组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 环境污染
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 42 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了近期日本政府将福岛第一核电站的核污水排放至太平洋的正式计划,对自然与人类的影响及周边地区的反应。

1 . The Japanese government said it planned to begin the discharge (排放) of slightly radioactive wastewater from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant on Thursday, rejecting calls for a delay from some people in neighboring countries.

An earthquake and tsunami knocked out power at the Fukushima nuclear plant on March 11, 2011, causing meltdowns at three reactors. Tritium (氚) and carbon-14 are, respectively, radioactive forms of hydrogen (氢) and carbon, and are difficult to separate from water. They are widely present in the natural environment, water and even in humans, as they are formed in the Earth’s atmosphere and can enter the water cycle. Both emit very low levels of radiation but can pose a risk if absorbed in large quantities. Water which was used to cool reactor cores as well as rainwater and groundwater that flowed into or near the plant have been contaminated with radioactive substances. Plant operator Tokyo Electric Power, or Tepco, has stored the water in more than 1,000 tanks at the facility but says it is running out of room.

Tepco says it will reduce the concentration (浓度) of nearly all radioactive substances in the wastewater to a safe level with the exception of tritium, an isotope (同位素) of hydrogen. The water will then get diluted (稀释) with seawater so the concentration of tritium is reduced to a safe level before the discharge, according to Tepco. As the water is diluted further in the ocean, the concentration of tritium will almost equal the natural level by 6 miles from the discharge point, which is at the end of an undersea tunnel about six-tenths of a mile from the shoreline, a Tepco official said.

But that hasn’t reassured many of Japan’s neighbors, with officials from China and the Pacific Islands voicing alarm and opposition to the plan. Beijing will take “necessary measures” to safeguard food safety and its people’s health, said Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin on Tuesday, adding they “strongly urge the Japanese side to correct its wrongful decision”. Meanwhile, fishing communities in Japan and South Korea worry the wastewater release could mean the end of their livelihoods — with consumers across the region already beginning to quit seafood from Japan and its nearby waters, and some governments even banning imported food from parts of Japan, including Fukushima.

1. The meltdowns at three reactors were caused by ________.
A.the greenhouse effectB.human behaviour
C.climate changeD.natural disasters
2. The underlined word “contaminated” in paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to “________”.
A.purifiedB.reducedC.pollutedD.operated
3. Which of the following is true according to Tepco?
A.More than 1,000 tanks at the facility can store all the radioactive wastewater.
B.The concentration of all radioactive substances will be reduced to a safe level.
C.The discharge won’t affect the coastal residents since the discharge point is about 0.6 miles offshore.
D.The concentration of tritium will be nearly at the natural level after being diluted further in the ocean.
4. The discharge was opposed by some countries and communities in Japan and South Korea because ________.
A.people in these areas couldn’t make a profit in the future
B.it would threaten people’s physical health and livelihoods
C.it would be more difficult to import food from parts of Japan
D.the local seafood would be unaffordable for people in these areas
2024-05-12更新 | 18次组卷 | 1卷引用:浙江省金兰教育合作组织2023-2024学年高一下学期4月期中英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。主要介绍了一项新的研究揭示微塑料和纳米塑料对人体健康的潜在影响。

2 . Plastic is everywhere, from the Arctic ice to vital organs in the human body. In fact, previous estimates suggest that the average person swallows a credit card-worth of microscopic plastic particles(颗粒) every week. But new research shows that this could actually be an understatement.

Microplastics are plastics smaller than 5 millimeters, found in industrial waste, beauty products, and formed during the degradation of larger plastic pieces. Over time, they break down into even smaller nanoplastics. These tiny particles can pass through our intestines and lungs into our bloodstreams, reaching vital organs like the heart and brain.

While the idea of eating plastic is unsettling in itself, the major concern here is that these plastic particles contain chemicals that can interrupt our body’s natural release of hormones, potentially increasing our risk of reproductive disorders and certain cancers. They can also carry toxins(毒素) on their surface like heavy metals.

In the past, researchers have shown bottled water can contain tens of thousands of identifiable plastic fragments in a single container. However, until recently, only the larger microplastics were detectable with available measuring tools, leaving the area of nanoplastics largely a mystery.

