1 . Binge-watching (刷剧) is when a person watches more than one episode of a show in a row. With developments in the speed and connectivity of the Internet, increases in technology and the rise of on-demand entertainment companies, people can now have their favorite shows stream (流播) directly to their television at their convenience.
This behavior is nothing new. In fact, binge-watching has been officially listed in dictionaries since 2015. The entertainment companies recognize this behavior and many take steps to encourage it. Often, instead of releasing each episode on a week-by-week basis, an entire series will become available concurrently. Once the episode finishes, many platforms will display pop-ups with “you might like” suggestions, or will automatically play the next episode.
However, recent research suggests that out of the more than half of British adults who watch more than one episode of a show back-to-back (一集接一集地), almost a third have admitted missing sleep or becoming tired as a result; and 25% have neglected their household chores (家务活). Next we’ll be missing work!
Bingeing has other connections — binge eating, binge drinking and binge smoking. All of them are often associated with a lack of control and a possible route to addiction. Lindsey Fussell, consumer group director, said, “The days of waiting a week for the next episode are largely gone, with people finding it hard to resist (抗拒) watching multiple episodes around the house or on the move.” If people find binge-watching hard to resist, are we witnessing the birth of a new type of addiction?
The countless number of information and entertainment that television and online media can bring us is, many would say, a good thing. However, when the activity begins to bleed into other areas, causing us to stop functioning, then it becomes a problem. So, what’s the answer? Moderation! Neither a tiny amount, nor too much. After all, as the old proverb says, “A little of what you fancy does you good.”
1. How did the writer develop the first paragraph?| A．By giving a definition. | B．By telling a story. |
| C．By listing some examples. | D．By analyzing the cause and effect. |
| A．For convenience. | B．At the same time. |
| C．In detail. | D．Free of charge. |
| A．people can’t control their feelings | B．people can’t resist the temptation of Bingeing |
| C．people have no patience to do work | D．people are addicted to waiting for a new episode |
| A．To keep online media from stopping functioning. |
| B．To enjoy entertainment as much as possible. |
| C．To learn life lessons from the episodes. |
| D．To watch episodes in a moderate way. |
2 . Modern life is full of things that can influence your ability to be sensitive and responsive to your child. These include extra work, lack of sleep, and things like mobile devices. Some experts are concerned about the effects that distracted (分心) parenting may have on emotional bonding and children’s language development, social interaction, and safety.
If parents are inconsistently available, kids can get distressed and feel hurt, rejected, or ignored. They may have more emotional outbursts and feel alone. They may even stop trying to compete for their parent’s attention and start to lose emotional connections to their parents.
“There are times when kids really do need your attention and want your recognition,” explains Crnic, a psychologist. “Parents need to communicate that their kids are valuable and important, and children need to know that parents care what they’re doing,” he says.
It can be tough to respond with sensitivity during tantrums, arguments, or other challenging times with your kids. “If parents respond by being bad-tempered or aggressive themselves, children can copy that behavior, and a negative cycle then continues to upgrade,” explains Dr. Carol Metzler, who studies parenting at the Oregon Research Institute.
According to Crnic, kids start to regulate their own emotions and behavior around age three. Up until then, they depend more on you to help them regulate their emotions, whether to calm them or help get them excited. “They’re watching you to see how you do it and listening to how you talk to them about it,” he explains. “Parents need to be good self-regulators. You’re not only trying to regulate your own emotions in the moment, but helping your child learn to manage their emotions and behavior.”
As kids become better at managing their feelings and behavior, it’s important to help them develop coping skills, like active problem solving. Such skills can help them feel confident in handling what comes their way.
“When parents engage positively with their children, teaching them the behaviors and skills that they need to cope with the world, children learn to follow rules and regulate their own feelings,” Metzler says.
1. What may distract parenting according to the text?| A．Working overtime. | B．Too much sleep. | C．Negative emotions. | D．Social interactions. |
| A．Bad habits of ignored children. | B．Bad effects of parents’ absence. |
| C．The outcome of parents’ availability. | D．The behavior of emotional children. |
| A．Mental relaxation. | B．Extreme anger. | C．Heated discussions. | D．Desperate hunger. |
| A．Be strict with your children | B．Regulate your emotions |
| C．Stay available to your children | D．Set a good example for children |
3 . Public distrust of scientists stems in part from the blurring of boundaries between science and technology, between discovery and manufacture. Most governments, perhaps all governments, justify public expenditure on scientific research in terms of the economic benefits the scientific enterprise has brought in the past and will bring in the future. Politicians remind their voters of the splendid machines “our scientists” have invented, the new drugs to relieve old disorders, and the new surgical equipment and techniques by which previously unmanageable conditions may now be treated and lives saved. At the same time, the politicians demand of scientists that they tailor their research to “economics needs”, and that they award a higher priority to research proposals that are “near the market” and can be translated into the greatest return on investment in the shortest time. Dependent, as they are, on politicians for much of their funding, scientists have little choice but to comply. Like the rest of us, they are members of a society that rates the creation of wealth as the greatest possible good. Many have reservations, but keep them to themselves in what they perceive as a climate hostile to the pursuit of understanding for its own sake and the idea of an inquiring, creative spirit.
