组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 环境保护
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 17 道试题
书面表达-开放性作文 | 困难(0.15) |
1 . 假设你是李华,近期英语课上刚刚学习了关于黑脉金斑蝶的相关知识,恰巧你校英语报征集保护濒危物种的征文,请你以“Protect Monarch Butterflies”为题写一篇文章投稿, 以呼吁人们保护黑脉金斑蝶。内容主要包括:
1. 黑脉金斑蝶的现状;
2. 提出保护原因及措施;
3. 号召保护濒危动物。
注意:
1. 写作词数应为80左右;
2. 请按如下格式在答题卡的相应位置作答。

Protect Monarch Butterflies


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2023-12-09更新 | 53次组卷 | 1卷引用:辽宁省丹东市2023-2024学年高一上学期期中教学质量调研测试英语试题
书信写作-其他应用文 | 困难(0.15) |
2 . 假定你是李华,你校将以十月四日世界动物日为主题,举办英语演讲比赛,请你写一篇演讲稿。内容包括:
1.动物生存现状;
2.解决办法。
注意:
1.写作词数应为80左右;
2.请在答题卡的相应位置作答。
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2022-11-28更新 | 101次组卷 | 1卷引用:广东省名校联盟2022-2023学年高三上学期11月大联考英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约530词) | 困难(0.15) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇议论文。文章论述了企业通过破坏环境和伤害人们来获得利益,这是很正常的,但仅仅指责企业是没用的,还需发挥公众的作用和影响力。

3 . The environmental practices of big businesses are shaped by a fundamental fact that offends our sense of justice. A business may maximize the amount of money it makes by damaging the environment and hurting people. When government regulation is effective, and the public is environmentally aware, environmentally clean big businesses may out-compete dirty ones, but the reverse is likely to be true if government regulation is ineffective and the public doesn’t care.

It is easy to blame a business for helping itself by hurting other people. But blaming alone is unlikely to produce change. It ignores the fact that businesses are not charities but profit-making companies, and they are under obligation to maximize profits for shareholders by legal means.

Our blaming of businesses also ignores the ultimate responsibility of the public for creating the conditions that let a business profit through destructive environmental policies. In the long run, it is the public, either directly or through its politicians, that has the power to make such destructive policies unprofitable and illegal, and to make sustainable environmental policies profitable.

The public can do that by accusing businesses of harming them. The public may also make their opinion felt by choosing to buy sustainably harvested products; by preferring their governments to award valuable contracts to businesses with a good environmental track record; and by pressing their governments to pass and enforce laws and regulations requiring good environmental practices.

In turn, big businesses can exert powerful pressure on any suppliers that might ignore public or government pressure. For instance, after the US public became concerned about the spread of a disease, transmitted to humans through infected meat, the US government introduced rules demanding that the meat industry abandon practices associated with the risk of the disease spreading. But the meat packers refused to follow these, claiming that they would be too expensive to obey. However, when a fast-food company made the same demands after customer purchases of its hamburgers dropped, the meat industry followed immediately. The public’s task is therefore to identify which links in the supply chain are sensitive to public pressure.

Some readers may be disappointed or outraged that I place the ultimate responsibility for business practices harming the public on the public itself. I also believe that the public must accept the necessity for higher prices for products to cover the added costs of sound environmental practices. My views may seem to ignore the belief that businesses should act in accordance with moral principles even if this leads to a reduction in their profits. But I think we have to recognize that, throughout human history, government regulation has arisen precisely because it was found that not only did moral principles need to be made explicit, they also needed to be enforced.

My conclusion is not a moralistic one about who is right or wrong, admirable or selfish. I believe that changes in public attitudes are essential for changes in businesses’ environmental practices.