Using Raman microscopy (显微镜学), capable of detecting particles down to the size of a flu virus, the team measured an average of 240, 000 particles of plastic per liter of bottled water, 90 percent of which were nanoplastics, a revelation 10 to 100 times larger than previous estimates.

These plastics likely originate from the bottle material, filters used to “purify” the water, and the source water itself. “It is not totally unexpected to find so much of this stuff, ” the study’s lead author, Columbia graduate student Naixin Qian, said in a statement. His team hopes to expand their research into tap water and other water sources to better inform our exposure to these potentially dangerous particles. “The idea is that the smaller things get, the more of them I reveal, ” he added.

1. What is the primary focus of the new research?
A.The presence of plastic particles.B.The use of plastic in everyday products.
C.The detection methods for microplastics.D.The potential risks of nanoplastics to human.
2. What is the advantage of Raman microscopy?
A.Finding the source of plastic particles.B.Helping to cure the deadly flu virus.
C.Detecting the smaller plastic particles.D.Improving the quality of bottled water.
3. Why will the team expand their research into tap water?
A.To focus on areas with higher plastic pollution.
B.To be aware of the dangerous particles in daily life.
C.To further measure the types of particles in tap water.
D.To detect the smaller plastic particles in industrial areas.
4. What is Qian’s attitude towards his research?
A.Skeptical.B.Objective.C.Conservative.D.Positive.
2024-03-26更新 | 225次组卷 | 7卷引用:浙江省强基联盟2023-2024学年高三下学期3月联考英语试卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍新的研究在新鲜的水果和蔬菜中首次检测到微塑料颗粒污染。

3 . Just when you thought you were taking care of your health by eating enough fruit and vegetables every day, new research has come out revealing that you might be swallowing microplastic particles (颗粒) along with all those vitamins, minerals, and fiber. A groundbreaking study published in the journal Environmental Research has found that fruits and vegetables absorb microplastic particles from the soil and move them through vegetal tissues, where they remain until eaten by hungry diners, thus getting transferred to human bodies.

The researchers, who are from the University of Catania in Italy, as well as Sousse and Monastir universities in Tunisia, analyzed a variety of common fruits and vegetables —carrots, lettuce, broccoli, potatoes, apples, and pears. These were chosen for the fact that they are frequently consumed, usually one per day, which allowed the researchers to better assess the dietary intakes of MPs (microplastic particles) and NPs (nano-plastics). The samples were purchased from different sources in the city of Catania, including a small fruit vendor and a supermarket.

The researchers found that apples, followed by pears, were the most polluted fruit samples, and carrots were the most polluted vegetable. In the study’s discussion section, the authors wrote, “We can assume that the fruits contain more MPs not only because of the very high vascularization (血管化) of the fruit pulp (果肉) but also due to the greater size and complexity of the root system and age of the tree (several years) compared to the vegetables (60-75 days for the carrot).”

This study is important because it's the first to detect microplastics in fruits and vegetables. They have been found in other sources before, such as sea salt, beer, water (bottled, in particular), shellfish, sugar, soil, and even air, but never inside fresh produce. It’s an alarming discovery that raises yet another red flag about microplastic pollution in the natural environment.

It’s an area that will likely see a lot more attention in coming years, with the study authors calling for further research into the question of microplastic and whether it harms the health of both plants and humans.

1. What is the study mainly about?
A.The main cause and influence of soil pollution.
B.The microplastic pollution in fruits and vegetables.
C.The benefits of daily fruits and vegetables consumption
D.The great changes in people's dietary habits.
2. What may cause fruits to contain more MPs according to the authors?
A.The age of root system.B.The huge size of fruit tree roots.
C.The complex preservation method.D.The large amounts of the fruit pulp.
3. What do the study authors think of the research on microplastic?
A.It needs to be further studied.B.It wasted them quite a lot of time.
C.It has caused harm to health.D.It has attracted attention to diets.
2024-03-11更新 | 39次组卷 | 1卷引用:浙江省杭州第四中学下沙校区2023-2023学年高一上学期期末测试英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约150词) | 较易(0.85) |
文章大意:这是一篇应用文。文章主要介绍了电子垃圾的组成,数量以及电子设备如何回收。
4 .

