组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 法律法治
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 16 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:本文是一篇新闻报道。由于当地政府为了避免狂犬病而杀死34000多只流浪狗,引发了热议,人们对于出台的动物权利草案也有不同的看法。

1 . The local government killed more than 34,000 stray dogs (流浪狗) several months ago because those officials were afraid that the dogs would spread rabies (狂犬病).

This caused a debate across the country. Some people said that it was very cruel to dogs. There might be a better way to prevent the disease.

In the future, killing stray dogs might be seen as a crime. Last month, the Chinese government published a draft of animal rights laws. It says that a person who kills a stray dog without one good reason will be put in prison.

The draft also says that animal abuse and abandoning animals will be considered crimes under the criminal law.

The government published the draft so that the public could read it and discuss their thoughts. People have different reactions. Some think the law is good. They say other countries like Britain and Japan have similar laws. They say we will do better at protecting animals if there is one. But others say it’s not crucial to fight animal abuse with a new law. Criticism and fines can do the job.

Some people also say that the draft doesn’t deal with the biggest issues facing the country’s development. The country should make progress to give all people equal rights, they say, before turning attention to animals.

Another part of the draft is causing discussion. It says that people should not force animals to do something dangerous, like jumping through a ring of fire. But many people enjoy watching this kind of performance at the circus, especially kids. They say that if the animal does it properly, it will not get hurt.

1. Why did the local government kill many dogs?
A.The dogs were dirty.B.Those officials wanted to prevent rabies.
C.The dogs were homeless.D.Those officials wanted to eat the dogs.
2. Which of the following is acceptable according to the draft of animal rights laws?
A.Killing a dog with rabies.B.Beating an animal for fun.
C.Abandoning a blind pet dog.D.Forcing a cat to jump through a ring of fire.
3. What can we tell from the text?
A.All people agree with the law.
B.Criticism and fines can protect animals.
C.Protecting animals is the biggest issue in China.
D.People have different opinions on the law.
4. What will happen if the law takes effect?
A.People can’t kill stray dogs any longer.
B.The country won’t have human right problems.
C.Kids may not be able to watch animals’ performances in a circus.
D.Animals will not be killed.
文章大意:本文是一篇新闻报告。文章探讨了企业社会责任对企业在法律纠纷中的影响,研究发现,拥有全面企业社会责任计划的公司在被起诉时通常会受到较轻的惩罚,这表明企业社会责任可能为企业创造货币价值,并在法律纠纷中起到积极作用。

2 . “There is one and only one social responsibility of business,” wrote Milton Friedman, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, “that is, to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits.” But even if you accept Friedman’s statement and regard corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies as a waste of shareholders’ money, things may not be absolutely clear-cut. New research suggests that CSR may create monetary value for companies at least when they are charged with corruption (腐败).

The largest firms in America and Britain together spend more than $15 billion a year on CSR, according to an estimate by EPG, a consulting firm. This could add value to their businesses in three ways. First, consumers may take CSR spending as a “signal” that a company’s products are of high quality. Second, customers may be willing to buy a company’s products as an indirect way to donate to the good causes it helps. And third, through a more diffuse (分散的) “halo effect” its good deeds earn it greater consideration from consumers and others.

Previous studies on CSR have had trouble distinguishing these effects because consumers can be affected by all three. A recent study attempts to separate them by looking at bribery prosecutions (起诉) under American’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). It argues that since prosecutors do not consume a company’s products as part of their investigations, they could be influenced only by the halo effect.

The study finds that, among prosecuted firms, those with the most comprehensive CSR programmes tend to get more lenient punishments. Their analysis rules out the possibility that it is the firm’s political influence, rather than its CSR stance, that accounts for the leniency: Companies that contribute more to political campaigns do not receive lower fines.

In all, the study concludes that whereas prosecutors should only evaluate a case based on its merits, they do seem to be influenced by a company’s record in CSR. “We estimate that either eliminating a substantial labor-rights concern, such as child labor, or increasing corporate giving by about 20% result in fines that generally are 40% lower than the typical punishment for bribing foreign officials.” says one researcher.

Researchers admit that their study does not answer the question at how much businesses ought to spend on CSR. Nor does it reveal how much companies are relying on the halo effect, rather than the other possible benefits, when companies get into trouble with the law, evidence of good character can win them a less costly punishment.

