A team of scientists says that playing sounds underwater can get fish to return to areas with severely damaged coral reefs(珊瑚礁).
In an experiment, they found fish returned after hearing recordings of the sounds of a healthy ocean reef. The scientists placed underwater speakers in areas where coral had been dying in Australia’s northern Great Barrier Reef. They played the sounds over a period of about six weeks in 2017 and studied the results. The team reported that twice as many fish arrived in areas where the sounds of healthy coral were played.The sounds also led to a 50 percent increase in the number of species present in the area, the researchers found. Among the arriving fish were species that feed on all major food sources.
The researchers noted the importance of having many different kinds of fish return to the area. Different species of fish perform many activities that support the ocean environment and sea life. “Damaged reefs have a higher chance of recovery if they have healthy fish populations,” the scientists wrote in the report.
Steve Simpson is a professor at the University of Exeter who helped lead the research. He said in a statement that “healthy coral reefs are remarkably noisy places. ” They contain the sounds of many kinds of shrimp, fish and other sea creatures. Young fish listen for these sounds when they are looking for a place to settle, Simpson said.
He added that reefs “become ghostly quiet” when they suffer destruction that is usually related to human-caused pollution. Coral damage can cause unappealing smells and sounds that drive shrimp and fish away. But the experiment suggested that the use of underwater loudspeakers was an effective way to get young fish to come back.
Andy Radford, a professor at University of Bristol,said the underwater sounds are a promising way to fight coral reef damage at the local community level. But he noted that other threats need to be, reduced as well. These include climate change, pollution and overfishing.
1. What did the scientists find in the experiment?A.Twice as many fish arrived in the healthy coral areas. |
B.The sounds led to a 50 percent increase in the number of fish present in the area. |
C.Playing the sounds of healthy coral reefs is effective to save dying coral. |
D.Damaged reefs can recover completely if they have healthy fish populations. |
A.Human-caused pollution. |
B.The unattractive smells and sounds. |
C.Climate change. |
D.Overfishing. |
A.Healthy fish help recover the damaged coral reefs by swimming. |
B.People reduce environmental pollution to save dying coral. |
C.Scientists find a new way to protect the ocean environment and sea life. |
D.Researchers use underwater sounds to fight coral reef damage. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Throughout folktale, tales of shapeshifting creatures, from wolves to vampires, have often spread horror across a variety of cultures. But these physical transformations are not limited to the pages of fiction.
A review article suggests that climate change could be physically altering a variety of species across the planet, as individuals change their shape to suit the rising temperatures across the world. Features such as tails, legs and ears are changing to provide different levels of heat exchange with the environment. Warm-blooded animals tend to have longer ears, tails, and limbs if they live in warmer conditions, compared with similar animals in colder places. The long body parts provide a bigger skin surface that they can use to get rid of extra heat.
While the changes occur across a range of species, they’re not universal across every animal considered. These adaptations may be beneficial in the short to medium term, but as the climate continues to change, animals can not continually adapt. At some point, the trade-off won’t be beneficial anymore, which could lead to population declines and even extinction. So, while a larger beak may be useful for species wanting to lose more heat, if it makes the beak more impractical for feeding then it may end up being more of a disadvantage for the birds. There are also a variety of other ways of controlling body temperature that don’t require changes in body shape, such as behavioral changes like making use of shade and migrating at warmer times of year.
Of course, to some extent we already know what’s needed to limit the emptiness of the future natural world. This includes reducing greenhouse gases; protecting biodiversity; restoring connectivity between habitats; and reducing interrelated threats like pollution and land harvesting. Even species that are close to extinction can be brought back from the edge with enough conservation effort.
1. What’s the function of Paragraph 1?A.To show the prevalence of shapeshifting creatures. |
B.To introduce the topic of animals’ physical changes. |
C.To stress the fear caused by shapeshifting creatures. |
D.To list examples of shapeshifting creatures in folktales. |
A.Animals extend some of their body parts to achieve better cooling effect. |
B.Climate change is having a huge impact on almost every species on the earth. |
C.Animals transform their physical features to adapt to the drop of temperatures. |
D.Warm-blooded animals in colder places are more likely to have longer body parts. |
A.To warn that some changes in animals’ body parts do no good at all. |
B.To indicate that the rising temperatures have caused birds more harm. |
C.To introduce behavioral changes as a better way to deal with climate change. |
D.To demonstrate the limited or even negative effect of physical transformations. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Hopeful. | C.Indifferent. | D.Ambiguous. |
【推荐2】More than 40% of the insects around us could become extinct in next few decades. Simultaneously, the population of the adaptable and general species like that of houseflies, cockroaches and fleas is likely to bloom.