E-waste, the world’s largest and fastest growing type of waste, doesn’t only come from computers but other electronics as well.


In 2019, the world produced 53. 6 million tons of e-waste.


The world’s e-waste will reach 74.7 million tons by 2030. That’s almost a doubling of e-waste in just 16 years.


Today, only 15-20 percent of all e-waste is collected and recycled.

Why should we recycle e-waste?

E-waste has many valuable things in it, such as gold, silver and copper(铜).

One smart phone battery can pollute 600,000 liters(升)of water.

What can we do?

●Try to repair your electronics instead of buying new ones.

●Check for recycling organizations and give away your broken electronics.

●Remove any batteries (电池) because they need to be recycled separately.

●Tell others to recycle e-waste.


1. In___________, the amount of e-waste reached about 37.3 million tons.
A.2014.B.2019.C.2022.D.2030.
2. According to the passage, which of the following is TRUE?
A.E-waste only comes from computers.
B.In 2019, 53.6 million tons of e-waste was recycled.
C.We need to recycle batteries with other electronics.
D.We should consider repairing rather than buying new electronics.
3. We can read the above passage in a/an___________.
A.instructionB.novelC.newspaperD.comic book
2024-01-08更新 | 13次组卷 | 1卷引用:2023年新东方高一上英语02
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了德国和丹麦的研究人员研究噪声对人们健康产生的影响,呼吁政治家们关注噪声污染并采取措施解决噪声污染。

5 . Sleeping in a noisy room isn’t only distracting (使人分心的), and it can also harm your health. Although researchers have known for decades that long­term loud noises can harm us, it’s only recently become recognized as a widespread problem.

In a new review of previously published studies, researchers from Germany and Denmark took a look at the ways in which noises, such as an airplane passing by or jackhammer digging in the ground, can affect our hearts. Perhaps the most obvious impact of a loud sound while you are sleeping is that it can wake you up. But, even if you don't remember hearing the noise or you don’t physically get out of bed, it can disrupt you in ways you may not realize.

“Noise is not just causing annoyance, but it actually makes us sick,” said Dr. Thomas Münzel, a professor at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. “Regardless of where the sound is coming from, if it gets louder than 60 decibels (分贝),it can increase the risk of heart disease.”

When our body hears these noises, it reacts with a stress reaction. In this case, these sudden and unexpected noises cause hormones(荷尔蒙) to speed up and eventually damage the heart. Although the chance that a single noise will affect you is unlikely, it’s the continuous exposure (接触) to the sound that can finally affect you.

“But our heart health isn’t the only cause for concern. Long-term noise may also raise the risk of type 2 diabetes (糖尿病), depression, and anxiety disorders,” he warns. In the future, Münzel plans to examine how noises from cars, planes, and other vehicles affect the brain. But despite the amount or the depth of research he conducts, it’ll take the help of politicians to improve the effect of noise on our health.

“Politicians have to take into account, in particular, the new findings,” Münzel said, “As for aircraft noise and airports, it is important to make new laws and set new lower noise limits that protect people living close by the airport instead of the owners of the airport.”

1. What do researchers from Germany and Denmark find?
A.Noise does little harm to people who are asleep.
B.Noise can cause people’s memory to get worse sharply.
C.Noise has been a widespread concern for a long time.
D.Noise louder than 60 decibels may cause heart disease.
2. Which word can replace the underlined word “disrupt” in Paragraph 2?
A.Defeat.B.Harm.C.Attract.D.Discourage.
3. What can we infer from the last two paragraphs?
A.Politicians should take action to handle noise pollution.
B.Münzel will continue other studies on brain diseases.
C.Benefits of airport owners are more important than health.
D.Attention should be paid to heart health and other diseases.
4. Which can be the best title for the text?
A.Who Is to Blame for Noise PollutionB.What Should Be Done to Stop Noise
C.How Münzel Carried Out His ResearchD.How Noise Pollution Harms Our Body
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了“希望循环”所带来的问题,同时文章就如何正确回收提出建议。

6 . Recycling is a great way of doing your bit for the environment and helping to protect the earth’s precious resources. However, a new study has revealed that our desire to be sustainable maybe doing more harm than good. According to waste company Biffa, this is because of “wish-cycling” — assuming that items such as disposable coffee cup sand pizza boxes will be recycled if put in the recycling bin. In fact, pollution from those items or other non-recyclables can result in recyclable items that have been put in the correct bin going to landfill. David Heaton, a business director at Biffa, said: “Pollution happens when items are disposed of in the wrong bins or haven’t been cleaned before being recycled.”

