组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:105 题号:10181962

If you believe that scientists and artists are most creative when they're young, you are missing an important part of the story. A new study published in De Economist looked at Nobel Prize winners in the field of economics. It found there are two different peaks of creativity. One comes early in a person's career, while another comes later.

The research supports previous work by the authors that found similar patterns in the arts and other sciences.

"We believe what we found in this study isn't limited to economics, but could apply to creativity more generally," said Bruce Weinberg, lead author of the study and professor of economics at The Ohio State University.

"Many people believe that creativity is exclusively associated with youth,but it really depends on what kind of creativity you're talking about."

In the study, those who did their most groundbreaking work early in their careers tended to be "conceptual" innovators(创新者).

These type of innovators "think outside the box", challenging conventional wisdom and suddenly coming up with new ideas. Conceptual innovators are not yet immersed(沉浸于)in the accepted theories of their field, Weinberg said.

But there is another kind of creativity, he said, which is found among "experimental" innovators. These innovators accumulate knowledge through their careers and find new ways to understand it.

The long periods of trial and error for important experimental innovations come later in a Nobel laureate's(荣誉获得者的)career.

"Whether you hit your creative peak early or late in your career depends on whether you have a conceptual or experimental approach," Weinberg said.

The researchers took a novel, empirical(经验主义的)approach to the study, which involved 31 laureates. They arranged the laureates on a list from the most experimental to most conceptual.

This ranking was based on the laureates' most important work, classifying them into "conceptual" or "experimental".

After classifying the laureates, the researchers determined the age at which each laureate made his most important contribution to economics and could be considered at his creative peak.

They found that conceptual laureates peaked between ages 25 and 29. Experimental laureates peaked when they were roughly twice as old, in their mid-50s.

"Our research suggests that when you're most creative is more about how you approach your work."

1. What did the study published in De Economist find?
A.Creativity comes at any age, young or old.
B.Creativity tends to decrease as people get older.
C.Economists, artists and other scientists have much in common.
D.Economists are more creative than artists and other scientists.
2. What does the underlined phrase "think outside the box" mean?
A.Follow rules strictly.
B.Experiment on boxes.
C.Break old thought patterns.
D.Figure out how to escape from a box.
3. What do we know about "experimental" innovators?
A.They usually come up with new ideas all of a sudden.
B.They make discoveries through constant trial and error.
C.The majority of them reach their creative peak in their twenties.
D.They make more contributions than "conceptual" innovators.
4. What do the researchers believe determines someone's creative peak?
A.One's personality type.
B.What kind of job one takes.
C.How one handles their work.
D.One's attitude toward their work.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。文章讲述最近的研究表明,微生物群可以影响我们的行为方式,甚至影响我们对不同药物的反应,进而影响我们的寿命。

【推荐1】Meng Wang is a professor of human genetics. She’s been doing experiments about one of the most exciting new areas of medicine — our microbiome (微生物群).

You can’t see it with the naked eye, but our microbiome is all over (and inside of) us. Recent studies show that it can influence how we behave and even how well we respond to different drugs. Wang says, “Sometimes our microbiomes make us sick, but on the other hand, they also play a very important role in keeping us healthy.”

Wang wanted to know whether our microbiome could influence aging. To test it, she decided to work with a kind of worm (虫子) that lives only two or three weeks. Her question was, what would happen if you changed a worm’s microbiome. Would it be able to live for longer?

Wang chose one of the types of bacteria (细菌) that lives inside a worm, changed its genes (基因) so as to make different varieties, and then fed this bacteria to the worms. Three weeks later — by the time they should have all died — she checked on them. To her excitement, she found that the worms had not died. Older worms usually act slowly. The ones with the new microbiomes, however, not only moved around more quickly in their old age, but were less likely affected by illness too.

Wang is now carrying out tests on mice to see whether changing their microbiomes can influence their lives in a similar way. There is a chance that one day we might take pills which do the same of us. How much longer could this possibly allow us to live for? “Personally, I think 100 is already a good number,” says Wang.

1. What influence does Microbiome have on us according to recent studies?
A.Impacting our behavior.B.Lengthening lifespan.
C.Increasing drug resistance.D.Leading to deadly illness.
2. What was the result of Meng Wang’s experiment?
A.The worms grew bigger in size.
B.The worms kept active at old age.
C.The worms were free from illness.
D.The worms developed into new varieties.
3. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A.Man can live as long as 100.B.Microbiome works on mice similarly.
C.More tests need to be made.D.Wang will develop anti-aging pills soon.
4. Which might be the best title?
A.Microbiome: the hope of longer life?B.Tips for scientific research
C.Meng Wang: leading scientist of geneticsD.Into the world of Microbiome
2023-04-08更新 | 83次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍研究发现,朋友之间的气味比较相似,人们选择朋友至少在一定程度上是基于身体气味。

【推荐2】Dogs greet other dogs nose-first, as it were sniffing each other from fore to (especially) aft. People are not quite so open about the process of sniffing each other out. But there is also evidence that human beings can infer kinship (亲属关系), deduce emotional states and even detect disease via the sense of smell.

