Scientists in Australia are testing printed solar panels to power a Tesla on a 15, 100-kilometer (9,400-mile) journey beginning in September, which they hope will get the public thinking about steps to help prevent climate change.
The Charge Around Australia (CAA) project will power a Tesla electric car with 18 of the team’s printed plastic solar panels, each 18 meters (59 feet) long, rolling them out beside the vehicle to absorb sunlight when it needs a charge.
Paul Dastoor, the inventor of the printed solar panels, said the University of Newcastle team would be testing not only the endurance of the panels but their potential performance for other applications. “This is actually an ideal test bed to give us information about how we would go about using and powering technology in other remote locations, for example, in space,” Dastoor told Reuters in the town of Gosforth, north of Sydney.
Printed solar is a lightweight, laminated (层压的) plastic that can be made at a cost of less than $10 a square meter. The panels are made on a commercial printer originally used for printing wine labels.
Dastoor said using the panels to power a car would get Australians to think more about electric vehicles and could help ease their “range anxiety.” The community is seeking these sorts of answers to the problems it’s being faced with, day in, day out, around climate change.
On their 84-day Tesla journey, the team plans to visit about 70 schools to give students a taste of what the future may hold. Asked what Elon Musk, creator of the Tesla car and founder of Tesla Inc TSLA.O, might say about the CAA project, Dastoor said he hoped he would be pleased. CAA was “showing how our innovative technology is now combining with his developments to develop new solutions for the planet”, Dastoor said.
1. What can we learn about the printed solar panel?A.It weighs a lot. | B.It can be rolled and carried. |
C.lt can be used at any time of a day. | D.It has been applied to power gas cars. |
A.The climate is getting worse. | B.The solar panels are 100 long. |
C.The solar panels are expensive. | D.The endurance of the panels is poor. |
A.Musk is pleased with the CAA project |
B.Students are positive about their own future. |
C.The electric car lasts 84 days on a single charge. |
D.The CCA team and Musk are making efforts for climate changes. |
A.A new test on Tesla | B.A new discovery in space |
C.A breakthrough in solar panels | D.A concern for climate changes |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】KFC has announced that it will partner with Russian company 3D Bioprinting Solutions to develop bioprinted lab-grown chicken. It is a part of the global fast food giant’s aggressive strategy towards alternative protein.
KFC’s new bioprinted labgrown chicken made with plant material and cultured animal cells are a part of the chain’s mission to become a “restaurant of the future”. In the announcement, the fast food giant says that its laboratory-produced chicken nuggets (鸡块), which will be the world’s first, will reduce the environmental footprint of the product compared to using conventional chicken meat.
According to a paper cited in KFC’s press release, growing meat from cells reduces energy consumption by more than half, reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 25 fold, and requires 100 less land when weighed up against traditional livestock farming.
“Our experiment in testing 3D bioprinting technology to create chicken products can also help address several global problems,” said Raisa Polyakova, general manager of KFC Russia & CIS, in a statement.
“The rapid development of such technologies will allow us to make 3D-printed meat products more accessible and we are hoping that the technology will help accelerate the launch of cell-based meat products on the market,” explained cofounder of 3D Bioprinting Solutions, Yusef Khesuani.
This isn’t the first time that KFC has dipped its toes into more sustainable meat alternatives on the market.In the United States, KFC is currently working with plant based food tech Beyond Meat to expand KFC’s Beyond Fried Chicken across the country.
Beyond Fried Chicken first appeared on the market in 2020 in Atlanta. The menu item — first available in a oneday consumer test in Atlanta — sold out in less than five hours, the company said.In the Netherlands, a Rotterdam branch of KFC went 100% meat-free for a whole week in 2021.
“I’ve said it before: despite many imitations, the flavor of Kentucky Fried Chicken is one that has never been replicated (复制), until Beyond Fried Chicken,” said Andrea Zahumensky, chief marketing officer, KFC US.
1. What is special about KFC’s new chicken nuggets?A.They are 100% meatfree. |
B.They don’t contain protein. |
C.They are much cheaper than conventional ones. |
D.They save more energy than conventional ones. |
A.The benefits of KFC’s new chicken nuggets. |
B.The advantages of KFC’s future restaurants. |
C.The popularity of KFC’s new chicken nuggets. |
D.The development of KFC’s aggressive strategy. |
A.They voiced their doubt. |
B.They took no clear stand. |
C.They showed their support. |
D.They expressed their concern. |
A.Its flavor was completely new. |
B.Its first trial was a big success. |
C.It is available around the world. |
D.Andrea Zahumensky didn’t like it. |
【推荐2】Sarah Park has known about the impact of music on the brain since a young age. The 13-year-old, who has been playing the violin since she was 4, says she noticed its positive effect on those around her, especially her grandmother, who suffered from mental illness.