Experts at Biffa analyzed the amounts of non-target and non-recyclable materials that entered UK material recycling facilities between 2016 and 2020. It was found that, in 2016, the average pollution rate of recycling waste was 13.4 percent, rising over four years to 17 percent by the end of 2020. This shows that, even as people are becoming more eco-conscious, wish-cycling is increasing both in households and businesses.

The Biffa experts say that one of the best ways to prevent pollution of recycling is to clean recyclable waste before putting it in the bin. They suggest cutting off the top of old pizza boxes and only recycling that part to avoid pollution from the grease (油脂). Check the on-packaging recycling label to check it can actually be recycled When it comes to plastics, Biffa recommends checking the resin code, the number in the plastic triangle, to know whether it should go in the recycling bin. In general, resin codes 1, 2, 4 and 5 are recyclable, while 3, 6 and 7 are not. Larger items, like electronics, furniture and batteries, can also be recycled but often can not go in household recycling bins as they need specialist separating. These will need to be taken to recycling centers or sustainable waste management companies.

“It’s vital as a nation that we get better at effective ‘pre-cycling’— sorting waste correctly before collection to reduce pollution rates,” added Mr. Heaton.

1. What’s the truth of “wish-cycling” according to the first paragraph?
A.The desire to lead a sustainable life.
B.The good intention to help recycling.
C.The habit of throwing items that end up in landfills.
D.The practice of recycling items that can not be recycled.
2. What has experts at Biffa concluded after their analysis?
A.People are becoming more eco-conscious.
B.Wish-cycling is on the rise in recent years.
C.Pollution happens less frequently in recycling facilities.
D.People are used to cleaning recyclable waste before putting it in the bin.
3. Which of the following is a proper way of recycling?
A.Dispose of electronics together with household waste.
B.Skip the step of checking the on-packaging recycling label.
C.Check the resin code of plastics to see whether it is recyclable or not.
D.Cutoff the top of old pizza box and throw the rest to the recycling bin.
4. Which is the most suitable title for the text?
A.Recycling: a Big ProjectB.Wish-cycling: a New Trend
C.Wish-cycling: a Growing ConcernD.Pre-cycling: an Effective Method
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章简要介绍了根据一项对空气中塑料颗粒的研究,全球范围内的微塑料污染正在急剧增加。

7 . Microplastic pollution is increasing dramatically around the globe, according to a study of airborne (空气传播的) plastic particles (粒子).

People are already known to breathe, drink and eat microplastics, and research suggests that pollution levels will continue to rise rapidly. The researchers said that breathing in these particles can damage lung tissue and lead to serious diseases.

Professor Natalie Mahowald, at Cornell University in the US and part of the research team, said, “But maybe we could solve this before it becomes a huge problem, if we manage our plastics better, before they accumulate (积聚) in the environment and move around quickly everywhere.”

The research, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examined airborne microplastics, which have been far less studied than plastic in oceans and rivers.

The team gathered more than 300 samples of airborne microplastics from 11 sites across the western US. These were the basis for atmospheric modeling that estimated (估计) the contribution from different sources, and was the first such study to do so.

They found that roads were the main factor in the western US, linked to about 85 percent of the microplastics in the air. These are likely to include particles from tires on vehicles, and plastics from litter that had been broken down.

The researchers enlarged their modeling work to a global level and this suggested that while roads are also likely to be the main driver of airborne plastics in Europe, South America and Australia, plastic particles blown up from fields may be a much bigger factor in Africa and Asia.

