Where are the bees?
Bees are essential to the production of food we eat. Bees make honey, but they also pollinate large areas of crops, such as straw berries, apples and onions. About a third of the food we eat is a result of pollination of the bees. Unfortunately, bees have been disappearing at an alarming rate.
In 2006, bee keepers started reporting about something called Colony Collapse Disaster (CCD).The main sign of CCD is the loss of adult honey bees from a hive. In October of 2006, some beekeepers reported that they had lost between 30 and 90 percent of their hives.
There were many theories for the disappearance of the bees. But the most convincing one has to do with pesticides and lifestyles of bees today. Nowadays, beekeeper get most of their income not from producing honey but from renting bees to pollinate plants. This means that the life of the typical bee now consists of travelling all around the country to pollinate crops as the seasons change. That means a lot of traveling on trucks, which is very stressful to bees. It is not unusual for up to 30% of the hive to die during transport due to stress. In addition, bees that spend most of their time locked up on trucks are not exposed to what they usually live on. Instead, they live on a sweet liquid from corn, usually polluted with pesticides.
The exact reason for the disappearance of bees is not sure, but losing bees is very costly to the economy. The bee pollination services are worth over $8 billion a year. With no bees, pollination will have to be done by hand, which would have effects on the quality of food and increased food priced. We hear a lot about big environmental disasters almost every day. But one of the biggest may just be the less of that tiny flying insect.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Each sentence can be used only once. Note that there are two more sentences than you need.
Are Your Clothes Causing Pollution?
Very small pieces of plastic, called microfibers, are polluting rivers and oceans.
Studies on microfibers in the environment
Pollution caused by plastic is not new, but recent studies have shown the effect of microfibers in the environment. Studies show very small microfibers are ending up in our waters, which may come from waste water treatment factories. A 2015 study found them in fish from California.
Microfibers, effect on food supplies
Beyond the waterways, the researchers say microfibers may end up in soil and agricultural lands.
Steps to save or keep microfibers from the environment
Until more information becomes known, there are steps to take to reduce the amount of microfibers in the environment. People should use less of the artificial materials. If we already have those in our lives and we’re using them, an important step would be washing them less.
A.New technology may a1so help. |
B.So if these m icrofiber s have been found in fish and seafood, ar e they safe to eat? |
C.They can al so move around the atmosphere. |
D.Studies are conducted on how much of the microfibers is released |
E.The source of these mi crofibers may surprise you: your clothes. |
F.Washing machines keep microfibers from escaping with w ash water |
3 . Mountain regions are not just playgrounds for the richer citizens on the planet, however. The disappearing snows of Mount Kilimanjaro are a worrying sign that nowhere is safe from the adverse effects of human actions. The United Nations has identified three main areas that need to be addressed to ensure the future safety of the world’s mountains. These are: the protection of mountain ecosystems, the encouragement of peace and stability in mountain regions, and assistance for mountain people to maintain their ways of life.
From the busy cities of India to the farmlands of California, more than half the world’s population is dependent on mountains for their fresh water supply. Global warming, deforestation, mining and heavy farming seriously damage breakable mountain ecosystems and put vital fresh water sources at risk.
Mountain regions host a large proportion of the world’s wars. From Afghanistan to the Balkans and the Andes to many parts of Africa, territorial(领土的) and drug related conflicts have damaging effects on the local environment and the lives of the local people. Fighting makes essential tasks such as farming impossible. Land mines make large areas of potential farming ground unusable. Also schools, roads, bridges and other important infrastructure(基础设施) are left in ruins.
Mountain people are among the poorest, least represented groups on the earth. They face many hardships and each day can be, “a test of survival”. Damage to mountain ecosystems worsens their situation and leaves them even more unprotected to disease and ‘natural’ disasters such as floods and landslides. It’s been recommended that forest profit should be reinvested in mountain communities and the people living there should be given a stronger political voice. Their fate is in many ways directly connected with that of people living at sea level.
There is an old motto for visitors to the countryside which advises them to leave nothing but footprints. It is still as relevant today as it always was. Unfortunately, the size of our footprints seems to be getting larger.
1. What the writer discussed in the previous sections is most probably about .A.mountain ecosystems | B.mountain regions |
C.mountain people | D.mountain sports |
A.direct | B.harmful |
C.positive | D.powerful |
A.inadequate supply of fresh water | B.impossible farming |
C.mountain people’s poor living condition | D.ruined infrastructure |
A.Mountain people have enough political voice to protect themselves. |
B.More money should be raised to establish mountain communities. |
C.Worsened ecosystems put mountain people’s lives under threat. |
D.Visitors to mountains have left nothing but large footprints. |
![](https://img.xkw.com/dksih/QBM/2019/2/11/2138344447213568/2138640901373952/STEM/0273d3053812489b96fbddd219bb57f2.png?resizew=537)
Is climate change consuming your favorite foods?
Coffee: Whether or not you try to limit yourself to one cup of coffee a day, the effects of climate change on the world’s coffee-growing regions may leave you little choice.
Tea: When it comes to tea, warmer climates and erratic precipitation aren't only
Seafood: Climate change is affecting the world's aquaculture as much as its agriculture. As air temperatures rise, oceans and waterways absorb some of the heat and
And that
Is Climate Change Consuming Your Favorite Foods?
Due to climate change, the world’s endangered lists are no longer just for animals. We may not only need to adapt ourselves to living in a warmer world but a
As the increased amount of carbon dioxide in the air linked to global warming
Whether or not you try to limit yourself
Rising temperatures and unpredictable rainfall patterns are reported to have been threatening coffee plantations in South America, Africa, Asia, and Hawaii. The result? Significant cuts in coffee yield.
