组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:491 题号:15263113

A study of 8 different experiments showed that our brains tend to prefer addition rather than subtraction when it comes to finding solutions—in many cases, it seems we just don’t consider the strategy of taking something away at all.

The researchers found that this preference for adding was noticeable in three situations in particular: when people were under higher cognitive (认知的) load, when there was less time to consider the other options, and when volunteers didn’t get a specific reminder that subtracting was an option. In one of the experiments, participants were asked to improve a Lego structure so that it was able to take more weight. Half the volunteers were reminded that they could take away bricks as well as add them, and half weren’t. In the group that got the reminder, 61 percent solved the problem by taking away a brick—which was a much faster and more efficient way of making the structure stable. In the group that didn’t get the reminder, only 41 percent went for the removing bricks approach.

“Additive ideas come to mind quickly and easily, but subtractive ideas require more cognitive effort,” says psychologist Benjamin Converse, from the University of Virginia. “Because people are often moving fast and working with the first ideas that come to mind, they end up accepting additive solutions without considering subtraction at all.”

The researchers have a few ideas about what might be going on. Our brains might find additive changes easier to process perhaps, or we might be associating adding with ideas of something that's bigger and therefore better in our subconscious. There might also be associations in our minds with the current status being something that needs to be maintained as much as possible—and taking something away is arguably more destructive to the current status than adding something new.

The researchers say their work is important in a much broader sense: for institutions looking to streamline (简化), for example, and even for the human race looking for ways to better manage the planet’s resources.

1. What does the underlined word “subtraction” in paragraph 1 refer to?
A.Removal.B.Moderation.C.Refusal.D.Solution.
2. In which situation do people prefer adding?
A.When they are under high pressure.B.When they lack cognitive ability.
C.When they are specially reminded.D.When they are hurried to decide.
3. What were participants required to do in the experiment?
A.Re-shape Lego bricks.B.Take Lego bricks away.
C.Move the Lego structure.D.Stabilize the Lego structure.
4. What is paragraph 4 mainly about?
A.The ways to make additive changes.
B.The effects of taking something away.
C.The reasons for brains preferring addition.
D.The importance of maintaining current status.
2022·广东·模拟预测 查看更多[6]
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了阿尔伯塔大学的一项新研究发现,强大的社会网络对树木也是有好处的,森林土壤中的真菌网络给树木的生长提供了有利的条件。

【推荐1】Being highly connected to a strong social network has its benefits. Now a new study is showing the same goes for trees, thanks to their underground neighbors. The study is the first to show that the growth of adult trees is linked to their participation in fungal (真菌) networks living in the forest soil. Though past research has focused on young trees, these findings give new insight into the importance of fungal networks to older trees — which are more environmentally beneficial for functions like capturing carbon.

“Large trees make up the main part of the forest, so they drive what the forest is doing,” said researcher Joseph Birch, who led the study. When they live in the forest soil, fungal networks act as a sort of highway, allowing water, nutrients and compounds to flow back and forth among the trees. The network also helps nutrients flow to resource-limited trees like family units that support one another in times of stress.

Cores taken from 350 Douglas firs (花旗松) showed that annual tree ring growth was related to the extent of fungal connections a tree had with other trees. They had much higher growth than those that had only a few connections. The research also showed that trees with more connections to many unique fungi had much greater growth than those with only one or two connections. “If you have this network that is helping trees grow faster, that helps capture more carbon year after year. These networks may help trees grow more steadily even as conditions become more stressful, and could even help protect them against death.” said Birch.

Birch hopes his findings lead to further studies in different kinds of forests in other geographical areas, because it’s likely that the connections among trees change from year to year. He said, “Knowing whether fungal networks are operating the same way in other tree species could inform how we reforest areas after harvesting them, and inform how we plant trees to preserve these networks.”