1. The main idea of Paragraph 3 is that environmental damage__________.
A.is the result of ignorance of the public
B.requires political action if it is to be stopped
C.can be prevented by the action of ordinary people
D.can only be stopped by educating business leaders
2. In Paragraph 4, the writer describes ways in which the public can__________.
A.reduce their own individual impact on the environment
B.learn more about the impact of business on the environment
C.raise awareness of the effects of specific environmental disasters
D.influence the environmental policies of businesses and governments
3. What pressure was given by big business in the case of the disease mentioned in Paragraph 5?
A.Meat packers stopped supplying hamburgers to fast-food chains.
B.Meat packers persuaded the government to reduce their expenses.
C.A fast-food company forced their meat suppliers to follow the law.
D.A fast-food company encouraged the government to introduce regulations.
4. What would be the best heading for this passage?
A.Will the world survive the threat caused by big businesses?
B.How can big businesses be encouraged to be less driven by profit?
C.What environmental dangers are caused by the greed of businesses?
D.Are big businesses to blame for the damage they cause to the environment?
阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 困难(0.15) |
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了一份泄露的政府间气候变化专门委员会草案报告称,全球数百万平方公里的树木种植和生物能源作物的广泛使用可能会对粮食安全和土地退化造成潜在的严重后果,并展开了相关讨论。

4 . A leaked IPCC draft reports, “Widespread use across millions of square kilometers globally of tree-planting and bioenergy crops could have potentially serious consequences for food security and land degradation (退化).” In other words, more massive monocultures (单种栽培) and more bioenergy crops, fueled by more fertilizers, could damage the structure of the environmental soil and its capacity to absorb carbon.

Everyone knows that to help ease the increasing climate crisis, we need to plant new trees. It’s said that the earth could support an additional 9,000,000 square kilometers of forest, potentially hosting 500 billion trees capable of capturing more than 200 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide at maturity. It would be a serious help to the environment.

Bioenergy now holds a 50 percent share of the world’s renewables consumption—as much as hydro, wind, solar and all others combined. It’s good news, but not entirely. If we consider that increasing desertification and rising ocean levels will take away more arable (可耕种的) land, we arrive at a crucial “trilemma”(三难困境). Should we use our spare soil for agriculture, reforestation or bioenergy?

Such a question would make sense in a multilateral, harmonious world, not on a planet where the richest country cancels an environment-saving agreement, thus encouraging the most tropically-forested nation to set about cutting trees.

Last year, 36,000 square kilometers of forest was cut down. Wouldn’t it be better to start by stopping deforestation altogether? Animal farming takes up 77 percent of the world’s arable land and provides us with 18 percent of the calories. Shouldn’t we cut back on global meat consumption? Modern bioenergy is already available. Shouldn’t we get rid of first-generation biofuels, which are produced from food crops?

1. What’s the IPCC’s attitude to the widespread planting?
A.AmbiguousB.PositiveC.DisapprovingD.Uncaring
2. What does the author intend to do in paragraph 2?
A.Add some background information.B.Summarize the previous paragraphs.
C.Provide some advice for the readers.D.Introduce a new topic for discussion.
3. How can we understand “but not entirely” in paragraph 3?
A.There is less sustainable energy for use.
B.No more land is available for bioenergy.
C.More trees are cut in the richest country.
D.Bioenergy can cause more climate problems.
4. What does the text mainly talk about?
A.Developing farmland as much as possible.
B.Planting trees to prevent global warming.
C.Using bioenergy to reduce environmental pollution.
D.Protecting present resources instead of developing new ones.
2022-05-08更新 | 789次组卷 | 5卷引用:福建省三明市教研联盟2021-2022学年高二下学期期中联考英语试题
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~
文章大意:这是一篇新闻报道。文章主要介绍了一个名为Chip Bag Project的公益项目,通过回收空薯片袋,为无家可归者制作睡袋,既保护了环境,又减少了贫困。

5 . Eradajere Oleita thinks she may have a partial solution for two of their country’s persistent problems: garbage and poverty. It’s called the Chip Bag Project. As a student and_________she is asking local snack lovers a_________: Rather than throw empty chip bags_________into the trash,_________them! Then she can turn them into sleeping bags for the homeless.

Chip_________drop off their empty bags at two_________: a print shop and a clothing store, where Oleita and her volunteer helpers collect them. After they sanitize (清洁) the chip bags in soapy hot water, they slice them open,_________them flat, and iron them together. They_________fillings to line the insides.

It takes about four hours to_________a sleeping bag, and each takes around 150 to 300 chip bags, depending on whether they’re single-serve or family__________. The__________is a sleeping bag that is “waterproof, lightweight, and easy to carry around,” Oleita told theNews.

Since its start in 2020, the Chip Bag Project has__________more than 800, 000 chip bags and,__________last December, created 110 sleeping bags.

