I'm an early user of social media. For the most part, I've enjoyed the time I've spent on the site. But like many friends I know, I was also starting to feel like my visits to Facebook were just a waste of time.
Of course, the obvious move would just be to steer clear of Facebook and other social media sites. But as a writer, I have to use social media several times a day. And once I'm in the site, it's almost impossible to take no notice of those notices reminding me of posts in my personal feed(信息推送). I felt like I had to find the one or two meaningful posts that made my social media feed worth the time.
Then I came across a post by Melissa Hartwig, the founder of the Whole30 program. In the post she said "Don't act like social media just happens to you; make it work FOR YOU."
It hit home with me. I immediately set out to change the way I was using social media. I hid and unfollowed groups and accounts(账户)that were not adding something active to my life. I didn't stop to think. I just clicked my way through the feed.
I'm not burying my head in the sand. I continue to follow people whose opinions on different topics differ from my own, but their words are interesting and open-minded.
Then I limited my interaction(互动)on social media. Unless I had something to say, I no longer interacted. A study found that inactive use of social media has a bad effect on our mood, while active use—sharing thoughts and commenting on others' posts—improved mood.
The result? I can say without doubt that I no longer worry about getting into a time-wasting vacuum(真空). That's because my feed is nowhere near as bottomless as it once was.
1. Which word can best replace the underlined part "steer clear of" in Paragraph 2?A.Share. | B.Explore. |
C.Quit. | D.Improve. |
A.His friends' influence. | B.A sentence in a post. |
C.The Whole30 program. | D.A talk with Melissa Hartwig. |
A.He set a time limit. |
B.He hid his own accounts. |
C.He interacted less with others. |
D.He no longer read different opinions. |
A.It met great difficulties. | B.It was a waste of time. |
C.It attracted more friends. | D.It got a satisfying result. |
相似题推荐
The universal use of technology has resulted in a constant current of information interrupting the "flow" of our life. This disturbing pattern was initially marketed as "call-waiting" for our phones. But now our eyes, ears, and fingers are glued to our technology24/7. We are flooded by emails, texts, or the news feeds on our Face book pages. My friend Ron refers to this technology as "weapons of mass distraction."
Aside from the impact of technology on our attention and our ability to be at ease in the absence of our technology, let's examine how interacting with our devices interferes with the development of our fundamental communication and social skills. Many researchers observe that everyday conversation between human beings is becoming increasingly rare.
Many of today's children are growing up with a built-in dependence on devices, making it difficult for them to feel comfortable in everyday social situations.
Over time these children forget how to relate with each other because they have become habituated to using technology to avoid direct contact with others and life itself.
A.Often, they find it challenging to make eye contact or deal with even the simplest face-to-face interactions without the aid of technology as an intermediary. |
B.But how is this mass distraction affecting our degree of presence and ability to attend to the everyday demands offline? |
C.The more dependent people are on their phones, the stronger the distraction effect, according to the research. |
D.In fact, some neuroscientists believe that use of the internet actually rewires our brains. |
E.The distraction is just part of the larger picture. |
F.Checking social media is one of the most frequent use of a cellphone and the biggest distraction and time-waster. |
【推荐2】Although his 1-year-old smart-phone still works perfectly, Li Jijia already feels the need to replace it. “There are many better ones available now. It's time to upgrade(更新)my phone.”
Li’s impatience is shared by many. Shortly after the season when new products are released(发布,发售), many consumers feel the urge to upgrade their electronic equipment, even though the ones they have still work just fine.
As consumers’ minds are occupied by Apple’s newly- released products and debate whether the Google tablet is better than the new Amazon Kindle, it might be time to take a step back and ask: “Do we really need the latest upgrades?”
According to Donald Norman, an American author, “planned obsolescence (淘汰)” is the trick behind the upgrading culture of today’s consumer electronics industry.
Electronics producers strategically(战略性地) release new upgrades periodically, both for hardware and software, so that customers on every level feel the need to buy the newest version.
“This is an old-time trick---they’re not inventing anything new,” Norman said. “This is a wasteful system through which companies--many of them producing personal electronics-- release poor-quality products simply because they know that, in six months or a year, they’ll put out a new one.”
