1 . Nuclear pollution is a serious global
When nuclear accidents occur in coastal areas, the
Following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011, efforts to cool the reactors by pumping in seawater resulted in the
This
A.change | B.opportunity | C.concern | D.possibility |
A.caused | B.posed | C.created | D.increased |
A.resulted in | B.led to | C.brought about | D.caused |
A.terrestrial | B.aquatic | C.marine | D.atmospheric |
A.balancing | B.regulating | C.considering | D.stabilizing |
A.heightened | B.raised | C.decreased | D.lifted |
A.minor | B.slight | C.substantial | D.insignificant |
A.accumulation | B.storage | C.deposition | D.buildup |
A.Therefore | B.Despite | C.However | D.Hence |
A.from | B.by | C.of | D.in |
A.residents | B.citizens | C.inhabitants | D.dwellers |
A.issue | B.measure | C.release | D.disposal |
A.web | B.chain | C.network | D.system |
A.urgent | B.immediate | C.pressing | D.critical |
A.address | B.tackle | C.solve | D.resolve |
2 . Blue whales eat up to 10 million pieces of microplastic every day, research estimated Tuesday, suggesting that the pollution causes a bigger danger to the world’s largest animal than previously thought.
A US-led research team put tags on 191 blue whales that live off the coast of California to observe their movements. “It’s basically like an Apple Watch, just on the back of a whale,” said Shirel Kahane-Rapport, a researcher at California State University, Fullerton, and the study’s first author.
The whales mostly fed at depths of between 50 to 250 meters, which is home to the “greatest concentration of microplastics in the sea,” Kahane-Rapport said. The researchers then estimated the size and number of mouthfuls the whales had daily, modeling three different situations. Under the most likely situation, the blue whales ate up to 10 million microplastic pieces a day. Over the 90 to 120 days’ annual feeding season, which represents more than a billion pieces a year.
The largest animal ever to live on Earth is also likely the biggest microplastic consumer, eating up to 43.6 kilograms a day, the study said. While it is easy to imagine whales sucking (吞没) in vast amounts of microplastics as they ate, the researchers found that was not the case.
Instead, 99 percent of the microplastics entered the whales because they were already inside their prey (猎物). “That’s concerning for us,” Kahane-Rapport said, because humans eat that prey. “We also eat sardines,” she said, adding that “krill (磷虾) is the basis of the food web.” “Previous research has shown that if krill is in a tank with microplastic, they will eat it,” Kahane-Rapport said.
Now that the researchers know how much microplastic is being consumed by whales, next they aim to determine how much harm it could be doing. “The quantity defines the poison,” Kahane-Rapport said.
1. Why is a tag placed on the back of the whales?A.It can treat the illness of whales. | B.It can track the living of whales. |
C.It can ensure the safety of whales. | D.It can record the danger of whales. |
A.By providing data. | B.By giving examples. | C.By explaining the reason. | D.By expressing their guess. |
A.The research process was very complicated. | B.The whales live in the area free from pollution. |
C.Most microplastics entered the whales directly. | D.Humans may eat microplastics through their diet. |
A.It will be highly profitable. | B.It will be further conducted. |
C.It will involve food poison. | D.It will help whales avoid risk. |
3 . Natural selection is the process by which one type of animal within a species grows or develops well because of certain features that make it more likely(可能的) to live than others in its group. The history of the peppered moth (灰蛾) is an example of the natural selection process.
In nineteenth-century England, certain types of peppered moths were able to better blend (融合) into their surroundings. During that time period, great changes were happening in Great Britain. The Industrial Revolution was part of this change, and with it came air pollution. Natural selection often takes hundreds or even thousands of years to happen. For the peppered moth, this process happened comparatively(相对地) quickly.
At the beginning of the Industrial Age, most peppered moths in England were light-colored and covered with black markings, although a few moths had dark-colored wings. Because the light-colored moths blended into the light-colored bark on the trees, they could not be easily seen by birds that would eat them. As the air grew more polluted, however, tree trunks became covered with soot (煤烟) and became darker. The light-colored moths became easy for birds to see against the dark tree trunks. Since the dark-colored moths now had the advantage, their numbers grew. Within 50 years, the peppered moth went from being mostly light-colored to being mostly dark-colored.
In the twentieth century, the air cleared up, and the peppered moth population changed again. As tree trunks lightened because of less soot in the air, light-colored moths once again had an advantage. Their numbers increased as soot levels dropped. Depending on their environment, the coloration of the moths helped them to be “naturally selected” to survive(生存).