Although some species of insects are vectors (带菌者)of serious diseases, or others destroy crop, but a world without insects is inconceivable. Their importance in interconnected ecosystems and food chains can never be undermined. Insects have essential roles in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems as herbivores, carnivores and decomposers.
There are 17 times as many insects as humans, and these numbers are essential for proper functioning of all ecosystems. Insects are responsible for pollinating around 75% of the crops in the world and also serve as food for other creatures. They replenish soils and keep the number of pests in check.
The primary cause of this extinction is loss of habitat. Be it the grasslands or wetlands, everything is vanishing in man's quest towards intensive agriculture and urbanization.
Another cause of this decline is the excessive use of pesticides, fertilizers and introduced invasive species. As if this wasn't enough, climate change and pollution of all sorts have already started worsening their lives. Climate change may also cause emergence of new pests and other vector-borne insects.
The biggest threat of Insect Armageddon comes from Germany, where 75% of insect population have declined in just 30 years and from Puerto Rico, where due to 2 degree rise in temperature, there has been 60 fold decline in invertebrate (无脊椎的)population since the 1970s.
However, the fact that insects getting extinct is a global crisis is undisputed. But the neat thing about insects is, we all can do our bit to save them. We all can maintain pesticide-free kitchen gardens and organic farms. We can plant flowers and trees and invite them to nest again.
Maybe this tragedy would have never arisen in the first place and you would not have to read this article, if the world had stopped using all kinds of pesticides immediately after Rachel Carson had published the Silent Spring. Conserving the insect biodiversity is not our responsibility. It is a necessity because if they go, so will we.
1. Why can't we stand a world without insects?A.For their parts in global ecology. |
B.For their longer history than humans'. |
C.For their shockingly large population. |
D.For the appearance of new insect species. |
A.Possible. | B.Doubtless |
C.Exact | D.Flexible. |
A.Climate change. |
B.Human activities. |
C.The abuse of chemicals. |
D.The agriculture. |
A.Calling on us to do something to save insects. |
B.Introducing the urgent situation insects are facing. |
C.Presenting us ways to handle the global crises. |
D.Treating differently beneficial and harmful insects. |
【推荐3】You might expect to hear parrots like these in the wild in South America. But these birds are actually nesting in the middle of Chicago. Despite being known as monk parakeets (和尚鹦鹅), the green-and-gray birds are true parrots. And they’ve been living in the Windy City since the 1970s. But not just there.
“There are monk parakeets in many, many states. They’re breeding (繁殖) in around 21 states,” said Jenny Uehling, a Ph. D. student now at Cornell, who was at the University of Chicago when she studied these birds. Certain populations will appear in certain states and then, you know disappear, but they’re by far the most widespread of any of the species.
Uehling wanted to know how many non-native parrots were living in the US. To do this, “we used eBird and Christmas Bind Count, or CBC. We use these two databases because they have the largest spatial distribution of data, basically, for the United States”. Uehling and her team looked at data collected from 2002 to 2016 and concluded that there were 56 different species of parrots living free in 43 states, Of these species, 25 of them had become naturalized, that is “able to successfully breed and keep their own population without the addition of additional individuals from captivity (圈养).”
Most of these non-native parrots were either set free by owners or escaped from captivity. Some established breeding populations. And some of these new populations are saving entire bird species.
“The red-crowned parrot is declining in its native range, so are the monk parakeets. And so I think that leads to a really interesting question of, you know: Could we possibly use these populations of non-native parrot species to understand the biology of a species declining in its native range?”
Florida may have a half-million monk parakeets. And they’re even hardy enough to live year-round in Brooklyn and the Bronx, as well as Chicago. And if you’ve ever heard the noise they make, it’s clear that these monks never promised silence."
1. What does the underlined part “Windy City” in Paragraph I refer to?A.Chicago. | B.Florida. | C.Brooklyn. | D.The Bronx. |
A.To protect monk parakeets. |
B.To study the living habits of monk parakeets. |
C.To understand the biology of a species declining in the US. |
D.To calculate the number of non-native parrots living in the US. |
A.They are dying out. |
B.They are making the biggest noise. |
C.They are declining in its native range. |
D.They are living in 50 states of the US. |
A.A diary. | B.A magazine. | C.A novel. | D.A guidebook. |
【推荐1】Last year, Americans spent more than $22 billion on chocolate. But the tasty treat comes at a far greater cost than this.