But the new psychology of consumers is part of this system, as Norman admitted, “We now want something new, something pretty, the next shiny thing.” In its most recent year, Apple's profit margin(利润) was more than 21 percent. At Hewlett-Packard, the world’s biggest PC maker, it was only 7 percent.
Apple’s annual upgrades of its products create sales of millions of units as owners of one year’s MacBook or iPhone line up to buy the newest version(版本), even when the changes are slight.
As to Li Jijia, the need for upgrading his smart-phone comes mainly from friends and classmates. When they are switching to the latest equipment, he worries about feeling left out.
“Some games require better hardware to run,” said Li. “If you don't join in, you lose part of the connection to your friends.”
1. What’s the author’s attitude towards people’s greed for new products?A.Supportive. | B.Satisfied. |
C.Critical. | D.Unclear. |
A.They make a fool of customers by recycling their old products. |
B.They make full use of the “planned obsolescence” strategy. |
C.They control the customers’ way of thinking while shopping. |
D.They invent new products to attract the youth like Li Jijia. |
A.To provide customers with better service. |
B.To defeat other competitors like Hewlett-Packard. |
C.To establish a favorable image of itself among its customers. |
D.To make huge profits(利润) out of its business. |
A.peer pressure | B.new psychology |
C.life style | D.friends' expectation |
【推荐3】If you’re tired of your phone, you’re not alone. People receive between around 60 and 80 daily notifications (通知) on average, and some of us may get as many as 200. These seemingly endless dings and buzzes can really affect our wellbeing. Research has linked them to depression and anxiety, and they may even cause problems associated with ADHD (多动症).
These outcomes may result from the fact that frequent phone interruptions increase our cognitive load (认知负荷), or the amount of information processed by the working memory. We only have so much mental capacity, and the extra effort it takes to switch between tasks can make us tired, less focused and disrupt (扰乱) emotional regulation. Additionally, in this state, we even experience a less accurate perception of time—we feel time is passing faster than in reality, which would eventually lead us to overlook results and cause hurried decisions, for example, buying a pricey dress without thinking it through.
With the fact that cell phone notifications can mess with our brains, scientists have sought out ways to counteract these effects. One possible solution: Scheduling notifications into batches (批次) that arrive at certain times of the day with the help of certain apps. For example, you could choose to keep things quiet except for at 7 am, noon and 5 pm to go with waking up, taking a lunch break and heading home from school. In a 2019 study, researchers assigned 237 participants (参与者) into three groups, including those who received all their notifications three times a day, hourly, or none at all. The three-times-a-day group said they felt more productive, attentive, in a better mood and in greater control of their phones than the other two groups, while the notification-free group experienced more anxiety and fear of missing out.
Besides, some researchers have argued that more personalized user design is possible. Developers should pay attention to how people interact with their devices. With the help of a machine learning model, our phone can automatically learn from our past behavior what types of notification we want to receive first, such as messages from relatives. Thus, certain notifications can be delivered at suitable times.
This highly individualized method could be beneficial, but more individuality means more phone monitoring, which introduces yet another problem: In the struggle to free ourselves from tech addiction, it isn’t clear whether more monitoring is the solution, or just adding more fuel to the fire.
1. What is the possible result of frequent phone notifications?A.The working memory processes less information. |
B.Time passes faster than what we are usually used to. |
C.We tend to have distraction and emotional disruptions. |
D.We weigh the possible results before making decisions. |
A.The study lasted three years. |
B.The comparative method was used. |
C.The none-at-all group felt more productive. |
D.Participants were addicted to their mobile phones. |
A.Depression and anxiety lead us to rely on our phones. |
B.Adding extra phone monitoring can free us from tech addiction. |
C.The fewer phone notifications received, the better we control our phones. |
D.Personalized user design helps phones decide what notifications come first. |
A.To warn us against the phone overuse. |
B.To draw our attention to the problems of ADHD. |
C.To stress the importance of controlling our phones. |
D.To discuss ways to handle frequent phone notifications. |
【推荐1】A great many people, when they speak of home, tend to connect it with a certain atmosphere,certain physical surroundings (环境), and certain emotional attitudes within themselves. This sentimentality (多愁善感) toward home is something that has come down to us from the past. Many modern people do not have it, and I think it is a good thing that they do not.
