组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 法律法治
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 2 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要介绍了一直生活在克拉马斯河沿岸的尤洛克人为了保护他们赖以生存的地区和河流,为该河流通过法案,使其与人类享有同等的法律权利。

1 . The Yurok people have lived along the Klamath River, which flows from the Cascades in Oregon southwest through Northern California, for thousands of years, protecting the region and river from which they — and others — draw sustenance (生计).

But as development and pollution continue to reduce the number of fish in the river and the quantity and quality of its waters, the Yurok Tribe is legalizing (合法化) the tribe’s longstanding care by granting the Rights of Personhood to the Klamath, the first river in North America to have such rights declared.

The Yurok Tribal Council’s May 2019 resolution means the river has the same legal rights as a human under tribal law. This order allows people to bring law cases on behalf of the river when its rights are violated. According to the resolution, the tribe’s intention is to provide a legal basis for safeguarding the river and its ecosystem, especially in the face of water diversion, industrial pollution, and climate change impacts, among other threats. In a testimony (证词) delivered to the U. S. House of Representatives in October 2019, Yurok Tribe Vice Chairman Frankie Myers said this legal framework could create a path to ward a more thoughtful view of the rights of nature in other communities and courts, and that any money awarded by the Yurok courts will fund cleanup and restoration projects to remedy the litigated harms.

The Yurok Tribe’s resolution draws lessons from the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and echoes the efforts of other Indigenous tribes, including the White Earth Band of Ojibwe, which adopted the Rights of wild rice, in December 2018. “This is a very important step forward in the Rights of Nature movement,” Mari Margil, Associate Director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund commented.

1. Which of the following can be used to describe Yurok people?
A.A conqueror.B.A guardian.C.A governor.D.A consumer.
2. What is paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.The process of legalization.B.The tradition of Yurok tribe.
C.The reason behind the legalization.D.The importance of the Klamath River.
3. What does the law aim to do?
A.Win an award in cleanup projects.
B.Protect the personhood of the river.
C.Fight against global water pollution.
D.Improve the government legal system.
4. What can we learn from Yurok Tribe according to the last paragraph?
A.Time and tide wait for no man.
B.Birds of a feather flock together.
C.Past experience is a guide for the future.
D.All things are difficult before they are easy.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 适中(0.65) |

2 . Spring soccer season is under way, and many youth leagues are playing under new safety rules. In November, the US Soccer Federation said that players on its teams who are 10 or younger are no longer allowed to head the ball Players ages 11 to 13 have limits on how often they can practice heading. The new rules are made to prevent kids from getting concussions (脑震荡)—injuries caused by a blow to the head that shakes the brain. Common problems include headaches and dizziness. Severe concussions can lead to long brain damage.

Heading the ball can be one of the riskiest parts of soccer. Sometimes the force of hitting the ball with their heads gives players concussions. But more often, players receive concussions when they accidentally knock heads with other players and hit their heads on the grass. “More concussions happen during the act of heading than any other action in soccer,” explains Dr. Robert Cantu, an expert on brain injuries.

So far, the new rules are made only to teams that are part of the US Soccer Federation. But the group says it hopes other leagues will soon follow its example.

Former US soccer star Brandi Chastain is one of the leaders of the activity to ban heading in youth soccer. She applauds the rule change. Last month, Chastain showed her determination of learning more about the effects of heading when she promised to donate her brain to science after she dies.

“If there’s any information to be gathered on the study of someone like me,who has played soccer for 40 years, it feels like my responsibility,” Chastain told The New York Times.

1. What can we learn from the first two paragraphs?
A.Players needn’t take the risk of heading the ball in soccer.
B.All of the players, headaches result from hitting heads on the grass.
C.Players must receive concussions when knocking heads with other players.
D.The act 0f heading can cause more concussions than other actions in soccer.
2. What is Brandi Chastain’s attitude towards the new safety rules in playing soccer?
A.Unconcerned.B.Positive.
C.Negative.D.Doubtful.
3. From the text, we can learn         .
A.Brandi Chastain suffers from very severe concussions
B.concussions caused by heading the ball can not be healed
C.Brandi Chastain is willing to devote herself to the security of soccer players
D.the new rules in soccer have been carried out among all of the American leagues
2017-07-09更新 | 43次组卷 | 1卷引用:山西省晋中市名校2016-2017学年高一下学期期中考试英语试题
共计 平均难度:一般