1. The author views Milton Friedman’s statement about CSR with___________.
A.uncertaintyB.interestC.approvalD.tolerance
2. According to Paragraph 2, CSR helps a company by___________.
A.guarding it against malpracticesB.protecting it from consumers
C.winning trust from consumersD.raising the quality of its products
3. The underlined expression “more lenient” in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to___________.
A.less debatableB.more lastingC.more effectiveD.less severe
4. When prosecutors evaluate a case, a company’s CSR record___________.
A.comes across as reliable evidenceB.has an impact on their decision
C.is considered part of the investigationD.increases the chance of being punished
2023-07-26更新 | 61次组卷 | 3卷引用:Test for Unit 2 选择性必修第一册(上外版2020)
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:本文是一篇新闻报道。文章报道泰国出台法律控制烟民在家里吸烟的行为并说明制定该法令的原因。

3 . Smoking in your own home in Thailand may now be considered a crime, if the smoke is considered harmful to other people in the house.

The new law, Family Protection and Development Promotion Act, aiming at controlling smoking at home which might be hazardous for others’ health living under the same roof, was initiated by the Ministry of Social Development and Human Security and was announced in the Royal Gazette on May 22, 2019. It came into force on August 20.

According to the center for research and knowledge management for tobacco control, at the Faculty of Medical Science of Mahidol University, there are about 4.9 million households where one or more family members smoke. An average of 10.3 million people have unwittingly (不知不觉地) become passive smokers because they’ve been breathing smoke at home. Scientific studies show that passive smokers are at greater risk of being affected by cancer. Of 75 child patients from houses where smoking is practiced, 76% of them were found to have nicotine traces in their urine (尿液), with 43% of them having nicotine content exceeding (超过) permissible levels.

Smoking at home also “may lead to physical or emotional violence” because of aggressiveness when there is a lack of smoking, and might as well ruin relationships between smokers and non­smoking family members.

According to the new law, anyone who thinks they are affected by domestic smoking can report to government departments concerned so that officials will be sent to investigate and take legal action against the smokers. Once convicted (证明有罪的), the court may order a person to receive treatment to quit smoking in an attempt to protect the person’s family.

1. What does the underlined word “hazardous” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?
A.Guilty.B.Beneficial.
C.Influential.D.Dangerous.
2. How does the author organize Paragraph 3?
A.By listing figures.
B.By giving examples.
C.By comparing the differences.
D.By explaining the reasons.
3. What can we learn from the passage?
A.Smoking anywhere in Thailand is considered a crime.
B.Passive smokers are more likely to have lung cancer.
C.76% of the children in Thailand have nicotine traces in their urine.
D.Smoking at home may hurt other family members both physically and emotionally.
4. What may be true according to the new law?
A.Anybody must report to the officials once they are affected.
B.Officials will take legal action against all the people concerned.
C.Smoking in one’s own home in Thailand may now be considered a crime.
D.The court may order a smoker to stop smoking to protect all non­smokers.
2023-04-23更新 | 16次组卷 | 1卷引用:Unit 4 Section A Starting out & Understanding ideas同步练习2021-2022学年高中英语外研版选择性必修第三册
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |

4 . The local government killed more than 34,000 stray dogs (流浪狗) several months ago because those officials were afraid that the dogs would spread rabies (狂犬病).

This caused a debate across the country. Some people said that it was very cruel to kill dogs. There might be a better way to prevent the disease.

In the future, killing stray dogs might be seen as a crime. The Chinese government published a draft of animal rights law. It says that a person who kills a stray dog without good reason will be put in prison.

The draft also says that animal abuse and abandoning animals will be considered crimes under the criminal law.

The government published the draft so that the public could read it and discuss their thoughts. People share different opinions. Some think the law is good. They say other countries like Britain and Japan have similar laws. They say we will do better at protecting animals if there is one. But others say it’s not necessary to fight animal abuse with a new law. Criticisms and fines can do the job.

Some people also say that the draft doesn’t deal with the biggest issues facing the country’s development. The country should make progress to give all people equal rights, they say, before turning attention to animals.

Another part of the draft is causing discussion. It says that people should not force animals to do something dangerous, like jumping through a ring of fire. But many people enjoy watching this kind of performance at the circus, especially kids. They say that if the animal does it properly, it will not get hurt.