Sure, it would be__________to raise the money to buy new sleeping bags. But the project is only half the__________for Oleita whose family moved to the United States from Nigeria a decade ago with the hope of attaining a better life — and her fellow volunteers. “We are dedicated to making an impact not only__________but environmentally,” she says.

And, of course, there’s the symbolism of recycling bags that would__________land in the trash and using them to help the homeless. It’s a powerful__________that environmental__________and poverty often go hand in hand. As Oleita toldlocalnews. com,“I think it’s time to show__________between all of these issues.”

1.
A.instructorB.helperC.environmentalistD.tailor
2.
A.criterionB.qualificationC.questionD.favor
3.
A.lightlyB.deliberatelyC.occasionallyD.indirectly
4.
A.sellB.emptyC.cleanD.donate
5.
A.producersB.eatersC.sponsorsD.buyers
6.
A.dustbinsB.locationsC.bagsD.streets
7.
A.leadB.lieC.layD.print
8.
A.checkB.needC.reachD.use
9.
A.sewB.designC.offerD.discover
10.
A.memberB.sizeC.missionD.debt
11.
A.resultB.reliefC.methodD.produce
12.
A.madeB.decoratedC.accumulatedD.charged
13.
A.in terms ofB.regardless ofC.instead ofD.as of
14.
A.busierB.simplerC.heavierD.smaller
15.
A.goalB.stageC.procedureD.chance
16.
A.objectivelyB.politicallyC.sociallyD.secretly
17.
A.moreoverB.otherwiseC.insteadD.besides
18.
A.reportB.blameC.reminderD.solution
19.
A.problemsB.groupsC.regulationsD.protection
20.
A.divisionsB.similaritiesC.messagesD.connections
2022-04-13更新 | 1091次组卷 | 4卷引用:四川省成都市成华区某校2023-2024学年高三上学期期中考试英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 困难(0.15) |
真题 名校

6 . Hundreds of scientists, writers and academics sounded a warning to humanity in an open letter published last December: Policymakers and the rest of us must engage openly with the risk of global collapse. Researchers in many areas have projected the widespread collapse as “a credible scenario(情景) this century”.

A survey of scientists found that extreme weather events, food insecurity, and freshwater shortages might create global collapse. Of course, if you are a non-human species, collapse is well underway.

The call for public engagement with the unthinkable is especially germane in this moment of still-uncontrolled pandemic and economic crises in the world's most technologically advanced nations. Not very long ago, it was also unthinkable that a virus would shut down nations and that safety nets would be proven so disastrously lacking in flexibility.

The international scholars’ warning letter doesn't say exactly what collapse will look like or when it might happen. Collapseology, the study of collapse, is more concerned with identifying trends and with them the dangers of everyday civilization. Among the signatories(签署者) of the warning was Bob Johnson, the originator of the “ecological footprint” concept, which measures the total amount of environmental input needed to maintain a given lifestyle. With the current footprint of humanity, “it seems that global collapse is certain to happen in some form, possibly within a decade, certainly within this century,” Johnson said in an email.

“Only if we discuss the consequences of our biophysical limits,” the December warning letter says, “can we have the hope to reduce their speed, severity and harm”. And yet messengers of the coming disturbance are likely to be ignored. We all want to hope things will turn out fine. As a poet wrote,

Man is a victim of dope(麻醉品)

In the incurable form of hope.

The hundreds of scholars who signed the letter are intent(执着) on quieting hope that ignores preparedness. “Let's look directly into the issue of collapse,” they say, “and deal with the terrible possibilities of what we see there to make the best of a troubling future.”

1. What does the underlined word “germane” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Scientific.B.Credible.
C.Original.D.Relevant.
2. As for the public awareness of global collapse, the author is________.
A.worriedB.puzzled
C.surprisedD.scared
3. What can we learn from this passage?
A.The signatories may change the biophysical limits.
B.The author agrees with the message of the poem.
C.The issue of collapse is being prioritized.
D.The global collapse is well underway.
2021-09-06更新 | 4104次组卷 | 7卷引用:北京师范大学附属中学2021-2022学年高三上学期期中考试英语试题
语法填空-短文语填(约210词) | 困难(0.15) |
名校
7 . 阅读下面材料,在空白处填入适当的内容(1个单词)或括号内单词的正确形式。

When Peter Sanger and Liang Wu got together, it    1    (strike)them that they must be long-lost friends, Both firm advocates in the fight    2    air pollution, they believe that if you can't measure it, you can't beat it. That's    3     they founded Green City Solutions: "The solution to quantifiably improve city air."