In the old days, life was difficult. Enemies could attack you and kill or rob you, and you had little protection against them. People did not live in well-built houses where doors could be locked. They did not have the protection of an organized police force or telephones which could call the police instantly. How did this influence the way people felt about home? Small family groups clung (贴近) tightly together for protection against beasts and against other men.
Today, thanks to modern transportation and well-organized society, thousands of people willingly and eagerly leave the surroundings where they were born, and the oftener they do so, the less sentiment (情绪) they are likely to have for those surroundings. I lived in England for three years, and I noticed that boys and girls left their parents’ homes and lived in places of their own. There they could just telephone and ask an agency to provide them with a house or an apartment, which was their home. How has the meaning of this word “home” been changed by such activity? What does home mean to those people or to families who often move about, living in first one hotel and then another? I believe that for them home means a place where they can have privacy.
As for me, the atmosphere and surroundings of the place where my parents live have no sentimental (情感的) attachment (依恋). Home is where I can shut the door and be by myself. When I left my parents several years ago, I was anxious to leave. You might call it unfeeling, but that was the way I felt. On the day of my departure for the United States, my grandmother cried. My father, however, showed that he knew how I felt. “Son,” he said, “I am not sorry that you are leaving us. I only hope that you make the most of your time.”
1. Which of the following is NOT the reason for difficult life in the old days?A.No attack or killing or robbery from enemies. |
B.People had no protection of a police force. |
C.People lived in poorly-built houses. |
D.People had no telephones. |
A.Because they can afford the money to live outside. |
B.Because there are no wild animals or enemies around. |
C.Because the society provides them with the feeling of safety. |
D.Because they are not actually satisfied with their environment. |
A.Surroundings influence the way that people act. |
B.Not many modern people have sentimentality toward home. |
C.Rights to privacy are well protected in modern society. |
D.Older people can hardly understand the leaving of the young. |
A.The History of Home | B.People and Home |
C.Different Ideas of Home | D.Ideas of Home Have Changed |
【推荐2】In the second half of the twentieth century, many countries of the South (发展中国家) began to send students to the industrialized countries for further education. They urgently needed supplies of highly trained personnel to implement a concept of development based on modernization. But many of these students decided to stay on in the developed countries when they had finished their training. At the same time, many professionals who did return home but no longer felt at ease there also decided to go back to the countries where they had studied.
In the 1960s, some Latin American countries tried to solve this problem by setting up special “return” programmes to encourage their professionals to come back home. These programmes received support from international bodies such as the International Organization for Migration, which in 1974 enabled over 1, 600 qualified scientists and technicians to return to Latin America.
In the 1980s and 1990s, “temporary return” programmes were set up in order to make the best use of trained personnel occupying strategic positions in the developed countries. This gave rise to the United Nations Development Programme’s Transfer of Knowledge through Expatriate (移居国外的) Nationals, which encourages technicians and scientists to work in their own countries for short periods. But the brain drain (人才流失) from these countries may well increase in response to the new laws of the international market in knowledge.
Recent studies forecast that the most developed countries are going to need more and more highly qualified professionals around twice as many as their educational systems will be able to produce, or so it is thought. As a result, there is an urgent need for developing countries which send students abroad to give preference to fields where they need competent people to give muscle to their own institutions, instead of encouraging the training of people who may not come back because there are no professional outlets for them. And the countries of the South must not be content with institutional structures that simply take back professionals sent abroad, they must introduce flexible administrative procedures to encourage them to return. If they do not do this, the brain drain is bound to continue.
1. Which of the following is NOT correct according to the passage?A.The developing countries believe that sending students to the industrialized countries is a good way to meet their own needs for modernization. |
B.The South American countries have been sending students to developed countries since the 1920s. |
C.Many people trained abroad remain in the developed countries instead of coming back to serve their home countries. |
D.The International Organization for Migration successfully helped more than 1,600 professionals return to their own countries in a single year. |
A.keep their present administrative procedures so as to ensure that their students return after graduation |
B.cooperate more effectively with international organizations |
C.set up more return programmes under the guidance of the UN |
D.send students abroad in the fields where their knowledge is more likely to be made full use of in their own countries |
A.as long as the developed countries need more qualified professionals than they can educate domestically |
B.as long as the developing countries are content with their present institutional structures |
C.unless those countries stop sending large number of students to be trained abroad |
D.if the governments fail to make administrative adjustments concerning the return procedures of their professionals |
A.The Brain Drain of the Developing Countries |
B.Knowledge Transfer |
C.The Talents from the Developing Countries |
D.The Failure of Development Programmes |
【推荐3】One recent report found that adults in the US check their phones, on average, 344 times a day—once every four minutes—and spend almost three hours a day on their devices in total. The problem for many of us is that one quick phone-related task leads to a quick check of our email or social media feeds, and suddenly we’ve been trapped into endless scrolling (刷屏).
