组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 政治与经济 > 政治政策
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:104 题号:12935430

Fractional ownership is a percentage ownership of a specific asset (资产). It has often been used to share the ownership of expensive assets such as expensive boats, private planes and so on. When the value of the asset increases, the ownership shares do as well. Co-owners also share equally the costs carried by the asset. Most recently, the same concept of fractional ownership was applied to art as well. The logic is the same. Multiple people own one artwork and share the benefits and the costs of the asset. Galleries and artists, instead of selling one artwork to one person, they can sell it to more than 1000 art lovers.

Co-ownership of art gives the possibility to everyone to participate in the art market. The potential market for artworks is suddenly way bigger. Only a few people can afford artworks that cost more than £100,000. But everyone can afford to buy some shares priced at £10 each. On top of this, all co-owners share the costs involved with the acquisition of an artwork. For art lovers that are just starting to collect art for investment (投资) reasons, co-ownership of art can be a great tool to start learning and understanding the market without risking too much capital. For big collectors instead, sharing the ownership of an artwork is an easy way to diversify their portfolio (投资组合) without having the burden of managing the asset.

For many years only wealthy people could afford to buy expensive artworks. Because of this, most artworks are hidden in private collections and dark storages since decades where the public has no access to. And, if we think that art is supposed to deliver important messages and topics and is the representation of our past and present, it seems incredible that art has become something that few people can fully enjoy. Fractional ownership of art, by giving everyone the possibility to co-own art, has the power to greatly change this. Suddenly, art becomes an asset available to everyone and, by being more accessible, it starts to attract way more people.

1. Which of the following is a kind of fractional ownership?
A.A wealthy businessman owns a private ship.
B.A museum event is attended by 1000 art lovers.
C.Galleries and artists sold one artwork to one person.
D.10 friends bought a house priced at S10,000 together.
2. What is Paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.The potential market for artworks.
B.The source of capital for investment.
C.The benefit of fractional ownership.
D.The development of fractional ownership.
3. What might the author agree to?
A.Art contributes greatly to social economy.
B.Co-ownership of art benefits the general public.
C.Only wealthy people could afford expensive artworks.
D.Fractional ownership is a way to invest without risk.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
【推荐1】阅读下列短文,从每题所给的四个选项 (A 、B 、C 和 D )中 ,选出最佳选项。
The sharing economy has grown in recent years to include everything from apartment sharing to car sharing to community tool sharing. Since 2009,a new form of sharing economy has been emerging in neighborhoods throughout the US and around the world—Little Free Libraries. The libraries are boxes placed in neighborhoods where residents(居民) can take out and leave books. Little Free Libraries come in all shapes and sizes. Some libraries also have themes, focusing on books for children, adults, or tour guides.
In 2009,Tod Bol built the first Little Free Library as a gift to his mother, a devoted reader. When he saw the people of his community gathering around it, exchanging conversations as well as books, he knew he wanted to take his simple idea further. “I think Little Free Libraries open the door to conversations we want to have with each other.” Bol said.
Since then, his idea has become a movement, spreading from state to state and country to country. According to Little Free Library. org, there are now 18,000 of the little structures around the world, located in each of the 50 US states and 70 countries in Europe, Africa and Asia.
The Internet has helped to spread Little Free Libraries. But an Atlantic article says the little structures serve as a cure for a world of e-reader downloads. The little wooden boxes are refreshingly physical and human. For many people, the sense of discovery is Little Free Libraries’ main appeal. “A girl walking home from school might pick up a graphic novel that gets her excited about reading; a man on his way to the bus stop might find a volume of poetry that changes his outlook on life,” says the Atlantic article. “Every book is a potential source of inspiration.”
1. How do Little Free Libraries get their books?
A.Citizens shared them.B.Tod Bol donated them.
C.US government provided them.D.The communities bought them.
2. Why did Tod Bol want to build more Little Free Libraries?
A.He wanted to promote his idea worldwide.
B.He was inspired by the sharing economy.
C.They can offer neighbors more chances to talk.
D.They are a gift to please his mother.
3. According to the Atlantic article , Little Free Libraries _________.
A.help cut down on e-reading
B.benefit the spread of the Internet
C.promote e-reader downloads
D.call on human to care about each other
4. Little Free Libraries attract readers most in that .
A.they connect strangers together
B.they are located all over the world
C.they are in various shapes and sizes
D.they may give readers a sense of discovery
2016-06-03更新 | 84次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Poets,songwriters and left—wing politicians hate the idea,but for decades,opinion—poll evidence has been clear: money buys happiness and the richer you are,the more likely you are to express satisfaction with your life.Until now,a survey of 43 countries published on October 30th by the Pew Research Centre shows that people in emerging markets are within a whisker of(一步之遥)expressing the same level of satisfaction as people in rich countries.It is in line with the standard view of happiness and income seen so far.