In such circumstances no one should be too hard on people who are suspicious of conflicts of interest. When we learn that the distinguished professor assuring us of the safety of a particular product holds a consultancy with the company making it, we cannot be blamed for wondering whether his fee might conceivably cloud his professional judgment. Even if the professor holds no consultancy with any firm, some people may still distrust him because of his association with those who do, or at least wonder about the source of some of his research funding.
This attitude can have damaging effects. It questions the integrity of individuals working in a profession that prizes intellectual honesty as the supreme virtue, and plays into the hands of those who would like to discredit scientists by representing them as corruptible. This makes it easier to dismiss all scientific pronouncements, but especially those made by the scientists who present themselves as “experts”. The scientist most likely to understand the safety of a nuclear reactor, for example, is a nuclear engineer, and a nuclear engineer is most likely to be employed by the nuclear industry. If a nuclear engineer declares that a reactor is unsafe, we believe him, because clearly it is not to his advantage to lie about it. If he tells us it is safe, on the other hand, we distrust him, because he may well be protecting the employer who pays his salary.
1. What is the chief concern of most governments when it comes to scientific research?| A．The decline of public expenditure. | B．Quick economic returns. |
| C．The budget for a research project. | D．Support from the voters. |
| A．They realize they work in an environment hostile to the free pursuit of knowledge. |
| B．They know it takes incredible patience to win support from the public. |
| C．They think compliance with government policy is in the interests of the public. |
| D．They are accustomed to keeping their opinions secrets to themselves. |
| A．some of them do not give priority to intellectual honesty |
| B．sometimes they hide the source of their research funding |
| C．they could be influenced by their association with the project concerned |
| D．their pronouncements often turn out to be short-sighted and absurd |
| A．Scientists themselves may doubt the value of their research findings. |
| B．It may wear out the enthusiasm of scientists for independent research. |
| C．It makes things more trivial for scientists to seek research funds. |
| D．People will not believe scientists even when they tell the truth. |
4 . Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (人工智能), also called AI, and the rapid using of robots across different industries are causing the fear of jobless growth. Reponses (回应) to these developments have focused on what to do to ensure that robots don’t steal jobs.
Bill Gates, for example, has called for the taxing of robots that take away jobs. This has led to responses from leading economists, such as Larry Summers, who argues against the idea, saying that robots are job creators and that the idea of taxing them is absolutely wrong. Another idea is to use a basic income for all—the idea that everyone receives a minimum income—to pay for the impact of technological unemployment (失业). This idea also causes arguments.
The focus on these arguments is misplaced. Jobs are not created or lost because of a single technology, but because of the business models designed to make use of the power of the technology.
Maybe, we’ve seen a similar example in history, with recorded music in the last century. It wasn’t the 1930s recording technology itself that threatened (威胁) the jobs of live musicians (音乐家). It was its combination with radio broadcasting, jukeboxes (点唱机) and the way businesses operated that led to job losses. Hotels, restaurants and bars replaced live musicians with jukeboxes. A single recording could be played over and over without requiring the appearance of musicians.
As I argue in Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies, the early recording of music destroyed the jobs of some live musicians and made them make less money than before. The social objections (反对) became larger about monopoly (垄断) power and less about the technology itself.
1. What’s Larry Summers’ argument against?| A．Taxing robots. | B．Replacing robots. |
| C．Reducing the use of robots. | D．Paying the jobless for using robots. |
| A．To give us advice. | B．To show us an example. |
| C．To present us his point of view. | D．To tell us the power of technology. |
| A．The threat from the customers. | B．The impact of unemployment. |
| C．The use of recording technology. | D．The increasing number of live musicians. |
| A．Surprised. | B．Positive. | C．Doubtful. | D．Curious. |
5 . If you’re worried about the planet, please make sure your rubbish is buried under the ground.
People talk about “reduce, reuse, recycle.” It sounds like a good idea. There is a problem, though. Recycling costs too much money.
