组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科学技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:433 题号:11134673

The different parts of a health care system have different focuses. A hospital's stroke (中风) unit monitors blood flow in the brain. The cardiac unit is interested in that same flow, but through and from the heart. Each collection of equipment and data is effective in its own field. Thus, like the story of blind men feeling an elephant, modern health care offers many separate pictures of a patient, but rarely a useful united one.

On top of all this, the instruments that doctors use to monitor health are often expensive, as is the training required to use them. That combined cost is too high for the medical system to scan regularly, for early signs of illness, so patients are at risk of heart disease or a stroke.

An unusual research project called AlzEye, run by Moorfields Eye Hospital in London, in cooperation with University College, London (UCL) , may change this. It is attempting to use the eye as a window through which signals about the health of other organs could be discovered. The doctors in charge of it, Siegfried Wagner and Pearse Keane, are studying Moorfields' database of eye scans, which offers a detailed picture of the health of the retina (视网膜).

The project will go a step further:With the information about other aspects of patients' health collected from other hospitals around England, doctors will be able to look for more accurate signs of disease through eye scans.

The Moorfields data set has lots of linked cases to work with--far more than any similar project. For instance, the UK Biobank, one of the world's leading collections of medical data about individual people, contains 631 cases of a "major cardiac adverse event". The Moorfields data contain about 12, 000 such. The Biobank has data on about 1, 500 stroke patients. Moorfields has 11, 900. For the disease on which the Moorfields project will focus to start with dementia, the data set holds 15, 100 cases. The only comparable study has 86.

Wagner and Keane are searching for patterns in the eye that show the emergence of disease elsewhere in the body. If such patterns could be recognized reliably, the potential impact would be huge.

1. Why does the author mention “the story of blind men feeling an elephant” in Paragraph 1?
A.To claim the ineffectiveness of our health care system.
B.To tell the similarity in various health care units.
C.To explain the limitation of modern health care.
D.To show the complexity of patients' pictures.
2. What does the underlined word "this" in Paragraph 3 refer to?
A.The challenge of making advanced medical instruments.
B.The high risk of getting a heart disease or a stroke
C.The inconvenience of modern health care service.
D.The incomplete and expensive health monitoring.
3. How does AlzEye work?
A.By thoroughly examining one's body organs.
B.By identifying one's state of health through eye scans
C.By helping doctors discover one's diseases of the eye
D.By comparing the eye-scan data from different hospitals.
4. What can be inferred about the Moorfields's project from Paragraph 5?
A.It takes advantage of abundantly available medical data.
B.It makes the collection of medical data more convenient.
C.It improves the Moorfields' competitiveness in the medical field.
D.It strengthens data sharing between the Moorfields and the Biobank.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约440词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Guests arriving at the Aloft Hotel in Manhattan or one in Silicon Valley will soon be able to do something hotels have dreamed about offering for years: walk past the check-in desk and enter their rooms by using a smartphone as a room key. The boutique hotel brand from Starwood to Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. plans to offer this feature at two hotels, in the Harle neighborhood and in Cupertino, Calif, before the end of the quarter.

Starwood officials are hoping this will be one of the biggest technological changes in the industry since free Wi-Fi. "We believe this will become the new standard for how people will want to enter a hotel." says Frits van Passchen, Starwood's CEO. "It may be a novelty at first,but we think it will become table stakes for managing a hotel.

Not everyone is so sure. Past attempts to use technology to streamline the check-in process have had mixed results. Robert Habeeb, president of the First Hospitality Group, which is the owner of 55 hotels in the U.S, says he pulled out check-in kiosks at two of his Holiday Inn hotels after finding that most guests ignored them. He found that many travelers will sacrifice speed or ease to talk with a staff member and ensure their room has the right view or location, or to try for an upgrade. Other guests may still want to be greeted when they arrive.

Hotels have never been known for being in the forefront of technology. The industry is often a delay, in part because many hotels are owned and managed by separate companies, making investments in technology more complicated. Nevertheless, many hotel operators have been searching for ways to remove the bottlenecks that can form at a hotel's front desk. The delays are the bane(祸根)of many a road warrior's travel experience. “Everybody has to check in, but we are all doing it pretty much the same way we were 100 years ago, ”says Christopher Nassetta, chief executive officer for Hilton Worldwide holdings Inc.“It' s something we are seriously addressing.

Yet it is still not clear that virtual keys will do better than previous attempts to beat traditional check-ins. An effort several years ago to allow guests to enter rooms with the magnetic strip on their credit cards never became popular . Guests worried about security and were unwilling to give their kids credit cards instead of room keys.

1. According to the first two paragraphs, which of the following is NOT true?
A.Aloft of Hotel in Manhattan will allow guests to use a smartphone as a room key
B.Hotel officials hope the new room key will be a great change in hotel industry.
C.All Starwood Hotels plan to offer the new room key before the end of the quarter.
D.The new room key may become a new standard of choosing a hotel
2. The word streamline(Para. 3) is closest in meaning to _____________.
A.strengthenB.simplify
C.changeD.unify
3. Christopher Nassetta would most likely agree that _____________.
A.it's a good idea to cancel check-in
B.the management of hotel needs to be improved
C.the way of check-in needs to be changed
D.it's time to make use of technology in hotel industry
4. From the text we can see that the writer thinks the future of the new room key is __________.
A.optimisticB.uncertain
C.brightD.Negative
2019-01-14更新 | 100次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约510词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】One evening in February 2007, a student named Paula Ceely brought her car to a stop on a remote road in Wales. She got out to open a metal gate that blocked her path .That’s when she heard the whistle sounded by the driver of a train. Her Renault Clio was parked across a railway line. Seconds later, she watched the train drag her car almost a kilometer down the railway tracks.