1. Which of the following is acceptable according to the draft of animal rights law?
A.Killing a dog with rabies.
B.Beating an animal for fun.
C.Abandoning a blind pet dog.
D.Forcing a cat to jump through a ring of fire.
2. We can tell from the text that ________.
A.all people agree with the law
B.criticisms and fines can protect animals
C.protecting animals is the biggest issue in China
D.people have different opinions towards the law
3. If the law goes into effect, ________.
A.people can’t kill stray dogs any longer
B.the country won’t have human right problems
C.kids may not be able to watch animals’ performances in a circus
D.animals will not be killed
2021-08-26更新 | 54次组卷 | 2卷引用:(人教2019)必修第二册 Unit 2 Section Ⅲ Discovering Useful Structures
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~

5 . About 60,000 Pacific Islanders worked as indentured labourers (签订契约的劳工)on Queensland’s sugar cane(甘蔗)fields between 1863 and 1903.They were mainly males, aged 9 to 30, transported to Australia by ship.Some came freely, wanting the new life promised to them, some were tricked, and some were kidnapped(绑架).

The practice of kidnapping people for labour was called “blackbirding”.“Blackbird” was a term used instead of slave, because slavery was actually illegal.Britain had passed the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833 and as a British colony (殖民地),Queensland had to follow the Act It is said that a third of Pacific Islanders who worked as indentured labourers were either kidnapped or tricked into coming to Australia.Indentured labour was really just another name for slavery.

Indentured labourers had to work for a required period of time,usually three years,to pay back their passage to Australia and then they could earn money as free labourers.It was hard, dirty work in the Queensland countryside.Most indentured labourers were badly treated, many returning to their homelands as soon as their indentured period was finished.A small number married into local communities and stayed.Free labourers were also badly treated on the cane fields, working for low pay and living in very poor conditions.

Then the Australian Government’s White Australia Policy forced Pacific Islanders to leave Australia.Even people who were born in Australia to Pacific Islander parents were driven out of the country due to their colour.If they didn’t leave voluntarily, they were rounded up and driven away forcibly between 1906 and 1908.This practice destroyed many families.Some of the people had lived in Australia most, if not all, of their lives.Only a few who had married Australians were allowed to stay.A few managed to hide and avoid being driven away.

1. What happened from 1863 to 1903?
A.Australians had a new life.
B.Many Australians were kidnapped.
C.Australia was in want of labourers.
D.Australia’s sugar industry began to slow down.
2. What do we know about slavery in Queensland?
A.It was lawful before 1863.B.It came to an end in 1833.
C.It was introduced by the British.D.It replaced the word “blackbirding” .
3. Why did some indentured labourers go back to their homelands?
A.To escape mistreatment.B.To get a better-paid job.
C.To avoid being kidnapped.D.To be involved in local communities.
4. What’s the best title for the text?
A.Slaves for sugarB.Laws in Australia
C.Pacific Islanders’ new homeD.Sugar cane industry's development
2021-03-09更新 | 53次组卷 | 1卷引用:外研版2019选择性必修二 Unit 4 Section C Developing ideas, Presenting ideas&Reflection
21-22高二上·湖北·期末

6 . Food brings us together and connects us to our families, friends, nature and to foreign cultures. Food is universal. Food waste, on the other hand, has become a universal problem, as it significantly contributes to climate change. Luckily, there are countries that have laws to require supermarkets or other businesses to donate unsold food.

About one third of all food grown for human consumption is thrown out or wasted according to the Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO). This creates both environmental and financial problems, since traditional agriculture requires large amounts of resources including land and water. Food production is also a major cause of greenhouse gases and climate change.

Food waste occurs at every step of food production from the field to the store. In fact, fruits, vegetables, and roots have the highest waste. Donating food that is unusually wasted does not mean giving away damaged food. Sometimes it is simply a case of food being mislabeled, a can that has a torn label, or slightly bruised fruit.

To reduce both the financial and environmental pressure, Italy passed a law to encourage businesses and farmers to donate unsold food to charities. Companies that donate their leftovers will pay lower taxes on waste removal.

Waste management is also a very costly thing for governments. In fact, according to Global Citizen, in 2016, Italy spent over $13.3 billion on waste management. The idea behind the law is that when it is economic and convenient, companies will happily follow the law.