What we do know is that the simple distraction of checking a phone or seeing a notification (提示) can have negative consequences. This isn’t very surprising; we know that, in general multitasking harms memory and performance. One of the most dangerous examples is phone use while driving. One study found that merely speaking on the phone, not texting, was enough to make drivers slower to react on the road. It’s true for everyday tasks, too. Simply hearing a notification “ding” made participants of another study perform far worse on a task-almost as badly as participants who were speaking or texting on the phone during the task.
In one recent study, for example, researchers asked participants to either put their phones next to them so they were visible (like on a desk), nearby and out of sight (like in a bag or pocket), or in another room. Participants then completed a series of tasks to test their abilities to process and remember information, their problem-solving, and their focus.
They were found to perform far better when their phones were in another room instead of nearby—whether visible, powered on or not. That held true even though most of the participants claimed not to be consciously thinking about their devices.
Our brains may be subconsciously hard at work in preventing the desire from checking our phones, or constantly monitoring the environment to see if we should check our phone (eg. waiting for a notification). Either way, this distracted attention can make doing anything else more difficult. The only “fix”, the researchers found, was putting the device in a different room entirely.
1. What did the recent report in Paragraph I find?A.Multitasking is very dangerous. |
B.Notification is always heard. |
C.People are addicted to mobile phones. |
D.People like doing phone-related tasks. |
A.By making comparisons. |
B.By examining differences. |
C.By following the order of importance. |
D.By analyzing causes and giving examples. |
A.Do anything more difficult. |
B.Use phones to do right things. |
C.Monitor the environment around. |
D.Stay away from phones entirely. |
A.How do We Avoid the Distraction of Phones? |
B.Why Are People Fond of Using Mobile Phones? |
C.What Should We Do When Buying Mobile Phones? |
D.How Do We Do Research by Using Mobile Phones? |
【推荐1】A young and successful manager was traveling down a neighborhood street, going a bit too fast in his new Jaguar (捷豹) . He was watching for kids rushing out from between parked cars and slowed down when he thought he saw something.
As his car passed, one child appeared, and a brick smashed(撞击) into the Jag’s side door. He slammed (砰地关上) on the brakes and spun the Jag back to the spot from where the brick had been thrown.
He jumped out of the car, grabbed some kid and pushed him up against a parked car, shouting. “What was that all about and who are you? Just what are you doing?”
Building up a head of steam, he went on “That’s a new car and that brick you threw cost a lot of money. Why did you do it?”
“Please, mister, please, I’m sorry. I didn’t know what else to do! pleaded(恳求) the youngster.
“It’s my brother,” he said. “He rolled off the curb and fell out of his wheelchair and I can’t lift him up. Sobbing, the boy asked the manager, “Would you please help me get him back into his wheelchair?
He’s hurt and he’s too heavy for me.”
Moved beyond words, the driver tried to swallow the rapidly swelling lump in his throat. He lifted the young man back into the wheelchair and took out his handkerchief and wiped the scrapes and cuts, checking to see that everything was going to be okay.
“Thank you, sir. And God bless you,” the grateful child said to him. The man then watched the little boy push his brother to the sidewalk toward their home.
It was a long walk backs to his Jaguar... a long, slow walk. He never did repair the side door. He kept the dent (凹痕) to remind him not to go through life so fast that someone has to throw a brick at you to get your attention.
Life whispers in your soul and speaks to your heart. Sometimes, when you don’t have the time to listen... Life throws a brick at your head.
It’s your choice: Listen to the whispers of your soul or wait for the brick!