1. What do we know about the peppered moth’s natural selection process?A.It was a good example of environmental protection. |
B.The soot levels in England did not affect it. |
C.This type of color change was typical for moths. |
D.The length of time was unusual. |
A.Both kinds of moths preferred the dark-colored trees. |
B.Birds failed to see light-colored moths. |
C.There were more light-colored moths than dark-colored moths in the beginning. |
D.The color of moths was unimportant. |
A.Birds would eat fewer moths. |
B.Light-colored moths would disturb people’s life. |
C.Moths would not be able to stay alive. |
D.The population of dark-colored moths would increase. |
A.the surrounding environment may affect some peppered moths’ survival |
B.birds preferred to eat dark-colored moths than to light-colored ones |
C.different types of peppered moths liked different kinds of tree trunk |
D.birds were dangerously affected by the soot levels |
4 . Natural selection is the process by which one type of animal within a species thrives (兴旺) because of certain characteristics that make it more likely to live than others in its group. The history of the peppered moth (灰蛾) is an example of the natural selection process.
In nineteenth-century England, certain types of peppered moths were able to better blend (融合) into their surroundings. During that time period, great changes were happening in Great Britain. The Industrial Revolution was part of this change, and with it came air pollution. Natural selection often takes hundreds or even thousands of years to occur. For the peppered moth, this process occurred comparatively quickly.
At the beginning of the Industrial Age, most peppered moths in England were light-colored and covered with black markings, although a few moths had dark-colored wings. Because the light-colored moths blended into the light-colored bark on the trees, they could not be easily seen by birds that would eat them. As the air grew more polluted, however, tree trunks became covered with soot (煤烟) and became darker. The light-colored moths became easy for birds to see against the dark tree trunks. Since the dark-colored moths now had the advantage, their numbers grew. Within 50 years, the peppered moth went from being mostly light-colored to being mostly dark-colored.
In the twentieth century, the air cleared up, and the peppered moth population changed again. As tree trunks lightened due to less soot in the air, light-colored moths once again had an advantage. Their numbers increased as soot levels declined. Depending on their environment, the coloration of the moths helped them to be “naturally selected” to survive.
1. What do we know about the peppered moth’s natural selection process?A.It was a good example of environmental protection. |
B.The soot levels in England did not affect it. |
C.This type of color change was typical for moths. |
D.The length of time was unusual. |
A.Both kinds of moths preferred the dark-colored trees. |
B.Birds failed to see light-colored moths. |
C.There were more light-colored moths than dark-colored moths originally. |
D.The color of moths was unimportant. |
A.Birds would eat fewer moths. |
B.The population of dark-colored moths would increase. |
C.Moths would not be able to stay alive. |
D.Light-colored moths would disturb people’s life. |
A.there were always many peppered moths |
B.birds preferred to eat dark-colored moths |
C.trees changed colors to adapt to the environment |
D.birds were dangerously affected by the soot levels |
5 . Living downstream from a waste-treatment plant can leave fish tired, a new study finds, led by Graham Scott, a biologist in Canada. “Wastewater treatment plants are pretty good at taking out the waste and treating it before it gets into our waterways,” he said. “But not everything can be taken out,” he added.
For example, some plants beside the stream were not designed to remove remains of drugs. So when some medicines are left over after people use them, they can be released into the environment. These include the drugs used to treat depression and high blood pressure.
Life-sustaining chemical reactions in an animal’s body (including ours) allow it to grow, move and reproduce. These reactions, taken together, are known as the creature’s metabolism (新陈代谢). Some studies have shown that even just one drug can change the metabolism of fish, making their metabolism slow down. Then that will impair their bodies.
That creates a problem for the animals — using the extra energy to rid their bodies of the pollutants which can damage their cells and tissues. “That’s energy they burn just to stay alive,” explained Scott. That is also the energy no longer available to avoid predators (天敌), to find food and to mate.
And they report that fish exposed to a mix of chemicals can use up some of their energy just to deal with those pollutants. Therefore, they will have less energy to eat and avoid being eaten, says Paul Craig, a biologist in Ontario.
“It is up to us to help reduce the types of pollutants in. wastewater,” Craig says. “That includes not throwing leftover medicines down the toilet.” he recommends.