France was the first country to pass a food donation law in 2016. It required supermarkets that are at least 4,300 square feet to donate unsold food to charity. Since then, 90 percent of supermarkets began donating food, the number of which was 66 percent before the law.

To increase food donations, Israel passed a law in 2018 to ensure that unused food from restaurants, hotels and other places goes to the people that need it most.

1. What does paragraph 2 focus on?
A.FAO's guidelines.B.Human eating diets.
C.Global climate change.D.Food waste problems.
2. What is most likely to be given away according to the law?
A.Heavily broken canned food.B.Unhealthy vegetables.
C.Slightly bruised fruit.D.Damaged food.
3. What benefit will the Italian government get from the law?
A.It will sell donated food to make money.B.It will ask companies to pay higher taxes.
C.It will save money on waste management.D.It will attract more international companies.
4. What is known about the food donation law?
A.It seems difficult to pass in Israel.B.It takes effect gradually in France.
C.It is just applied in supermarkets.D.It is an unsuccessful try in France.
2021-02-06更新 | 87次组卷 | 2卷引用:选择性必修 第三册Unit 4 综合检测—2023年高考英语一轮复习讲练测(人教版2019)

7 . Owls(猫头鹰)can be found in many parts of the world. And today, one kind of owl, the barred owl, is causing a problem in forests of the northwestern United States. Barred owls are a large species native to eastern North America, but they began moving west at the start of the 20th century. In parts of the Pacific Northwest, barred owls are now causing a drop in the population of a kind of smaller and less aggressive(侵略性的) bird: the northern spotted owls. The U.S. Geological Survey is doing something unusual to protect spotted owls: killing barred owls. As a member of the department, David Wiens has mixed feelings about the program. “It’s a little unpleasant, I think, to go out killing owls,” he says. “But we knew that barred owls were really stronger than spotted owls and their numbers were growing too fast, so it makes sense to do that.”

It is a controversial( 有争议的) program. “A decision not to kill the barred owl is a decision to make the spotted owl disappear,” says Bob Sallinger, a director at the nonprofit Audubon Society in Portland, Oregon. However, Marc Bekoff, a professor of ecology(生态学 ) and biology at the University of Colorado, Boulder, strongly disagrees with the experiment and says humans should find another way to help spotted owls.

If reducing the barred owl population improves the number of spotted owls, the U.S. Geological Survey may consider killing more barred owls as part of a longer-term effort. Enough success has been noted for the experiment to be extended to August of 2021.

1. Why are barred owls being killed ?
A.They are breaking the laws of nature.
B.They are killing each other to survive.
C.They are destroying large areas of forests.
D.They are putting the spotted owls in danger.
2. What is Wiens’ attitude towards the program?
A.Doubtful.B.Uncaring.C.Supportive.D.Negative.
3. Which is the best title for the text?
A.New Ways to Help Forests
B.How to Keep Ecological Balance
C.Killing One Species to Save Another
D.Time to Protect Animals

8 . The biggest soccer organization in the U.S. introduces new rules to make the sport safer.

The U.S. Soccer Federation announced that players in its teams who are 10 or younger are no longer allowed to head the ball. Players aged from 11 to 13 have limits on how often they can practice heading.

The new rules are set to stop kids from getting hurt because of a blow to the head that shakes the brain. Players may get headaches by heading the ball. Even worse, they may also get concussions, which will cause lasting brain damage.

Heading the ball can be one of the most dangerous parts of soccer. Sometimes the force of hitting the ball with their heads gives players concussions. But more often, players receive concussions when they jump to head the ball and by accident knock heads with other players or fall and hit their heads on the grass.

“More concussions happen during the act of heading than any other action in soccer,” says Dr. Robert Cantu, an expert on brain damage.

So far, the new rules are only used by teams that are part of the U.S. Soccer Federation. But the group says it hopes more soccer teams will soon follow its example.

Former U.S. soccer star Brandi Chastain is one of the leaders of the activity to ban heading among young soccer players. She welcomes the rule change but wants the rule to include all players under 14.

