A study of 8 different experiments showed that our brains tend to prefer addition rather than subtraction when it comes to finding solutions—in many cases, it seems we just don’t consider the strategy of taking something away at all.
The researchers found that this preference for adding was noticeable in three situations in particular: when people were under higher cognitive (认知的) load, when there was less time to consider the other options, and when volunteers didn’t get a specific reminder that subtracting was an option. In one of the experiments, participants were asked to improve a Lego structure so that it was able to take more weight. Half the volunteers were reminded that they could take away bricks as well as add them, and half weren’t. In the group that got the reminder, 61 percent solved the problem by taking away a brick—which was a much faster and more efficient way of making the structure stable. In the group that didn’t get the reminder, only 41 percent went for the removing bricks approach.
“Additive ideas come to mind quickly and easily, but subtractive ideas require more cognitive effort,” says psychologist Benjamin Converse, from the University of Virginia. “Because people are often moving fast and working with the first ideas that come to mind, they end up accepting additive solutions without considering subtraction at all.”
The researchers have a few ideas about what might be going on. Our brains might find additive changes easier to process perhaps, or we might be associating adding with ideas of something that's bigger and therefore better in our subconscious. There might also be associations in our minds with the current status being something that needs to be maintained as much as possible—and taking something away is arguably more destructive to the current status than adding something new.
The researchers say their work is important in a much broader sense: for institutions looking to streamline (简化), for example, and even for the human race looking for ways to better manage the planet’s resources.
1. What does the underlined word “subtraction” in paragraph 1 refer to?A.Removal. | B.Moderation. | C.Refusal. | D.Solution. |
A.When they are under high pressure. | B.When they lack cognitive ability. |
C.When they are specially reminded. | D.When they are hurried to decide. |
A.Re-shape Lego bricks. | B.Take Lego bricks away. |
C.Move the Lego structure. | D.Stabilize the Lego structure. |
A.The ways to make additive changes. |
B.The effects of taking something away. |
C.The reasons for brains preferring addition. |
D.The importance of maintaining current status. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Being highly connected to a strong social network has its benefits. Now a new study is showing the same goes for trees, thanks to their underground neighbors. The study is the first to show that the growth of adult trees is linked to their participation in fungal (真菌) networks living in the forest soil. Though past research has focused on young trees, these findings give new insight into the importance of fungal networks to older trees — which are more environmentally beneficial for functions like capturing carbon.
“Large trees make up the main part of the forest, so they drive what the forest is doing,” said researcher Joseph Birch, who led the study. When they live in the forest soil, fungal networks act as a sort of highway, allowing water, nutrients and compounds to flow back and forth among the trees. The network also helps nutrients flow to resource-limited trees like family units that support one another in times of stress.
Cores taken from 350 Douglas firs (花旗松) showed that annual tree ring growth was related to the extent of fungal connections a tree had with other trees. They had much higher growth than those that had only a few connections. The research also showed that trees with more connections to many unique fungi had much greater growth than those with only one or two connections. “If you have this network that is helping trees grow faster, that helps capture more carbon year after year. These networks may help trees grow more steadily even as conditions become more stressful, and could even help protect them against death.” said Birch.
Birch hopes his findings lead to further studies in different kinds of forests in other geographical areas, because it’s likely that the connections among trees change from year to year. He said, “Knowing whether fungal networks are operating the same way in other tree species could inform how we reforest areas after harvesting them, and inform how we plant trees to preserve these networks.”
1. In what way do the new findings differ from the previous ones?A.They reveal the value of fungal networks to adult trees. |
B.They clarify misunderstandings of fungal networks. |
C.They demonstrate a new way to capture carbon. |
D.They confirm the benefits of fungal networks. |
A.By acting as the center of family units. |
B.By maintaining the balance of resources. |
C.By fighting against diseases. |
D.By bettering forest soil conditions. |
A.Tree rings. |
B.Cores from Douglas firs. |
C.Douglas firs. |
D.Fungal networks. |
A.The fungal networks support one another in times of stress. |
B.The fungal networks enable us to know more about reforestation. |
C.The findings can apply to different kinds of forests in other geographical areas. |
D.The fungal networks will help trees grow more steadily if conditions become more stressful. |
【推荐2】If you do not use your arms or your legs for some time, they become weak; when you start using again, they slowly become strong again. Everybody knows this, and nobody would think of questioning the fact.