Ceely’s near miss made the news because she blamed it on her GPS device (导航仪). She had never driven the route before. It was dark and raining heavily. Ceely was relying on her GPS, but it made no mention of the crossing. “I put my complete trust in the device and it led me right into the path of a speeding train,” she told the BBC.

Who is to blame here? Rick Stevenson, who tells Ceely’s story in his book When Machines Fail Us, points the finger at the limitations of technology. We put our faith in digital devices, he says, but our digital helpers are too often not up to the job. They are filled with small problems. And it’s not just GPS devices: Stevenson takes us on a tour of digital disasters involving everything from mobile phones to wireless key-boards.

The problem with his argument in the book is that it’s not clear why he only focuses on digital technology, while there may be a number of other possible causes. A map-maker might have left the crossing off a paper map. Maybe we should blame Ceely for not paying attention. Perhaps the railway authorities are at fault for poor signalling system. Or maybe someone has studied the relative dangers and worked out that there really is something specific wrong with the GPS equipment. But Stevenson doesn’t say.

It’s a problem that runs through the book. In a section on cars, Stevenson gives an account of the advanced techniques that criminals use to defeat computer-based locking systems for cars. He offers two independent sets of figures on car theft; both show a small rise in some parts of the country. He says that once again not all new locks have proved reliable. Perhaps, but maybe it’s also due to the shortage of policemen on the streets. Or changing social circumstances. Or some combination of these factors.

The game between humans and their smart devices is amusing and complex. It is shaped by economics and psychology and the cultures we live in. Somewhere in the mix of those forces there may be a way for a wiser use of technology.

If there is such a way, it should involve more than just an awareness of the shortcomings of our machines. After all, we have lived with them for thousands of years. They have probably been fooling us for just as long.

1. The underlined phrase “near miss” in Paragraph 2 can best be replaced by ________.
A.close hitB.heavy loss
C.narrow escapeD.big mistake
2. Which of the following would Rick Stevenson most probably agree with?
A.Digital technology often falls short of our expectation.
B.Modern technology is what we can’t live without.
C.Digital devices are more reliable than they used to be.
D.GPS error is not the only cause for Ceely’s accident.
3. In the writer’s opinion, Stevenson’s argument is ________.
A.well-basedB.reasonable
C.puzzlingD.one-sided
4. What is the real concern of the writer of this article?
A.The major causes of traffic accidents and car thefts.
B.The human unawareness of technical problems.
C.The relationship between humans and technology.
D.The shortcomings of digital devices we use.
2018-12-12更新 | 20次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文,本文主要呈现了“什么时候机器能做我的工作?”的不同观点。

【推荐3】Many people think that the world is about to step into the fourth industrial revolution. This time, machines can do a lot of work in the charge of human beings, even better than human beings. In the future, the world can be more efficient and enjoy cheaper services, but unemployment will become more common.

It raises a troubling question for all of us — when will a machine be able to do my job? Katja Grace, a research associate at the University of Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute, and her colleagues from the AI Impacts project and the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, have surveyed 352 scientists and compiled (汇编) their answers into predictions about how long it may take for machines to outperform humans on various tasks.

The good news is that many of us will probably be safe in our jobs for some time to come. The researchers predict there is a 50% chance that machines will be capable of taking over all human jobs in 120 years.

“One of the biggest surprises was the overall lateness of the predictions,” says Grace. “I expected the amazing progress in machine learning in recent years, plus the fact that we were only talking to machine learning researchers, to make the estimates earlier.”

“I am a bit sceptical of some of the timelines given for tasks that involve physical manipulation (操纵),” says Jeremy Wyatt, professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham. “It is one thing doing it in the lab, and quite another having a robot that can do a job reliably in the real world better than a human.”

Manipulating physical objects in the real world — figuring out what to manipulate, and how, in a random, changing environment — is an incredibly complex job for a machine. Tasks that don’t involve physical manipulation are easier to teach.

Perhaps the hardest jobs for machines to perform are those that take years of training for humans to excel at. These often involve intuitive (直觉的) decision making, complex physical environments or abstract thinking — all things that computers struggle with.

1. Why did the researchers conduct the survey on the future role of machines?
A.To make it clear how machines can replace humans.
B.To find why machines can take the place of humans.
C.To explain humans will be substituted by machines.
D.To learn when machines may be superior to humans on jobs.
2. What did Grace think of the time for machines to replace humans on tasks?
A.She thought the time would be totally uncertain despite the survey.
B.She thought the time would be later than predicted.
C.She thought the time would be earlier than predicted.
D.She thought machines would take over all the jobs in 120 years.
3. What can we infer from the opinion of Jeremy Wyatt?
A.A robot can do a job reliably in the real world better than a human.
B.Tasks that don’t involve physical manipulation are quite complicated.
C.It is difficult for robots to finish the jobs related to physical manipulation.
D.He is sure of the timelines given for tasks that involve physical manipulation.
2024-05-26更新 | 17次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般