组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 动物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:54 题号:11471909

A team of scientists says that playing sounds underwater can get fish to return to areas with severely damaged coral reefs(珊瑚礁).

In an experiment, they found fish returned after hearing recordings of the sounds of a healthy ocean reef. The scientists placed underwater speakers in areas where coral had been dying in Australia’s northern Great Barrier Reef. They played the sounds over a period of about six weeks in 2017 and studied the results. The team reported that twice as many fish arrived in areas where the sounds of healthy coral were played.The sounds also led to a 50 percent increase in the number of species present in the area, the researchers found. Among the arriving fish were species that feed on all major food sources.

The researchers noted the importance of having many different kinds of fish return to the area. Different species of fish perform many activities that support the ocean environment and sea life. “Damaged reefs have a higher chance of recovery if they have healthy fish populations,” the scientists wrote in the report.

Steve Simpson is a professor at the University of Exeter who helped lead the research. He said in a statement that “healthy coral reefs are remarkably noisy places. ” They contain the sounds of many kinds of shrimp, fish and other sea creatures. Young fish listen for these sounds when they are looking for a place to settle, Simpson said.

He added that reefs “become ghostly quiet” when they suffer destruction that is usually related to human-caused pollution. Coral damage can cause unappealing smells and sounds that drive shrimp and fish away. But the experiment suggested that the use of underwater loudspeakers was an effective way to get young fish to come back.

Andy Radford, a professor at University of Bristol,said the underwater sounds are a promising way to fight coral reef damage at the local community level. But he noted that other threats need to be, reduced as well. These include climate change, pollution and overfishing.

1. What did the scientists find in the experiment?
A.Twice as many fish arrived in the healthy coral areas.
B.The sounds led to a 50 percent increase in the number of fish present in the area.
C.Playing the sounds of healthy coral reefs is effective to save dying coral.
D.Damaged reefs can recover completely if they have healthy fish populations.
2. According to Steve Simpson,what will drive fish away from damaged coral reefs?
A.Human-caused pollution.
B.The unattractive smells and sounds.
C.Climate change.
D.Overfishing.
3. What’s the main idea of the text?
A.Healthy fish help recover the damaged coral reefs by swimming.
B.People reduce environmental pollution to save dying coral.
C.Scientists find a new way to protect the ocean environment and sea life.
D.Researchers use underwater sounds to fight coral reef damage.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了世界气候的变化导致动物的外形也相应发生了改变,文章介绍了这种改变的一些局限性以及作者对自然界未来的看法。

【推荐1】Throughout folktale, tales of shapeshifting creatures, from wolves to vampires, have often spread horror across a variety of cultures. But these physical transformations are not limited to the pages of fiction.

A review article suggests that climate change could be physically altering a variety of species across the planet, as individuals change their shape to suit the rising temperatures across the world. Features such as tails, legs and ears are changing to provide different levels of heat exchange with the environment. Warm-blooded animals tend to have longer ears, tails, and limbs if they live in warmer conditions, compared with similar animals in colder places. The long body parts provide a bigger skin surface that they can use to get rid of extra heat.

While the changes occur across a range of species, they’re not universal across every animal considered. These adaptations may be beneficial in the short to medium term, but as the climate continues to change, animals can not continually adapt. At some point, the trade-off won’t be beneficial anymore, which could lead to population declines and even extinction. So, while a larger beak may be useful for species wanting to lose more heat, if it makes the beak more impractical for feeding then it may end up being more of a disadvantage for the birds. There are also a variety of other ways of controlling body temperature that don’t require changes in body shape, such as behavioral changes like making use of shade and migrating at warmer times of year.

Of course, to some extent we already know what’s needed to limit the emptiness of the future natural world. This includes reducing greenhouse gases; protecting biodiversity; restoring connectivity between habitats; and reducing interrelated threats like pollution and land harvesting. Even species that are close to extinction can be brought back from the edge with enough conservation effort.

1. What’s the function of Paragraph 1?
A.To show the prevalence of shapeshifting creatures.
B.To introduce the topic of animals’ physical changes.
C.To stress the fear caused by shapeshifting creatures.
D.To list examples of shapeshifting creatures in folktales.
2. According to Paragraph 2, which of the following statements is TURE?
A.Animals extend some of their body parts to achieve better cooling effect.
B.Climate change is having a huge impact on almost every species on the earth.
C.Animals transform their physical features to adapt to the drop of temperatures.
D.Warm-blooded animals in colder places are more likely to have longer body parts.
3. Why does the author mention the example of “a larger beak” in Paragraph 3?
A.To warn that some changes in animals’ body parts do no good at all.
B.To indicate that the rising temperatures have caused birds more harm.
C.To introduce behavioral changes as a better way to deal with climate change.
D.To demonstrate the limited or even negative effect of physical transformations.
4. What’s the author’s attitude toward the future of the natural world?
A.Doubtful.B.Hopeful.C.Indifferent.D.Ambiguous.
2022-01-25更新 | 100次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】More than 40% of the insects around us could become extinct in next few decades. Simultaneously, the population of the adaptable and general species like that of houseflies, cockroaches and fleas is likely to bloom.