Professor Andreas Stohl of the University of Vienna’s Faculty of Earth Sciences, and not part of the study team, said, “The study confirms the global-scale nature of microplastic transport in the atmosphere and does a good job in highlighting highly relevant and concerning possibilities, but more measurement data is needed to get a better idea of the sources.”

1. What did the researchers find out about airborne plastic pollution?
A.Its impact varies on different continents.
B.Public transportation takes responsibility for it.
C.Its main driver differs across continents.
D.Africa is suffering the most from the pollution.
2. According to Professor Andreas Stohl, what is the next step of the study?
A.To predict the possible damages of microplastics.
B.To get more data to understand the sources of microplastics.
C.To understand the nature of airborne plastic pollution globally.
D.To improve the method of collecting samples of microplastics.
3. What could be the best title for the text?
A.Effects of microplastics on human health
B.Possible solutions to microplastic pollution
C.Microplastic pollution on the global scale
D.Microplastic pollution rising rapidly in the air
4. Which section of the newspaper may this article be found in?
A.Society.B.Nature.C.Health.D.Science.
2023-04-20更新 | 84次组卷 | 1卷引用:浙江省浙北G2联盟 2022-2023学年高一下学期4月期中联考英语试题(含听力)
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 较难(0.4) |
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。虽然塑料造成了很多问题,但是停止使用塑料是难以想象的。文章从塑料在医疗应用、维持健康、食品体系等方面的广泛运用,以及清除塑料带来的糟糕的连锁反应方面,介绍了停止使用塑料的后果。

8 . Of the 8,300 million tons of virgin (原始的) plastic produced up to the end of 2015, 6,300 million tons have been discarded (丢弃). Most of that plastic waste is still with us, buried in landfills or polluting the environment. Microplastics have been found in Antarctic sea ice, in the guts of animals that live in the deepest ocean trenches and in drinking water around the world.

But what if we could wave a magic wand and remove all plastics from our lives? For the sake of the planet, it would be a tempting prospect — but we’d quickly find out just how far plastic has spread to every aspect of our existence.

In hospitals, the loss of plastic would be devastating. “Imagine trying to run a dialysis (透析) unit with no plastic”, says Sharon George, senior lecturer in environmental sustainability and green technology at Keele University in the UK. Plastic is used in gloves, tubing, blood bags, sample tubes and more.

Some everyday plastic items are also vital for protecting health. Face masks, including plastic-based surgical masks and respirators (人工呼吸器), as well as reusable cloth masks, have helped slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus. “A mask that you have for COVID is related to our safety and the safety of others,” says George. “The impact of taking that away could be loss of life if you took it away on a big scale.”

Our food system would also quickly come apart. We use packaging to protect food from damage in transit and preserve it long enough to reach supermarket shelves, as well as for communication and marketing. “I cannot imagine how plastic would be replaced completely in our system,” says Eleni Iacovidou, a lecturer in environmental management at Brunel University London.

Swapping out plastic packaging would have knock-on (产生连锁反应的) environmental effects. While glass has some advantages over plastic, such as being endlessly recyclable, a one-liter glass bottle can weigh as much as 800 g compared to a 40 g plastic one. When those heavier bottles and jars need to be transported over long distances, carbon emissions grow even more.

It’s clear that replacing one material with another won’t solve all our plastic problems.

1. What is the purpose of the first paragraph?
A.To give a definition.B.To report on a study.
C.To introduce a topic.D.To describe a phenomenon.
2. What does the underlined word “devastating” in Paragraph 3 most probably mean?
A.Interesting.B.Practical.C.Predictable.D.Destructive.
3. What is Eleni Iacovidou’s attitude toward removing plastic totally in food system?
A.Doubtful.B.Supportive.C.Optimistic.D.Uninterested.
4. Which would be the best title for the text?
A.What if we stopped using plastic?
B.Is plastic packaging bad for the environment?
C.More recycling won’t solve plastic pollution
D.Swapping out plastic for sustainable living
2023-04-17更新 | 167次组卷 | 1卷引用:浙江省宁波三锋教研联盟2022-2023学年高二下学期期中联考英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要介绍了材料工程师Nzambi Matee通过自己的努力,创造性地解决塑料垃圾污染的问题。

9 . Kenya has been at the forefront (前沿) of the global war on plastic since the government banned single-use plastics in protected areas in June 2020. Unfortunately, the preventive measures have barely received attention. Hundreds of tons of industrial and consumer polymer waste continue to get dumped into landfills daily. However, if 29-year-old Nzambi Matee has her way, the unsightly plastic heaps will soon be transformed into colorful bricks.

