组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.85 引用次数:231 题号:12843655

These days there is so much tempting technology to look at: smart phones, tablets, computer games and TV screens. Much of children's entertainment and education comes from using them, so it's no wonder they spend so much time staring at them. But even if the saying that looking at a screen for too long gives you square eyes isn't true, there is still some concern. So, should we be worried?

Certainly for children who spend hours glued to a screen, there is a concern that their health might be at risk. Also there is a fear that their eyesight is declining too. Although there's not much evidence to prove this yet, recent findings have brought the problem into light.

Chris Hammond, consultant at St Thomas' Hospital, says “We find short-sightedness is becoming more common It has greatly spread in East Asia, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea where approaching 90 of 18-year-olds are now short-sighted.”

But can this be linked to children's obsession with using electronic gadgets? Annegret Dahlmann, expert at Moorfields Eve Hospital in London. says lack of natural light seems to be the key issue. She's suggested that children in East Asia study a lot, using computers, smart phones or tablets, and they go outside less. Wearing glasses is one solution, but it's not ideal.

This leads to a dilemma: achieving short-term academic success or protecting your long-term eyesight. It's always going to be a challenge to drag children away from their screens and it's likely that more and more studying will be done online. But despite that, Professor Hammond says. “In countries like urban China, where 10% of children in each class per year are becoming short-sighted from about the age of six. there's an argument for saying we should be trying to prevent it.” It's evidence we can't turn a blind eye to. So, maybe it's time to hit the “off” button and get our children outside?

1. What can we infer from the first two paragraphs?
A.Recent findings have opened our eyes to the issue of eyesight.
B.Looking at a screen for too long will get you square eyes.
C.It has been confirmed that children's eyesight is failing.
D.Using electronic gadgets affects children's education.
2. According to Annegret, which is mainly to blame for short-sightedness?
A.Wearing glasses.B.Heavy school work.
C.Lack of natural light.D.Booming technology.
3. According to the text, what trouble has raised concerns?
A.Learning online or offline.
B.Reading for pleasure or exams.
C.Focusing on study or protecting eyesight.
D.Protecting eyesight or promoting technology.
4. What does the author call on children to do?
A.Study hard.B.Head outdoors.C.Quit computer.D.Challenge more.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约180词) | 较易 (0.85)

【推荐1】China Youth says that more and more girl students have entered colleges to study in the recent few years. As we know, once the number of boys was larger than that of girls and boys did much better than girls in our country for a long time. Now, things have changed a lot.

In recent years, the proportion (比例) of girl students is growing fast. In 1998, about 39.7% of college students were girls. In 2000, it was 41.07% and in 2001, the number was 42.14%.

There are several reasons for this.

Firstly, there is little difference between boys and girls in their intelligence (智力). That’s to say, girls are as clever as boys. And boys have more interests than girls, so they may not always do well in their study.

Secondly, girls are more careful than boys. They work harder at school and they do better in all exams.

Another reason is that with the development of society, people pay more and more attention to girls’ education.

1. China Youth says that more and more ______.
A.boys are clever than girls
B.girls have entered colleges
C.boys can’t go to school
D.girls begin to study at school
2. 42.14% refers to (指) the number of ______.
A.girls at schools in 1998
B.boys at schools in 2001
C.girls in colleges in 2001
D.boys in colleges in 1998
3. The writer gave us ______ reasons to explain the question.
A.threeB.twoC.fourD.five
4. Which of the following sentences is TRUE?
A.Boys may not do well in their study as girls because they don’t like studying.
B.Boys are much cleverer than girls because they’re interested in many things.
C.Girls study harder, but they couldn’t get higher marks than boys.
D.Girls’ intelligence is the same as boys’.
2020-10-10更新 | 45次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 较易 (0.85)

【推荐2】In recent years many countries have been faced with the problem of how to make their workers more productive. Some experts claim the answer is to make jobs more varied. But do more varied jobs lead to greater productivity? There is evidence to suggest that while variety certainly makes the worker's life more enjoyable, it doesn't actually make him work harder. As far as increasing productivity is concerned, then, variety is not an important factor.