1. The new rules are made to________.
A.keep young players from being hurt
B.teach young players how to practice heading
C.make the U.S. Soccer Federation more famous
D.encourage young players to improve their skills
2. What is Brandi Chastain’s attitude towards the new rules?
A.She is against them.B.She supports them.
C.She is unsure about them.D.She doesn’t care about them.
3. What’s the main idea of the passage?
A.New rules in soccer.B.How to protect young players.
C.Brain damage becomes more common.D.The introduction of the U.S. Soccer Federation.
2020-10-28更新 | 95次组卷 | 1卷引用:《10分钟同步课堂专练》3.3 Reading for Writing(重点练)-2020-2021学年高一英语上学期十分钟同步课堂专练(人教版2019必修第一册)

9 . Hundreds of new drivers have been given bans (禁令) for using their mobile phones at the wheel, as part of stricter new laws introduced. In March, the punishment for driving while on the phone was doubled to six points — meaning drivers with less than two years’ experience faced a ban.

New laws meant the punishment for being caught on a mobile phone at the wheel was increased to six points. The new rules were introduced in England, Scotland and Wales. Drivers who get six points within two years of passing their test will lose their licence, creating a one-strike rule for mobile phone users. To get back behind the wheel, new drivers have to retake both the theory and practical parts of the driving test.

Mr Williams in the RAC said, “These people have spent hours and hours and hundreds of pounds learning to drive to gain their personal freedom only to throw it all away through this foolish behaviour. The only comfort is that they won’t be drawn into some terrible crashes caused by the distraction (使人分心的事物) of a hand-held mobile phone.”

When the new laws were introduced, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said they would act as a strong warning to mobile phone users. However, the numbers suggested a total of 15,752 drivers received the punishment of six points for using a mobile phone between March and August. This is an increase from 15, 237 drivers in the same period of last year.

National Police Chiefs’ Council Lead on roads Policing, Chief Constable Anthony Bangham, said the police took the offence (违法行为) seriously. “This is not a small offence and is never a risk worth taking because a moment’s distraction behind the wheel can change lives forever.” “Our message is simple — don’t do it,” he added.

1. What can we infer from Paragraph1?
A.The new laws have not been passed.
B.The new laws are not strict enough.
C.Drivers with less than two years’ experience won’t be affected.
D.Punishment for driving while phoning used to be three points.
2. What will happen if a Welsh citizen who got a licence last year gets six points?
A.He will be fined a lot.
B.He must learn the new rules.
C.He will lose his driving licence.
D.He will be given a warning.
3. When the new laws were first introduced, _________.
A.traffic accidents were cut down
B.there were still many drivers who broke them
C.drivers thought the laws were unfair to them
D.fewer people broke them compared
4. What does Anthony Bangham mean?
A.The police didn’t take the new rules seriously.
B.The roads policy should be improved for safety.
C.A moment of carelessness may cause big accidents.
D.The laws need to be improved a lot and retested.
阅读理解-七选五 | 较易(0.85) |
名校

10 . California will be the first state to ban the sale and manufacture of new fur products.    1    It will go into effect on January 1, 2023.

California’s fur law was one of several bills designed to prevent cruelty to animals. “California is a leader when it comes to animal protection and today that leadership includes banning the sale of fur, ” said Governor Newsom in a news report. “    2    We are making a statement to the world that beautiful wild animals like bears and tigers have no place on trapeze (高空秋千) wires or jumping through flames.”    3    More than a dozen European countries, including the United Kingdom, Austria, Norway and the Netherlands have also passed laws to limit the fur trade.

    4    “The signing of the ban shows the point that today’s customers simply don’t want wild animals to suffer extreme pain and fear while keeping up with the fashion,” said Kitty Block, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States and president of Humane Society International. Not everyone, however, was pleased with the ban. Banning the killing of animals for their fur means killing the fur business, says Hyatt, an owner of a fur store.    5    

Many retailers are also ending fur sales. In mid-October, Macy’s (American’s department store) announced it will stop fur from all its stores by the end of 2020. The stores will also close all fur vaults and salons. Other fashion brands such as Prada, Gucci, Michael Kors and Burberry have taken similar steps in recent years.

A.But we are doing more than that.
B.California is taking the lead in protecting animals.
C.Similar laws have been carried out globally already.
D.And that in turn will leave many people unemployed.
E.Two other California cities had already banned fur sales.
F.Not surprisingly, the ban is welcomed by animal rights activists.
G.The ban applies to clothing, shoes, handbags and other things that contain fur.
共计 平均难度:一般