Although some species of insects are vectors (带菌者)of serious diseases, or others destroy crop, but a world without insects is inconceivable. Their importance in interconnected ecosystems and food chains can never be undermined. Insects have essential roles in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems as herbivores, carnivores and decomposers.

There are 17 times as many insects as humans, and these numbers are essential for proper functioning of all ecosystems. Insects are responsible for pollinating around 75% of the crops in the world and also serve as food for other creatures. They replenish soils and keep the number of pests in check.

The primary cause of this extinction is loss of habitat. Be it the grasslands or wetlands, everything is vanishing in man's quest towards intensive agriculture and urbanization.

Another cause of this decline is the excessive use of pesticides, fertilizers and introduced invasive species. As if this wasn't enough, climate change and pollution of all sorts have already started worsening their lives. Climate change may also cause emergence of new pests and other vector-borne insects.

The biggest threat of Insect Armageddon comes from Germany, where 75% of insect population have declined in just 30 years and from Puerto Rico, where due to 2 degree rise in temperature, there has been 60 fold decline in invertebrate (无脊椎的)population since the 1970s.

However, the fact that insects getting extinct is a global crisis is undisputed. But the neat thing about insects is, we all can do our bit to save them. We all can maintain pesticide-free kitchen gardens and organic farms. We can plant flowers and trees and invite them to nest again.

Maybe this tragedy would have never arisen in the first place and you would not have to read this article, if the world had stopped using all kinds of pesticides immediately after Rachel Carson had published the Silent Spring. Conserving the insect biodiversity is not our responsibility. It is a necessity because if they go, so will we.

1. Why can't we stand a world without insects?
A.For their parts in global ecology.
B.For their longer history than humans'.
C.For their shockingly large population.
D.For the appearance of new insect species.
2. What does the underlined word '"undisputed" in Paragraph 7 mean?
A.Possible.B.Doubtless
C.ExactD.Flexible.
3. Which of the following may best explain the extinction of insect species?
A.Climate change.
B.Human activities.
C.The abuse of chemicals.
D.The agriculture.
4. What is the author's purpose in writing the text?
A.Calling on us to do something to save insects.
B.Introducing the urgent situation insects are facing.
C.Presenting us ways to handle the global crises.
D.Treating differently beneficial and harmful insects.
2020-07-07更新 | 172次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了和尚鹦鹉正在美国安家。

【推荐3】You might expect to hear parrots like these in the wild in South America. But these birds are actually nesting in the middle of Chicago. Despite being known as monk parakeets (和尚鹦鹅), the green-and-gray birds are true parrots. And they’ve been living in the Windy City since the 1970s. But not just there.

“There are monk parakeets in many, many states. They’re breeding (繁殖) in around 21 states,” said Jenny Uehling, a Ph. D. student now at Cornell, who was at the University of Chicago when she studied these birds. Certain populations will appear in certain states and then, you know disappear, but they’re by far the most widespread of any of the species.

Uehling wanted to know how many non-native parrots were living in the US. To do this, “we used eBird and Christmas Bind Count, or CBC. We use these two databases because they have the largest spatial distribution of data, basically, for the United States”. Uehling and her team looked at data collected from 2002 to 2016 and concluded that there were 56 different species of parrots living free in 43 states, Of these species, 25 of them had become naturalized, that is “able to successfully breed and keep their own population without the addition of additional individuals from captivity (圈养).”

Most of these non-native parrots were either set free by owners or escaped from captivity. Some established breeding populations. And some of these new populations are saving entire bird species.

“The red-crowned parrot is declining in its native range, so are the monk parakeets. And so I think that leads to a really interesting question of, you know: Could we possibly use these populations of non-native parrot species to understand the biology of a species declining in its native range?”

Florida may have a half-million monk parakeets. And they’re even hardy enough to live year-round in Brooklyn and the Bronx, as well as Chicago. And if you’ve ever heard the noise they make, it’s clear that these monks never promised silence."

1. What does the underlined part “Windy City” in Paragraph I refer to?
A.Chicago.B.Florida.C.Brooklyn.D.The Bronx.
2. What did Uehling use eBird and CBC for?
A.To protect monk parakeets.
B.To study the living habits of monk parakeets.
C.To understand the biology of a species declining in the US.
D.To calculate the number of non-native parrots living in the US.
3. What do we konw about monk parakeets?
A.They are dying out.
B.They are making the biggest noise.
C.They are declining in its native range.
D.They are living in 50 states of the US.
4. Where is the text most likely from?
A.A diary.B.A magazine.C.A novel.D.A guidebook.
2022-03-30更新 | 45次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般