组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:184 题号:1194823
Imagine this situation. You pass a group of people. The people are talking to each other. You cannot hear what they are saying. But suddenly they start laughing. What would you think? Would you think they were laughing at something funny that one of them said? Or—be honest with yourself—would you think they were laughing at you? Yes, you.

Being laughed at is a common fear. But a major study published in two thousand and nine found that this fear is not the same around the world. It differs from culture to culture.

People in Finland were the least likely to believe that people laughing in their presence were making fun of them. Less than ten percent of Finns in the study said they would think that, compared to eighty percent of people in Thailand.

Some people in the study said they felt unsure of themselves in social situations but hid their feelings of insecurity. Others said they avoided social situations where they had been laughed at before.

The study found that people in Turkmenistan and Cambodia were more likely to be in the first group. They would hide their feelings of insecurity if they were around other people's laughter. But people in Iraq, Egypt and Jordan were more likely to try to avoid such situations if they felt they had been laughed at before.

Shy people often avoid situations that would force them into close contact with other people. They worry that something they say or do will make other people laugh at them. But some people worry much more than others. They may have a disorder called gelotophobia. Gelos is a Greek word. It means laughter. Phobia means fear. This fear of laughter can be truly sad for those who live with it. It can affect how they lead their lives.

In the study, a team from the University of Zurich led more than ninety researchers from around the world. They wanted to understand the difference between normal shyness and true gelotophobia. Another purpose of the study was to compare the levels of fear of being laughed at in different cultures. The researchers surveyed more than twenty-two thousand people in forty-two different languages. The findings appeared in the scientific journal Humor.

1. People in Finland don’t believe other people are making fun of them if _________________.
A.they suddenly start to laugh
B.they keep on laughing
C.they laugh in their presence
D.they stop laughing suddenly
2. What’s FALSE of the study led by a team from the University of Zurich?
A.They wanted to study the difference between normal shyness and true gelotophobia.
B.They wanted to compare the levels of fear of being laughed at in different cultures.
C.They did such a survey in order to prevent people from being laughed at in public.
D.They surveyed more than 22 thousand people coming from different cultures.
3. The passage is likely to occur in _______________.
A.an advertisementB.a science magazine
C.a science fictionD.a storybook
4. According to the passage, people who suffer from gelotophobia ______________________.
A.care more about being laughed at by others
B.shouldn’t hide their feelings of insecurity
C.should avoid having close contact with other people
D.will lead a happy life so long as they care
2012·福建龙岩·二模 查看更多[2]
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】A recent study surveyed 5,000 British families about their experiences with volunteering and their mental health. Participants completed the same survey every two years from 1996 to 2008.

About 20 percent of the survey participants reported doing regular unpaid work Researchers found that these volunteers also scored highest on their mental health scores. The two were linked so directly that the more a person volunteered, the happier they were.

One could argue a chicken-and-egg theory: happier people are more likely to have the time, money, energy and resources to give back to others. But even when researchers adjusted for education, social class and total health, the link was there, suggesting that the mental increase came from volunteering and not the other way around.

According to Dr. Stephen G. Post, author of The Hidden Gifts of Helping, when you help others, your brain releases feel-good chemicals, which can help cells repair themselves and grow. And this translates to better health.

So volunteering can help improve both your physical and mental health—on one condition. You have to mean it. People who volunteered for "self-oriental" reasons, either because they were forced to do so for work or school or because they were trying to get away from problems in their lives, had a mortality(死亡率)risk that was similar to those who didn't volunteer at all. It was only when people were volunteering out of a true sense of sympathy that they saw any health benefits.

So whether it's arranging books at the library or walking dogs at the animal shelter, find a cause that's important to you and give it a try. Volunteering is a good way to develop a sense of connection that not only helps your community, but may also be good for you.

1. Who are healthier according to the study?
A.people who are happier.
B.people who are good at taking exams.
C.people that work as volunteers regularly.
D.people that make a large amount of money.
2. Why does the author mention the chicken-and-egg theory?
A.To introduce a world-famous theory.
B.To point out that volunteering came first.
C.To prove happy ones would like to help others.
D.To tell us that the cause and the effect are mixed.
3. What may be one of the "self-oriented" reasons?
A.You try your best to solve others' problems.
B.You are filled with pity for the foster kids.
C.You have the duty to look after the old.
D.You're always willing to help others.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.A chicken-and-egg theory.
B.Happiness has a lot to do with health.
C.A sense of connection is important to us.
D.Volunteering willingly is good for health.
2018-10-27更新 | 68次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】It might be hard at first glance to see what things like toothbrushes, tires, cigarettes, and shoes have in common. But look closer and you’ll find that, like so many objects in our daily lives, they’re often made to a greater or lesser degree of the magic stuff (东西): plastic.