Now, the Jacksonville, Florida, middle-schooler hopes to use music therapy (疗法) to help others struggling with mental illness. Her invention, Spark Care+, earned her the title of “America’s Top Young Scientist” at the 3M Young Scientist Challenge on October 19, 2021.
Spark Care+ requires participants to respond to a series of questions based on the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Scale, designed to assess the person’s mental state. The device’s inbuilt sensors record vital mental health indicators, such as heart rate and blood pressure. Spark Care+’s AI component analyzes the information and recommends the appropriate music to help lift the participants’ spirits. It also monitors its impact on the listeners.
Sarah Park hopes to make her invention accessible to all. The ninth-grader hopes to turn it into a wristband with inbuilt sensors, a heart-rate monitor, and Bluetooth. She also wants to build an app to make Spark Care+ accessible to everyone. “I hope to be able to distribute it around the world to people of all ages,” Park says.
In addition to being an inventor, Park is also a musical prodigy who has won several violin competitions, including the Florida state championship. She also plays the piano and is a math champion. The teen hopes to be an innovator and researcher in the medical field using technology and robotics. Her advice to other young scientists? “Dream big, ask questions, and anything is possible.”
1. What led to Park’s invention of Spark Care+?A.Her desire to earn a title. | B.Her research on brain health. |
C.Her grandmother’s mental illness. | D.Her observation of the effect of music. |
A.To monitor heart rate. | B.To collect information. |
C.To lower blood pressure. | D.To suggest delightful music. |
A.Park’s future plans. |
B.Park’s achievements. |
C.Influence of Park’s invention. |
D.Application of Park’s invention. |
A.New Invention Surprises the Science Field |
B.Sarah Park Has Become the Youngest Scientist |
C.Young Scientist Uses Music to Improve Mental Health |
D.Spark Care+ Brings Honor to Young Scientist Sarah Park |
【推荐3】Young children are significantly more likely than adults to have their opinions influenced by robots, according to a new research. The study, conducted at the University of Plymouth, compared how adults and children respond to an identical task when in the presence of both their peers(同龄人)and robots.
It showed that while adults regularly have their opinions influenced by peers, something also showed in previous studies, they are largely able to resist being persuaded by robots. However, children aged between seven and nine were more likely to give the same responses as the robots, even if they were obviously incorrect.
The study asks people to look at a screen showing four lines and say which two match in length. When alone, people almost never make a mistake but when doing the experiment with others, they tend to follow what others are saying.
When children were alone in the room in this research, they scored 87% on the test, but when the robots join in their score drops to 75%. And of the wrong answers, 74% matched those of the robot.
The research was led by former Plymouth researcher Anna Vollmer and Professor in Robotics Tony Belpaeme, from the University of Plymouth and Ghent University.
Professor Belpaeme said: “People often follow the opinions of others and we’ve known for a long time that it is hard to resist taking over views and opinions of people around us. But as robots will soon be found in the home and the workplace, we were wondering if people would follow robots. What our results show is that adults do not follow what the robots are saying. But when we did the experiment with children, they did. It shows children can perhaps have more of an affinity(亲和力)with robots than adults, which does give the question: what if robots were to suggest, for example, what products to buy or what to think?”
1. What did the adults do when staying with robots?A.They totally accept the robots’ suggestions. |
B.They generally refused the robots’ effects. |
C.They tried to persuade robots to resist them. |
D.They usually compared robots with their children. |
A.Because children were not as clever as adults. |
B.Because robots in the presence made such mistakes. |
C.Because robots reflected better than human beings. |
D.Because children wanted to affect the robots on purpose. |
A.He is optimistic about the result. | B.He doubts the result of the research. |
C.He doesn’t care about the result. | D.He is so worried about the future. |
A.What will we do to teach our children? |
B.What will adults do to avoid the problem? |
C.What will people do to solve such problems? |
D.Why are children influenced by such robots? |
【推荐1】Improvements to energy efficiency, such as LED lights, are seen by many authorities as a top priority for cutting carbon emissions. Yet a growing body of research suggests that a rebound effect could wipe out more than half of the savings from energy efficiency improvements, making the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change even harder to hit.
A team led by Paul Brockway at the University of Leeds, UK, looked at the existing 33 studies on the impact of the rebound effect. First comes the direct rebound: for instance, when someone buys a more efficient car, they may take advantage of that by driving it further. Then comes the indirect rebound: fuel savings leave the owner with more money to spend elsewhere in the economy, consuming energy.
Although the 33 studies used different methods to model the rebound effect, they produced very consistent estimates of its impact, leading the team to conclude that the effect wipes out, on average, 63 percent of the anticipated energy savings.
“We’re not saying energy efficiency doesn’t work. What we’re saying is rebound needs to be taken more seriously,” says Brockway.
The idea that increased efficiency may not deliver the hoped-for savings dates back to the Jevons paradox(悖论), named after the economist William Stanley Jevons, who, in 1865, observed that more efficient coal use led to more demand for coal.
