1. What animal is in the video that the woman saw?
A.A duck. | B.A turtle. | C.A fish. |
A.There will be fewer fish in the sea than plastics. |
B.50% of the fish in the ocean will die. |
C.All businesses will stop using straws. |
A.To a restaurant. | B.To a gift shop. | C.To a coffee shop. |
Every year, more than 13 billion plastic bottles are sold in Britain. All of them
Some think plastic bottles should be banned(明令禁止).
3 . Masks that helped save lives during the Covid-19 pandemic (疫情)are proving a deadly risk for wildlife, with birds and sea creatures trapped in many facial coverings in animal habitats.
Single-use masks have been found on the ground, waterways and beaches worldwide since countries required (heir use in public places to slow the pandemic's spread. Worn once, the thin protective materials can take hundreds of years to break down. "Face masks aren't going away any time soon-but when we throw them away, these items can harm the environment and the animals who share our planet," Ashley from anima! rights group PETA said.
Monkeys have been found playing with used masks in the hills outside Malaysia's capital Kuala Lumpur. And in an incident in Britain, a seagull was saved in Chelmsford after its legs got caught in an abandoned mask for a week.
However, the biggest influence is in the water. More than 1.5 billion masks made their way into the world's oceans last year, accounting for around 6200 extra tons of ocean plastic pollution, according to environmental group OceansAsia. “Masks and gloves are particularly problematic for sea creatures," says George Leonard, chief scientist from NGO. "When those plastics break down in the environment, they form smaller and smaller particles (颗粒).Those particles then enter the food chain and influence the entire ecosystem,“ he added.
Campaigners have urged people to deal with masks properly after using them. OceansAsia has also called on governments to increase punishment for littering and encourage the use of washable masks.
1. What bring(s) a great danger to wildlife now?A.Waste masks. | B.Covid-19. |
C.Polluted water. | D.Damaged habitats. |
A.Important. | B.Attractive. |
C.Common. | D.Troubling. |
A.Monkeys learned to wear masks from humans. |
B.Plastics are less harmful after becoming particles. |
C.Used masks have a worse effect on sea creatures. |
D.Waste masks are the main ocean plastic pollution. |
A.Keep masks after they' re used. |
B.Call on governments to stop littering. |
C.Punish those who wear single-use masks. |
D.Put used masks in the recycling box. |
4 . Plastic pollution has long been a problem, but now it's gotten to a new height literally. Microplastic, referring to plastic fragments and particles less than 5 millimeters in diameter, have been found on Mount Qomolangma as high as 8,440 meters above sea level, just 408.86 meters below the peak of the mountain, according to a recent study published in the journal One Earth.
“These are the highest microplastics ever discovered so far.” lead author Imogen Napper from the University of Plymouth, UK, said in a statement. Scientists collected snow and water samples from 19 different locations from 4,200 meters above sea level all the way up to the summit of Mount Qomolangma. They found microplastics in all the water samples and part of the snow samples. The most polluted sample was from the Base Camp in Nepal, where most human activities on the mountain are concentrated. It had 79 particles of microplastics per liter of snow.
But how have these fragments made it all this way and in such a great abundance? The answer is apparent human activities. It is climbers who bring plastic products to the mountain. Even if they don't litter, just walking for 20 minutes or opening a bottle of water can release microplastics into the environment.
The harsh fact is that plastic pollution has reached even the most remote places on Earth. Researchers even found a plastic bag al the deepest point in the world's oceans—in the Mariana Trench, located in the Pacific Ocean. The bag is the same as the ones commonly used in grocery stores. Even covered in ice, the Arctic is still a victim of plastic pollution. A 2020 report published in Nature suggests that there are 2.000 to 17,000 plastic particles per cubic meter in Arctic ice cores, and between 0 to 18 microplastic particles per cubic meter from the water beneath ice floes. Experts think microplastics may be transported by air and then reach the North Pole in snowfall.
“What we don t yet fully know is the potential problems these tiny pieces of plastic could be having to ecosystems, to organisms and even to our own health as well,” said Christian Dunn of Bangor University, UK. Then what can we do? “We need to start focusing on deeper technological solutions that focus on microplastics, like changing fabric design and including natural fibers instead of plastic when possible.”
1. What are the first two paragraphs mainly about?A.The polluted samples from the peak were the most serious. |
B.Plastic pollution has been discovered at high altitudes. |
C.Humans have .climbed to the peak of Mount Qomolangma. |
D.Microplastics are a newly-found material by researchers. |
A.Microplastics may go far beyond the range of human activities. |
B.The means of microplastics transportation has been confirmed. |
C.There are frequent exchanges between Arctic ice cores and ice floes. |
D.Bags from grocery stores are the main source of plastic pollution. |
A.to prohibit the use of plastic products | B.to diversify the design of microplastics |
C.to apply only natural fibrous alternatives | D.to develop more advanced technologies |
A.Litter in the Mariana Trench | B.New One Earth Campaigns |
C.Pollution Reaches New Height | D.Adventurous Human Activists |
5 . The French Danone company is the latest to replace some plastic water bottles with aluminum (铝) cans. Competitors like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Nestle have also started selling water in aluminum cans.
Replacing plastic water bottles that pollute the seas with recyclable aluminum cans should be an easy way to help the environment, right?
Maybe not.
Aluminum cans might result in less ocean waste, and the metal containers also are lighter than glass or plastic bottles, but they also come with their own cost to the environment. The production of an aluminum can is estimated to release two times as much carbon dioxide into the air as a plastic bottle.
“That’s the dilemma you’re going to have to choose between,” said Ruben Griffioen, an official at beermaker Heineken. He said his company was Lrying to reduce the use of plastic bottles.
Bruce Karas of Coca - Cola North America agreed. He said, “There’s a mix. There are some things that are not that desirable, but if you have five good things and one that isn’t, we’ll all have to make decisions.” He added, “It’ll never be that clean.”
Bottled water is a 19 billion industry. Although its use of cans is increasing, experts say cans are unlikely to completely replace plastic bottles.
Aluminum is costlier than plastic so canned drinks mean higher prices for buyers. Another major consideration is user convenience-cans stay open while bottles can be reclosed. More importantly, there is one barrier to ending the use of plastic water bottles: There may not be enough cans to go around. Beer and wine makers are now also increasingly using aluminum.
1. What’s the advantage of aluminum cans?A.They are pollution-free. | B.They are lighter. |
C.They are cost-effective. | D.They are low-carbon. |
A.Supportive. | B.Disapproving. | C.Neutral | D.Indifferent. |
A.The wide application of aluminum cans. | B.The promising future aluminum cans |
C.The major advantages of aluminum cans. | D.The unavoidable limitations of aluminum cans. |
A.Aluminum Cans or Plastic Bottles? | B.A Blessing or a Misfortune? |
C.How to Deal with Plastic Bottles? | D.Why Do We Choose Aluminum Cans? |