According to organizations like Australia's Climate Institute, half of the present coffee-producing areas
With temperatures continuously rising, oceans are absorbing some of the heat and undergoing warming of their own,
And how about that satisfying “crack” which you get when you are eating crabs and lobsters? It could be silenced
Even worse is the possibility
A.The demand of the job market. | B.The location of the hotel. |
C.The damage to the environment. | D.The solution to the issue. |
A.Beijing was the most polluted city. |
B.The air quality index reading for Xi’an reached 500. |
C.The AQI for Xingtai in Hebei Province was 491. |
D.Emergency measures against air pollution have not been taken. |
A.About 100 cities. | B.About 50 cities. |
C.About 500 cities. | D.About 20 cities. |
A.Limiting government vehicle use. |
B.Putting off all construction. |
C.Asking polluters to apologize for their action. |
D.Reducing the emissions from power companies. |
8 . The Paris climate agreement finalised in December last year indicated a new era for climate action. For the first time, the world’s nations agreed to keep global warming well below 2℃.
This is vital for climate-vulnerable nations. Fewer than 4% of countries are responsible for more than half of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. In a study published in Nature Scientific Reports, we reveal just how deep this injustice runs.
Developed nations such as Australia, the United States, Canada, and European countries are essentially climate “free-riders”: causing the majority of the problems through high greenhouse gas emissions, while paying few of the costs such as climate changes impact on food and water. In other words, a few countries are benefiting enormously from the consumption of fossil fuels, while at the same time contributing disproportionately to the global burden of climate change.
On the other hand, there are many “forced riders”, who are suffering from the climate change impacts despite having scarcely contributed to the problem. Many of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries, the majority of which are African or small island states, produce a very small quantity of emissions. This is much like a non-smoker getting cancer from second-hand smoke, while the heavy smoker is fortunate enough to smoke in good health.
The Paris agreement has been widely considered as a positive step forward in addressing climate change for all, although the details on addressing “climate justice” can be best described as incomplete.
The goal of keeping global temperature rise “well below” 2℃ deserves to be praised but the emissions reduction promises submitted by countries leading up to the Paris talks are very unlikely to deliver on this.
More than $100 billion in funding has been put on the table for supporting developing nations to reduce emissions. However, the agreement specifies that there is no formal distinction between developed and developing nations in their responsibility to cut emissions, effectively ignoring historical emissions. There is also very little detail on who will provide the funds or, importantly, who is responsible for their provision. Securing these funds and establishing who is responsible for raising them will also be vital for the future of climate-vulnerable countries.
The most climate-vulnerable countries in the world have contributed very little to creating the global disease from which they now suffer the most. There must urgently be a meaningful mobilization of the policies outlined in the agreement if we are to achieve national emissions reductions while helping the most vulnerable countries adapt to climate change.
And it is clearly up to the current generation of leaders from high-emitting nations to decide whether they want to be remembered as climate change tyrants (暴君) or pioneers.
1. The author is critical of the Paris climate agreement because ________.A.it is unfair to those climate-vulnerable nations |
B.it aims to keep temperature rise below 2℃ only |
C.it is beneficial to only fewer than 4% of countries |
D.it burdens developed countries with the full responsibility |
A.They needn’t worry about the food and water they consume. |
B.They are better able to cope with the global climate change. |
C.They hardly pay anything for the problems they have caused. |
D.They are free from the greenhouse effects affecting “forced riders”. |
A.It will motivate all nations to reduce carbon emissions. |
B.There is no final agreement on where it will come from. |
C.There is no clarification of how the money will be spent. |
D.It will effectively reduce greenhouse emissions worldwide. |
A.Encouraging high-emitting nations to take the initiative. |
B.Calling on all the nations concerned to make joint efforts. |
C.Pushing the current world leaders to come to a consensus. |
D.Putting in effect the policies in the agreement at once. |
9 . Keeping The Taps Running in Thirsty Cities
Water covers 71% of Earth’s surface yet only 2% of it is accessible as a source of fresh water.
It is important to recognize that it is not just city residents who
Water stress is not always caused by physical shortages in dry areas.
Every thirsty city operates within its own context,
On February 1, the authorities put in place a strict limit of 50 litres of water per person per day.
In addition, a ban was placed on using
Crises such as the Cape Town drought are in danger of becoming the new norm. The
A.Impact | B.Pressure | C.Impression | D.Observation |
A.recycle | B.waste | C.consume | D.apply |
A.restored | B.abstracted | C.separated | D.preserved |
A.change | B.source | C.origin | D.volume |
A.Competition | B.Protection | C.Construction | D.Regulation |
A.contributing | B.regarding | C.responding | D.referring |
A.in addition | B.for example | C.on the contrary | D.as a result |
A.prospect | B.illustration | C.symptom | D.security |
A.reported | B.presented | C.predicted | D.explained |
A.respectively | B.increasingly | C.restrictively | D.extensively |
A.By comparison | B.In other words | C.To our surprise | D.What’s more |
A.feasible | B.drinkable | C.inevitable | D.influential |
A.campaign | B.statement | C.presentation | D.advertisement |
A.invaded | B.liberated | C.suffered | D.proceeded |
A.change | B.theory | C.record | D.threat |
一家服装店的橱窗外,两只狐狸在对话:
——爸爸快看,妈妈在对我笑呐!
——走吧儿子,有人过来了。
请简要描述这幅图片,并就其传达的信息和意义谈谈你的看法。
![](https://img.xkw.com/dksih/QBM/2016/2/25/1578833936072704/1578833936343040/STEM/cf33a9542049445d816b6e27ff32f68a.png?resizew=191)
.
.
.
.
.
.