组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:116 题号:15260467

An interesting question in humankind’s development is, when did we begin to think critically? In other words, when did we turn from animals focused only on the daily struggle to avoid starvation to humans who could think symbolically about the word around us? However, answering this question is not easy as thinking leaves no fossils to discover.

A commonsense assumption is that higher levels of thought go hand-in-hand with verbal language, because higher thinking, such as creative thought, would naturally seek a means of expression. So tracing the development of language could give an approximate idea of when humans began to think critically.

Interestingly, we do have some fossil evidence related to speech. Animals whose larynx (voice box) is placed high in their throats are unable to produce the variety of sounds necessary for speech. Fossil bones tell us that in early humans, the larynx was originally high in the throat. However, by about 200,000 years ago, it had moved lower in the throat. This lowering provided a larger sound chamber (the space in the throat and the mouth) in which passing air could be controlled by the tongue, making a wide range of sounds and rhythms possible.

So humans were physically able to speak around 200,000 years ago, but when did they actually start doing so? Estimates range from 35,000 to 100,000 years ago. But with no physical evidence of ancient language use, we need another approach to determine more precisely when humans began to speak - and to think critically.

Professor Richard Klein of Stanford University suggests that art may be the key. After all, ability to create or appreciate art is a uniquely human train. If ancient humans had the imagination to create a work of art (which in itself is a means of communication), then it seems highly likely that they would possess the primary means of communication: language. This suggests that the first works of art can be considered indicators of when language and critical though began.

Until recently the earliest art was believed to be cave paintings, carved figures, and jewelry found in southwestern Europe and thought to data from about 40,000 years ago. This suggested that humans first became capable of critical thought about 40,000 years ago. However, this time frame was recently overturned by an exciting discovery in South Africa. Anthropologist Christ Henshilwood spent more than ten years exploring a cave there. He found many well-made tools, but more intriguing were the 8,000 pieces of ochre, a soft stone that can be turned into paint. Hensilwood’s breakthrough came in 1999 when he found an ochre piece with lines cut in a careful pattern. In other words, it was deliberate artistic design. Henshilwood had found the oldest piece of art yet, its date of origin set at 70,000 years — nearly 30,000 years before the art in Europe.

Based on Henshilwood’s discovery, it seems that humans began to speak and think critically at least 70,000 years ago.

1. ______ made humans physically able to speak.
A.The evolution of the tongue
B.The lowering of the larynx
C.The appearance of various sounds
D.The higher thinking
2. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.No other animals than humans can enjoy art.
B.Before 1999, Africa was thought to be the origin of art.
C.Without creative though, humans would be unable to speak.
D.Evidence of ancient language use was once found in Europe.
3. According to the passage, the oldest deliberate artistic design dates back to ______ years ago.
A.30,000
B.40,000
C.70,000
D.200,000
4. Which of the following might be the best title of the passage?
A.How did humans stop struggling for starvation?
B.When did humans become able to create art?
C.How did humans communicate more freely?
D.When did humans begin to think?
20-21高三下·上海·阶段练习 查看更多[2]
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文,文章主要介绍了一项研究发现鹦鹉寿命极长,部分原因是它们的大脑相对较大。

【推荐1】Parrots live extremely long partly due to their relatively large brains; an international team of researchers has discovered. Simeon Smeele, a doctoral student at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, led the study, the results of which were published in March in the Proceedings of the Royal Society.

When it comes to lifespan, birds truly stand out. Lifespan tends to increase with an animal’s body size, roughly speaking. Thus, the bigger the animal, the longer they live. But a bird tends to live much longer than a comparably-sized mammal. One theory is that birds’ ability to fly means they are less at risk from the animals that kill them, which reduces their risk of being eaten, decreases stress, and frees up bodily resources for growth.

And among birds, parrots are the aging champions. The confirmed longest-living bird was Cookie, a Major Mitchell’s cockatoo (a species of parrot), who lived at the Brookfield Zoo in Illinois for all but one of his 83 years. Though cockatoos often weigh around a pound, they usually live for four decades. Most of the other 398 parrot species also live longer than other birds of similar size.

What sets parrots apart? In the new research, Smeele and his colleagues gathered data on over 130,000 individual parrots held in more than 1,000 zoos, representing 217 species. Through this data, they created reliable estimates of the average lifespan for each species. They next searched for a link between each species’ lifespan and its relative brain size and found a clear, positive correspondence. Parrot species with larger brains relative to their body size lived longer than species with smaller brains.

“This supports the idea that in general larger brains make species more flexible. For flexibility allows them to live longer.” Smeele said in a statement. “For example, if they run out of their favorite food, they could learn to find something new and thus survive.” He added, “All parrots have relatively large brain sizes compared to most other birds.”

Researchers have previously shown that, when trained, some parrots can recognize and understand objects, colors, and shapes, and even speak with an impressive vocabulary. They can even match five-year-old humans on basic tests of intelligence.