If a friend complains that his arms are weak, we know that it is his own fault.
Have you ever noticed that people who cannot read or write usually have better memories than those who can?
A.Why is this? |
B.What do you think of it? |
C.So if you want a good memory |
D.But if he tells us that he has a poor memory |
E.When someone else says that he is poor in the health |
F.The position is exactly the same as that of two people. |
G.Yet many people do not seem to know that the memory works in the same way |
【推荐3】We certainly look different. The most obvious differences between boys and girls are our bodies, inside and out. For example, can men have babies? Can women grow beards?
In the 1800s, scientists developed a theory called craniology (头骨学), which said that intelligence could be measured by skull size. Men have bigger skulls than women. So men must be smarter, people thought.
In the 1950s, psychologists gave girls and boys science tests to see if they could tell who was smarter. On average, the girls did worse than the boys.
As scientists continue to investigate, they have discovered that boys do seem to be better than girls at something called spatial rotation (空间转动). Girls,on the other hand, do better on some tests of vocabulary and language. Why?
A.But how different are we really? |
B.Therefore, women were treated differently. |
C.This influenced how well boys learned and how poorly girls did. |
D.If our bodies differ, what does that say about our intelligence and skills? |
E.Naturally,researchers concluded that boys are smarter than girls in science. |
F.Studies have shown that parents treat boys and girls differently as soon as they’re born. |
G.According to psychologists, girls were less intelligent than boys in many aspects. |
【推荐1】By the end of the century, if not sooner, the world’s oceans will be bluer and greener due to a warming climate, according to a new study.
At the heart of the phenomenon lie tiny marine microorganisms (海洋微生物) called phytoplankton, which create colourful patterns at the ocean surface. Ocean colour varies from green to blue, depending on the type and concentration of phytoplankton. Climate change will fuel the growth of phytoplankton in some areas, while reducing it in other spots, leading to changes in the ocean’s appearance.
Phytoplankton live at the ocean surface, where they pull carbon dioxide into the ocean while giving off oxygen. When these organisms die, they bury carbon in the deep ocean, an important process that helps to regulate the global climate. But phytoplankton are vulnerable to the ocean’s warming trend, which can easily affect phytoplankton growth.
Stephanie Dutkiewicz, a scientist in MIT’s Center for Global Change Science, built a climate model that projects changes to the oceans throughout the century. The model projects that currently blue areas with little phytoplankton could become even bluer. But in some waters, such as those of the Arctic, a warming will make conditions riper for phytoplankton, and these areas will turn greener.
And why does that matter? Phytoplankton are the base of the food web. If certain kinds begin to disappear from the ocean, Dutkiewicz said, “it will change the type of fish that will be able to survive.” Those kinds of changes could affect the food chain.
Whatever colour changes the ocean experiences in the coming decades will probably be too gradual and unnoticeable, but they could mean significant changes. Dutkiewicz said, “The change in the colour of the ocean will be one of the early warning signals that we really have changed our planet.”
1. What are the first two paragraphs mainly about?A.The various patterns at the ocean surface. |
B.The cause of the changes in ocean colour. |
C.The tiny marine organisms in the oceans. |
D.The current condition of warming climate. |
A.Sensitive. | B.Beneficial. | C.Significant. | D.Unnoticeable. |
A.Phytoplankton play a declining role in the marine ecosystem. |
B.Dutkiewicz’s model aims to project phytoplankton changes. |
C.Phytoplankton have been used to control global climate. |
D.Oceans with more phytoplankton may appear greener. |
A.To assess the consequences of ocean colour changes. |
B.To analyse the composition of the ocean food chain. |
C.To explain the effects of climate change on oceans. |
D.To introduce a new method to study phytoplankton. |
【推荐2】China's Yungang Grottoes (石窟) will complete the scanning of all the caves in five years, paving the way for the creation of digital versions that can withstand weathering and other real-world damage.