The invention—the City Tree—act as an air purifier-an interesting    4    (add)to urban trees and green spaces. Rooted in science, air pollution can be eaten by the vertical flat-paneled(平面的)"trees"    5    (dot)around cities across Europe, while the "trees" also act as seats for pedestrians Sanger and Wu's vision is for a world in which people in cities can live    6    (healthy). They long to create living conditions that allow all people around the world to permanently have cleaner air    7    (breathe).

Using remote technology, the City Tree combines    8    air-purifying feature of moss with remote technology to increase the air flow through the "trees". This allows them to "suck up" and clean more air than normal, and the amount they filter can be increased    9    (depend)on pollution levels at different times of day.

The German green-tech start-up is now funded by the European Commission to set up a City Tree network of 15 brand new units and test it in a    10    (science)way in Berlin's pollution hotspots next year.

书面表达-概要写作 | 困难(0.15) |
名校
8 . Directions: Read the following passage. Summarize the main idea and the main point(s) of the passage in no more than 60 words. Use your own words as far as possible

Is renting clothes greener than buying them?

Clothing rental is a hot new industry and retailers are demanding to get on board in hopes of attracting green shoppers. But is renting fashion actually more environmentally-friendly than buying it, and if so, how much more? Journalist and author Elizabeth Cline investigated this question and concluded that it’s not as sustainable as it seems.

Take shipping, for example, which has to go two ways if an item is rented — receiving and returning. Cline writes that consumer transportation has the second largest carbon footprint of our collective fashion habit after manufacturing. She writes, “An item ordered online and then returned can send out 20 kilograms of carbon each way, and increases up to 50 kilograms for rush shipping. By comparison, the carbon impact of a pair of jeans purchased from a physical store and washed and worn at home is 33.4 kilograms, according to a 2015 study by Levi’s.”

Then there’s the burden of washing, which has to happen for every item when it’s returned, regardless of whether or not it was worn. For most rental services, this usually means dry cleaning, a high impact and polluting process. All the rental services that Cline looked into have replaced perchloroethylene (氯乙烯), a carcinogenic (致癌的) air pollutant that is still used by 70 percent of US dry cleaners, with hydrocarbon alternatives, although these aren’t great either.

Lastly, Cline fears that rental services will increase our appetite for fast fashion, simply because it’s so easily accessible. There’s something called “share washing” that makes people engage in more wasteful behaviors precisely because a product or service is shared and thus is regarded as more eco-friendly. Uber is one example of this, advertised as “a way to share rides and limit car ownership.” and yet “it has been proven to discourage walking, bicycling, and public transportation use.”

Renting clothes is still preferable to buying them cheap and throwing them in the dustbin after a few wears, but we shouldn’t let the availability of these services make us too satisfied. There’s an even better step—and that’s wearing what is already in the closet.

完形填空(约510词) | 困难(0.15) |
名校

9 . Every minute, every single day, the equivalent of a truckload of plastic enters our oceans. In the name of profit and convenience, corporations are literally choking (塞满) our planet with a substance that does not just “____” when we toss it into a bin. Since the 1950s, some 8.3bn tons of plastic have been produced worldwide, and to date, only 9% of that has been recycled. Our oceans bear the brunt (受主要冲击) of plastics epidemic—up to 12.7m tons of plastic end up in them every year.

Just over a decade ago, I launched the Story of Stuff to help shine a light on the ways we ____, use and dispose of the stuff in our lives. The Story of Stuff is inextricably (不可逃避的) linked to the story of plastics—the packaging that goes along with those endless ____. We buy a soda, sip it for a few minutes, and toss its ____ packaging “away”. We eat potato chips, finish them, and throw their packaging “away”.

The cycle is endless, and it happens countless times every single day. But here’s the ____—there is no “away”. As far as we try to toss a piece of plastic—whether it’s into a recycling bin or not—it does not disappear. Chances are, it ____ polluting our communities, oceans or waterways in some form.