1. What do Scott’s words mean in paragraph 1?A.There are still some pollutants in the treated water. |
B.Wastewater treatment plants don’t work well. |
C.Things in waterways are difficult to deal with. |
D.Canadians tend to throw waste down the toilet. |
A.Form. | B.Harm. | C.Benefit. | D.Examine. |
A.They will stop growing. |
B.They will avoid their mates. |
C.They will have to rid their bodies of the polluted cells. |
D.They will consume extra energy to survive. |
A.To explain how pollutants affect animals. |
B.To show ways of fighting against pollution. |
C.To advise people to stop buying polluted fish. |
D.To urge people to reduce pollutants in wastewater. |
6 . One of the problems damaging our planet is the number of things we throw away. A more recent addition to the list of things we throw away is e-waste — electronic items that are broken and not recycled.
Recently, there’s a growing trend for repair events and clubs which could be part of a solution to the growing amount of electrical and electronic junk. The BBC visited a Restart Project in London, which is one of many found around the world. One of its operators, Francesco Calo, said that “This project makes total sense.
A.First of all, this project prolongs the life of electric objects |
B.It is partly because it’s cheaper to replace them than fix them |
C.It is reported that many people have made a big fortune from it |
D.Now solutions have been put forward to give this e-waste a new life |
E.So it’s thought that doing this could be more profitable than traditional recycling |
F.As many electrical items contain valuable metals, another solution is e-waste mining |
G.One of the reasons is that people don’t think their electronic items are fashionable enough |
7 . Nobody wants to snack on plastic bags or soda rings, but according to a recent study from the University of Neweastle, we could be consuming roughly a credit card's worth of plastic every week.
Microplastic, which are less than a quarter-inch size and come in various shapes, have polluted the natural world and infiltrated(渗入)our bodies. The first clue to microplastic exposure in humans came around 2013, when scientists discovered plastic particles in seafood prepared for consumption. But in 2019, when the University of Newcastle study was published, the scientific community understood that the problem was considerably broader. Microplastics shed off clothes and tires and have been found in beer, honey, table salt and other food items. We breathe in plastic staying in the air and drink plastic floating in our drinks. It's no stretch to conclude that our exposure is significant. What we don't know is what this means for us.
The amount of evidence collected on this subject is growing rapidly, according to Scott Coffin, a toxicologist(毒理学家). Studies done on mice and rats have found that plastic in their bodies can severely damage cells and cause stress.
Because microplastics are too small to clean up, the only solution is to stop plastic waste at the source. And doing so would take a thorough adjustment, given that plastics are deeply embedded in our economy and lifestyle. Stopping using them would fundamentally affect countless industries, including textiles(纺织业), transportation and manufacturing.
"I think we need to have more studies coming out that are directly related to human health before we see a lot more concern from the general public," Scott said. "It takes a lot to convince people that something that is really convenient for them to use is something they should sacrifice."
The question of microplastics and human health needs more attention—from the scientific community ,the general public, the government and funding groups. The issue isn't being ignored, but it's not being prioritized either.
1. What does the second paragraph mainly tell us about microplastics?A.Their wide usage in daily life. |
B.Their harm to human health. |
C.Their significant exposure in humans. |
D.The new study conducted on them. |
A.The way that microplastics exist. |
B.The pollution caused by microplastics. |
C.The relationship between microplastics and human health. |
D.The reason for the existence of microplastics. |
A.To cut down plastic production. |
B.To carry out more studies on mice and rats. |
C.To invent something more convenient than plastics. |
D.To promote people's awareness on the harm brought by microplastics. |
A.Is Microplastic pollution harmful to our health? |
B.Why is Microplastic pollution everywhere? |
C.Why is plastic harmful? |
D.What do you know about Microplastics? |
8 . Rain is vital to life on Earth. However, rain isn’t just made of water anymore—it’s partly made of plastic.
Millions of tiny pieces of plastic, called microplastics, are wandering around Earth’s atmosphere and traveling across entire continents, according to a study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on April 12. Another study, published in the journal Science in June 2020, has revealed that every year more than 1,000 tons of the particles (颗粒)—equivalent to over 120 million plastic bottles—fall in rain.
Microplastics are plastic particles less than 5 millimeters in diameter (直径) and come from a number of sources. Plastic bags and bottles released into the environment break down into smaller and smaller bits. Some microplastics are manufactured deliberately to provide abrasion (研磨) in a host of products, such as toothpaste and cleansers, according to the Daily Mail. Another major source is your washing machine. When you wash synthetic (合成的) clothing, tiny microfibers get flushed (冲掉) away with the wastewater. Even though the water is treated by a wastewater plant, the microplastics remain, and they are released into the sea, according to American magazine Wired.