The materials engineer’s seeking to find a practical solution to control plastic pollution began in 2017. She quit her job and set up a small lab in her mother’s backyard. It took her nine months to produce the first brick and even longer to convince a partner to help build the machinery to make them. But the determined eco-entrepreneur was confident in her idea and did not give up.

She says, “I wanted to use my education to handle plastic waste pollution. But I was very clear that the solution had to be practical, sustainable, and affordable. The best way to do this was by channeling the waste into the construction space and finding the most efficient and affordable material to build homes.” Her company produces over 1,500 bricks a day. The pavers are made using a mix of plastic products that cannot be reprocessed or recycled.

The collected plastic is mixed with sand, heated at very high temperatures, and compressed (压缩) into bricks that vary in color and thickness. The resulting product is stronger, lighter, and about 30 percent cheaper than concrete bricks. More importantly, it helps repurpose the lowest quality of plastic. “There is that waste they cannot process anymore; they cannot recycle. That is what we get.” Matee says.

Matee is not nearly done. Her dream is to reduce the mountain of trash to just a hill by increasing production and expanding her offerings. She says, “The more we recycle the plastic, the more we produce affordable housing, the more we created more employment for the youth.”

1. What does the underlined sentence in paragraph 1 imply?
A.Matee’s method can be effective if adopted.B.Matee’s idea has been widely accepted.
C.Colorful bricks are in huge demand.D.Plastic waste hasn’t attracted enough attention.
2. Which of the following can best describe Nzambi Matee?
A.Generous and ambitious.B.Confident and grateful.
C.Creative and resolved.D.Optimistic and modest.
3. What is Nzambi Matee’s ultimate purpose in using a mix of plastic products?
A.to build cheaper houses.B.to support the government.
C.to create job opportunities.D.to tackle plastic pollution.
4. Which of the following is the best title for the text?
A.Kenya: Pioneer in Banning Plastic Single-use Plastics
B.Nzambi Matee: Innovator in Solving Plastic Waste
C.Mix of Plastic Products: A New Construction Material
D.Plastic Recycling: A Creative Solution to Pollution
阅读理解-七选五(约220词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了塑料垃圾堆积成海,我们应当提高环保意识,改变现状。

10 . A Plastic Ocean is a film to make you think.Think,and then act.We need to take action on our dependence on plastic.We’ve been producing plastic in huge quantities.Drinking bottles,shopping bags and even clothes are made with plastic.    1     What happens to all the rest?This is the question the film A Plastic Ocean answers.

The film begins as a journey to film the largest animal on the planet,the blue whale.But during the journey the filmmakers make the shocking discovery of a huge,thick layer of plastic floating in the Indian Ocean.    2     In total,they visited 20 locations around the world during the four years to make the film.

In the film there are beautiful shots of the seas and marine life.    3     We see how marine species are being killed by all the plastic we are dumping in the ocean.The message about our use of plastic is painfully obvious.

    4     In the second half,the filmmakers look at what we can do to deal with the problem.

They present short-term and long-term solutions.These include avoiding plastic containers and recycling as much as you can.The filmmakers also stress the need for governments to work more on recycling programmes.

We make a shocking amount of plastic.Over 300 million tons of plastic are produced every year,and at least 8 million of those are dumped into the oceans.The results are disastrous,but it isn’t too late to change.    5    

A.This causes them to travel around the world to look at other affected areas.
B.Once you’ve seen the film,you’ll realize it is time to do our part.
C.It has raised public concern all over the world.
D.We live in a world full of plastic,and only a small amount is recycled.
E.But the film doesn’t only present the negative side.
F.In conclusion,we only have one earth to live on.
G.These are contrasted with dumps of plastic rubbish.
共计 平均难度:一般