Even the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) says it only makes sense economically and environmentally to recycle about 35 percent of thrown materials, Among those materials are paper and aluminum cans (铝罐), Recycling 1 ton of paper or aluminum cans, the agency says, can save about 3 tons of CO2 emissions (排放) overproducing those materials again. Paper producers pay for the trees they process If it was cost-effective to recycle paper. producers would be beating down your door to bay it. But they aren’t. That means it’s more expensive to recycle old paper than to cut trees and then replant trees for processing.
Plastic can be recycled too. Because of the recent drop in crude oil (原油) prices. it is now cheaper to make a new plastic container (塑料容器) than to recycle an old one. Even if that were not true, the EPA says that recycling a ton of plastic saves only about a ton of CO2. However, it doesn’t take into consideration the water most people use to wash their plastic containers before having them recycled. The New York Times Journalist John
Tierney recently wrote. “If you wash plastic in water that was heated by electricity, them the effect of your recycling could be mere carbon in the air.
Glass is another recyclable material. To reduce greenhouse gas emissions by I ton, you have to recycle 3 tons of glass. If one includes the cost of collecting glass waste from neighborhoods, and the pollution produced by the collection trucks and the recycling process itself, glass recycling creates more greenhouse gas emissions and is more expensive than making new glass, which comes primarily from sand that exists everywhere.
If recycling were truly cost-effective, private companies would be lining up at your doorstep to buy your rubbish. Don’t look now because they’re not there.
1. What’s the EPA’S attitude to recycling aluminum cans?| A．It is helpful to the environment. | B．It is actually a waste of money. |
| C．It costs less than recycling paper. | D．It costs the same as producing new cans. |
| A．The crude oil. | B．The water pollution. |
| C．The process to clean it. | D．The electricity for lights. |
| A．It results in lots of waste in neighborhoods. |
| B．The material for new glass can be easily got. |
| C．It is slightly more expensive than recycling glass. |
| D．Making 3 tons of new glass produces I ton of carbon emissions. |
| A．Recycling will disappear soon. |
| B．Companies will line up at your doorstep. |
| C．Recycling is a way to deal with your rubbish. |
| D．Companies won’t bother to collect thrown materials. |
| A．Whose fault is it? | B．Where does waste go? |
| C．Is everything recyclable? | D．Is it really worth the effort? |
6 . It is natural that young people are not often comfortable when they are with their parents. They say that their
When you want your parents to let you do
Young people often make their parents angry with their choices in clothes, in
Sometimes you are so proud of yourself that you do not want your parents to
If you plan to control your life, you’d better
| A．parents | B．teachers | C．friends | D．classmates |
| A．in | B．for | C．to | D．with |
| A．often | B．always | C．usually | D．seldom |
| A．hate | B．trust | C．support | D．envy |
| A．loved | B．studied | C．felt | D．learned |
| A．choosing | B．worrying | C．promising | D．thinking |
| A．stood | B．grown | C．got | D．brought |
| A．more | B．younger | C．older | D．less |
| A．agree | B．think | C．plan | D．sense |
| A．painful | B．foreign | C．unexpected | D．unlikely |
| A．something | B．everything | C．anything | D．nothing |
| A．after | B．before | C．while | D．until |
| A．entertainments | B．services | C．behaviors | D．sports |
| A．controlled | B．connected | C．separated | D．focused |
| A．friends | B．minds | C．own | D．sense |
| A．normal | B．active | C．unforgettable | D．unhappy |
| A．say | B．speak | C．state | D．express |
| A．looked after | B．left alone | C．watched over | D．cared for |
| A．forgive | B．frighten | C．persuade | D．employ |
| A．right | B．advice | C．instruction | D．explanation |
7 . A letter written by Charles Darwin in 1875 has been returned to the Smithsonian Institution Archives(档案馆) by the FBI after being stolen twice.
“We realized in the mid-1970s that it was missing,” says Effie Kapsalis, head of the Archives. “It was noted as missing and likely taken by an intern (实习生), from what the FBI is telling us. Word got out that it was missing when someone asked to see the letter for research purposes,” and the intern put the letter back. “The intern likely took the letter again once nobody was watching it.”
Decades passed. Finally, the FBI received a clue that the stolen letter was located very close to Washington, D.C. Their art crime team got back the letter but were unable to accuse the suspect because the time of limitations had ended. The FBI worked closely with the Archives to determine that the letter was both genuine and exactly belonged to Smithsonian.
The letter was written by Darwin to thank an American geologist, Dr. Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden, for sending him copies of his research into the geology of the area that would become Yellowstone National Park.
The letter is in fairly good condition, in spite of being out of the care of trained museum staff for so long. “It was luckily in good shape,” says Kapsalis, “and we just have to do some minor things in order to be able to unfold it. It has some glue on it that has colored it slightly, but nothing that will prevent us from using it. One of our goals is to get items of high research value or interest to the public online.”