That’s because farmers often cut down trees in the rainforest when they need more land to plant cacao trees. This contributes to climate (气候) change. In turn, climate change hurts cacao crops (产量). This puts chocolate at risk. But experts are developing solutions to ensure its future.
Chocolate comes mainly from the Cocoa Belt, a narrow piece of land along the equator. In the Cocoa Belt, it is hot and rainy. The conditions are perfect for growing cacao. But in recent years, climate change has a bad influence on the weather in the Cocoa Belt. As a result, cacao trees produce fewer beans. Climate change has also led to the spread of disease that harms trees.
In 2013, researchers studied the changing conditions in the Cocoa Belt. They said that by2050, it will be harder to grow cacao in 90% of places where it is now planted. But Christian Bunn of the International Center for Tropical Agriculture says chocolate won’t disappear anytime soon. Plans to protect it are already taking shape.
One solution to the problem is cross-breeding (杂交). Scientists have developed new cacao trees that stand up to disease. Some even produce more cacao.
Weather stations will also help. Groups are building them in Africa. Around 70% of cacao is grown there. Information from the stations will help farmers know when to plant trees. “Years back, farmers would follow farming rules that go with the seasons,” Bunn said. “Those rules don't always apply anymore.”
These fixes could help farmers grow more cacao on less land. That could help end the push to clear rainforest. That’s good for chocolate, and a sweet deal for the planet. “Everything has a side effect,” Bunn said. “We have to be smarter about our food.”
1. What causes a drop in cacao crops according to the text?A.Higher costs. | B.Less farmland. |
C.Water pollution. | D.Climate change. |
A.Go with. | B.Die from. | C.Protect against. | D.Bring about. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Uncaring. | C.Positive. | D.Disapproving. |
A.Solutions to Saving Chocolate | B.An End to Traditional Farming |
C.New Ways to Plant Cacao Trees | D.Measures to Protect Rainforest |
【推荐2】Denmark is only about half the size of South Carolina, but it produces more of its electricity from wind than any other country in the world. That's not because it's a country with particularly strong wind; it has pretty ordinary wind speeds. The reason why the Danes now get 47% of their electricity from wind, with more to come, comes down to a combination of history and policy.
First, the history: Paul la Cour was a scientist and inventor who experimented with and built early wind power machines at the start of the 20th century. So it's not surprising that Denmark spent money building wind power plants early, beginning at a national level in the 1970s. In the 1980s, because of a strong movement against nuclear (原子核的)power plants, Denmark increased production before many other countries were even considering it.
Denmark has also had important government support for wind-energy projects, as well as support from the country 's technology-focused universities. Even back in 2002, the country was taking climate change warnings seriously, successfully cutting greenhouse gas emissions (排放)by 20%.
Some of the world's largest companies—including Vestas, which builds turbines ((涡轮), and Orsted, which specializes in offshore wind projects—are Danish. European countries are global leaders in using wind power but Denmark is far in front of its nearest competitor Ireland, which sourced 28% of its power from wind in 2018 according to industry group Wind Europe.
At the end of 2019, lawmakers in Denmark set a new goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 70% by 2030 and increase the share of electricity sourced from renewable power to 100%.
1. What do we know about Denmark from Paragraph 1?A.It produces more than half of its electricity from wind. |
B.It makes the most of its wind to produce electricity . |
C.It is the most environmentally friendly country. |
D.It is a country with rich wind resources. |
A.Denmark started making use of wind power very early . |
B.Paul la Cour built wind power plants in the whole country. |
C.Nuclear power plants produce most electricity in Denmark. |
D.Denmark taught other countries to build wind power plants. |
A.has an influential role on the world stage |
B.has many technology-focused companies |
C.is the head office of many large companies |
D.is the world's leading wind power country |
A.History. | B.Lifestyle. | C.Environment. | D.Society. |
【推荐3】As an oceanographer (海洋学家), I’ve spent many years developing robots to explore the ocean, and now we’re putting that technology to use in our JASON Project, a program that’s designed to inspire students and get them interested in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. In theaters throughout the country, we bring kids together and send back to them on large screens our live explorations of large areas of the globe. Not only are the kids observers, but they can operate robots moving across the area while broadcasting images back to them. The kids have the sensation (感受) of really being at the site with us.