Other experts feel that giving the worker freedom to do his job in his own way is important.   The problem is that this kind of freedom cannot easily be given in the modern factory with its complicated(复杂的) machinery. Thus while freedom of choice may be important, there is usually very little that can be done to create it.

Another important consideration is how much each worker contributes to the product he is making.   In most factories the worker sees only one small part of the product. Some car factories are now experimenting with having many small production lines so that each worker contributes more to the production of the cars on his line. It would seem that not only is degree of worker contribution an important factor, but it is also one we can do something about.

To what degree does more money lead to great productivity? The workers themselves certainly think this is important. But perhaps they want more money only because the work they do is so boring. Money just lets them enjoy their spare time more. A similar argument may explain demands for shorter working hours.   Perhaps if we succeed in making their jobs more interesting, they will neither want more money, nor will shorter working hours be so important to them.

1. According to the author, what advantage do varied jobs bring?
A.They increase productivity enormously.
B.They reduce boredom among workers.
C.They bring out the best in workers.
D.They relieve workers' difficulties.
2. What can we clearly see from the passage?
A.It’s practical to allow more freedom in a modern factory.
B.It's necessary to have a large number of workers.
C.It's important to raise workers’ sense of contribution.
D.It’s difficult to have more production lines.
3. The passage seems to suggest that ________.
A.more money leads to demands for shorter working hours
B.more money does not automatically create higher productivity
C.workers like more money better than more interesting jobs
D.workers expect to have both more money and more interesting jobs
4. What does the passage mainly discuss?
A.How to enrich workers'1ife.
B.How to make workers more productive.
C.How to shorten working hours.
D.How to decrease dullness in a factory.
2019-03-01更新 | 67次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 较易 (0.85)
文章大意:这是一篇新闻报道。文章主要说明了7月中旬,伯克利成为美国第一个禁止新建低层建筑和住宅使用天然气的城市,这是一件了不起的事情。它标志着天然气时代结束的开始。文章还说明了燃气烹饪和取暖的潜在危害和建设全电动的新建筑的可行性。

【推荐3】By becoming the first city in the nation to ban natural gas in new low-rise buildings and homes, Berkeley did something great in mid-July. It signaled the beginning of the end of the natural gas era.

California has set a climate mandate of 100% clean, renewable energy by 2045. It won’t reach that goal unless it gets rid of natural gas. Burning natural gas emits carbon dioxide and other pollutants. In many cities, including Berkeley, buildings are the second leading greenhouse gas-emitting sector, after transportation. Now that regulations aimed at the 2045 mandate are in place for cars, trucks and coal-fired power, natural gas has to be next.

The popular image of gas cooking and heating—clean, cheap and reliable, a “bridge fuel” from coal to renewables—needs to be changed. Natural gas has produced more greenhouse gas emissions overall in the US than coal since 2015. Now natural gas emissions from the state’s 12 million buildings account for 12% of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions.

What’s more, natural gas is combustible, a common reason for fires and explosions. An underground gas pipe explosion in the Bay Area city in 2010 killed eight people and destroyed or damaged more than 100 homes. Gas leaks can cause not only indoor pollution but also deaths.

The case for making new buildings all-electric is overwhelming. It costs less to set up just one kind of energy—electricity—in new constructions, instead of laying gas pipes too. And the latest technologies work well: Electric heat pumps both cool and heat homes.

At least 50 other California cities will encourage all-electric new constructions in the coming months. They may not ban gas altogether in new constructions, but the aim is the same. The Berkeley measure is the beginning of an equally essential but more difficult task: re-equipping all existing buildings so that they, too, become all-electric.

1. What are emitting the largest amount of greenhouse gas now in Berkeley?
A.Heat pumps.B.Power plants.
C.Motor vehicles.D.New buildings.
2. What does the author think of gas cooking and heating?
A.It is clean, cheap and reliable.B.It should be used in a small range.
C.It should be used as a “bridge fuel”.D.It is more harmful than commonly thought.
3. What does the underlined word “combustible” in Paragraph 4 mean?
A.Widely used.B.Spoken highly of.
C.Able to burn easily.D.Affordable for most families.
4. According to Paragraph 5, making new buildings all-electric         .
A.is practicalB.is a difficult choice
C.has a long way to goD.deserves further research
2022-04-28更新 | 62次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般