For years, we’ve been ____ that the problem of plastic packaging can be solved through better individual action. We’re told that if we ____ recycle, we’re doing our part. We’re told that if we drink from a reusable bottle, we’re making enough of a ____. But the truth is that we cannot recycle our way out of this mess.

Recycling alone will never stop the flow of plastics into our oceans; we have to get to the ____ of the problem and slow down the production of all this plastic waste. Think about it: if your home was flooding because you had left the tap on, your first step wouldn’t be to start ____. You’d first cut the flooding off at its source—the tap. In many ways, our plastics problem is no different.

____, we need corporations—those like Coca-Cola, Unilever, Starbucks and Nestlé that continue to mass-produce throwaway plastic bottles, cups, and straws—to step up and show real ____ for the mess they’ve created. Drink companies produce over 500bn single-use plastic bottles annually; there is no way that we can recycle our way out of a problem of that scale.

Bag, cup and straw bans like those in Morocco, Iceland, Vancouver and some US cities are a great start, but also not enough. And while clean-up efforts are ____ in addressing litter problems, they can’t begin to touch the problems created by microplastics.

Not long ago, we existed in a world without throwaway plastic, and we can thrive that way again. The world’s largest corporations—with all their profits and innovation labs—are well ____ to help move us beyond single-use plastics. All over the world people are already innovating toward solutions that focus on reusing and reducing plastics. It’s time to accelerate this process and move beyond half measures and baby steps.

1.
A.pass byB.go awayC.give inD.turn around
2.
A.produceB.pursueC.consumeD.clear
3.
A.desiresB.purchasesC.profitsD.varieties
4.
A.needlessB.attractiveC.completeD.permanent
5.
A.significanceB.reliefC.instanceD.challenge
6.
A.originates fromB.ends upC.relates toD.goes beyond
7.
A.thrilledB.frustratedC.convincedD.concerned
8.
A.skillfullyB.randomlyC.simplyD.precisely
9.
A.differenceB.proposalC.discoveryD.choice
10.
A.complexityB.analysisC.presenceD.source
11.
A.moppingB.screamingC.complainingD.regretting
12.
A.OtherwiseB.BesidesC.HoweverD.Therefore
13.
A.enthusiasmB.responsibilityC.preferenceD.demand
14.
A.inadequateB.helpfulC.voluntaryD.fruitless
15.
A.educatedB.acknowledgedC.establishedD.positioned
2020-12-14更新 | 890次组卷 | 2卷引用:上海市建平中学2020-2021学年高三上学期期中英语试题(含听力)
20-21高二上·江西·期中
阅读理解-七选五(约250词) | 困难(0.15) |
名校

10 . Pollution

Pollution happens when the environment is dirtied, by waste, chemicals, and other harmful substances(物质).Pollution is a problem all over the world. But it is especially bad in large cities with a lot of industries and cars.    1    

Wildfires, volcanoes, and industrial chemicals cause some air pollution. But most air pollution comes from burning fossil fuels (矿物燃料)These include coal, oil and natural gas. The burning of fossil fuels may release harmful gases. Air pollution may cause such diseases cancer and asthma. It also leads to polluted rain that can harm living things    2     Finally, air pollution damages the ozone layer(臭氧层)which is important because it protects Earth against harmful rays from the sun.

Causes of water pollution are easy to see. People dump(倾倒) garbage and dirty water into river, lakes and oceans. Factories or cities sometimes release poisonous chemicals, and other wastes into water. These chemicals may make the groundwater unfit to drink.    3    

Littering, or throwing garbage on the ground, is a form of land pollution. Litter can destroy the habitats of plants and animals. The buildup of dangerous chemicals in the ground is another form of land pollution. The chemicals may come from farms or factories.    4     They may even harm people who eat the polluted plants and animals.

Many governments, environmental groups, and ordinary people are working to control pollution. Governments have passed laws to keep people from releasing dangerous chemicals into the environment     5     Instead they are getting power from the sun, wind, water, and other energy sources to produce less pollution. Many communities use recycling to reduce pollution.

A.Farmers use chemical to help crops grow.
B.This type of pollution may be seen in big cities.
C.They also can harm fish and other forms of life.
D.These chemicals can spread to plants and animals.
E.In addition, air pollution may be a cause of global warming.
F.There are three main forms of pollution: air, water, and land.
G.Some companies and people are trying to use fewer fossil fuels.
共计 平均难度:一般