I believe advances in robot technology will one day be the key to a new kind of travel. In the next 10 or 15 years, people will have rooms in their houses that will be able to simulate (模拟) other environment. I like to call this rooms “home domes” — small theaters with screens and advanced equipment that can reproduce the sights, sounds, smells, and feel of a desert or a forest. Hand in hand with these rooms, I can see a market for travel robots located in countries around the world. You could rent (租) a robot working in a rain forest, then go into your home dome, where you yourself operate the robot’s movements. The equipment in the room will receive the sensations in the robot’s environment and simulate them for you.
Today, much of the world’s population never travels more than 50 or 60 miles from home. And even a person with enough time can see only a part of the earth’s sights. But this new way of travel will cost so much less in both time and money and allow people to see a lot more of the globe. And simulated travel will also help protect our planet. You can’t take large groups of tourists to look at Dian Fossey’s gorillas (大猩猩). But a small robot, with no animal smell, can get very close to a gorilla and send the sights, sounds, and smells back to a million people.
1. The main purpose of the JASON Project is to .A.design robots | B.educate children |
C.explore the world | D.improve technology |
A.enjoy a guided trip | B.get very close to nature |
C.develop and operate robots | D.send images back to scientists |
A.Uncaring. | B.Doubtful. |
C.Hopeful. | D.Dissatisfied. |
A.has been widely accepted | B.costs lots of time and money |
C.is harmful to the environment | D.is time and money-saving |
【推荐1】Getting around Venice by travelling along its water ways is a delight for all visitors. Apart from offering unforgettable views of the architecture, the city's transportations are convenient, efficient, and also relatively inexpensive.
PASSES
Instead of paying EUR 7 per ride, a better option is to purchase one of ACTV's passes, which offer unlimited travel for 1 day (EUR 20), 2 days (EUR 30), 3 days (EUR 40) or 1 week (EUR 60). For children and young people between the ages of 6 and 29, ACTV offers a special "Rolling Venice" 3-day pass (EUR 29).
BY GONDOLA
Considered by many as the most symbolic feature of Venice, today gondolas circulate most often on canals in the centre of the city, carrying tourists on rides at fixed rates, which tend to be rather high. A 40-minute ride costs around EUR 100, but may be shared by as many as six passengers.
BY RENTAL BOAT
It is possible to rent a boat to travel around Venice's canals. A boating permit is not required, but you will need to pass a basic turning and docking test before being allowed to rent a boat. Rates start at EUR 30 per hour.
BY WATER TAXI
Getting around by water taxi in Venice is most costly, but can be a convenient option when you are in a hurry or need to carry a lot of luggage. The initial charge is EUR 15, then EUR 2 per minute. If you have more than one bag per passenger, there is a charge of EUR 3 for each additional piece.
Note: There are only four fueling stations for boats in Venice. Make sure you note their locations before heading out.
1. What is said about the ACTV's pass?A.It provides the tourists with five choices. | B.It is only suitable for kids and the young. |
C.It should be ordered ahead of time online. | D.It is a certificate given to the foreign tourists. |
A.Because it is the most economical means. | B.Because tourists can enjoy the city for longer. |
C.Because tourists will be clear about the cost. | D.Because it represents the city of Venice. |
A.PASSES. | B.BY GONDOLA. |
C.BY WATER TAXI. | D.BY RENTAL BOAT. |
【推荐2】For several months, Cara has been working up the courage to approach her mom about what she saw on Instagram. Not long ago, the 11yearold girl, like all the other kids in this story, discovered that her mom had been posting her photos for much of her life. “I’ve wanted to bring it up. It’s strange to see myself up there, and sometimes there are pictures I don’t like of myself, ”she said.
Like most other modern kids, Cara grew up immersed(沉迷…之中) in social media. While many kids may not yet have accounts themselves, their parents, schools, sports teams, and organizations have been organizing an online presence for them since birth. The shock of realizing that details about your life have been shared online without your permission or knowledge has become an important experience in the lives of many teenagers. Recently a parenting blogger(博主) wrote in a Washington Post essay(散文) that despite(不顾) her 14yearold daughter’s horror at discovering that her mother had shared years of highly personal stories and information about her online, she simply could not stop posting on her blog and social media. The writer said that promising her daughter that she would stop posting her publicly on the Internet would mean shutting down a vital part of herself, which isn’t necessarily good for herself or her daughter.