If the rebound effect does prove to be as big as suggested, it means future global energy demand will be higher than expected and the world will need far more wind and solar power and carbon-capture technology than is currently being planned for.
But that doesn’t mean nothing can be done to limit the rebound effect. One answer is to double down on energy efficiency and do twice as much to achieve the same effect.
1. Which of the following is a rebound effect?A.A man uses LED lights to cut carbon emissions. |
B.A company uses coal more efficiently to reduce waste. |
C.A family saves money by using energy-saving devices. |
D.A lady spends savings from her fuel efficient car on more clothes. |
A.By interviewing economists. |
B.By analyzing former studies. |
C.By modeling the rebound effect. |
D.By debating about the Jevons paradox. |
A.Authorities should dismiss energy efficiency. |
B.Worldwide efforts to preserve energy are in vain. |
C.The rebound effect helps protect the environment. |
D.More attention should be paid to the rebound effect. |
【推荐2】Lonely Planet Trips
Here are some travel destinations by Lonely Planet. Reading them, you’ll be in a flash.
Bhutan
The Kingdom of Bhutan, located on the Silk Road in South Asia, claimed the No. 1 spot partly for its majestic beauty and because it had become the first fully organic nation by 2020. The kingdom has lush subtropical plains in the south and sub-alpine Himalayan mountains in the north, which include Gangkhar Puensum, Bhutan’s highest peak and is believed to be the highest unclimbed mountain in the world.
North Macedonia
If you want an alternative to Europe's more popular travel spots, North Macedonia could be for you. Its mountains and their trails are “blissfully quiet” and the locals are “unfailingly helpful” according to Lonely Planet. Among its destinations is Ohrid, a charming, old town dotted with medieval ruins and churches, lined with cobblestone streets, and overlooking Lake Ohrid.
Eswatini
The kingdom offers multitudinous climate and topography differences, and is known for its wide varieties of wild animals, which include more than 500 bird species and 107 mammal species. The nation has seven nature reserves, four frontier conservation areas and three wildlife reserves.
Costa Rica
Costa Rica is beloved for many reasons, from its coffee to its epic surfing. It’s also notable for its reliance on green energy sources. In fact, 90% of its energy is created by regenerative sources such as wind and hydro. It is also one of the world’s most biodiverse countries — home to half a million species. Of course, no trip to Costa Rica is complete without a visit to the Sloth Sanctuary.
1. What can tourists appreciate in both Bhutan and North Macedonia?A.Organic products. | B.Subtropical jungles. |
C.Medieval architecture. | D.Mountain scenery. |
A.Pleasant quietness. | B.Topography varieties. |
C.Abundant wildlife. | D.Cobblestone streets. |
A.Renewable resources. | B.Biodiverse plants. |
C.Frontier preserves. | D.The Silk Road. |
【推荐3】Parents may fear that if their high school student isn’t motivated (有动力) to do well in classes, there’s nothing that will change that. But a new study found that students’ learning motivation often did change and usually for the better.
1,670 students from grades 9 to 11 took part in the study in two school years, during which they completed several surveys that assessed their motivation. After each survey, the students were placed into six different profiles (档案), from worst — those who were not motivated at all, to best — those who had an inner desire to learn.
The study found about 67 % students did change their profiles during the two years and there was an overall positive change in students’ motivation. For example, 8% of the students were in the best profile — autonomously motivated — in the first year, and that increased to 11.4% in the second year. The worst profile, the not motivated, described 2.8% of the students in the first year, dropping to 2.1% in the second year.
“The other good news in the study was that if we can find better ways to motivate students, if we can get them in a better profile, they tend to stay there,” said Kui Xie, lead author of the study and professor of educational studies at the Ohio State University.
Why did students move in a positive direction? One reason may be simply because they’re a year older and more mature (成熟).
But the study did find two factors that impacted how likely they were to become more motivated. One was the previous achievement. Students who had higher grade the first year were more likely to remain in better profiles in the second year of the study. The other factor was school belongingness, with students who felt they were more a part of their school in the first year being more likely to move to or stay in a better profile in the second year.
“This may be one area where we can help students become more motivated,” Xie said. “Belongingness is something schools can change. They can find ways to help students feel like they are part of the school community.”
1. What did Kui Xie’s study discover?A.Students’ willingness to study can be improved. |
B.Teenagers’ inner desire to learn can be assessed. |
C.Students from grades 9 to 11 are easy to be inspired. |
D.Teenagers’ learning motivation is parents’ most concern. |
A.The background of the study. |
B.The influence of the study. |
C.The purpose of the study. |
D.The process of the study. |
A.Their average ages. |
B.Their previous scores. |
C.Their personal profiles. |
D.Their motivated schoolmates. |
A.Schools should put students in better profiles. |
B.Students should have their own assessment plan. |
C.Schools should use motivation strategies to inspire students. |
D.Students should improve their communication with their parents. |