Now, Inbal Ravreby, Kobi Snitz and Noam Sobel of the Weizmann Institute of Science, in Israel, have gone a step further.

They have shown, admittedly in a fairly small sample of individuals, that friends actually smell alike. They have also shown that people pick friends at least partly on the basis of body odour (气味).

As they report in Science Advances, Dr Ravreby, Dr Snitz and Dr Sobel started their research by testing the odours of 20 pairs of established, non-romantic, same-sex friends. They employed an electronic nose (e-nose) and two groups of specially recruited (招聘的) human “smellers”. The e-nose used a set of metal-oxide gas sensors to assess t-shirts worn by participants.

One group of human smellers were given pairs of these shirts and asked to rate how similar they smelt. Those in the other group were asked to rate the odours of individual t-shirts on five subjective dimensions: pleasantness, intensity, sexual attractiveness, competence and warmth. All three approaches yielded the same result. The t-shirts of friends smelt more similar to each other than did the t-shirts of strangers.

Friends, in other words, do indeed smell alike.

To further understand whether friendship causes similarity of smell, or similarity of smell causes friendship, Dr Ravreby, Dr Snitz and Dr Sobel investigated whether e-nose measurements could predict positive interactions between strangers to develop a new friendship.

They gathered another 17 volunteers, gave them t-shirts to wear to collect their body odours, ran those odours past the e-nose, and then asked the participants to play a game.

Participants were paired up at random and their reactions recorded. After each interaction, they demonstrated how close they felt to their fellow game   by overlapping (重叠) two circles (one representing themselves, the other their partner) on a screen. It showed that the more similar the two electronic smell signatures were, the greater the overlap.

1. What is the author’s purpose in mentioning dogs at the beginning of the passage?
A.To raise some doubts.B.To illustrate a point.
C.To introduce the topic.D.To impress the readers.
2. How did the researchers carry out the first experiment?
A.By analyzing the chartsB.By describing the details.
C.By comparing the results.D.By explaining the theories.
3. Which is the right order of the events according to the second study?
a. Participants were paired randomly.
b. Seventeen volunteers wore t-shirts.
c. Participants overlapped two circles.
d. The researchers ran smells past the e-nose.
A.b-c-d-a.B.c-d-a-b.C.d-c-b-a.D.b-d-a-c.
4. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.Pleasant body odours attract friends.
B.Similar smells strengthen friendship.
C.Friendship is based on same interests.
D.Friends tend to have similar body odours.
2023-12-11更新 | 27次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】A few minutes of looking into a deep red light could have a dramatic effect on preventing eyesight decline as we age, according to a newstudy published this week in the Journals of Gerontology.

“You don’t need to use it for very long to start getting a strong result.” said lead author Glen Jeffery, a professor of neuroscience at University College London’s Institute of Ophthalmology. The study was small, an experimental study to test the concept. Researchers recruited 12 men and 12 women, whose ages ranged from 28 to 72. Each participant was given a small handheld flashlight that emitted a red light with a wavelength of 670 nanometers. They spent three minutes each day looking into the light over a period of two weeks.

The lights work on both cones (视锥细胞) and rods (视杆细胞) in the eye. Cones are photo receptor cells that detect color and work best in well-lit situations. Rods, which are much more plentiful, are retina cells that specialize in helping us see in dim light, according to the American of Ophthalmology. Researchers measured the cone function in subjects’ eyes by having them identify colored letters with low contrast. And they measured their eyes’ rod sensitivity by asking them to detect light signals in the dark.

There was a 14% improvement in the ability to see colors, or cone color contrast sensitivity, for the entire two dozen participants. Improvement, however, was most significant in study participants over age 40. For those ages, cone color contrast sensitivity rose by 20% over the course of the study.

That age group also saw significant increases in rod threshold, that is the ability to see in low light. Study participants under 40 also experienced some improvement, but didn’t see the same jump as older subjects. Younger eyes haven’t declined as much as older eyes.

“The retina ages faster than any other organ in your body.” Jeffery said. “From an evolutionary viewpoint, they fundamentally have never lived past 40. Now, of course, we regularly live well beyond that age, and need ways to care for the organs that have been the most likely to wear out earliest in life. But more studies are needed to prove it helps.”

1. What do we know about the study?
A.24 old people took part in the test.
B.Each participant has good eyesight.
C.All the participants were tested for their eyes’ cone and rod sensitivity.
D.The participants were asked to detect light signal in well-lit situation.
2. What does the study led by Glen Jeffery find?
A.Cone sensitivity rose by 20% for those under 40.
B.Younger participants haven’t get any improvement.
C.Older eyes haven’t declined as much as younger eyes.
D.The participants over 40 have increases in the ability to see in the dark.
3. What does Jeffery mean in the last paragraph?
A.It’s easy to protect our organs.B.He will carry out further research.
C.Our organs never last past 40 years.D.The research has benefits many people.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.Using a flashlight can improve people’s eyesight.
B.Looking into a red light can lead to good eyesight.
C.Declining eyesight can be improved by looking at a red light.
D.Light can raise eyes’ cone and rod sensitivity.
2021-01-31更新 | 73次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般