According to the survey,in 2007,57%of respondents in rich countries regarded themselves as happy;in emerging markets the share was 33%; in poor countries only 16%—a classic expression of the standard view. But in 2017, 54% of rich—country respondents counted themselves as happy,whereas in emerging markets the percentage jumped to 51%.

The sharp increase happened thanks to huge improvements in countries such as Indonesia (+35)and Pakistan(+22).In 12 of the 24 emerging markets,half or more people rate their life satisfaction in the top of the ladder.

This is not to say the link between income and satisfaction has been snapped. Poor countries still lag behind:only a quarter of the people there count themselves as happy—half the level of the other two groups.There is also a clear link between happiness and income growth.China's GDP rose at an annual average rate of 10% in 2007—2017 and its happiness level rose 26 points.

Within countries,richer people express more satisfaction than their poorer neighbors.The study divided respondents into categories with higher and lower incomes and fewer and more household goods.In every country in every group, richer folk with more goods expressed higher levels of happiness.So at a personal level,money does buy happiness.And if you ask people about different aspects of their lives—health,family life,religion,standard of living—it turns out that satisfaction with living standards still has the biggest influence on happiness.

1. What's the standard view of happiness and income?
A.Income is not closely related to happiness.
B.Happiness does not depend on how much you earn.
C.The higher your income is, the more likely you will feel satisfied.
D.The more you are satisfied, the more you can earn every month.
2. What contributed to the increase of happiness in emerging markets?
A.Their rapid development.B.Investment in emerging markets.
C.Economic downturn.D.More cooperation with rich countries.
3. What's the purpose of the writer by mentioning China's GDP?
A.To prove that China's GDP growth led to the happiness of people in Asia.
B.To remind readers of the progress that China has made.
C.To express the author's concern about the development of emerging markets.
D.To show that there is a link between happiness and income growth.
4. What is the author's attitude to the standard view of happiness and income?
A.Disappointed.B.Skeptical
C.Supportive.D.Indifferent.
2019-08-11更新 | 129次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】His Excellency

Kim Jong Un

Chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Dear Mr. Chairman,

We greatly appreciate your time, patience, and effort with respect to our recent negotiations and discussions relative to a summit (峰会) long sought by both parties, which was scheduled to take place on June 12 in Singapore.

We were informed that the meeting was requested by North Korea, but that to us is totally irrelevant (不重要的). I was very much looking forward to being there with you.

Sadly, based on the unacceptable and unfriendly statement, I feel it is not proper, at this time, to have this long-planned meeting.

Therefore, please let this letter to serve to represent that the Singapore summit, for the good of both parties, but to the detriment of the world, will not take place.

You talk about your nuclear capabilities (能力), but ours are so massive and powerful that I pray to God they will never have to be used.

I felt a wonderful dialogue was building up between you and me, and ultimately, it is only that dialogue that matters. Some day, I look very much forward to meeting you.

In the meantime, I want to thank you for the release of the hostages (人质) who are now home with their families. That was a beautiful gesture and was very much appreciated.

If you change your mind having to do with this most important summit, please do not hesitate to call me or write. The world, and North Korea in particular, has lost a great opportunity for lasting peace and great prosperity and wealth. This missed opportunity is a truly sad moment in history.

Sincerely yours,

Donald J. Trump

President of the United States of America

1. What is the purpose of this letter written by Donald J. Trump?
A.To invite Kim Jong Un to take part in a summit to be held in Singapore.
B.To cancel the summit to be held on June 12.
C.To express his appreciation for the patience and effort of Kim Jong Un.
D.To show off the nuclear capabilities of the United States.
2. What is the proper meaning of the underlined word “detriment” in Paragraph 4?
A.Damage.B.Advantage.C.Benefit.D.Development.
3. What can be inferred from the last two paragraphs?
A.Trump is greatly dissatisfied with the release of the hostages.
B.Kim Jong Un did not want to release the American hostages.
C.Trump is eager to hold another summit with Kim Jong Un next year.
D.The Singapore summit may be a great chance for the peace of the world.
2018-08-10更新 | 42次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般