1. What do we know about parrots according to the text?
A.They outlive other similar-sized birds.
B.They live longer in the zoo than in the wild.
C.They have an average lifespan of four decades.
D.They live in relatively less competitive environments.
2. What does the underlined word “correspondence” in Paragraph 4 probably mean?
A.Goal.B.Evidence.C.Difference.D.Connection.
3. With the example in Paragraph 5,what does the author want to stress?
A.Parrots find it hard to survive nowadays.
B.Bigger brains give parrots more adaptability.
C.Parrots like to discover new things by nature.
D.Bigger brains aid parrots with their social ability.
4. What would be the best title for the text?
A.Why do parrots live so long?B.Why are parrots so intelligent?
C.What do parrots do for a living?D.What are the longest living animals?
2023-02-19更新 | 67次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐2】阅读下列短文,从每题所给的四个选项(A、B、C和D)中,选出最佳选项。
When I was little, I’d see tons of bats flying around streetlights at night in my neighborhood in upstate New York. But I’ll never forget the first time when I saw a bat up close. By the time I turned 7,though, I noticed something strange: All the bats in my neighborhood had disappeared, and I wondered why.
Then, three years ago, when I was 11 and visiting the state fair, I learned what had happened to my town’s bats. A disease called “white nose syndrome” had killed 93 percent of New York State’s bats. I was horrified. Then I wrote a letter to the host of an environmental program on the local radio station, asking if they could do a show on bats. They did!
But I still wanted to find a way to educate people face to face. I reached out to a teacher I had in elementary school and asked if I could make a presentation to her class. I described how bats help farmers by eating crop-damaging insects. It went over so well that other teachers started requesting me. Over the past three years, I’ve talked in front of everyone from 5-year-olds to senior citizens! Many people think that bats are blind, and that they always carry diseases, but none of that is true. The more I present, the more I notice that I am changing minds.
And while getting people to respect bats is pretty hard, getting them to respect me has been difficult too. When I first applied to host a booth(摊位)at a local street fair, the managers thought I was too young. But I refused to take “no” for an answer. I continued to ______, and they finally said yes! The best part is, I impressed them so much— 100 visitors on my first day— that they now invite me back every year.
1. All the bats in the neighborhood disappeared because they             .
A.were killed by a disease
B.moved to another habitat
C.were hunted by other animals
D.hid in a place where people couldn’t find them
2. The author wrote a letter to the host in order to ask them to             .
A.donate some money to save bats
B.make a radio program about bats
C.announce new findings about bats
D.finish some questionnaires about the fair
3. How did the author save bats?
A.By building a new home for them.
B.By volunteering to work in the wild.
C.By improving their living environment.
D.By educating people that they are beneficial.
4. What does the underlined phrase “make my case.”in the last paragraph mean?
A.make an impressive persuasion.
B.look into the matter.
C.quarrel with them
D.stick to the facts.
2016-06-03更新 | 74次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了蜜蜂通过训练可以学习技能,并且传播所学到的技能。

【推荐3】Scientists in Britain have managed to teach bumblebees (大黄蜂) to pull strings to get to food and then pass on what they have learned to others in their colony — showing a high level of intelligence despite their tiny brains.

Researchers at Queen Mary University of London said the experiments, often used to test the intelligence of apes (猿) and birds, showed for the first time that some insects are up to the task, and can also pass skills on through several generations.

The findings add to the evidence suggesting the ability for “culture spread” — the ability to learn and pass on knowledge and skills — may not be exclusive to humans.

In the research, published in the journal PLOS Biology on Tuesday, the scientists were able to train 23 out of a group of 40 bees to pull strings with their legs and feet.

The strings were attached to discs- or artificial “flowers” — containing food at their center but placed under a transparent screen. The bees, spotting the food beneath the screen, learned to pull the “flowers” out by pulling the string with their legs and feet to be able to get to it. From another group of bees given the chance to solve the task without any training, only two of 110 were successful.

Another group of bees was then allowed to observe the trained bees pulling the strings, and 60 percent of them successfully learned the skill. Finally, trained bees were put in colonies, and the scientists found the technique spread successfully to a majority of the colony’s worker bees.

Lars Chittka, a Queen Mary University professor who guided the project, said the team is interested in figuring out the brain processes behind the bees ‘learning and teaching skills.

1. What does the underlined word “exclusive” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Ordinary.B.Unique.C.Beneficial.D.Widespread.
2. What did the researchers find about bees?
A.Bees learn best in insects.
B.Bees are as clever as birds.
C.Bees can be trained to learn skills.
D.Bees are born good learners.
3. What may the research team focus on next?
A.How bees’ brain work.B.Where bees learn skills.
C.How bees teach others.D.What else bees can do.
4. What may be the best title for the text?
A.Small bees, great abilitiesB.Bees can learn and teach
C.Bees are smarterD.Let bees learn
2022-11-13更新 | 126次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般