It would be difficult to steal things like the letter. “Archiving practices have changed greatly since the 1970s,” says Kapsalis, “and we keep our high value objects in a safe that I can’t even reach.”
1. What happened to Darwin’s letter in the 1970s?| A．It was got back by the FBI. | B．It was stolen more than once. |
| C．It was bought by the archives. | D．It was put in the archives for research purpose. |
| A．They proved its real identity. | B．They kept it in a safe. |
| C．They helped repair the letter. | D．They accused the suspect but failed. |
| A．Display it in the Archives. |
| B．Turn it into an item of interest. |
| C．Carry out a major repair. |
| D．Make it available on line. |
| A．People grow more interested in art objects |
| B．Strict safety measures are taken in Archives. |
| C．The value of museum objects has been increased. |
| D．The letter helped Ferdinand do research into geology. |
8 . About five years ago, when the first generation of wearable fitness trackers became popular, they were announced as the
The U.S. has an exercise problem,
Another new study
To be
| A．consequence | B．dawn | C．dusk | D．process |
| A．access | B．assistance | C．material | D．tendency |
| A．consume | B．purchase | C．exercise | D．perform |
| A．wearable | B．electronic | C．appropriate | D．conventional |
| A．among | B．with | C．for | D．by |
| A．outspoken | B．inactive | C．discouraged | D．ridiculous |
| A．announced | B．determined | C．hoped | D．convinced |
| A．limit | B．comprehend | C．interpret | D．change |
| A．encouraging | B．interesting | C．pioneering | D．challenging |
| A．benefit from | B．result in | C．add to | D．focus on |
| A．consequence | B．movement | C．profit | D．difference |
| A．imitated | B．arranged | C．highlighted | D．informed |
| A．reduction | B．participation | C．creation | D．expectation |
| A．shortly | B．therefore | C．deliberately | D．namely |
| A．evaluation | B．popularity | C．confusion | D．interaction |
| A．but | B．and | C．or | D．so |
| A．casual | B．fair | C．accessible | D．technical |
| A．what | B．why | C．that | D．how |
| A．persuade | B．advocate | C．follow | D．motivate |
| A．frequently | B．automatically | C．faithfully | D．measurably |
采访内容:
1.你或你身边的人在日常生活中使用移动支付的情况；
2.移动支付带来的好处
3.你的看法。
参考词汇: 微信: Wechat 支付宝: Alipay 二维码: QR code
注意:1.词数120左右;
2.可适当增加细节，以使行文连贯
Dear Jenny,
How is your survey on mobile payment going？ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yours faithfully
Li Hua
10 . Mount Hood is the highest mountain in Oregon, a state in the western United States. At 3, 400 meters it is attractive to many people, some of whom, of course, run into trouble. Each year 25 to 50 people have accidents or get lost on Mount Hood and need rescue（营救）. Although most of these are understandable accidents, a few result from careless risk-taking.
In one recent case, three experienced climbers went hiking in the middle of a snowstorm in December. Most hikers climb Mount Hood in May or June when the weather conditions are good. But in December, the mountain is covered in snow and ice. Winds up to 135 kilometers per hour blow the snow around, making it difficult to see. Temperatures can drop below freezing. As one rescue worker put it, "What were they thinking? They were just asking for it. "
During a rescue a few years ago, a helicopter full of rescue workers crashed and the rescue workers were almost killed. Linda Carle, who lives in the Mount Hood area, asks, If someone made a muddled decision, why should rescue teams have to risk their lives to save them? Why do people take unnecessary risks and do things that aren't right if they know that they can get into trouble? "
Most of the Mount Hood rescue workers are either volunteers or part of the local police department There is no charge for these rescues. It is the taxpayers who pay the bill. Linda Carle suggests that people who take careless risks and need rescue should ay for the rescue. She fees it is only fir that costs for things like damaged helicopters and medical care for rescuers should be paid for by the people who take the risks. What would you do if you were the local police officer at Mount Hood?
1. What can we learn about Mount Hood?| A．It lies in the west of the United States. |
| B．It is the highest mountain in the United States. |
| C．The best time to climb the mountain is from May to July. |
| D．Hundreds of people get lot in the mountain every year. |
| A．poor | B．important | C．wise | D．clear |
| A．Taxpayers | B．Risk takers | C．Government | D．Police |
| A．Advice on stopping people from climbing Mount Hood. |
| B．Other serious accidents in Mount Hood. |
| C．The requirements of becoming a volunteer. |
| D．Some possible ways to solve the problem of rescue costs. |