So far, the UNESCO World Heritage Site in Shanxi Province has completed three-dimensional scans of one-third of its Buddhist grottoes, according to the Yungang Grottoes Research Institute. “We're racing against time,” said Ning Bo, director of the institute's digitalization office, “Weathering is like cancer to grottoes, eating away at the sculptures year by year. Few technologies can prevent such progressive damage.”
Using three-dimensional laser (激光) scanning and multiplanar (多平面) reconstruction, the institute is working to capture the shapes, colors and other fine details of the grottoes and create millimeter-level digital archives for future study and preservation. “We hope to preserve the grottoes in digital form as much as possible, so people in the future will still have access to the information even if the grottoes fade away.” Ning said, adding that the digitalization will also allow the public to “visit” the grottoes more easily on their computer screens.
The digitalization project, which began in 2003 at the grottoes, still faces challenges posed by the caves' enormous sizes, complicated structures and exquisite sculptures, according to the institute. “The Yungang Grottoes were built into a mountain, and so our team is actually scanning structures as huge as a mountain. Besides, the inner structures vary wildly from exotic domes to traditional Chinese architecture.” said the director.
The Yungang Grottoes, located in the city of Datong, has 45 major caves and more than 59,000 stone statues. With a grotto complex stretching about 1 km from east to west, it is one of the largest ancient grottoes in the country.
1. What does Ning Bo mean by saying “racing against time”?A.Scanning the grottoes is an urgent task. |
B.It is not an easy job to scan the grottoes. |
C.He is dying because of a severe disease. |
D.There is a deadline required by UNESCO. |
A.To keep them from being damaged. |
B.To carry out a scientific experiment. |
C.To preserve them for future generations. |
D.To make them accessible via the Internet. |
A.The influence of the project. | B.The difficulties facing the team. |
C.The beauty of the grottoes. | D.The structures of the statues. |
A.Education. | B.Technology. | C.Culture. | D.Opinion. |
【推荐3】In principle, it sounds simple: eat less and move more. This dietary advice for handling obesity has been around for decades. Yet, despite all the calorie counting, dieting and exercising, worldwide obesity rates just keep soaring up. In a recent paper, researchers question the basic assumption of whether taking in more calories than you burn really is the primary cause of obesity. They argue that the evidence actually points the other way: we are driven to overeat because we are getting fatter.
This may seem incredible, but consider the rapid adolescent growth. As their growth rate speeds up, teenagers may eat much more than they used to. Does this “overeating” cause the rapid growth?
Or does the rapid growth make teens hungrier so they eat more? Clearly the latter, as adults won’t grow taller, no matter how much they eat. A few hours after eating a high-carb meal, the number of calories in the blood stream drops dramatically, so we get hungrier sooner. From this perspective, the difficulty resisting hunger that so many dieters have isn’t a sign of poor discipline, but rather a biological problem involving how our bodies distribute the calories we consume. A low-calorie, low-fat diet further restricts an already limited supply of energy, worsening hunger without addressing the underlying tendency to store too many calories in body fat. Consequently, weight loss becomes a battle between mind and metabolism (新陈代谢) that most people will probably lose.
Although much more research will be needed to test this controversial idea, it is time to question the basic assumptions about cause and effect, calories and weight gain that have dominated our thinking for decades.
1. What can be inferred from the first paragraph?A.It is extremely tough to deal with overweight. |
B.Eating less and moving more will make you lose weight. |
C.We are forced to eat more food because we are getting fatter. |
D.Taking in more calories than you burn is the main cause of obesity. |
A.Because the dieters are fond of eating a high-carb meal. |
B.Because some of the dieters are weak in self-discipline. |
C.Because the number of calories in the blood drops dramatically. |
D.Because the case is more related to the distribution of calories taken in. |
A.It causes people to feel hungrier. |
B.It solves the tendency for too much fat. |
C.It provides the energy people need. |
D.It makes people lose their metabolism. |
A.Supportive. | B.Doubtful. | C.Objective. | D.Indifferent. |