1. Why did the child throw a brick at the Jaguar?A.To play tricks on the manager | B.To make fun of the manager |
C.To ask him for help | D.To show his dissatisfaction |
A.Angry | B.Surprised | C.Content | D.Disappointed |
A.Selfish and lazy | B.Caring and warm-hearted |
C.Indifferent and stubborn | D.Determined and courageous |
A.A Damaged New Jaguar | B.A Boy in Need | C.A Helpful Manager | D.A Pleading Brick |
【推荐2】In this semester, Professor Van Rijnsoever of Utrecht University of the Netherlands is to teach “Dutch Culture in the World”, in English.
The language is the university’s choice. Actually sixty percent of masters’ programs at Utrecht University are in English. At higher degrees' level, no courses are taught in Dutch at all.
Utrecht is not alone.
The University of Eindhoven has even completely kicked the Dutch language out of its campus. Even the sandwiches in the stores there are sold as cheese rather than with the Dutch word “kaas”.
As a result, the Netherlands has one of the world’s highest levels of English proficiency (流利)among non-native speaking countries, second only to Sweden.
But not everyone is happy with that .
“I don't mind. Most of the literature is in English,” says Professor Van Rijnsoever. “As a teacher it’s not that much of a problem because we also do research in English. For the students, you see they are struggling to express themselves properly.”
He added “We aren’t as good at English as they think we are. We shouldn’t use a weaker language in education. If we use just English in higher education, Dutch will get worse. We add a bit of English and we lose a bit of Dutch. We cannot master Dutch and English at the same time.”
Actually, English is so widely used in Dutch universities that a group of lecturers are worried about a possible “linguicide” and demanded that the universities stop creating more courses in English until an official research has been carried out.
“Dutch is our mother tongue. Our culture is based on Dutch,” says Annette de Groot, a lecturer at the University of Amsterdam. “What would happen to our identity(身份)if our mother tongue is no longer the main language of higher education?”
“It is high time for an honest debate.” said a teacher from the University of Erasmus.
1. Which university teaches all its courses in English?A.Utrecht. | B.Eindhoven. | C.Amsterdam. | D.Erasmus. |
A.The highest level of English proficiency in the Netherlands. |
B.The teaching of “Dutch Culture in the World" in English. |
C.The kick out of the Dutch language from all schools. |
D.The widespread use of English in the Dutch universities. |
A.The all- English courses might weaken the mastery of Dutch. |
B.Students can learn two languages equally well at the same time. |
C.The stress on English can help the spread of Dutch culture. |
D.The students of Utrecht are happy with the all-English courses. |
A.The birth of a language. | B.The loss of one’s cultural identity. |
C.The war between cultures. | D.The popularity of a language. |
【推荐3】I was diagnosed(诊断)with cancer last June. Finding out that I had breast cancer felt like I’d been locked up in a prison cell, but I later found something unexpected: freedom.
Tests and procedures followed. Once the daily treatments started, I was tired out. The tiredness that came with cancer was not like any kind of tiredness I’d known before.
Then the magic happened.
I started to realize that this life change had brought an unexpected gift. The usual pressures of life gave way to a different kind of stress, but it came with self-discovery. I do what I can and don’t care about the rest. With the disease, decisions come more easily, and things that I’d previously weighted more heavily no longer matter as much. I don’t need a perfect home. What does matter now is having family and friends and a husband who can shoulder this new responsibility with me.
The doctor says my situation is very good and there’s a 91 percent chance that I’ll still be alive in 10 years. I look forward to simple things like my garden this spring, and going back to work when I’m healthy again. I’m also imagining the joy of getting my quiet and modest life back. It’s inspiring and there are lots of people there with me. And the professionals are really good at what they do.
I used to wonder how it would feel to be told I had cancer. Sure, my first reaction was fear, panic, sorrow, and anger. Then I found my strength. The fear is still there, but to my amazement, I am handling it. “You got this,” people say encouragingly.
1. What does the underlined sentence in Paragraph 1 mean?A.She felt as if she had lost her freedom. |
B.She was unable to walk out of the cell. |
C.Cancer gave her something unexpected. |
D.Cancer cost her the ability to move freely. |
A.was too tired to bear the treatment any more |
B.found that she could handle the treatment easily |
C.grew more peaceful and valued her family more |
D.learned to be in a good state and free of pressure |
A.Positive. | B.Hopeless. | C.Doubtful. | D.Concerned. |