Plastic rain may remind people of acid rain, but the former is far more widespread and harder to deal with. The tiny particles, too small to be seen with the naked eye, are collected by the wind from the ground. They are so light that they stay in the air to be blown around the globe. As they climb into the atmosphere, they are thought to act as nuclei (核心) around which water vapor (水蒸气) condenses (凝结) to form clouds. Some of the dust falls back to land in dry conditions, while the rest comes down as rain, according to the Daily Mail.
Microplastics have been found everywhere you can imagine. From fish and frogs to mice and mosquitoes, their bodies have been found, on average, to contain 40 pieces of microplastic, reported Daily Mail. As the top of the food chain, humans are exposed to microplastics, too. “We live on a ball inside a bubble,” microplastic researcher Steve Allen at University of Strathclyde, Scotland, told Wired. “There are no borders, there are no edges. It (plastic rain) raining on the land and then getting blown back up into the air again, to move somewhere else. There’s no stopping it once it’s out.”
1. What does paragraph 3 mainly talk about?A.How microplastics should be handled. | B.How microplastics are used widely. |
C.How microplastics pollute water. | D.How microplastics come into being. |
A.They are light and can be easily dealt with. |
B.They result in both acid rain and plastic rain. |
C.They have a diameter of at least 5 millimeters. |
D.They have nearly affected the whole food chain. |
A.No place is safe from microplastic pollution. |
B.The atmosphere possesses the capacity to self-cleanse. |
C.Countries should work together to fight plastic pollution. |
D.It is important to remove microplastics somewhere else. |
A.To compare acid rain and plastic rain. |
B.To warn people of the dangers of microplastics. |
C.To call on people to reduce using plastic products. |
D.To introduce the sources and effects of microplastics. |
9 . Are Your Clothes Causing Pollution? Very small pieces of plastic, called microfibers, are polluting rivers and oceans.
Pollution caused by plastic is not new, but recent studies have shown the effect of microfibers in the environment. Studies show very small microfibers are ending up in our waters, which may come from waste water treatment factories. A 2015 study found them in fish from California.
Microfibers, effect on food supplies.
Beyond the waterways, the researchers say microfibers may end up in soil and agricultural lands.
Steps to save or keep microfibers from the environment.
Until more information becomes known, there are steps to take to reduce the amount of microfibers in the environment. People should use less of the artificial materials. If we already have those in our lives and we're using them, an important step would be washing them less.
A.New technology may also help. |
B.Studies on microfibers in the environment. |
C.They can also move around the atmosphere. |
D.Studies on how much of the microfibers is released. |
E.The source of these microfibers may surprise you: your clothes. |
F.Washing machines keep microfibers from escaping with wash water. |
G.So if these microfibers have been found in fish and seafood, are they safe to eat? |
10 . Garbage or trash is a major kind of environmental pollution.Each person produces about 2kg of trash a day.We are making waste products faster than nature can break them down.And we are using up resources(资源)faster than they can be replaced(取代).
This adds up to trouble for the environment.Where does all that garbage go?What can be done to help dispose of(处理)garbage?How call we make less garbage?
Garbage isn't just the smelly rotting fruits,vegetables or meat that we throw away in our homes.Those are only a small pan of all the stuff we throw away.We create other kinds of waste,in construction,mining and in our factories.
Did you ever wonder what happens to your garbage?Most is burned or buried in landfills(垃圾填埋场)Less than a quarter of our waste is recycled.
With a population of 1.3 billion(十亿),garbage is a big problem for China.Chinese cities create around 148 million tons of garbage every year.The amount is growing at around 10 percent each year.
Once we used about 3 billion plastic shopping bags every day in China.The result was a great waste of resources and serious pollution.So we did something about that.Now we use more cloth bags and shopping baskets when we shop.
In the coming years China will build waste-to-energy plants in cities to clean up the garbage.But there’s a lot more that needs to be done.And you can play a part.
1. What can be learned from the first paragraph?A.Garbage is the most serious environmental pollution. |
B.Each person produces 20kg of garbage a week. |
C.Nature can break the garbage down as soon as we produce it. |
D.We may use up our resources before they can be replaced. |
A.homes | B.schools |
C.factories | D.banks |
A.植物 | B.种植 |
C.设备 | D.工厂 |
A.How to deal with garbage in daily life. | B.Let's make the Earth a cleaner place. |
C.New resources. | D.Problems in big cities. |
A.An English scientist. | B.A Chinese journalist. |
C.A UN governor. | D.An American student. |