But it’s not just crazy mommy bloggers who construct a child’s online identity; plenty of average parents do the same. There’s even a special word for it: sharenting. Almost a quarter of children begin their digital lives when parents upload their photos to the Internet, according to a study conducted by the Internetsecurity firm AVG. The study also found that 92 percent of kids under the age of 2 already have their own unique digital identity.
1. How does Cara feel about her mom’s behavior?A.It’s aggressive. | B.It’s appropriate. |
C.It’s annoying. | D.It’s favorable. |
A.Because it filled up her blog. | B.Because it showed off her success. |
C.Because it recorded her stories. | D.Because it meant a lot to her. |
A.A quarter of students. | B.Most ordinary parents. |
C.Kids under the age of 2. | D.Some crazy bloggers. |
A.Children’s New Trouble | B.Social Media |
C.Kids’ Online Performance | D.Mommy Bloggers |
【推荐3】The sporty all-electric car from the Netherlands resembles a BMW coupe (双门轿车), but is unique: It captures more carbon than it emits. Called ZEM, for zero emission mobility, the two-seater houses a Cleantron lithium-ion battery pack, and most of its parts are 3D-printed from recycled plastic.
“Our end goal is to create a more sustainable future,” said Jens Lahaije, finance manager for TU/ecomotive, the Eindhoven University of Technology student team that created the car. “The target is to minimize carbon dioxide emitted during the car’s full lifespan, from manufacturing to recycling,” he added.
Direct Air Capture(DAC) technology captures carbon dioxide by pulling in atmospheric air, and then through a series of chemical reactions, extracts the carbon dioxide(CO2) from it while returning the rest of the air to the environment. The team has made use of this innovative technology and implemented (执行) this in the car. The idea is very simple: while driving, air will move through the self-designed filters and the CO2 will be captured and stored.
ZEM uses two filters that can capture up to 2 kilograms(4.41 lb)of CO2 over 20,000 miles of driving, the Eindhoven team estimated. They imagine a future when filters can be emptied at charging stations.
Nikki Okkels, external relations manager at TU/ecomotive: “We want to tickle (使发痒) the industry by showing what is already possible. If 35 students can design, develop and build an almost carbon-neutral car in a year, then there are also opportunities and possibilities for the industry. We’re not finished developing yet either, and we want to take some big steps in the coming years. We warmly invite car manufacturers to come and take a look.”
1. What do we know about the sporty all-electric car?A.It is developed by BMW manufacturer. |
B.It can totally transform CO2 into oxygen. |
C.Its body is completely made from recycled plastics. |
D.It contains a Cleantron lithium-ion battery pack. |
A.To minimize the expense of the car. | B.To reduce CO2 emission greatly. |
C.To enlarge the lifespan of the car. | D.To sustainably recycle more cars. |
A.Air will be stored in the two filters of the car. |
B.CO2 is isolated from air through chemical reactions. |
C.It has been widely applied in automobile making industry. |
D.The filters can be emptied in the process of driving the car. |
A.Promising. | B.Problematic. | C.Profitable. | D.Widely-used. |
【推荐1】Best Wine Club Gifts
Here are the best wine club gifts that you can give to yourself or your beloved ones this month.
Vinebox Club: for the person that’s scared of commitment
To get started with Vinebox, you’ll just take a quiz on your favorite flavors and tastes. Then Vinebox will select 3 or 6 different brands of wines and send them straight to your door. Enjoy their surprise!
Cost: $ 27 a box
Winc Choice: for the new wine drinker
Just note that when you’re gifting a Winc subscription, the gift receiver isn’t going to get a box. Instead, it will be a Winc gift card that offers him a variety of choices.
Cost: You choose the amount that you want to gift.
Cellars Wine Club: for the picky wine drinker
From international to local wines, and all the way from sweets to 90+ point offerings, there’s an amazing wine club out there. For lovers of sweet wines, its Sweet Club series, which offers sweeter wines, like moscato d'asti and rieslings, is perfect.
Cost: $29-$79 a month.
Blend (混酿酒) Club: for the on-the-go wine drinker
You can choose between a red blend, a white blend, a rosé blend, or all three in their variety pack subscription.
Cost: Get the first 3 blends at only $27 for subscription, or $12 per blend.