That stuff is now a planetary problem. Sometimes, because the plastic is mixed with other materials — including other plastics, such as in shoes — it’s difficult or impossible to recycle. In many places, recycling or burying in a landfill isn’t an option, not to mention all the waste that ends up in rivers and oceans. And so, more often than not, after a short useful life, plastic objects enter what’s likely to be a centuries-long afterlife as rubbish.

They’re thrown into rivers and washed into the sea. They break down into tiny bits called micro plastics. Sea animals big and small eat those pieces. Some pieces get mixed in with sea salt and we wind up eating them, with uncertain effects. We breathe in even smaller pieces called nano plastics: Scientists recently discovered them on remote mountaintops and even in the Arctic, where they are carried by winds and mixed with rain and snow.

The magic stuff has now become the stuff of nightmares.

Increasingly the challenge is to have the former without the latter. “Reduce, reuse, and recycle” has been the environmentalists’ answer for half a century. Businesses that sell plastic products or packaging, however, have little motivation to encourage reducing or reusing, and recycling — once thought a cure-all — can be complex and expensive. But with plastic pollution now a global problem, the stakes (风险) are raised, and so is public awareness.

Plastic waste has started to worry us. Business owners are creating new options for avoiding it. The point is not to demonize(妖魔化)things that were invented for good reason and with good intentions; the point is to find a way to have our plastic and not eat it too.

1. Which of the following can best describe plastic in our life according to Paragraph 1?
A.Old-fashionedB.Widely-used
C.HarmfulD.Useless
2. What can we infer about the solution to plastic pollution in the last 50 years?
A.It hasn’t worked properly.
B.It has been totally ignored.
C.It hasn’t gained support from the public.
D.It has encouraged the businesses to recycle.
3. Which of the following will the author agree with to solve plastic problem?
A.A ban on plastic production.
B.A law punishing plastic littering.
C.An alternative material replacing plastic.
D.A new method of using without pollution.
4. Where is the text most likely from?
A.A magazine.B.A guidebook.
C.A novel.D.A diary.
2020-04-19更新 | 37次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了一项新的科学研究表明,作为人类,当我们感到压力时,我们的汗水和呼吸会产生不同的气味,而狗狗在放松时可以用它们最擅长的嗅觉把这些气味和我们的气味区分开来,即使是它们不认识的人。

【推荐3】The physiological (生理的) processes associated with a psychological stress response produce changes in human breath and sweat that dogs can detect with an accuracy of 93. 75%, according to a new study published this week in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Clara Wilson of Queen’s University Belfast, UK, and colleagues.

In the new study, the researchers collected samples ( 样 本 ) of breath and sweat from non-smokers who had not recently eaten or drunk. Samples were collected both before and after a fast-paced maths task, along with self. reported stress levels and objective physiological measures: heart rate (HR)and blood pressure (BP). Samples from 36 participants who reported an increase in stress because of the task, and experienced an increase in HR and BP during the task, were shown to dogs within three hours of being collected.

Four dogs of different kinds had been taught by researchers to match smells in a discrimination task. Then at testing, dogs were asked to find the participant’s stress sample (taken at the end of the task) while the same person’s relaxed sample (taken only minutes before, prior to the task starting) was also in the sample group.

Overall, dogs could detect and perform their alert (警觉的) behavior on the sample taken during stress in 675 out of 720 trials, or 93. 75% of the time, much greater than expected by chance. The first time they were exposed to a participant’s stressed and relaxed samples, the dogs correctly alerted to the stress sample 94. 44% of the time. Individual dogs ranged in performance from 90% to 96. 88% accuracy.

Clara Wilson, the lead study author, explains, “The findings show that we, as humans, produce different smells through our sweat and breath when we are stressed and dogs can tell this apart from our smells when relaxed using what they do best— smelling— even if it is someone they do not know. ”The study made us more aware of a dog’s ability to use their nose to “see” the world, which could be useful when training service dogs and therapy dogs.

1. What can we learn about the participants in the new study?
A.They are nondrinkers.
B.They are nonsmokers.
C.They suffer from high blood pressure.
D.They think a lot about the pressures of life.
2. What did the researchers do to the dogs before testing them?
A.They fed them.B.They named them
C.They trained them.D.They measured them.
3. What is the main idea of the text?
A.Dogs can pick up on human emotions.
B.Dogs can’t detect humans’ stress levels.
C.Dogs can tell our stress from our smells.
D.Dogs can perform visual discrimination tasks.
4. In which section of a newspaper may this text appear?
A.Science.B.Entertainment.C.Education.D.Health.
2023-02-18更新 | 52次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般