treat multiple health conditions may have a higher risk of drug interactions because of the higher number of medicines being used at the same time to treat different conditions. The aging body is not as expert at absorbing, distributing and clearing medicines as younger bodies are. This can put older adults at higher risk for an overdose and drug-to-drug interactions with some medicines.
The Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend giving cold medicines to children under age 4. Because of a variety of factors, young children have a higher risk of an accidental overdose and adverse events that could lead to death.
1. What does the author convey in the first paragraph?A.People don’t care about their health at all. |
B.OTC medicines may also exist some risks. |
C.OTC medicines are extremely harmful to our health. |
D.Few people are aware of the dangers of drug addiction. |
A.Take drugs as early as possible. | B.Buy medicines from official hospitals. |
C.Overlook the package ingredients of drugs. | D.Seek instructions and advice from doctors. |
A.Beneficial. | B.Indifferent. | C.Unfavorable. | D.Effective. |
A.Tips for taking OTC medicines. | B.OTC medicines may be unsafe. |
C.How to deal with an OTC drug overdose. | D.Should OTC medicines be available? |
10 . An experimental treatment rejuvenates (使...恢复活力) the immune (免疫的) systems of older mice, improving their ability to fight infections. If it works in humans, the treatment could reverse (逆转) age-related decreases in immunity that leave older adults susceptible to disease.
These decreases may be due to changes in our blood stem cells which can develop into any type of blood cell—including key parts that make up the immune system. As we age, a larger proportion (比例) of these stem cells tend to produce some immune cells over others, says Jason Ross at Stanford University in California. This imbalance damages the immune system’s defenses.
Ross and his colleagues have developed a treatment using antibodies (抗体), which are proteins that recognize and attack certain cells to target these abnormal stem cells. They tested the treatment in six mice between 18 and 24 months old, which is roughly equal to an age of 56 to 70 years in humans.
A week after receiving an antibody injection, the mice had about 38 percent fewer of these abnormal stem cells than six mice of the same age that didn’t receive the treatment. “You can think of it as kind of turning back the clock,” says Ross. “We’re making the proportion of these immune cells more similar to those of a younger adult mouse.”
To test if the changes resulted in a stronger immune system, the researchers vaccinated (打疫苗) 17 older mice against a mouse virus. Nine of these mice had received the antibody treatment eight weeks earlier. The researchers then infected (感染) the mice with the virus. Two weeks later, they measured the number of infected cells in the animals and found that nearly half of the treated mice had cleared the infection, compared with only one of the eight untreated mice.
The findings indicate that the antibody treatment rejuvenates the mouse immune system. “Since humans, like mice, also see abnormal blood stem cells increase with age, a similar antibody treatment may rejuvenate our immune systems,” says Ross.
1. What does the underlined word “susceptible” in paragraph 1 mean?A.Strongly resist. | B.Easily suffer from. |
C.Completely unaffected by. | D.Highly immune to. |
A.Changes in our nervous system. |
B.An increase in antibodies in our body. |
C.Changes in blood stem cells. |
D.A decrease in the number of immune cells. |
A.By analyzing changes in their lifestyle. |
B.By observing differences in their behavior. |
C.By conducting blood tests to measure immune cell counts. |
D.By counting the number of infected cells after virus contact. |
A.The antibody treatment has no effect on the mouse immune system. |
B.The antibody treatment increases the risk of infections in mice. |
C.The antibody treatment only works on young mice, not older ones. |
D.The antibody treatment improves the mouse immune system. |