1. What is special about Winc Choice?A.It offers a variety of colorful sweet wines. |
B.It only sells wines to the registered members. |
C.The gift receiver will get a card to choose his favorite wines. |
D.The gift receiver needs to take a test on his favorite flavors. |
A.$9. | B.$12. |
C.$27. | D.$39. |
A.Vinebox Club. | B.Cellars Wine Club. |
C.Blend Club. | D.Winc Choice. |
【推荐2】From the V&A’s landmark fashion exhibitions to a collection of Vincent van Gogh’s finest works: these are the London exhibitions you can’t miss right now.
Mary Quant
The fashion exhibition at the V&A this summer moves to street-smart designer Mary Quant, who’s considered highly influential in the trends of the 1960s, playing a big part in the popularity of the mini-skirts and hot pants. In this exhibition, see more than 200 clothing pieces as well as photographs and designs that will transport you back to the decade.
Tickets: £12
Dates: Sunday, 6 April, 2019-Sunday, 16 February, 2020
Van Gogh and Britain
The exhibition at the Tate Britain brings together 50 pieces Van Gogh’s classic works. His relationship with Britain is an early focus: he spoke and read English well and was devoted to British literature. “My whole life is aimed at making the things from everyday life that Dickens describes,” he wrote. See Van Gogh’s collection of British books before arriving at his paintings.
Tickets:£22
Dates:Wednesday, 27 March-Sunday, 11 August, 2019
Diane Arbus: In the Beginning
This display of Diane Arbus’ works has been put on by The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Titled Diane Arbus: In the Beginning, it covers the first half of her career, featuring more than 100 photographs taken across New York landmarks such as Times Square and Coney Island, more than two-thirds of which haven’t been seen in the UK before.
Tickets:£14
Dates: Until Thursday, 6 May,2019
DonMccullin
More than 250 photos taken by British photojournalist DonMcCullin over the past six decades are on display at the Tate Britain. See shots from one of the UK’s most famous war photographers reporting in Vietnam, Northern Ireland and Syria, as well as photos taken of working-class life in London’s East End. The pictures offer a fascinating insight into more than 60 years of conflict and poverty around the world.
Tickets:£18
Dates: Tuesday, 5 February-Monday, 6 May, 2019
1. Which exhibition brings you back to the sixties?A.Mary Quant. | B.Van Gogh and Britain. |
C.Diane Arbus:In the Beginning. | D.Don Mccullin. |
A.£12. | B.£22. | C.£14. | D.£18. |
A.Designs and photos of clothing. | B.Van Gogh’s collection of British books. |
C.Shots of famous New York sights. | D.Photos reflecting poverty around the world. |
【推荐3】In six states in the USA, drivers are forbidden to use cell phones while operating a vehicle. In 19 states, anyone who is behind the wheel of a car will get a ticket for text messaging. While cell phone may distract people when they are supposed to be paying attention to traffic, some feel that these laws are an invasion of privacy.
With the increase in the popularity of cell phones, more and more people are using them while driving. Police officers have found talking on hand-held or even hands-free phones while driving is becoming the cause of more and more crashes. As a matter of fact, talking on a cell phone does reduce the brain activities associated with driving by 37 percent. In nearly 25 percent of crashes, police officers have reported that cell phones have had a distracting effect on the drivers. Although evidence shows that using a cell phone while driving can cause traffic crashes, many people believe that they have a right to privacy in their own vehicle.
Privacy advocates have been attempting to define privacy as a fundamental human right. In America privacy is not guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, but the Supreme Court has ruled that citizens be granted a right against government intrusion (侵犯). This is one of the reasons why advocates believe that giving fines for doing something as simple as talking on the phone goes against the privacy of the individual. People are free to do what they feel like doing, but if it has the potential to harm others, then there should be laws stopping this behavior.
Just as a citizen of a country has freedom of speech but it is still not allowed to yell “fire” in a crowed movie theater, people should not be allowed to talk on a cell phone while navigating their way through traffic. Last year at any time during the daytime, there were 800,000 individual text messaging or making phone calls with hand-held cell phones. That same year, 6,000 people died in automobile accidents related to cell phone use. These statistics show that cell phone use in a vehicle can put one's life in danger.
1. Why are privacy advocates upset?A.They think the fines are too high. |
B.They believe a basic right is being violated. |
C.They want to change the Constitution. |
D.They want more citizens’ right. |
A.Cell phone use can be dangerous. |
B.Governments shouldn't limit cell phone use. |
C.Privacy is a basic human right. |
D.Text messaging is acceptable while driving. |
A.Citizens have a right to privacy. |
B.Text messaging is not too dangerous. |
C.Evidence concludes that it is risky. |
D.Friends should connect with each other with cell phones. |