1. In what way do the new findings differ from the previous ones?
A.They reveal the value of fungal networks to adult trees.
B.They clarify misunderstandings of fungal networks.
C.They demonstrate a new way to capture carbon.
D.They confirm the benefits of fungal networks.
2. How do fungal networks help trees?
A.By acting as the center of family units.
B.By maintaining the balance of resources.
C.By fighting against diseases.
D.By bettering forest soil conditions.
3. What does the underlined “those” refer to in Paragraph 3?
A.Tree rings.
B.Cores from Douglas firs.
C.Douglas firs.
D.Fungal networks.
4. What can be inferred from what Joseph Birch has put?
A.The fungal networks support one another in times of stress.
B.The fungal networks enable us to know more about reforestation.
C.The findings can apply to different kinds of forests in other geographical areas.
D.The fungal networks will help trees grow more steadily if conditions become more stressful.
2022-10-08更新 | 596次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约270词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】If you do not use your arms or your legs for some time, they become weak; when you start using again, they slowly become strong again. Everybody knows this, and nobody would think of questioning the fact.    1     When someone says that he has a good memory, he really means that he keeps his memory in practice by exercising it regularly, either consciously or unconsciously. When someone else says that his memory is poor, he really means that he does not give it enough opportunity to become   strong.    2    One of them exercises his arms and legs by playing tennis, while the other sits in a chair or a   motor car all day.

If a friend complains that his arms are weak, we know that it is his own fault.     3    , many of us think that his parents are to blame, or that he is just unlucky, and few of us realize that it is just as much his own fault as if it was his arms or legs that were weak. Not all of us can become extremely strong or extremely clever; but all of us can, if we have ordinary bodies and brains, improve our strength and our memory by the same means––practice.

Have you ever noticed that people who cannot read or write usually have better memories than those who can?       4    Of course, because those who cannot read or write have to remember things: they cannot write them down in a little notebook. They have to remember dates, time and prices, names, songs and stories; so their memory is the whole time being exercised.

    5    , learn from the poor: practice remembering.

A.Why is this?
B.What do you think of it?
C.So if you want a good memory
D.But if he tells us that he has a poor memory
E.When someone else says that he is poor in the health
F.The   position is exactly the same as that of two people.
G.Yet many people do not seem to know that the memory works in the same way
2020-06-20更新 | 59次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约260词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】We certainly look different. The most obvious differences between boys and girls are our bodies, inside and out. For example, can men have babies? Can women grow beards?     1    

In the 1800s, scientists developed a theory called craniology (头骨学), which said that intelligence could be measured by skull size. Men have bigger skulls than women. So men must be smarter, people thought.     2     No one encouraged them to go on in school. Some doctors even said women who went to college would no longer be able to have children! Of course, now we know these beliefs aren’t true.

In the 1950s, psychologists gave girls and boys science tests to see if they could tell who was smarter. On average, the girls did worse than the boys.     3     But is this really true? Instead of measuring natural ability, maybe the tests revealed something about the conditions under which children were being taught. Parents and teachers didn't expect girls to do well in math or science,and so they didn’t encourage them. In class, teachers focused their attention on boys.     4    

As scientists continue to investigate, they have discovered that boys do seem to be better than girls at something called spatial rotation (空间转动). Girls,on the other hand, do better on some tests of vocabulary and language. Why?     5     They often give girls dolls to play with, while they more frequently give boys blocks. Playing with blocks helps children develop spatial skills. So without meaning to, adults might be helping boys develop better spatial skills. And maybe they talk to girls more, which helps girls with those vocabulary words.

A.But how different are we really?
B.Therefore, women were treated differently.
C.This influenced how well boys learned and how poorly girls did.
D.If our bodies differ, what does that say about our intelligence and skills?
E.Naturally,researchers concluded that boys are smarter than girls in science.
F.Studies have shown that parents treat boys and girls differently as soon as they’re born.
G.According to psychologists, girls were less intelligent than boys in many aspects.
2020-10-26更新 | 226次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般